コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 went DCB angioplasty or conventional balloon angioplasty.
2 repopulation of stented blood vessels after angioplasty.
3 ary artery bypass graft surgery, stents, and angioplasty.
4 superior compared with conventional balloon angioplasty.
5 ry branch occlusion during elective coronary angioplasty.
6 h a paclitaxel-coated balloon or to standard angioplasty.
7 fits of cardiovascular interventions such as angioplasty.
8 a dedicated bifurcation stent or SB balloon angioplasty.
9 easing the risk of late thrombosis following angioplasty.
10 ncy among patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty.
11 magnetic resonance (MR) imaging 3 days after angioplasty.
12 following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
13 served in 5% of patients during test balloon angioplasty.
14 tery revascularization compared with balloon angioplasty.
15 crophage invasion, and TLR4 expression after angioplasty.
16 ated balloon angioplasty or uncoated balloon angioplasty.
17 restenosis compared to conventional balloon angioplasty.
18 of DCB angioplasty over conventional balloon angioplasty.
19 both strategies compared to standard balloon angioplasty.
20 ove vessel patency after superficial femoral angioplasty.
21 acute aneurysm formation was 0% to 13% after angioplasty, 0% to 5% after bare metal stent placement,
22 s, mortality was similar after plain balloon angioplasty (12.6%) and paclitaxel-coated balloon angiop
24 rogressively declined from plain old balloon angioplasty (341% increase) to bare metal stent (218% in
25 rs consisted of 13 bypasses (4.3%), 18 patch angioplasties (6.0%), and 79 primary repairs (26.4%).
27 plasty (12.6%) and paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty (9.6%; HR=0.84 [95% CI, 0.66-1.06], P=0.14).
28 ized DAPA trial (Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty) aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of p
29 taxel-coated balloon was superior to balloon angioplasty alone with a late loss of 0.43 +/- 0.61 mm v
30 er endovascular treatment for CoA, including angioplasty alone, bare metal stenting, and primary cove
31 consider for future clinical trials include angioplasty alone, indirect surgical bypass procedures,
33 gioplasty compared with conventional balloon angioplasty (also known as plain old balloon angioplasty
34 elevation MI successfully treated by primary angioplasty and 16 matched controls were prospectively r
35 nfidence interval [CI]: 80.4%, 95.2%) of DCB angioplasty and 62.7% (95% CI: 50.0%, 73.0%) of conventi
36 urred in 97.2% (95% CI: 89.1%, 99.3%) of DCB angioplasty and 78% (95% CI: 66.5%, 86.0%) of convention
39 sadvantages and limitations of plain balloon angioplasty and bare-metal stents, some limitations appl
41 Coronary interventions, including balloon angioplasty and coronary stent implantation, are associa
42 tion, and emergent coronary angiography with angioplasty and intravascular US were performed ( Fig 1
46 treat atherosclerosis, such as transluminal angioplasty and stent implantation, often cause vascular
48 a cohort of 284 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and stent placement (rs350099: TT versus CC+
49 on of iliofemoral stenosis or occlusion with angioplasty and stent placement has been increasingly us
52 gnificantly lower in patients treated by PEB angioplasty and stenting (34+/-31%) as compared with BA
53 and stenting (34+/-31%) as compared with BA angioplasty and stenting (56+/-29%, P=0.009) or DA (55+/
55 with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAAS), the benefits from medic
56 efficacy, safety, and durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) have been better defined
57 ain balloon angioplasty (BA) followed by PEB angioplasty and stenting (n=48), BA and stenting (n=52),
59 tid revascularization with endarterectomy or angioplasty and stenting are established treatments for
62 or target lesion revascularization after PEB angioplasty and stenting as compared with BA and stentin
64 reover, endovascular drug delivery following angioplasty and stenting has been achieved with a marked
65 on lesion modification to facilitate balloon angioplasty and stenting has underpinned major advances
66 level 1 evidence comparing open bypass with angioplasty and stenting in TransAtlantic Inter-Society
67 superficial femoral artery lesions with PEB angioplasty and stenting is superior to BA angioplasty a
69 The Revascularization With Open Bypass vs Angioplasty and Stenting of the Lower Extremity Trial (R
70 B angioplasty and stenting is superior to BA angioplasty and stenting or DA in terms of angiographic
71 omized and receive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting or femoropopliteal bypass, resp
72 adverse outcomes in the ACT-1 trial (Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asympt
76 rtic valvuloplasty; coarctation of the aorta angioplasty and stenting; and pulmonary artery stenting.
77 opliteal bypass or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting; patients with TASC II A and D
80 f infrapopliteal interventions using balloon angioplasty and/or bare stents are limited by a relative
81 ents, -24.2% (-32.2 to -16.4) versus balloon angioplasty, and -31.8% (-44.8 to -18.6) versus rotablat
82 dies of the use of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as primary treatment for patients with infra
84 e randomized to treatment with plain balloon angioplasty (BA) followed by PEB angioplasty and stentin
86 With A Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon), 300 symptomatic patients (Rutherfo
87 cokinetic Study of the Stellarex Drug-Coated Angioplasty Balloon), paclitaxel plasma concentrations w
89 associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons and stents in lower-limb endovascul
91 on-DCB devices (such as conventional balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents, or drug-eluting stents)
94 weeks after percutaneous transluminal, renal angioplasty blood pressure was normalized in all animals
96 duit tears are common in patients undergoing angioplasty, but clinically important tears, which only
98 To assess 2-year efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty compared with conventional balloon angioplas
99 cular event (myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, strok
101 ficial femoral artery," "popliteal artery," "angioplasty," "drug-eluting balloon," "paclitaxel-elutin
103 n Peripheral Intervention for below the knee angioplasty evaluation (DEBATE-BTK) is a randomized, ope
106 was significantly lower in patients with PCB angioplasty for BMS restenosis compared with DES resteno
113 porary outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal atherosc
114 on the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions.
115 balloon angioplasty was superior to standard angioplasty for the treatment of stenotic lesions in dys
116 ral Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Art
117 angioplasty was superior to uncoated balloon angioplasty for treatment of bare-metal stent (BMS) and
118 allocation of higher-risk patients, primary angioplasty gave 22% lower mortality (odds ratio, 0.78;
120 nts in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group and 77% in the nitinol stent group sho
122 vascular treatment, percutaneous endoluminal angioplasty has become particularly attractive for arter
123 such as atherosclerosis and restenosis after angioplasty, how control of VSMC phenotypic switching is
124 acement to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease R
125 atic carotid stenosis (Endarterectomy versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid
128 d a major advancement over plain old balloon angioplasty in the management of coronary artery disease
131 nds PTCA [percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty] inflations/deflations)+PCI (n=65) versus ro
133 een achieved RF goals in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Investigation Revascularization 2 Diabetes)
134 coronary angiography with simultaneous test angioplasty is an important step to evaluate for the pre
135 elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is associated with myocardial ischemic damag
139 rtery disease with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is limited by the occurrence of vessel recoi
142 aclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) catheter angioplasty is the preferred treatment for revasculariza
144 With the advent of thrombolytic therapy and angioplasty, it has become possible to reduce myocardial
145 ultrasound guidance during dialysis fistula angioplasty lead to cause more and more frequent employm
146 ities (previous peripheral bypass surgery or angioplasty, limb or foot amputation, intermittent claud
147 id revascularization and carotid stenting or angioplasty (low and insufficient SOE, respectively).
148 myocardial infarction reperfused by primary angioplasty (<12 hours after symptom onset) in this card
155 apy (MT) and percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (MT + PTRA) (n = 11, 3 bilaterally, n = 14 k
156 nded end-to-end anastomosis (n = 632), patch angioplasty (n = 72), interposition grafting (n = 49), b
157 was compared between 3 groups; plain balloon angioplasty (N=2104) versus paclitaxel-coated balloon an
158 ty (N=2104) versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty (N=3543), bare-metal stenting (N= 2045) vers
159 us Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, ran
162 The 1-year restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty of long lesions in below-the-knee arteries m
165 analyzed in 109 patients undergoing elective angioplasty of right or circumflex coronary arteries.
166 012, 70 patients underwent 76 procedures for angioplasty of RV-PA homografts with UNC Atlas balloons.
167 Stenosis trial, Stent-Protected Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery versus Endarterectomy
168 of the main branch with our without balloon angioplasty of the side branch offers hemodynamic advant
170 giography; 119/137 (86.9%) were treated with angioplasty, of which 113/137 (82.5%) were stented.
173 creased all-cause mortality included balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stent placement compared with
175 cal progression to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or loss of patency during 12-month follow-up
176 ver, prior trials compared CABG with balloon angioplasty or older generation stents, and it is not kn
179 onary artery (CA) compression during balloon angioplasty or stent placement in the overlying conduit.
180 and LDL cholesterol values, and intracranial angioplasty or stent placement, or both, in selected pat
181 branch stenting without side branch balloon angioplasty or stenting provided the most favorable hemo
182 long-term results for freedom from coronary angioplasty or stenting, renal dysfunction, diabetes mel
185 grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or angiographic evidence of significant ste
186 dial infarction (MI), coronary intervention (angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass surgery), angina
187 a post hoc analysis of the Second Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II), which is a rand
195 DCB angioplasty and two conventional balloon angioplasty participants died (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% CI:
196 sful high-pressure percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, participants were randomly assigned to rece
197 randomly assigned to DCB (n=200) or standard angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]
198 was shown to be superior to standard balloon angioplasty (POBA) in terms of restenosis prevention for
199 s after paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty, primary patency and freedom from target les
200 oronary artery bypass graft surgery/coronary angioplasty procedure/stent (1.35; 1.08-1.69), or any of
201 ess commonly in the others, with coarctation angioplasty procedures being the least successful (51%).
207 imb ischemia using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bail-out bare metal stenting (BMS)
208 ntion rates versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and improve wound healing/limb preserv
209 pared the DES with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and provisional bare-metal stent (BMS)
211 underwent balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) between January 2009 and December 2012
212 ersus conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the reduction of restenosis in dia
213 oated balloon with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of symptomatic super
214 ty versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal perip
215 raft and patient survival after percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) or stent placement for transplant rena
216 01) than those for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), as were radiation exposures to the ha
217 term outcomes with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), stent placement, atherectomy, or surg
218 er DCB or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), we aggregated data from 2 RCTs compri
219 with conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), yet durability of the treatment effec
221 Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] Balloon Catheter vs Standard PTA for t
223 ization with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and stenting often fails to recover r
224 ransfer decreased neointimal formation in an angioplasty rat model by preventing vascular smooth musc
225 ed from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Register between 2009 and 2013 and linked wi
226 mprehensive Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) and end points evaluated th
227 included in the Swedish Coronary Angiography Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) between 2006 and 2010 and w
230 the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) on all patients undergoing PCI (wi
235 ted patients with MIS both in the setting of angioplasty-related MIS (area under the curve 0.94) and
237 rgeted pharmacotherapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty represent potential therapeutic alternatives
240 disease burden was determined by the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) myoca
241 us and coronary artery disease in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (
244 essive Drug Evaluation; NCT00007657) (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes [
245 omen and men enrolled in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes)
246 oup, (n = 766 of 2,287), the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes)
247 cumented CAD enrolled in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes)
248 with medical therapy in the BARI-2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes)
249 Aggressive Drug Evaluation], BARI 2D [Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes],
251 eart disease and were enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Di
253 N-negative control subjects) from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Di
254 t), clinical severity, type of intervention (angioplasty, stent, thrombolysis), clinical location (ho
258 part of a percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty strategy has equivalent 1-year patency and s
261 n anterior STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, the sooner IV metoprolol is administered in
262 least one invasive intervention (22 patients angioplasty/thrombolysis, 62 TIPS, and 20 OLT) and 36 (2
263 a step-wise approach using anticoagulation, angioplasty/thrombolysis, transjugular intrahepatic port
266 gene transfer to arteries treated with stent angioplasty using a 2-source magnetic guidance strategy.
267 e or inhibit, respectively, restenosis after angioplasty, vein graft intimal thickening and atherogen
269 the superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus standard percutaneous transluminal an
270 conditional Prkcd knockout mice, and carotid angioplasty was conducted in rats receiving transient Pr
271 series, PA stent fracture using UHP balloon angioplasty was feasible and did not result in major com
279 of IH in various animal models (e.g. balloon angioplasty, wire injury, and vein graft), but very few
281 cally significant atherosclerotic lesions to angioplasty with a paclitaxel-coated balloon or to stand
282 al artery disease, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a paclitaxel-coated balloon resulted in
284 consecutive patients undergoing endovascular angioplasty with a retrievable stent to treat vasospasm
287 successful percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty with an iodinated contrast medium (20 mL Iop
288 rate was low and did not differ between PCB angioplasty with and without additional BMS implantation
289 assigned to primary DES implantation or DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting after stratification f
293 r-level factors, as well as the Stenting and Angioplasty With Protection in Patients at High Risk for
294 reased surgical risk, SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for
296 and harms of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty with stent placement (PTRAS) versus medical
298 compression resulting in symptoms, although angioplasty with stenting may be used in recalcitrant ca
299 ary patency among patients who had undergone angioplasty with the drug-coated balloon was superior to
300 ficant reductions in pressure gradient after angioplasty, with no difference in postangioplasty gradi