コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ole of isotype for an influenza A monoclonal antibody therapeutic.
2 of binding mechanisms, and to design future antibody therapeutics.
3 t for design of next-generation vaccines and antibody therapeutics.
4 egy for the rational design of more powerful antibody therapeutics.
5 cturing, helped to launch this modern era of antibody therapeutics.
6 owerful and universal platform for advancing antibody therapeutics.
7 resistance to vaccine-induced antibodies and antibody therapeutics.
8 le, safer, and effective delivery system for antibody therapeutics.
9 ture development of safer and more effective antibody therapeutics.
10 litate development of vaccines and candidate antibody therapeutics.
11 to host cells, and is the intended target of antibody therapeutics.
12 portant for designing safe and selective CNS antibody therapeutics.
13 to the development of recombinant monoclonal antibody therapeutics.
14 ntages inherent to chronic administration of antibody therapeutics.
15 st commonly adopted isotype among monoclonal antibody therapeutics.
16 lls are an emerging class of next-generation antibody therapeutics.
17 information on the higher order structure of antibody therapeutics.
18 in ongoing rational design of EGFR-targeted antibody therapeutics.
19 ze them towards the engineering of candidate antibody therapeutics.
20 olecule inhibitors has lagged behind that of antibody therapeutics.
21 mor-specific antigens that are accessible to antibody therapeutics.
22 the experimental immunogenicity of existing antibody therapeutics.
23 proliferative effects of potential anti-HER3 antibody therapeutics.
24 ties during the discovery and development of antibody therapeutics.
25 uences for efficacy of emerging vaccines and antibody therapeutics.
26 al for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of antibody therapeutics.
29 red, offering the potential of intracellular antibody therapeutics against human immunodeficiency vir
30 ries such as rCIG can be utilized to develop antibody therapeutics against present and future SARS-Co
31 ctivity, gene therapies targeting NFATc1 and antibody therapeutics against RANK pathway, effectively
34 ion procedure applicable to both full-length antibody therapeutics and antibody-antigen complexes.
35 te that our method enables quantification of antibody therapeutics and antigen biomarkers in both cli
36 cape-mutation maps enable rational design of antibody therapeutics and assessment of the antigenic co
37 tigenic targets, compare them to traditional antibody therapeutics and CAR T cells, and review the va
38 ance to public health as options for passive antibody therapeutics and even active prophylactics.
39 odies will accelerate the development of new antibody therapeutics and provide guidance for the ratio
42 he discovery and development of vaccines and antibody therapeutics, and help us gain a deeper underst
44 ped a highly diverse, recombinant polyclonal antibody therapeutic anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin hype
51 ble) region is a vital component of existing antibody therapeutics, as well as many next generation b
52 velopment of a novel, host receptor-targeted antibody therapeutic broadly applicable to the treatment
56 decade ago, the realization that monoclonal antibody therapeutics could be engineered to improve the
57 f a large set of post-phase-I clinical-stage antibody therapeutics (CSTs) and calculate in silico met
58 Our findings redefine the influenza-specific antibody therapeutic design and support Fc-optimized, no
59 related to the effectiveness of vaccines and antibody therapeutics developed against the unmutated wi
61 eterminants could be targeted for vaccine or antibody therapeutic development against multiple alphav
64 ad-spectrum vaccine capable of generating an antibody therapeutic effective against the multiple stra
68 Both endogenous antibodies and a subset of antibody therapeutics engage Fc gamma receptor (FcgammaR
70 luble ligands have commonly been targeted by antibody therapeutics for cancers and other diseases.
71 iding a rationale to test their potential as antibody therapeutics for diverse neurological and other
72 illustrated here by multiple generations of antibody therapeutics for human epidermal growth factor
74 (SARS-CoV-2) possess mutations that prevent antibody therapeutics from maintaining antiviral binding
75 ering methodology for generating fully human antibody therapeutics from murine mAbs produced from sta
76 roperties will differentiate next generation antibody therapeutics from traditional IgG1 scaffolds.
77 particular challenge to targeting EGFR with antibody therapeutics has been resistance, resulting fro
80 tions such as antibody arrays and monoclonal antibody therapeutics have increased the demand for more
81 he risk of developing de novo donor-specific antibodies, therapeutic immunosuppression is the most ob
83 of the many promising future directions with antibody therapeutics, including the application of arti
84 ntary determining region of the FDA approved antibody therapeutic ipilimumab used as a model system.
85 itial criteria for success of any protein or antibody therapeutic is to understand its binding charac
89 ecies, and the mechanism of these monoclonal antibody therapeutics is still not understood in detail.
92 erved in all 48 genomes, deployed monoclonal antibody therapeutics (mAb114 and ZMapp) should be effic
94 cern (VOCs) that reduce the effectiveness of antibody therapeutics necessitates development of next-g
97 major problem in an industrial setting where antibody therapeutics often require high local concentra
98 the exploration of promising glycoforms for antibody therapeutics.Post-translational modifications c
99 the non-clinical safety profile of TCR-like antibody therapeutics prior to first-in-human clinical a
100 critical quality attribute for a monoclonal antibody therapeutic product due to its perceived signif
101 ver, the design and discovery of early-stage antibody therapeutics remain a time and cost-intensive e
102 s (BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2) of two monoclonal antibody therapeutics (S309 [Vir Biotechnology] monother
103 ed glycan profiles on recombinant monoclonal antibody therapeutics significantly affect antibody biol
104 lds offer low-cost alternatives to classical antibody therapeutic strategies and some have shown earl
105 tforms will be applicable to a wide range of antibody therapeutic studies for different species.
108 his review will discuss the pros and cons of antibody therapeutics targeted at bacterial infections.
109 o accelerate the development of vaccines and antibody therapeutics targeting a broad range of viruses
111 t engagement and tumor-residence kinetics of antibody therapeutics targeting programmed death ligand-
112 bloodstream infection; however, vaccines and antibody therapeutics targeting staphylococcal surface m
113 Pharmaceuticals, discuss the development of antibody therapeutics targeting the spike protein of SAR
114 marked synergy of EAI045 with cetuximab, an antibody therapeutic that blocks EGFR dimerization, rend
116 micron and the need for rapid development of antibody therapeutics that maintain potency against emer
117 the wise use of combination-based monoclonal antibody therapeutics to improve outcomes and prevent re
118 ryptococcal meningitis and for the design of antibody therapeutics to treat other infectious diseases
121 n models revealed windows of opportunity for antibody therapeutic treatment that correlated well with
124 l optionality for developing next-generation antibody therapeutics with broader utility and improved
125 s and the worldwide approval of at least 212 antibody therapeutics with tens of millions of patients