ライフサイエンスコーパス: anthropogenic

1 that future changes in temperature and other anthropogenic activites (e.g., nitrogen loading) will li

2 Anthropogenic activities have led to a global decline in

3 istry and biota and not only the presence of anthropogenic activities in a watershed.

4 rate the effects of climate change and other anthropogenic activities on carbon burial over centennia

5 levels in groundwaters influenced by general anthropogenic activities preclude them as individual rob

6 Various anthropogenic activities simultaneously alter essential

7 These aspects can be altered by anthropogenic activities, thus influencing associated as

8 al Se emissions from the four major sources: anthropogenic activities, volcanoes, marine biosphere, a

9 sites that have subsequently been altered by anthropogenic activities.

10 unced spatial variation, primarily driven by anthropogenic activities.

11 networks and coral reefs may be impacted by anthropogenic activities.

12 be exacerbated in intensity and duration by anthropogenic activities.

13 ere headwater streams are highly impacted by anthropogenic activities.

14 ad, intI1 as a gene commonly associated with anthropogenic activity and AR, and two AR genes bla(OXA-

15 with increased food resources due to greater anthropogenic activity, we expected an increase in PEMA

16 o 2010 changes in GPP have been dominated by anthropogenic activity.

17 thern latitudes, mostly in areas with a high anthropogenic activity.

18 Anthropogenic aerosols are hypothesized to enhance plane

19 rease by 62% and enhance the global combined anthropogenic and natural aerosol indirect effect by -0.

20 t the response of the climate system to both anthropogenic and natural forcing rather than any intrin

21 Anthropogenic and natural forest disturbance cause ecolo

22 o 195 teragrams CH(4) per year)(2,3) between anthropogenic and natural geological sources (such as se

23 Anthropogenic and nonanthropogenic forces have destroyed

24 al communities, and tested whether social or anthropogenic and other environmental factors predicted

25 cal simulations highlights the importance of anthropogenic and volcanic aerosols over GHG in generati

26 markers (HFMs; crAssphage, enterococci) and anthropogenic antibiotic resistance markers (AARMs; intI

27 e present a compilation of global records of anthropogenic atmospheric lead (Pb) spanning the last 40

28 Closing the anthropogenic carbon cycle by converting CO(2) into reus

29 Ocean acidification (OA), a consequence of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO(2) ) emissions, strongl

30 Anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO(2)) emissions contribut

31 CO(2) emission data products, Vulcan and the Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions System (ACES).

32 we elucidate the microbial ecosystems within anthropogenic 'caves'; the Iron-Age, subterranean tombs

33 Landfills are a major contributor of anthropogenic CH(4) emissions.

34 nual and long-term (>3 decades) climatic and anthropogenic change affecting Borneo's coastal and cora

35 ncreased exposure to threats associated with anthropogenic change faced by migrating individuals may

36 ons of exotic species are a leading cause of anthropogenic change in biodiversity; however, context d

37 ment, revealing heterogeneity in response to anthropogenic change.

38 Having a better understanding of how anthropogenic changes affect delta channel networks over

39 Anthropogenic changes are often studied in isolation but

40 These findings demonstrate how anthropogenic changes could affect arms races between hu

41 Anthropogenic changes create evolutionarily novel enviro

42 reased, consistent with predictions based on anthropogenic changes in land use and atmosphere.

43 These anthropogenic changes may alter net soil N mineralizatio

44 Under anthropogenic changes such as eutrophication and altered

45 We hypothesized that different levels of anthropogenic changes to the environment can be an impor

46 sure, (b) abiotic and biotic factors and (c) anthropogenic changes.

47 o survival in the face of climatic and other anthropogenic changes.

48 t and Northeast United States are at risk of anthropogenic chloride contamination, but there is littl

49 are among the most vulnerable ecosystems to anthropogenic climate and land use change and are under

50 nable researchers to quantify the effects of anthropogenic climate change across the globe.

51 Anthropogenic climate change alters seasonal conditions

52 2020 mega-fires were exacerbated by drought, anthropogenic climate change and existing land-use manag

53 plasticity is maladaptive in the context of anthropogenic climate change and that selection now prom

54 As anthropogenic climate change continues the risks to biod

55 eme weather patterns associated with ongoing anthropogenic climate change could increase the potentia

56 Despite an average global greening, anthropogenic climate change has degraded 12.6% (5.43 mi

57 We find that anthropogenic climate change increased the likelihood of

58 Anthropogenic climate change likely influences the begin

59 Anthropogenic climate change precipitates the need to un

60 rge ensemble to estimate the contribution of anthropogenic climate change to the probability of occur

61 al (CDR), which is now necessary to mitigate anthropogenic climate change(1).

62 ity to drought is expected to increase under anthropogenic climate change, and drought-induced mortal

63 cing some of the most dramatic damage due to anthropogenic climate change, and the situation is predi

64 orecasts of the fate of such organisms under anthropogenic climate change, as well as of the function

65 Understanding the roles of anthropogenic climate change, which includes the CO(2) f

66 singly vulnerable to human stressors such as anthropogenic climate change, which will alter the ecolo

67 nformation on natural IOD variability before anthropogenic climate change.

68 falling Texas TCs change in the future under anthropogenic climate change.

69 offer a baseline in the context of on-going anthropogenic climate change.

70 ion is crucial to anticipate consequences of anthropogenic climate change.

71 ant perspective in quantifying the impact of anthropogenic climate disruption on the global state of

72 Anthropogenic climate disruption, including temperature

73 henotypic response of floral pigmentation to anthropogenic climatic change, suggesting that global ch

74 Cities are responsible for the largest anthropogenic CO(2) emissions and are key to effective e

75 Anthropogenic CO(2) emissions are projected to lower the

76 tributes significantly to present-day global anthropogenic CO(2) emissions, yet its hydrated products

77 e of the terrestrial biosphere in mitigating anthropogenic CO(2) emissions.

78 Since the industrial revolution 30% of the anthropogenic CO(2) is absorbed by oceans, resulting in

79 versity is undergoing mass extinction due to anthropogenic compounding of environmental, demographic

80 Aside from anthropogenic contamination, higher temperature and more

81 First, anthropogenic controls on GPP change have increased from

82 tential threat to nontargeted species due to anthropogenic copper inputs into protected waters.

83 of Cu bioavailabilities was associated with anthropogenic Cu inputs.

84 l movement and discuss how they may react to anthropogenic disruption, leading to unexpected threats

85 s global habitats continue to be modified by anthropogenic disturbance and climate change [10], our s

86 n lake carbon around AD 1000 and significant anthropogenic disturbance from c.

87 Land free of direct anthropogenic disturbance is considered essential for ac

88 arbon fluxes of these ecosystems, the direct anthropogenic disturbance may play a greater role.

89 results not only demonstrate the impacts of anthropogenic disturbance on hybrid network structure, b

90 This variability is caused by natural and anthropogenic disturbance regimes, which influence the a

91 arbon sequestration, the benthos, faces less anthropogenic disturbance than any other ocean continent

92 lonies at sites spanning a gradient of local anthropogenic disturbance through a tropical heatwave of

93 sites exposed to different levels of chronic anthropogenic disturbance, before, during, and after a m

94 lity of such hybrid networks are affected by anthropogenic disturbance.

95 singly threatened by both climate change and anthropogenic disturbance.

96 ense of others, road networks may echo other anthropogenic disturbances in bringing about large-scale

97 ate biomass loss from diverse and widespread anthropogenic disturbances, and as a result overestimate

98 synanthropic and invasive species, and other anthropogenic disturbances.

99 e elevated respiration is probably fueled by anthropogenic DOM contained in beer and/or urine.

100 of running waters transiently increases the anthropogenic DOM load into stream ecosystems and alters

101 e population impacts of abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic drivers differ, accounting for their direc

102 Similar impact magnitudes for abiotic/biotic/anthropogenic drivers hold for plants of different growt

103 hus liable to be complex, involving multiple anthropogenic drivers of environmental change acting wid

104 However, interactions with anthropogenic drivers such as climate change, land use,

105 subject to myriad climatic, biological, and anthropogenic drivers, thresholds, and feedbacks and the

106 e led to a form of perpetual and accelerated anthropogenic drought in these basins.

107 In an era of pervasive anthropogenic ecological disturbances, there is a pressi

108 ntegrate an understanding of the natural and anthropogenic EMF environment together with the response

109 gated comparison reveals regional offsets in anthropogenic emission fluxes in EIs, overestimated foss

110 p the winter estimate to annual indicated an anthropogenic emission rate of 3.7 +/- 0.7 MtCH(4)/year,

111 Anthropogenic emissions alter secondary organic aerosol

112 Such direct anthropogenic emissions are gaining importance, as those

113 e project socio-economic outcomes under high anthropogenic emissions for stylized climate scenarios i

114 d underwater source is comparable with total anthropogenic emissions from entire Middle Eastern count

115 s to separate the influence of reductions in anthropogenic emissions from meteorological changes and

116 In January 2020, anthropogenic emissions in Northeast Asia reduced due to

117 forcing to quantify long-distance effects of anthropogenic emissions on the functioning and productiv

118 5 per cent of our estimate of annual Chinese anthropogenic emissions over that period.

119 Finally, the influence of reductions in anthropogenic emissions was greater than that of meteoro

120 nd carbon uptake of the ocean in response to anthropogenic emissions.

121 itivity of the drought risk in SSA to future anthropogenic emissions.

122 Anthropogenic environmental change is altering the behav

123 Rapid anthropogenic environmental change is expected to impact

124 populations face multiple threats induced by anthropogenic environmental change.

125 Anthropogenic environmental modification is placing as m

126 Anthropogenic environments have been implicated in enric

127 to take risks by interacting with humans in anthropogenic environments.

128 n, we assess the extent to which natural and anthropogenic factors have altered biogeochemical cyclin

129 nation program to identify environmental and anthropogenic factors that optimized removal of this pop

130 ntly shaped by paleoclimatic change and past anthropogenic factors.

131 An isotope mass balance suggests that anthropogenic Fe contributes 21-59% of dissolved Fe meas

132 n-stable isotopes reveal in situ evidence of anthropogenic Fe in seawater, with low delta(56)Fe (-0.2

133 not been confirmed by field observations of anthropogenic Fe in seawater.

134 t that time-sensitive restoration actions on anthropogenic features can affect the probability of ove

135 seismic lines in areas with low densities of anthropogenic features.

136 dence of ingestion of microplastic and other anthropogenic fibres in four demersal sharks species fou

137 ine for ingestion of microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres in native UK shark species and high

138 cal constraints to atmospheric assessment of anthropogenic fluxes in addition to offering the climate

139 population expansion, possibly explained by anthropogenic food subsidies via plantations of cash cro

140 ith some differences probably due to missing anthropogenic forcing and two-way vegetation-climate fee

141 r to determine how the ecosystem responds to anthropogenic forcing.

142 trial biosphere to climatic change and other anthropogenic forcing.

143 how these climatic effects compare to other anthropogenic forcings is largely unknown.

144 e climate system to a variety of natural and anthropogenic forcings.

145 some other publicly available data regarding anthropogenic [Formula: see text] emissions and natural

146 This result indicates that anthropogenic fossil CH(4) emissions are underestimated

147 dioxide (CO(2)) capture in addition to other anthropogenic gasses.

148 culture accounted for approximately 0.49% of anthropogenic GHG emissions in 2017, which is similar in

149 oncern, with agriculture representing 60% of anthropogenic global N(2) O emissions.

150 Anthropogenic global surface warming is proportional to

151 ant because of the poorly defined effects of anthropogenic global temperature rise on biological syst

152 The contribution of anthropogenic global warming to this prolonged rainfall

153 r- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are anthropogenic, globally distributed chemicals.

154 ection and movement behaviour in response to anthropogenic habitat modification, though caribou data

155 the mechanisms that drive their responses to anthropogenic habitat modification.

156 t Britain may function as analogues of novel anthropogenic habitats for insects and mites, analysing

157 Anthropogenic Hg added to the surface ocean is, therefor

158 anism for mobilizing naturally occurring and anthropogenic Hg from terrestrial landscapes to aquatic

159 nct in the wild as a consequence of damaging anthropogenic impact on their natural habitat and illega

160 n, our global assessment suggests coexisting anthropogenic impacts can intensify the ecological effec

161 deficit thresholds, water deficits caused by anthropogenic impacts every year in the Ganges-Brahmaput

162 mong and within species interactions,(1) and anthropogenic impacts have long had major influences on

163 roves our ability to predict consequences of anthropogenic impacts on tropical forests.

164 to study future changes that may result from anthropogenic impacts to the planet's climate and oceans

165 These top-down effects may interact with anthropogenic impacts, such as climate change, in largel

166 ild wave or atmospheric climates and minimal anthropogenic impacts.

167 mics of organisms and their environment, and anthropogenic impacts.

168 native species are modulated by co-occurring anthropogenic impacts.

169 Samples from the NE Atlantic contained this anthropogenic imprint at distances over 50 km from the c

170 itionally thought of as representative of an anthropogenic influence.

171 wer by a factor of ~4) thereby confining the anthropogenic influences closer to the surface.

172 The role of anthropogenic influences in both ancient and more recent

173 sed experiments to evaluate the diversity of anthropogenic influences on wildlife communities globall

174 is truly pristine, free from continental and anthropogenic influences, with the ocean as the dominant

175 onal climate patterns or additional external anthropogenic influences.

176 s replete with biological, environmental and anthropogenic information.

177 Anthropogenic inputs into coastal ecosystems are causing

178 with low levels of lanthanum-NPs, suggesting anthropogenic inputs of nanoCeO(2), probably from atmosp

179 infer Cu bioavailability changes related to anthropogenic inputs of this metal into the marine envir

180 WWTP and other anthropogenic inputs were similarly associated with elev

181 influence levels, channel connectivity, and anthropogenic interference levels).

182 osphere (CO(2) and CH(4) ) when subjected to anthropogenic interferences (e.g., drainage and deforest

183 ne foodweb at ~500 m, which is predominantly anthropogenic, is transported to deep-sea trenches prima

184 rth's landscape is increasingly dominated by anthropogenic land use, it is clear that broad-scale sys

185 deforestation, edge effects or other direct anthropogenic landscape change.

186 dinitrogen plays an important role in daily anthropogenic life, and the processes by which this fixa

187 systems to nighttime light pollution, but is anthropogenic light reaching the seafloor in sufficient

188 Space-use response to anthropogenic linear features (LFs) by predators and pre

189 Anthropogenic linear features facilitate access and trav

190 Anthropogenic loss hotspots across Southeast Asia and ar

191 Anthropogenic (man-made) sound has the potential to harm

192 nce, and evaluated the potential natural and anthropogenic mechanisms of its transport and deposition

193 Despite the limited direct anthropogenic mercury (Hg) inputs in the circumpolar Arc

194 In total, 15% of all anthropogenic mf were identified as plastic.

195 bull lifespan model to map the generation of anthropogenic mineral and 23 types of the capsulated mat

196 Anthropogenic mineral is absorbing wide concern in the c

197 total economic potential in yearly-generated anthropogenic mineral is anticipated to grow markedly fr

198 Total weight of anthropogenic mineral on average in China reached 39 Mt

199 est condition as determined by the degree of anthropogenic modification.

200 This indicates that anthropogenic modifications leading to habitat fragmenta

201 Anthropogenic modifications to river form and function a

202 hanges caused by sea level rise, subsidence, anthropogenic modifications, and changes to water and se

203 greater than natural mortality, non-harvest anthropogenic mortality (e.g. poaching, defense of prope

204 Our simulation indicated that removing anthropogenic mortality increased population size by an

205 We found anthropogenic mortality was greater than natural mortali

206 ted that bears are exposed to high levels of anthropogenic mortality, and the potential for human act

207 al EPPs, including new introductions through anthropogenic movement, natural dispersal and weather ev

208 in terrestrial carbon uptake due to ongoing anthropogenic N loading may be greater than previously t

209 The presence of anthropogenic nanoparticles (NPs) in the aquatic environ

210 ntification of the relative contributions of anthropogenic, natural, and internally-driven decadal va

211 Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition and resulting diff

212 Climate change and anthropogenic nitrogen deposition are widely regarded as

213 Anthropogenic nitrogen fixation is essential to sustain

214 In the context of continuously increasing anthropogenic nitrogen inputs, knowledge of how ammonia

215 rences in adjustments of acoustic signals to anthropogenic noise among species.

216 These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic noise and light can substantially affect b

217 to by reducing or mitigating the emission of anthropogenic noise into the environment.

218 communication differ in their adjustments to anthropogenic noise is little understood.

219 s the presence of species-specific sounds or anthropogenic noise.

220 in noisier times and to benchmark sources of anthropogenic noise.

221 tions, including studies across gradients of anthropogenic nutrient enrichment as well as the incorpo

222 In summary, our findings show that anthropogenic nutrient enrichment, herbivore exclusion a

223 n pathways are fundamentally "rewired" under anthropogenic nutrient regimes in ways that could increa

224 ed for a deciduous forest, demonstrates that anthropogenic nutrient supply can interact with disease

225 and generate predictions about the impact of anthropogenic nutrient supply rates on infectious diseas

226 affected coral growth, and moderate doses of anthropogenic nutrients had no additional effects.

227 ngs highlight a notable parallel between how anthropogenic nutrients promote symbiont dominance with

228 led more nuanced relationships, showing that anthropogenic nutrients reduced the diversity of coral-s

229 ls predict a decline in fish production with anthropogenic ocean warming, but how fish production equ

230 remes, and to attributing observed change to anthropogenic or natural factors.

231 Anthropogenic organic micropollutants such as pharmaceut

232 t remains unclear whether this pattern is of anthropogenic origin or a simple manifestation of intern

233 the recent North Atlantic warming hole is of anthropogenic origin.

234 Shipping is the main source of anthropogenic particle emissions in large areas of the g

235 We treated two soils with anthropogenic Pb contamination and samples of clean tops

236 lines obtained between the geogenic and the anthropogenic Pb isotopes data that characterize Europea

237 he toxicity and environmental persistence of anthropogenic per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS

238 e and have toxic properties similar those of anthropogenic-persistent organic pollutants (POPs).

239 thus being of the same magnitude with total anthropogenic PN emissions in continental areas.

240 shipping remains as a significant source of anthropogenic PN emissions that should be considered in

241 but their availability for the reduction of anthropogenic pollutants is often limited by competition

242 latile methyl siloxanes (VMS) are ubiquitous anthropogenic pollutants that have recently come under s

243 creasingly becoming a challenge due to novel anthropogenic pollutants.

244 Here, we show that the impacts of anthropogenic pollution reduction on PM(2.5) were found

245 Anthropogenic (pollution) ozone has increased iodine emi

246 trations being detected in areas with little anthropogenic pressure, while the presence of nanosilver

247 A key question is whether anthropogenic pressures have a similar impact on the soc

248 occurrence network analyses, we examined how anthropogenic pressures may have impacted marine biodive

249 gh biodiversity and continually intensifying anthropogenic pressures on aquatic wildlife habitats.

250 der threat from multiple direct and indirect anthropogenic pressures.

251 Finally, we compare the climate-driven and anthropogenic pumping impacts.

252 ed by the presence of naturally occurring or anthropogenic radionuclides.

253 rast to the depth of knowledge available for anthropogenic-related threats, our understanding of how

254 iod is the longest and most prominent global anthropogenic seismic noise reduction on record.

255 m predation pressure and then imposes strong anthropogenic selection on traits.

256 misleading-that clearly explain how and why anthropogenic sensory pollutants impact organisms.

257 Our analysis reveals that the anthropogenic signal has only recently emerged from the

258 In contrast, anthropogenic SOA accounted for the highest fraction of

259 be broadly applicable to other biogenic and anthropogenic SOA systems analyzed via (-) or (+) LC/ESI

260 Anthropogenic soil impacts may liberate AM fungal propag

261 inventory that incorporates both natural and anthropogenic sources and accounts for the interaction b

262 ndwater contamination by As from natural and anthropogenic sources is a worldwide concern.

263 uel extraction and use are among the largest anthropogenic sources of CH(4) emissions, but the precis

264 Rainfall mobilizes and transports anthropogenic sources of sediments and nutrients from te

265 Microplastics released into freshwaters from anthropogenic sources settle in the sediments, where the

266 re likely of geogenic origin (i.e., not from anthropogenic sources).

267 In addition to anthropogenic sources, endogenous triuret has been ident

268 d limitations in methodology for attributing anthropogenic sources.

269 ommunities to assess the importance of local anthropogenic sources.

270 ench coastal site contaminated by diffuse Cu anthropogenic sources.

271 ms face numerous challenges from natural and anthropogenic sources.

272 t]O flux to El Nino-Southern Oscillation and anthropogenic stratification of the low latitude ocean.

273 are keystone species that are threatened by anthropogenic stresses including climate change.

274 and highlight that soil acidification, as an anthropogenic stressor, reduced the responses of plants

275 ow that landscapes disturbed by a variety of anthropogenic stressors are consistently associated with

276 Our results highlight that two different anthropogenic stressors can affect critical developmenta

277 While the detrimental effects of anthropogenic stressors on the behavior and survival of

278 t results and underlines the profound threat anthropogenic stressors pose to fish communities.

279 at an alarming rate due to local and global anthropogenic stressors.

280 n water and vegetated shorelines and avoided anthropogenic structure.

281 m terrestrial ecosystems and facilitation of anthropogenic sulfate for monoterpenes SOA.

282 ed to elevated concentrations of natural and anthropogenic surface-active chemicals in the sea surfac

283 ssions and setting GHG emissions budgets for anthropogenic systems are influenced by several value an

284 emissions and setting emissions budgets for anthropogenic systems.

285 ts that will require further protection from anthropogenic threats like fixed fishing gear, shipping,

286 dynamic management efforts [12] to mitigate anthropogenic threats to this endangered population [13,

287 thus limited larval dispersal) and putative anthropogenic transport of specimens.

288 Anthropogenic trends in temperature, relative humidity,

289 nt hydroxyl dicarboxylic acids (OHDCA), with anthropogenic unsaturated organics as potential precurso

290 Anthropogenic upper-ocean warming, increased dissolved c

291 icting biodiversity responses to natural and anthropogenic variations in the environment.

292 Anthropogenic volatile organic compounds including aroma

293 knowledge about how much mortality is due to anthropogenic vs. natural causes.

294 expanding irrigation has dampened historical anthropogenic warming during hot days, with particularly

295 The impact of the ongoing anthropogenic warming on the Arctic Ocean sea ice is asc

296 ts a major socioeconomic hazard arising from anthropogenic warming, but the response of the largest c

297 lying a substantial part of both natural and anthropogenic water demands(1,2).

298 ntly constrained by barriers, which included anthropogenic water diversions, natural step-pools and c

299 n presence of a trend in observations due to anthropogenic water use.

300 Here we examine long-term exposed anthropogenic wood material (Douglas Fir) collected at t