コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina).
2 h daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina).
3 acute coronary syndromes (including unstable angina).
4 litus, elevated systolic blood pressure, and angina.
5 es and angiographic findings associated with angina.
6 (mortality/MACE) in patients with refractory angina.
7 h, acute MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina.
8 tion including microvascular and vasospastic angina.
9 independently associated with microvascular angina.
10 t correlated with the presence or absence of angina.
11 CI, 0.31-0.88) were associated with unstable angina.
12 oke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina.
13 ents, given their high prevalence of post-MI angina.
14 o not include subgroup analysis for unstable angina.
15 inical domains beyond the confines of stable angina.
16 a limit their use mostly to the treatment of angina.
17 ncluding 141 MIs and 84 episodes of unstable angina.
18 regarding the use of angiography in unstable angina.
19 w CD133(+) cells in patients with refractory angina.
20 ularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina.
21 alization for progressive angina or unstable angina.
22 Fewer patients underwent PCI for stable angina.
23 e, stroke, unstable angina, and freedom from angina.
24 emic stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina.
25 na and have been found to improve markers of angina.
26 nt after CTO PCI in patients with refractory angina.
30 syndrome (myocardial infarction or unstable angina) 1-12 months before randomisation and who had rai
31 .53 to 2.10; p = 0.88) and those with stable angina (11.6% vs. 15.8%; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.343
33 Overall, 78 (52%) had isolated microvascular angina, 25 (17%) had isolated vasospastic angina, 31 (20
34 alization, but most (68% of respondents with angina; 27% of the total sample) experienced it less tha
36 han 2 out of 5 respondents (44%) experienced angina 30 days after hospitalization, but most (68% of r
37 ar angina, 25 (17%) had isolated vasospastic angina, 31 (20%) had both, and 17 (11%) had noncardiac c
39 ectively randomized 350 patients with stable angina (55% women; aged 55+/-10 years), mostly with an i
41 atest in PCI procedures performed for stable angina (66%), followed by non-ST-segment-elevation myoca
43 S patients (left main stenosis with unstable angina, acute endocarditis, valvular regurgitation with
45 infarction, and nonfatal stroke) and 1-year angina after CABG and PCI using baseline covariates and
46 ic and clinical factors were associated with angina after CABG: younger age, worse preoperative SAQ a
47 associate with a diagnosis of microvascular angina although this was not significant (OR, 2.7 [0.9-7
50 randomly assigning 918 patients with typical angina and either two or more cardiovascular risk factor
51 e a novel potential treatment for refractory angina and have been found to improve markers of angina.
53 l trial in which 2,604 patients with chronic angina and incomplete revascularization following percut
54 Likewise, clinical scenarios with unstable angina and intermediate- or high-risk features were deem
55 The mechanisms governing exercise-induced angina and its alleviation by the most commonly used ant
56 wn about race and sex differences in post-MI angina and long-term risk of unplanned rehospitalization
57 tients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have less angina and more silent ischemia when compared with those
58 on acute coronary syndromes include unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctio
65 tion was observed with respect to changes in angina and quality of life, cumulative diagnostic costs,
67 RETATION: In patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increas
68 elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable angina and to evaluate long-term outcomes of nonenrolled
69 tor dysfunction is frequent in patients with angina and unobstructed coronaries in a European populat
71 -elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina) and stable presentation (51% stable angina or at
72 ularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina) and total key secondary composite endpoint event
74 revention strategies and treatment of stable angina), and in the selection of revascularization strat
76 atal stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina, and hospital admission for heart failure, analys
77 th escalation included lung disease, ongoing angina, and periprocedural major adverse cardiac and cer
78 e (fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, angina, and stroke) and type 2 diabetes costs associated
81 pooled were MACE, mortality, and indices of angina (angina episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society
84 sease (CVD) (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, arterial revascularization, stroke, or cardiovas
87 emic stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina-as well as total nonfatal cardiovascular events a
88 Further, only 30.6% of subjects reporting angina at 1 year had a residual major coronary artery st
91 , ranolazine's effect on glucose control and angina at 6 months was proportionate to baseline HbA1c,
92 nts, black patients were more likely to have angina at 6 weeks (female: 44.2% versus 31.8%; male: 33.
93 6.2), and nearly absent among those without angina at baseline (0.6 points; 95% credible interval, -
94 gest among participants with daily or weekly angina at baseline (10.1 points; 95% credible interval,
95 0 to 19.9), smaller among those with monthly angina at baseline (2.2 points; 95% credible interval, -
96 ger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5
98 , which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the in
100 nd unstable angina with greater freedom from angina at the expense of higher rates of procedural MI.
102 gistry, refractory angina was defined as any angina (baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] Angi
103 ND In a 10-site US PCI registry, we assessed angina before and at 1, 6, and 12 months after elective
106 The classic presenting symptom of SIHD is angina, but clinical presentation varies greatly among p
108 medical treatment; (3) patients had ongoing angina, Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II-IV; and
109 In addition to improvements in indices of angina, cell-based therapies improve cardiovascular outc
110 ian-assessed Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (P(interaction)=0.693), and treadmill exerc
112 na episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, exercise tolerance, and antianginal medica
113 for nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, emergency coronary rev
115 urrent Canadian Cardiovascular Society II-IV angina, despite optimal medical therapy, >/=1 myocardial
118 In patients who were not diagnosed with angina due to coronary heart disease, coronary CTA was a
120 were MACE, mortality, and indices of angina (angina episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina
123 or revascularization, hypertension, unstable angina, female sex, nonwhite race, and US location were
124 edian (interquartile range [IQR]) scores for angina frequency (100.0 [80.0-100.0]) overall with simil
126 to DES-PCI on several SAQ domains including angina frequency and physical function, as well as the r
128 ficantly larger degree of improvement of SAQ Angina Frequency and SAQ Summary Score (35.0+/-26.8 vers
129 the 1-year post-CABG study visit on the SAQ angina frequency domain were compared with patients repo
131 highly symptomatic at baseline with mean SAQ Angina Frequency of 51.1+/-23.8, SAQ quality of life of
132 ve PCI with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score (range, 0-100, higher=better).
134 (baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] Angina Frequency score of <=90) despite treatment with >
135 ocardiography score and the effect of PCI on angina frequency score with a larger placebo-controlled
136 er CABG: younger age, worse preoperative SAQ angina frequency score, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and
137 ociated with younger age, worse baseline SAQ angina frequency score, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and
138 ssed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire's angina frequency subscale at baseline and 2 years follow
139 ing in the inferior frontal lobe activation, angina frequency was increased by 13.7 units at baseline
144 h, acute MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina (hazard ratio: 1.54 per increase in log-hsTnI int
145 condary outcomes were myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, hypertension, arrhythmias, arteri
146 infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest.
147 infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest.
148 atal stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina, hospital admission for heart failure, or impaire
149 choline was associated with higher hazard of angina hospitalization (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.07;
150 nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina hospitalization was similar and fair for both CAC
151 as death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina hospitalizations over a median follow-up of 26.1
152 infarction, stroke, and heart failure), and angina hospitalizations served as clinical outcomes over
153 n of this region with stress correlates with angina in individuals with coronary artery disease.
154 correlates of microvascular and vasospastic angina in patients with symptoms and signs of ischemia b
155 or dysfunction is an important mechanism for angina in patients with unobstructed coronary arteries.
158 fect of angiography on mortality in unstable angina, incorporating the results of additional cardiac
162 oke, coronary revascularisation, or unstable angina; key secondary endpoint was the composite of card
166 tery (PA) in patients with PAH and angina or angina-like symptoms, determine the usefulness of screen
172 ith no evidence for pooled associations with angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke.
173 y, rehospitalization for refractory ischemia/angina, myocardial infarction, hospitalization because o
174 stroke n = 4; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.14-1.20), angina (n = 2; RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24), and heart f
175 Emergently admitted patients with unstable angina (n = 33 901) who did or did not receive angiograp
176 ocardial infarction (n = 4; 13.8%), unstable angina (n = 8; 27.6%), congestive heart failure exacerba
177 te consisting of myocardial infarction (MI), angina, need for coronary revascularization, and cardiac
178 outcome consisting of myocardial infarction, angina, need for coronary revascularization, stroke, or
179 ients were older than 18 years with unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (
180 symptoms (congestive heart failure, unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, syncope)
182 coronary syndrome and 369 [27.2%] for stable angina) on patients admitted to nonintensive care unit w
183 re were three adverse events (one episode of angina, one fall during a multifactorial fall-prevention
184 chest pain, hospital admission for unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction [AMI], 30-day read
185 A total of 2037 participants with stable angina or an acute coronary syndrome who had an indicati
188 lmonary artery (PA) in patients with PAH and angina or angina-like symptoms, determine the usefulness
192 years, history of heart disease, symptoms of angina or dyspnea, hemoglobin <12 mg/dl, vascular surger
193 for stable angina or urgent PCI for unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
195 ul PCI, does not influence the recurrence of angina or the outcome; these findings should be taken in
197 s and had had either elective PCI for stable angina or urgent PCI for unstable angina or non-ST segme
198 7.5 [95% CI, 1.7-33.0]; P=0.008) and typical angina (OR, 2.7 [1.1-6.6]; P=0.032) were independently a
199 ry heart disease (including heart attack and angina) or stroke (including ischaemic stroke or haemorr
200 rction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization), key secondary en
204 infarction (MI), stroke, revascularization, angina, or ischemic electrocardiogram) was associated wi
207 nt-reported response variables: freedom from angina (P(interaction)=0.116), physical limitation (P(in
208 y (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Imp
209 In biomarker-negative stable and unstable angina patients undergoing elective PCI, the trial did n
211 nt cohorts of patients with suspected stable angina pectoris (SAP) (3033 patients; median 10.7 y foll
212 75 in the best available therapy group) and angina pectoris (two [3%] of 74 in the ruxolitinib group
213 t-elevation myocardial infarction and stable angina pectoris , similar patterns were found albeit les
214 The use of nitroglycerin in the treatment of angina pectoris began not long after its original synthe
216 h Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class 2 or higher (n=839, 34 events), in
217 AxCanadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class interaction was observed in SCD ri
218 , Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class, and exercise capacity were used a
220 intracoronary ECG ST-segment elevation, and angina pectoris during the same 1-minute coronary occlus
221 CI (with or without FFR guidance) for stable angina pectoris in Sweden between January 2005 and March
222 vascular and cerebrovascular diseases (e.g., angina pectoris, heart failure, cerebral infarction).
223 t CVD, defined as new myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or stroke, which developed between base
227 al, 23,860 patients underwent PCI for stable angina pectoris; of these, FFR guidance was used in 3,36
228 rtery disease, history of stable or unstable angina, previous multi-vessel percutaneous coronary inte
229 f-reported angina symptoms using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and angiographic findings aft
230 , 12, 36, and 60 months by using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the 36-Item Short Form He
231 nction, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1
232 We assessed health status with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) before randomization and at 1
233 orted health status, assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), were compared across appropr
234 was defined as any angina (baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] Angina Frequency score of <=9
235 translated, validated version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire administered 30 days after discharg
237 2 months after elective PCI with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score (range, 0-10
239 independently associated with poorer Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary scores at 1-year (beta esti
241 bjects had similar burden of angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) but reduced quality of life compar
242 e assessed with the disease-specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and 5-year mortality was assessed
243 e and 1, 12, and 36 months using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the 12-Item Short Form Health Surv
244 ts including coronary insufficiency/unstable angina, recognized myocardial infarction, coronary revas
247 invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the
248 tantial or sustained benefits with regard to angina-related health status with an initially invasive
251 trial of PCI versus a placebo procedure for angina relief that was done at five study sites in the U
254 cardiac event; recurrence or persistence of angina requiring an addition, switch, or increase of the
255 eath, myocardial infarction (MI), refractory angina requiring coronary revascularization, and ischemi
262 CI, 0.45-0.92]) and increase in freedom from angina (RR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.15]) was also observed
264 d to subgroups of patients with unacceptable angina, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or
269 nseling patients on expected improvements in angina symptoms and in making decisions regarding the ne
271 D Patients referred for evaluation of stable angina symptoms underwent adenosine-stress dynamic compu
272 e relationship between patient self-reported angina symptoms using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (
274 ore unblinding, hospitalization for unstable angina that led to urgent revascularization was added to
275 levation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) to compare rates of cardiac procedures (Catheter
278 grel or ticagrelor in patients with unstable angina (UA) or non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) myocardia
279 The secondary endpoint was MACE + unstable angina (UA) receiving early (<=24 h) revascularization.
281 luded 1,379 consecutive patients with stable angina, unobstructed coronaries and ACH test performed f
282 aphy within 2 months of their index unstable angina versus 0.097 (CI, 0.090 to 0.105) for those not r
288 CTO PCI in a 12-center registry, refractory angina was defined as any angina (baseline Seattle Angin
289 raphic finding significantly associated with angina was incomplete revascularization of the left ante
293 emic stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina) was examined according to American College of Ca
295 l infarction, and were not being treated for angina were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 10 mg dail
296 s, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and angina) were quantified with logistic regression models
297 lower risk of nonprocedural MI and unstable angina with greater freedom from angina at the expense o
299 cular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina with revascularization, and heart failure hospita
300 th systolic heart failure and chronic stable angina without clinically significant adverse effects.