ライフサイエンスコーパス: ametropia

1 for patients with low-to-moderate amounts of ametropia.

2 cted patients for correcting high degrees of ametropia.

3 velopment of retinopathy of prematurity, and ametropia.

4 iable option to reduce the post-keratoplasty ametropia.

5 nother option in refractive surgery for high ametropia.

6 rs was present in 54.6% of all students with ametropia.

7 They are dominated by ametropia.

8 management of post-penetrating keratoplasty ametropia.

9 al axis obstruction or significant bilateral ametropia.

10 corneal astigmatism which is associated with ametropia.

11 them invaluable for the correction of severe ametropias.

12 in treating patients with mild and moderate ametropias.

13 ty and efficacy for the correction of severe ametropias.

14 which are the standard-of-care for treating ametropia.(1,2) We aimed to assess the impact of refract

15 4 eyes (34 healthy subjects, 19 to 80 years, ametropia +3 to -10 D).

16 refractive surgery has a role in correcting ametropia after implantation of multifocal intraocular l

17 ser corneal surgery for fine-tuning residual ametropia after presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses

18 Visual manipulations known to induce axial ametropia also promote the genesis of astigmatism in chi

19 Refractive surgery can correct both ametropia and astigmatism following corneal transplantat

20 Ametropia and astigmatism following successful penetrati

21 se aged 20 to 40 years showed that spherical ametropia and astigmatism were independently associated

22 ion between anisometropia and both spherical ametropia and astigmatism.

23 are also being used to treat high degrees of ametropia and astigmatism; however, the long-term result

24 od optical quality considering the degree of ametropia and atypical optical structures often found am

25 the relationship between induced refractive ametropia and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, perimete

26 al subjects with less than 6 diopters (D) of ametropia and no ocular pathology.

27 fspring and the interaction between parental ametropia and the effects of wearing progressive-additio

28 n was linearly related to induced refractive ametropia and to the empirical transverse magnification

29 children with neurodevelopmental disorders, ametropia, and spectacle nonadherence may provide develo

30 rum disorder and/or intellectual disability, ametropia, and spectacle nonadherence were included in t

31 ior fields were more myopic than the central ametropia, and the relative nasal field myopia increased

32 Children with ametropia at baseline were more likely to have a signifi

33 turity; and understanding the development of ametropia based on the electroretinogram findings.

34 Those with more extreme ametropia--beyond the effective range for surface ablati

35 superior fields were similar to the central ametropia, but the refractions in the nasal and inferior

36 is the first to show that induced refractive ametropia can affect OCT-A image magnification and indic

37 ematurity, and optical aberrations including ametropia, cataract, and glaucoma, among others.

38 n refractive surgery for naturally occurring ametropias directly translate into an improved ability t

39 ffective for correction of post-keratoplasty ametropia during short-term period, a notable regression

40 ted emission of radiation (LASER) to correct ametropia following multifocal lens implantation.

41 ny refractive options are available to treat ametropia following penetrating keratoplasty.

42 tudies of normal and abnormal eye growth and ametropia in primates.

43 ctable method to correct residual amounts of ametropia in pseudophakic patients with monofocal intrao

44 management for highly significant pediatric ametropia in selective patients who are noncompliant wit

45 Residual ametropia is one of the most common issues that can resu

46 neurobehavioral disorders and high bilateral ametropia may be functionally blind without the surgery.

47 PlusOptix A09 photoscreener in children with ametropia (myopia or hyperopia).

48 and correlated significantly with spherical ametropia of the principal meridians.

49 were linearly related to induced refractive ametropia (P < .05) and were reduced to 1% to 9%.

50 linear relationships with induced refractive ametropia (P < .05) with the 12 D tested range altering

51 large proportion of infants with significant ametropia, particularly those with significant hyperopia

52 contribute to emmetropizing responses and to ametropias produced by an abnormal visual experience.

53 The majority of children with ametropia--unilateral or bilateral--do well with glasses

54 In animal models of ametropia, usually one eye is manipulated and the fellow

55 However, we find that the pattern of ametropia varies widely not only by gene but also within

56 ts (compared with emmetropia: odds ratio for ametropia was 1.02, confidence interval 0.92-1.12).