戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ded strategy of the task, it was nonetheless analogical.
2 forms, a behavior that is consistent with an analogical account but not a rule-based one.
3 uctured representations of causal, temporal, analogical, and valence relationships - rather than prob
4 s evidence not only provides support for the analogical ape hypothesis, but also exemplifies how foun
5 nguistic phenomena, for which rule-based and analogical approaches make the same predictions.
6 ifies how foundational conceptually mediated analogical behavior may be for the chimpanzee.
7                            We argue that (1) analogical comparison processes are central to human cog
8 as explaining to oneself, mental simulation, analogical comparison, and reasoning.
9    Results showed greater activation for the analogical condition relative to the control conditions
10                        We predicted that the analogical condition would involve the most cognitive ef
11 nductive tasks, including category-based and analogical inferences.
12  out a perspective on the future of scalable analogical innovation and first steps using crowds and a
13 itive models that instantiate rule-based and analogical learning to the LLM training data and compare
14 a state-of-the-art deep learning model on an analogical mapping task.
15 ere we present visiPAM (visual Probabilistic Analogical Mapping), a model of visual reasoning that sy
16 ol conditions that required matching without analogical mapping.
17 eaningfulness facilitated the acquisition of analogical matching for human participants, whereas indi
18 s with variable nominalization patterns, the analogical model provides a much better match.
19                  As expected, rule-based and analogical models explain the predictions of GPT-J equal
20 d strategies-traditional perspective-taking, analogical perspective-taking, and perspective getting-i
21 ll and not statistically significant, though analogical perspective-taking-encouraging senders to com
22 r of a New World monkey species can solve an analogical problem.
23             Overall, our study suggests that analogical processes play a bigger role in the linguisti
24 the most well-studied types of reasoning are analogical reasoning (AR) and deductive reasoning (DR).
25         Previous evidence has suggested that analogical reasoning (recognizing similarities among obj
26 examined the role of stimulus meaning in the analogical reasoning abilities of three different primat
27                                              Analogical reasoning also engaged a left-sided network o
28 novel situations involves cognitions such as analogical reasoning and language learning and is consid
29 f FP lesion patients that reveal deficits in analogical reasoning and prospective memory.
30 memory retrieval relative to closely matched analogical reasoning and visuospatial perception tasks.
31 oelectric interaction was probed in terms of analogical reasoning based on the Rashba effect and dens
32 presents the most convincing evidence yet of analogical reasoning in a nonprimate species, as apes al
33              Activity in this network during analogical reasoning is hypothesized to reflect categori
34                                              Analogical reasoning is vital to advanced cognition and
35 is may be the first evidence for spontaneous analogical reasoning outside of the primate order.
36 hasis on achieving a better understanding of analogical reasoning relative to these other matching co
37 himpanzees eventually learned to shift their analogical reasoning strategy to match the reward contin
38                    Activation elicited by an analogical reasoning task that required both complex wor
39  recruited patients using two new tests: the Analogical Reasoning Test (ART) and the Deductive Reason
40 ther capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) can use analogical reasoning to solve a 3-dimensional search tas
41 ation of abstractly similar relations during analogical reasoning was investigated using functional m
42                     Our results suggest that analogical reasoning within a Bayesian ranking problem i
43 been interested in the species generality of analogical reasoning, but they initially found it diffic
44 ereby enabling relational generalization and analogical reasoning.
45 en known to exhibit rudimentary abilities in analogical reasoning.
46 mantic and perceptual responses in four term analogical reasoning.
47 lve complex physical problems via causal and analogical reasoning.
48 ns-between-relations serves as the basis for analogical reasoning.
49 abstract relational integration component of analogical reasoning.
50 icating a level of abstraction comparable to analogical reasoning.
51 he computational principles underlying human analogical reasoning; however, this work has generally r
52 ch to ranking protein interactions rooted in analogical reasoning; that is, the ability to learn and
53  capable of matching stimuli on the basis of analogical relations: that is, similarity of size, color
54 quires discovery of abstractions that permit analogical reuse of previously learned representations t
55                   In this study, we examined analogical strategies in 3 chimpanzees using a 3-dimensi
56 was compared to activation elicited by a non-analogical task that required complex working memory in
57 e-trained Transformer (GPT)-3) on a range of analogical tasks, including a non-visual matrix reasonin
58                          Many theorists deem analogical thinking to be uniquely human and to be found
59 dited intramolecular inhibitory interaction, analogical to tyrosine 527 regulating SH2-C-terminus bon
60 n particular, paradigms focusing on creative analogical transfer of knowledge may reflect CPS skills