ライフサイエンスコーパス: anodal

1 nscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (anodal, 1.5 mA, 10 min) were applied contralaterally aft

2 Anodal (+2 mA) tDCS was applied over the right occipito-

3 algia were randomized to a single session of anodal-(a)-tDCS or sham-(s)-tDCS.

4 rthermore, tDCS-induced LTP-like plasticity (anodal) abolishes while the inhibitory LTD-like plastici

5 bi-parietal return electrodes before sleep (anodal 'activation', cathodal 'deactivation', and sham s

6 polarity of hypha emergence from cathodal to anodal, an effect augmented by Ca(2+).

7 Both anodal and cathodal stimulation of the left pLPFC disrup

8 ction times were analyzed for the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (compared with sham tDCS).

9 I, we investigated the modulatory effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS at the right DLPFC on placebo a

10 ical perfusion being demonstrated after both anodal and cathodal tDCS compared to the period during s

11 ull DC intensity range (0.5-2.0 mA) for both anodal and cathodal tDCS in a sham-controlled repeated m

12 VPM nucleus (mediating sensory input) during anodal and cathodal tDCS suggest that tDCS modifies thal

13 ndicated a main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tDCS.

14 sity-dependent neuroplastic after-effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

15 healthy subjects were divided into groups of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

16 5, 10, and 20 mg or placebo medication) with anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulat

17 The impact on plasticity induced by anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulat

18 Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS induced a progressive increase

19 annot be explained by mere add-on effects of anodal and concurrent cathodal stimulation, but rather b

20 fects after cathodal stimulation relative to anodal and sham in the right prefrontal, left temporopar

21 ased on task performance differences between anodal and sham tDCS in different neurocognitive tasks (

22 seven male and female children received 2 mA anodal and sham tDCS, targeting the left dorsolateral pr

23 le cathodal activation (0.3 ms) or end-cycle anodal black (30-60 ms) at approximately 1 Hz through th

24 Anodal block (ABL) has been used to achieve directional

25 via a vascularly isolated carotid sinus and anodal block of baroreceptor afferent fibers in the caro

26 e isolated sinus was compared to that during anodal block of large A-fibers in the carotid sinus nerv

27 activity (46% compared to 3%), and generate anodal break action potentials (58% compared to 19%).

28 hreshold calcium current (It) giving rise to anodal break depolarisations.

29 l for distinguishing between anodal-make and anodal-break excitation.

30 f biphasic waveforms with the same tilts for anodal but not cathodal phase 1 at the right ventricular

31 After anodal, but not cathodal, tDCS, we found a reduced item

32 d working memory impairment was prevented by anodal, but not sham or cathodal, stimulation of the dlP

33 Anodal Ca2+ waves and resistance to Na+ and Ca2+ channel

34 n response to nsPEF: 1-20 nsPEF caused local anodal Ca2+ waves without Ca2+ transients, and > or =20

35 ranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS(anodal)) can induce perceptual learning in healthy human

36 Bipolar LBBAP caused anodal capture in 54% of patients and resulted in less L

37 Sixty-two adults underwent anodal, cathodal and sham high-definition tDCS of the le

38 multaneous stimulation-MRI protocol applying anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation to 24 healthy cont

39 li from 10 healthy subjects before and after anodal, cathodal and sham transcranial direct current st

40 rtex of 62 healthy adults in three sessions (anodal, cathodal and sham).

41 ossover approach, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered to the C3-C5

42 While participants completed the tasks, anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS was applied over the righ

43 pted backward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS.

44 rainstem, and CBI before and after 25 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current st

45 human participants were randomly assigned to anodal, cathodal, or sham-control groups.

46 mA and 2 mA) in two experiments: 1 mA tDCS (anodal, cathodal, sham) did not affect any of the TVA pa

47 ine of the angle of migration in relation to anodal-cathodal orientation.

48 We applied anodal, cathoP:dal or sham transcranial direct current s

49 imulation (sham tDCS) while Group 2 received anodal cerebellar tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS (real tD

50 and Group 2) received a second treatment of anodal cerebellar tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS (real tD

51 Anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulatio

52 Our data showed that anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulatio

53 on of acetylcholine (ACH; delivered using an anodal charge) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP; administere

54 Thirty-minute 2-mA anodal constant current transscleral and transcorneal io

55 y was induced in conscious dogs by a 150-muA anodal current applied to the intimal surface of the cir

56 The anterior tongue was stimulated with anodal current pulses to determine the time course of dr

57 lowest threshold was found by searching with anodal current pulses; in the other cells, cathodal curr

58 s received bilateral lesions of the LC using anodal current.

59 egular afferent responses to cathodal versus anodal currents.

60 Over left IPC, tDCS(anodal) did not modulate learning but instead introduced

61 Our study implies that the application of anodal direct currents to the right DLPFC represents a p

62 for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC

63 Also, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3

64 Moreover, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp

65 task, anodal vmPFC/cathodal dlPFC, isolated anodal dlPFC stimulation and isolated anodal vmPFC stimu

66 were unaffected, being directed towards the anodal ear and rotating in line with head orientation in

67 basic response consisted of a tilt in space (anodal ear down) of all three segments.

68 leaning and bending of the body towards the anodal ear.

69 consisted of a sway of the body towards the anodal ear.

70 , the single electrode montage used only one anodal electrode over a nodal brain region of the AFN, b

71 showed significantly increased Glx under the anodal electrode, but not in homologous regions of the c

72 right Arcuate Fasciculus Network (AFN) with anodal electrodes placed over the skull position of the

73 gatively, the effect was evident only during anodal excitation, requiring significantly less stimulus

74 We used anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), and sham tra

75 heric inhibition, we applied left hemisphere anodal-excitatory and right hemisphere cathodal-inhibito

76 Anodal (facilitatory) stimulation to the ipsilesional he

77 the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anodal, facilitatory tDCS has been shown to improve symp

78 In contrast, anodal fields decreased most active behaviors below base

79 urface therefore influenced the frequency of anodal galvanotropism but a reversal in surface charge w

80 , and the rate of learning was higher in the anodal group as compared with sham-control animals (F ((

81 oreover, the larger skill improvement in the anodal group was predominantly mediated by reductions in

82 nnaire, predicted memory recall only for the Anodal group.

83 In contrast, unlike both the sham and anodal groups, the cathodal group exhibited no RIF.

84 RS-based CVR during the first 150 seconds of anodal HD-tDCS in eleven healthy humans.

85 ed to receive either rTPJ or dorsomedial PFC anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimu

86 (2)): 39.3 +/- 8.42] received 15 sessions of anodal (i.e., enhancing cortical activity) or sham tDCS

87 female, 8 male, 1 "neither/other") received anodal (i.e., excitatory) or sham stimulation over the r

88 onse of HeLa cells from cathodal to slightly anodal in a PP1-dependent manner.

89 Participants received excitatory (anodal), inhibitory (cathodal), or sham stimulation befo

90 326 mug (13.40%) for MN in combination with anodal ITP (p<0.001).

91 Six-week treatment of 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right prefrontal tDCS (twelve 30-mi

92 cond ramp-up and ramp-down) for 4 weeks with anodal-left and cathodal-right prefrontal stimulation (3

93 rmed the Balloon Analog Risk Task: (1) right anodal/left cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right c

94 As predicted, during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation over the DLPFC, partici

95 We hypothesized that right anodal/left cathodal would decrease risk-taking behavior

96 ife was observed among patients who received anodal M1 stimulation.

97 s that are useful for distinguishing between anodal-make and anodal-break excitation.

98 ibrinogens revealed a slight increase in the anodal mobility of fibrinogen Philadelphia.

99 ears) both before and after 20 min of 1.5 mA anodal (n = 18) or sham (n = 14) tDCS applied to the rig

100 m motor learning: (1) stimulation protocols: anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere, cathodal on the c

101 star rats (n = 16) were randomized to either anodal or cathodal stimulation for either 5 or 10 consec

102 went a nonadaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effect

103 depressed by the simultaneous application of anodal or cathodal tDCS, respectively, when stimulation

104 In awake macaques receiving either anodal or cathodal tDCS, we found that cathodal stimulat

105 nd downregulating neuronal excitability with anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulati

106 was seen if the magnetic S2 was replaced by anodal or cathodal transcranial electrical stimulation.

107 nd sixteen males a cognitive ToM task during anodal or placebo tDCS over the mPFC.

108 sixteen females completed the task receiving anodal or placebo tDCS over the vertex.

109 roblems before and after receiving cathodal, anodal or sham tDCS to the left DLPFC.

110 Anodal or sham tDCS was applied during CBTT training in

111 y-four healthy participants underwent either anodal or sham tDCS while concurrently performing a set

112 nstraints than the participants who received anodal or sham tDCS.

113 ere measured before and after 20 min of 1 mA anodal or sham tDCS.

114 Anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (

115 the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with cathodal over the right DLPFC,

116 med the risk task while they received either anodal over the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC,

117 he three following intervention groups: tDCS(anodal) over left IFG, IPC, or sham.

118 he results will improve our understanding of anodal pacing and its risks and benefits in patients.

119 urinergic signaling and is dominant over the anodal pathway at neutral pH.

120 CS (F(1,9) = 8.98, P < 0.02, mean difference anodal pre-post: -1.02 muV) and a significant reduction

121 f) to depolarize the cell on the break of an anodal pulse.

122 essentially negative (hyperpolarized) during anodal pulses and positive (depolarized) during cathodal

123 tor and superior parietal cortices following anodal relative to cathodal and sham.

124 the skill measure, we assessed the impact of anodal (relative to sham) tDCS on both within-day (onlin

125 ht anodal/left cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right cathodal DLPFC tDCS, or (3) sham tDCS.

126 ease risk-taking behavior compared with left anodal/right cathodal or sham stimulation.

127 (2) For anodal S2 stimulation with the S1 wavefront propagating

128 (3) For anodal S2 stimulation with the S1 wavefront propagating

129 With anodal search and stimulation, cell body median threshol

130 Repetitive Ca2+ waves arising at the anodal side and Ca2+ destabilization occurred after repe

131 Dye uptake was restricted to the anodal side of strands with the largest negative DeltaVm

132 duced arrhythmias, the V(m) waveforms on the anodal side revealed a positive V(m) shift that followed

133 Anodal stimulation (1 mA, 20 min) was applied over the D

134 e notion of increased cortical arousal after anodal stimulation and decreased cortical arousal after

135 (Luo-Rudy phase I and II, or Oxsoft) predict anodal stimulation at the single-cell level.

136 -Anodal stimulation by external pacemakers has been expla

137 litude or power analysis were observed after anodal stimulation except for a significant increase in

138 ificantly reduced these unit spikes, whereas anodal stimulation exhibited the opposite effect, showin

139 To determine whether anodal stimulation has a cellular basis, we measured mem

140 Next, we found that anodal stimulation improved acuity enough to be measurab

141 Anodal stimulation improved response inhibition in contr

142 Twenty minutes of anodal stimulation improved subjects' vernier acuity by

143 Anodal stimulation improved the on-line control of self-

144 The basis of this anodal stimulation in single cells is recruitment of the

145 dicated stronger beta oscillations following anodal stimulation in the left supplementary motor area.

146 cross cell types and layers; (b) superficial anodal stimulation is more effective than cathodal at ce

147 Anodal stimulation is routinely observed in cardiac tiss

148 xpected to yield the highest payout, whereas anodal stimulation led to choices that were less influen

149 Anodal stimulation led to improved rationality as well a

150 In addition, anodal stimulation normalized default mode network activ

151 ulation, participants receiving simultaneous anodal stimulation of left DLPFC and cathodal stimulatio

152 ith cathodal stimulation and attenuated with anodal stimulation of primary visual cortex.

153 Our results indicate that anodal stimulation of the dlPFC may indeed preserve work

154 Second, these differences emerge with anodal stimulation of the mPFC, confirming the crucial r

155 results are consistent with the theory that anodal stimulation of the rTPJ increases the precision o

156 Anodal stimulation over the left LPFC specifically enhan

157 on over the affected cortex and simultaneous anodal stimulation over the unaffected cortex.

158 Bi-frontal anodal stimulation significantly decreased TST, compared

159 ificant behavioural improvements produced by anodal stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere are as

160 stimulation conditions in separate sessions: anodal stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere; catho

161 We found that anodal stimulation to the left AG modulated semantic int

162 Specifically, anodal stimulation to the left AG resulted in faster com

163 Crucially, anodal stimulation to the rTPJ increased the effect of b

164 cilitation of pitch memory was revealed when anodal stimulation was applied over the left SMG.

165 not axons, thresholds for both cathodal and anodal stimulation were dependent on the search method u

166 ility of the primary motor cortex (M1) using anodal stimulation while concurrently downregulating con

167 euronal populations by modulating GABAergic (anodal stimulation) and glutamatergic (cathodal stimulat

168 Relative to control conditions and anodal stimulation, tRNS-enhanced learning was at least

169 tivity for cell bodies over axons than would anodal stimulation.

170 eshold but also the excitation mechanism for anodal stimulation.

171 ckward adaptation was noticeably weaker with anodal stimulation.

172 mulation, and reduced duration of change for anodal stimulation.

173 Both cathodal and anodal stimuli evoked a neural response in the ganglion

174 enth to one tenth axonal threshold) than did anodal stimuli for both cell bodies and axons.

175 Bidomain models predict that anodal stimuli will hyperpolarize the underlying tissue

176 dal tACS decreased cortical excitability and anodal tACS increased excitability.

177 quency rTMS (HFrTMS) and low-frequency rTMS, anodal tDCS (atDCS) and cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), CT, sham

178 ounterbalanced, crossover design, we applied anodal tDCS (atDCS), cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), and sham tDC

179 in peak amplitude of somatosensory MMN after anodal tDCS (F(1,9) = 8.98, P < 0.02, mean difference an

180 evealed generally good reliability of 1.0 mA anodal tDCS (ICC(2,1) = 0.74 over the first 30 min).

181 Anodal tDCS also reduced multidimensional pain interfere

182 HRV increased under anodal tDCS and control, and plateaued under sham tDCS.

183 eiving either of five stimulation protocols: anodal tDCS applied over M1, anodal tDCS over DLPFC, sha

184 We found that excitatory anodal tDCS applied over the cerebellum increased skill

185 and gestures was specifically facilitated by anodal tDCS applied over the cytoarchitectonically defin

186 Our results revealed that anodal tDCS applied to M1 enhances decision-making capac

187 Anodal tDCS applied to the human motor cortex (M1) impro

188 The present study demonstrates that anodal tDCS applied to the left dlPFC improves deficient

189 c explanations for the behavioral effects of anodal tDCS applied to the left DLPFC in terms of modula

190 impairments after acute stress and point to anodal tDCS as a promising tool to reduce cognitive defi

191 ntly the skill measure remained greater with anodal tDCS at 3 months.

192 Anodal tDCS attenuated both these behavioural and neuron

193 Together the results suggest that anodal tDCS augments the development of an internal mode

194 enhancement of excitability in the dlPFC by anodal tDCS can be associated with blurred detail memory

195 Repeated and concurrent anodal tDCS can boost motor skill learning at clinically

196 (online plus offline) skill acquisition with anodal tDCS compared to sham, which was mediated through

197 The magnitude of M1 GABA decrease induced by anodal tDCS correlated positively with both the degree o

198 ated that, compared with sham, both dual and anodal tDCS decreased connectivity of right hippocampus

199 Anodal tDCS did not change the rate of forgetting relati

200 variables.Relative to sham tDCS, short-term anodal tDCS did not influence ad libitum intake of food

201 ed using a novel combination of left frontal anodal tDCS during an overt picture-naming fMRI study.

202 neural correlates of dual and unihemispheric anodal tDCS effects in 20 healthy older subjects in a ra

203 ensitivity correlated negatively with 1.0 mA anodal tDCS effects on excitability.

204 Anodal tDCS eliminated the checkerboard inversion effect

205 Notably, dual but not anodal tDCS enhanced connectivity of the left dorsal pos

206 Functionally, multisession anodal tDCS enhances performance on a contextual fear di

207 In the anodal tDCS group, compared with the sham group, VAS rat

208 tion protocols was observed, suggesting that anodal tDCS had little effect on learning the bimanual t

209 y anatomically connected to the DLPFC during anodal tDCS in conjunction with a decreased functional c

210 can be decreased by non-invasive bi-frontal anodal tDCS in healthy humans.

211 e were reduced only after a longer period of anodal tDCS in individuals with obesity.

212 Relative to sham tDCS, anodal tDCS increased activation in right Crus I/II duri

213 resulted in a clear decrease of CBI, whereas anodal tDCS increased it, in the absence of changes afte

214 When applied during encoding of pictures, anodal tDCS increased whereas cathodal stimulation reduc

215 n this randomized clinical trial, prefrontal anodal tDCS induced small- to medium-sized effects in yo

216 Compared with sham or cathodal stimulation, anodal tDCS led to significantly better working memory p

217 e sought to investigate whether multisession anodal tDCS may modulate AHN and its associated cognitiv

218 (P = 0.01), after long-term tDCS.Short-term anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC did not have an immediate

219 Anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex induced signific

220 periment 2 confirmed this second prediction: anodal tDCS of the TPJ improved lie detection specifical

221 However, we found no impact of anodal tDCS on cognitive control of visuomotor skills an

222 Optimized multichannel anodal tDCS or sham stimulation (1 mA, 20 minutes) targe

223 younger adults and 91 older adults received anodal tDCS or sham stimulation to the left dlPFC prior

224 pants were randomly assigned to receive 2-mA anodal tDCS or sham tDCS targeted to the ventromedial pr

225 Anodal tDCS over C3 with an intensity of 2 mA was admini

226 Anodal tDCS over DLPFC by itself did not significantly c

227 tion protocols: anodal tDCS applied over M1, anodal tDCS over DLPFC, sham tDCS over M1, sham tDCS ove

228 In contrast, anodal TDCS over M1 improved initial adaptation in both

229 Anodal tDCS over right DLPFC was associated with a signi

230 ately before and after the administration of anodal tDCS over right parietal cortex.

231 ols, but deterioration in pianists following anodal tDCS over the contralateral cortex and cathodal t

232 as to investigate whether the application of anodal TDCS over the lateral cerebellum and M1 affected

233 We applied anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

234 MG led to an improvement in performance, but anodal tDCS over the left SMG had no significant effect.

235 rolled study was to test the hypothesis that anodal tDCS over the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) sel

236 ted by enhanced ToM in females that received anodal tDCS over the mPFC compared with females that rec

237 The results showed that anodal tDCS over the mPFC enhances ToM in females but no

238 tested whether unilateral DLPFC stimulation (anodal tDCS over the right or left DLPFC with the cathod

239 hythm memory the opposite pattern was found; anodal tDCS over the right SMG led to an improvement in

240 icant effects on pitch memory were found for anodal tDCS over the right SMG or sham condition.

241 One week of daily anodal tDCS reduced overall caloric intake by 14% in com

242 onfirm the previously reported findings that anodal tDCS reduces GABA concentration and increases fun

243 Furthermore, anodal tDCS reduces the movement time required to accomp

244 In Purkinje cells, anodal tDCS shortens the repolarization phase following

245 both forward and backward adaptations, while anodal TDCS strongly impaired forward adaptation and, to

246 Anodal tDCS substantially improved WM relative to sham t

247 te brain activity.We tested whether repeated anodal tDCS targeted at the left DLPFC (compared with sh

248 Our study uncovers a novel mechanism of anodal tDCS to elicit cognitive-enhancing effects and ma

249 Anodal tDCS to the dlPFC was associated with an enhanced

250 Multisession anodal tDCS were applied on the skull over the hippocamp

251 er activations in bilateral M1 compared with anodal tDCS when participants used either their left or

252 We hypothesized that anodal tDCS would result in an enhancement of CBI and ca

253 With anodal tDCS, all active intensities resulted in equivale

254 pro-inflammatory effect of both cathodal and anodal tDCS, and a polarity-specific migratory effect on

255 Motor learning is enhanced by anodal tDCS, as long as activity-dependent BDNF secretio

256 of a consolidation mechanism, susceptible to anodal tDCS, which contributes to offline effects but no

257 ariance in the early after-effects of 1.0 mA anodal tDCS, which may be of practical relevance for fut

258 attentional bias was completely abolished by anodal tDCS.

259 d microglia occurred after both cathodal and anodal tDCS.

260 MRS provides evidence that excitatory (anodal) tDCS causes locally reduced GABA while inhibitor

261 Critically, in the anodal-tDCS condition (N = 48) the FIE for own-race face

262 Hz) and fine-scale MSE (fast activity) after anodal-tDCS, indicating reversal of pathological abnorma

263 quently targeted these areas with excitatory/anodal-tDCS, or targeted the contralateral homolog areas

264 eviously, we established that application of anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation (a-tsDCS)

265 During the application of cathodal and anodal transcranial currents we observed polarity-specif

266 iods showed that multiple-session home-based anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS)

267 Excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) c

268 Here, we assessed immediate effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) o

269 Here we demonstrate that facilitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS(ano

270 the activity of the dlPFC in MDD patients by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) an

271 Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) ca

272 ehaviors could be decreased using concurrent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of

273 Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) of

274 er-limb can be differentially facilitated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) ov

275 Using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) th

276 ious research shows that a single session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to

277 We then went on to show that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a

278 rietal cortex and the facilitatory effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied o

279 e in Children and Adolescents With ADHD With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Pr

280 Here, we induced neuronal excitation by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation versus sh

281 we quantified the magnitude of occlusion of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation-induced i

282 tees performed phantom hand movements during anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

283 mediately after 20 min session of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

284 eous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation

285 ve and 2-mA iontophoretic (both cathodal and anodal) transport experiments were conducted using these

286 In contrast, the anodal tsDCS protocol used had no effect on any measured

287 Interestingly, cathodal, but not anodal, tsDCS induced a persistent increase in tidal vol

288 locomotion were improved following 7 days of anodal-tsDCS (a-tsDCS).

289 on both Plastek substrata, the frequency of anodal turning was greater on dishes with a net positive

290 Adhesivity and the frequency of anodal turning were graded over the range of polylysine

291 maging to examine the mechanism of diastolic anodal unipolar stimulation of cardiac tissue under 4 mM

292 for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC

293 anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder stimulations w

294 , anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder we have observ

295 olated anodal dlPFC stimulation and isolated anodal vmPFC stimulation with extracranial return electr

296 For the time reproduction/estimation task, anodal vmPFC/cathodal dlPFC, isolated anodal dlPFC stimu

297 The influence of current polarity (anodal vs cathodal) and electrode location (left vs righ

298 participants were either stimulated (EXP-1: anodal vs. sham tDCS, EXP-2: cathodal vs. sham tDCS) or

299 Tisch/-TISCH) over a period of 3 d, and tDCS(anodal) was applied during the first 20 min of training.

300 perceptual learning occurred only when tDCS(anodal) was applied over left IFG.