戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 se-DNA encounters occur is presented in the "Appendix".
2 ugh rates for some sites have decreased (eg, appendix).
3 h Resources and Services Administration (see Appendix).
4                Changes were recommended (see Appendix).
5 to contact these investigators directly (see APPENDIX).
6 of the key parameters (fully described in an Appendix).
7 that were not reported during the interview (appendix).
8 s were compared using the two sample t-test (appendix).
9 h all degrees of movement for the TAP group (appendix).
10 e sham group was missing parity information (appendix).
11 ) and the specificity was 97.7% (96.9-98.3%; appendix).
12 patient's point of view of the care pathway (appendix).
13 ith metastatic primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix.
14 ppendix and 253 with a fully visualized (FV) appendix.
15 t difference from cases with a PV or even FV appendix.
16 f CT imaging and laparoscopic surgery on the appendix.
17 ave been constructed and are available in an appendix.
18 natures that differentiate carcinoids of the appendix.
19 te-induced isomerization are analyzed in the Appendix.
20 es, and demonstrating a healthy or unhealthy appendix.
21 ssion observed in normal goblet cells of the appendix.
22  out for a general model, are provided in an Appendix.
23 lementation of the algorithm is given in the Appendix.
24 ton exchange experiments is discussed in the Appendix.
25 dicitis (perforated or not) or with a normal appendix.
26  construction of the model is included in an appendix.
27 s are verified by more formal methods in the appendix.
28 patients (20%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix.
29 (HEV) in lymphoid organs, such as tonsil and appendix.
30  derived from a single site, most likely the appendix.
31 ntly correlated with the inflammation of the appendix.
32 ion is restricted to lymph nodes, thymus and appendix.
33 ss data reduction is freely available in the Appendix.
34 lobase transcript on lymph node, thymus, and Appendix.
35 th at least a 3-cm length of normal proximal appendix.
36 ro-/pre-B cells were present in young rabbit appendix.
37 ts with appendicitis and those with a normal appendix.
38 everal earlier cohorts) are described in the appendix.
39 uring B lymphocyte development in the rabbit appendix.
40 rationale for the peptides is included in an appendix.
41 cal Characterisation Group are listed in the appendix.
42 has an overlap between a normal and inflamed appendix.
43 bitory factor(+) cells in inflammatory human appendix.
44 can be insufficient for demonstration of the appendix.
45 lear study identifying the microbiome of the appendix.
46 al concomitant intussusceptions and inflamed appendix.
47 y assessment methodology are reported in the appendix.
48 n lymphoreticular tissues such as spleen and appendix.
49 g salpingo-oophorectomy is highly likely the appendix.
50  a primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix.
51 ng early retrieval are also described in the Appendix.
52 l's metacommunity dynamics is deferred to an appendix.
53                                          Web Appendixes 1 and 2, which are posted on the Journal's We
54 d by using a six-point scale: 0 meant normal appendix; 1, possibly abnormal appendix (6-mm diameter w
55 9.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 99.99%); that with a PV appendix, 100% (95% CI: 97.8%, 100%); and that with a FV
56 ey are most common in small intestine (25%), appendix (12%), and rectum (14%).
57 ite (44.7%), followed by the rectum (19.6%), appendix (16.7%), colon (10.6%), and stomach (7.2%).
58 ons addressed by the panel are summarized in Appendix 3.)
59 istribution of tumors was ileojejunum (37%), appendix (31 %), colon (13%), rectum (12%), stomach (4%)
60  meant normal appendix; 1, possibly abnormal appendix (6-mm diameter without other abnormality); 2, a
61 Canadian patients had higher rates of normal appendix (6.3% vs 4.3%; P < .001) and perforated appendi
62  patients (7%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix; 7 patients did not have CT, 5 patients had sur
63 re stomach (75.1%), small intestine (76.1%), appendix (76.3%), and rectum (87.5%).
64 ancreas (91%), lung (88%), gastric (80%) and appendix (79%).
65 0% (95% CI: 97.8%, 100%); and that with a FV appendix, 99.6% (95% CI: 97.8%, 99.99%).
66 5% CI: 95.5%, 99.8%); that with a visualized appendix, 99.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 99.99%); that with a PV
67 nd "intracranial pressure." See Supplemental Appendix A for complete list of search terms.
68  originally incorrectly read 'As reported in Appendix A of Cannon et al.(26) the additive version of
69 s Adequacy Clinical Practice Guideline 1 and Appendix A offered the first formal in-depth discussion
70                                              Appendix A summarizes the recommendations concerning the
71                                       In the Appendix, a crude model of ionized polymer chains that f
72 ystem (where a score of 1 indicated a normal appendix; a score of 2, an incompletely visualized norma
73 core of 2, an incompletely visualized normal appendix; a score of 3, a nonvisualized appendix; a scor
74 rmal appendix; a score of 3, a nonvisualized appendix; a score of 4, equivocal; a score of 5a, nonper
75 lusions 42 Acknowledgements 42 References 42 Appendix A1 48 SUMMARY: Plant carbon metabolism is impac
76 tomy and 1 case diagnosed by rereview of the appendix after the development of postoperative complica
77                Visualization of the proximal appendix alone is insufficient to exclude distal appendi
78 nality disorder was introduced into DSM-IV's appendix amid controversy.
79 68 subjects with a partially visualized (PV) appendix and 253 with a fully visualized (FV) appendix.
80 uorescein concentration) are described in an Appendix and are reported in arbitrary units.
81                                         vCJD appendix and blood (Buffy coat fraction) were negative f
82 t MR imaging, 143 had MR images in which the appendix and cecum were identifiable in the sagittal pla
83 dary tubercles in the lymphoid tissue of the appendix and ileocecal junction.
84    The technique of ligation/division of the appendix and mesoappendix was left to the surgeon's disc
85 onclusion that mucinous tumors involving the appendix and ovaries in women with PMP are clonal and de
86                         Dilated thick-walled appendix and periappendiceal inflammation were detected
87                             The young rabbit appendix and the chicken bursa of Fabricius are primary
88 ften have mucinous tumors involving both the appendix and the ovaries.
89 n peripheral lymphoid organs such as spleen, appendix, and lymph nodes, but not in bone marrow.
90 nlarged mesenteric lymph nodes with a normal appendix, and there may be associated ileitis or ileocol
91 ary gland, small intestine, large intestine, appendix, and tonsils.
92 de, spleen, small intestine, stomach, colon, appendix, and trachea.
93  fastest-growing incidence rates were in the appendix (APC, 15.61%; 95% CI, 9.21%-22.38%; P < .001),
94 may reflect the function of the young rabbit appendix as a site of both B cell development and divers
95 most common gastrointestinal site is not the appendix (as is often quoted), but the small intestine,
96 e neuroendocrine neoplasms, primarily of the appendix, associated with carcinoid syndrome in 10% of p
97 s, and few mammals other than humans have an appendix at all.
98                  One (8%) of 13 had a normal appendix at eventual surgery.
99 h right lower quadrant pain, a nonvisualized appendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute app
100  commonly found obstructing the lumen of the appendix at the time of appendectomy.
101                             Clonally related appendix B cells developed different amino acid sequence
102 during clonal expansion, we collected single appendix B cells from 3- to 9-wk-old rabbits and sequenc
103         A few small sets of clonally related appendix B cells were found at 3-5 wk; by 5.5 wk, some l
104 atic diversification of VDJ-C micro genes in appendix B cells.
105 %-5% of premenopausal women, was included in Appendix B of DSMIV, "Criterion Sets and Axes Provided f
106           Cluster A, B, and C PDs and DSM-IV Appendix B PDs during adolescence were all associated wi
107 ant to be aware of atypical locations of the appendix because appendicitis in an unusual area may mim
108 ial-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the appendix between December 2013 and November 2014 and Dec
109  thymus, T cell zones in the spleen, and the appendix, but in neither lymph nodes nor Peyer patches.
110 this disease may result from invasion of the appendix by specific pathogens.
111 spectively assessed the visualization of the appendix by using a 5-point scale.
112 d relative infrequency with which the normal appendix can be visualized in this population.
113         We presented five atypically-located appendix cases, including four with acute appendicitis t
114 ells were observed in the diseased colon and appendix (cecal patch) of TCRalpha(-/-) mice, but not ge
115 escending colon, sigmoid colon, or rectum vs appendix, cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, or tr
116 escending colon, sigmoid colon, or rectum vs appendix, cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, or tr
117  fragments selectively bind CD5 molecules in appendix cell lysates.
118 AID and isolation of AID protein from rabbit appendix-cell nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts.
119                                              Appendix cells from 6- to 9-wk-old rabbits were stained
120                                 We separated appendix cells from a 6-wk-old Alicia rabbit by FACS bas
121 he stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, appendix, colon and rectum.
122           Content note: this Article and its appendix contain graphic images of mpox lesions affectin
123                               A supplemental Appendix contains a Medline and ProQuest literature sear
124                                          The appendix contains an analysis of several binding curves
125    Among the patients without AA, the normal appendix could be visualized on US images in less than 2
126        In one patient with appendicitis, the appendix could not be visualized, but inflammation was p
127                                              Appendix CT examination can help diagnose or exclude app
128 One hundred patients prospectively underwent appendix CT examination, with use of oral and colon cont
129  the association of lymphoid tissue with the appendix, (d) the potential for biofilms to protect and
130 we found that levels of Rad51 were higher in appendix-derived B lymphocytes of 6-wk-old rabbits, a ti
131  explainers, length of stay, means vermiform appendix detected on ultrasonography, white blood cells,
132          Patients with adenocarcinoma of the appendix diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 were identified
133 L, no radiological signs of perforation, and appendix diameter of 10 mm or smaller.
134 d on ultrasonography, white blood cells, and appendix diameter were the most crucial markers in detec
135 eter without other abnormality); 2, abnormal appendix (diameter > or = 6 mm with wall enhancement) wi
136 rast, equations presented in an accompanying appendix do not lessen a paper's impact.
137    In addition, animal apical anatomy (in SI Appendix) doesn't always fit the classic view.
138 ationale for recommendations can be found in Appendix E1 (online).
139 onfidence in visualization of any portion of appendix, entire appendix, wall thickening, distention,
140 oliferation in the lymphoid follicles of the appendix estimated by in vivo incorporation of 5-bromo-2
141                       B cells at the base of appendix follicles begin proliferating and diversifying
142      Our results suggest that after entering appendix follicles, B cells home sequentially to the fol
143 ately 5 d after B cells first begin entering appendix follicles.
144 om injection to LeuTech visualization in the appendix for cases positive for appendicitis was 9 min.
145 ients prospectively evaluated with CT of the appendix for clinically suspected appendicitis.
146 ndation, and The Parkinson's Foundation (see appendix for full list of funding sources).
147 The most unusual locations of the tip of the appendix found in healthy subjects included: left inferi
148 he most atypical locations of the tip of the appendix found on CT (computed tomography) scans and thu
149  of bacteria from the genus Fusobacterium in appendixes from patients with AA.
150 ct viral RNA in the wall of small intestine, appendix, gallbladder, bile, liver, and urine.
151 tion during expansion of cells in splenic or appendix germinal centers used hydraulic micromanipulati
152                               A supplemental appendix gives additional details not in the main text.
153 of appendicolith, mass effect, and a dilated appendix greater than 13 mm are associated with higher r
154  the abdomen and pelvis revealed a distended appendix (&gt; 1.3 cm) and a fistula between the appendix,
155 s of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (&gt; 6 mm) and periappendiceal inflammation.
156                     An enlarged fluid-filled appendix (&gt;7 mm in diameter) was considered an abnormal
157 ia were introduced into rabbits in which the appendix had been rendered germfree by microsurgery (we
158  these tumors, most often originating in the appendix, harbor mutations in the GNAS oncogene.
159               We found that the normal human appendix harbors populations of Fusobacteria that are ge
160                    The function of the human appendix has long been a matter of debate, with the stru
161  abdominopelvic CT images with nonvisualized appendix have a high negative predictive value, without
162 il and peripheral lymph node, is absent from appendix HEVs or HEVs in some samples of chronically inf
163 olumes when sourced from the more-threatened Appendix I populations.
164 rvature and Gaussian curvature, explained in Appendix I), should act best when the assembling shell i
165                                       In the Appendix, I use previous derivations for natural direct
166 d in the right lower quadrant, with a normal appendix identified.
167 pecimen as Carcharhinus falciformis, a CITES Appendix II species.
168 patients were assigned a diagnosis of normal appendix in 632 (13%) cases, acute appendicitis in 3286
169  B cell clones supports the proposed role of appendix in generating the preimmune repertoire.
170 ons enhanced confidence in identification of appendix in mean of 57 patients.
171 ecal tilt angle is useful for localizing the appendix in pregnant patients at MR imaging and helps pr
172 ions to experimental data are explored in SI Appendix In the presence of experimental-like shot noise
173 a DALM (mucinous cystadenoma) arising in the appendix in the setting of UC.
174 rectly identify pelvic abscesses and healthy appendix in two patients.
175                               At no stage of appendix inflammation did LA significantly increase intr
176 verall 5-year survival for carcinoids of the appendix is 98%, gastric (types I/II) is 81%, rectum is
177            The human vermiform ("worm-like") appendix is a 5-10cm long and 0.5-1cm wide pouch that ex
178                             The young rabbit appendix is a dynamic site for primary B cell repertoire
179 icitis, an infection and inflammation of the appendix is a prevalent condition in children that requi
180              The most common location of the appendix is descending intraperitoneal.
181                                           An Appendix is included showing that the experimental data
182 th acute abdominal pain and in whom a normal appendix is not visualized at US.
183                                          The appendix is thought to have some immune function based o
184                The architecture of the human appendix is unique among mammals, and few mammals other
185 f the human bowel, we propose that the human appendix is well suited as a "safe house" for commensal
186                                       In the Appendix, it is shown that flow under a stationary lipid
187 sual condition defined by the presence of an appendix located in the inguinal hernia sac.
188 odenum, the rectum or appendages, and a long appendix located in the scrotum as the content of a hern
189 s correlated with the following CT findings: appendix location, appendicolith, cecal wall thickening
190 al wall thickening involving the base of the appendix, lymphadenopathy, and appendiceal diameter.
191 protein in the four subpopulations of rabbit appendix lymphocytes, distinguished by surface CD43 and
192 inflammation, we examined the changes in the appendix lymphoid follicle (ALF) and Peyer's patches (PP
193                                          The appendix masculina, a major sexual morphological indicat
194  after successful non-operative treatment of appendix mass (active observation group) and incidence o
195 ible children had acute appendicitis with an appendix mass and were successfully treated without appe
196 ter successful non-operative treatment of an appendix mass in children.
197 dicitis or a clinical diagnosis of recurrent appendix mass within 1 year of enrolment after successfu
198 ter successful non-operative treatment of an appendix mass.
199                               The tip of the appendix may be located in various areas of the abdomina
200                                          The appendix may play an active physiologic role as a reserv
201 h node (LN) resection after appendectomy for appendix neuroendocrine tumor (A-NET) remain controversi
202 ion about this archive may be included as an appendix of a report generated by Sweave or knitR.
203                              A comprehensive appendix of IL biodegradation data published since 2010
204 d with the ALP abnormalities observed in the appendix of individuals with PD specifically involving l
205 n microscopy of the cells of the thermogenic appendix of Sauromatum guttatum has revealed a fusion ev
206  data are included in a summary table in the appendix of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery.
207 ansion of a2 allotype-bearing B cells in the appendix of young mutant ali/ali rabbits.
208                                          The appendix of young rabbits is a site of primary heavy cha
209 , leaving a final study group (nonvisualized appendix) of 156 patients (mean age, 9.6 years; boys, 7.
210  10.2 years) and a control group (visualized appendix) of 421 patients (mean age, 11.0 years; boys, 9
211     However, the effect of routine CT of the appendix on the treatment of such patients and the use o
212 re assigned to the H01-Emergency excision of appendix OPCS-4 3-digit code procedure between 1996 and
213 lysis was stratified by infectious source as appendix or biliary tract (group A) versus other (group
214     Perforation was defined as a hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen.
215 ers or one of four disorders included in the appendix or in DSM-III-R) or a healthy, high-functioning
216 Most abscesses were due to either perforated appendix or recent appendectomy.
217 nent catheterizable channel, either with the appendix or reconfigured intestinal segments.
218  0.01), fecalith (P = 0.01), dilation of the appendix (P < 0.001), and perforation (P < 0.001).
219 a is predominantly expressed in lymph nodes, appendix, PBL, fetal liver, fetal lung and several cell
220 ood, essentially all VDJ genes of cells from appendix, peripheral blood, and bone marrow were diversi
221  reports were reviewed for visibility of the appendix, presence of appendicitis and appendiceal perfo
222 gnant melanoma with metastatic spread to the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis has rarely bee
223         We describe cases of melanoma of the appendix presenting with appendicitis and review our ins
224 ures coded to the "H01-Emergency Excision of Appendix" procedure code in the Hospital Episode Statist
225                            Developing rabbit appendix provides a particularly good site for studying
226                             In addition, the appendix provides an overview of asthma outcome measures
227 rgery (we refer to these rabbits as germfree-appendix rabbits).
228 esponse mutants of B. subtilis into germfree-appendix rabbits.
229         The presence of RAG gene products in appendix raised the possibility that pro-/pre-B cells we
230                     Perforation rate, normal appendix rate, and length of hospital stay.
231 ere no differences in perforation and normal appendix rates between those operations performed in tea
232 en are derived from mucinous adenomas of the appendix rather than from primary ovarian tumors.
233 c diversification, we surgically removed the appendix, sacculus rotundus, and Peyer's patches from ne
234                            The proportion of appendixes seen at MR imaging and at CT also was similar
235               Because mucinous tumors of the appendix similarly express MUC2, the MUC2 expression pro
236                                        In an Appendix, some objections to the conventional scheme for
237 intra-abdominal peritoneal carcinoma from an appendix source.
238   Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded preserved appendix specimens were reexamined by periodic acid-Schi
239 wing antagonism of NaV 1.7 in resected human appendix stimulated by noxious distending pressures.
240 dix surrounded by fat stranding; 4, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding and fluid; and 5, i
241  without adjacent fat stranding; 3, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding; 4, abnormal append
242 hough vCJD cases are now rare, evidence from appendix surveys suggests that a small proportion of the
243                                              Appendix swabs were collected from children undergoing a
244                           It is shown in the Appendix that both the excluded volume and the direct in
245 e subjected to an analysis, described in the Appendix, that allows calculation of the fractional satu
246 icipants who had appendicectomy for a normal appendix, the HRs were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83-1.15) for muco
247                                       In the appendix, the size and number of proliferating B cell fo
248 cleus of neutrophils recruited into inflamed appendix tissue, whereas leukotriene A(4) hydrolase rema
249 ct only with occasional endothelial cells in appendix tissues.
250                                           An Appendix to accompany this article is available at Bioin
251 tochastic model of ep-PCR is developed in an appendix to demonstrate the applicability of the algorit
252  Cary, North Carolina) is given in an online appendix to facilitate use of the approach in routine ep
253  appendicitis, from mild inflammation of the appendix to ruptured appendicitis with diffuse peritonit
254 ALT from newborn Alicia pups and ligated the appendix to sequester it from intestinal microflora.
255                                      The PSP Appendix Trial is a prospective, multi-center, cohort st
256                      METHODS/DESIGN: The PSP Appendix Trial is a prospective, multi-center, cohort st
257 in tip (67%), body (24%) or base (9%) of the appendix; tumor size was < 1 cm (62%), 1 to 2 cm (30%),
258 e, weight, sex, body mass index, and removed appendix type.
259       Patients believed to have a perforated appendix underwent interval appendectomy 4-6 weeks after
260 ppendix (> 1.3 cm) and a fistula between the appendix, urinary bladder, right scrotum, and right groi
261                                          The Appendix uses PNP2 theory to predict ionic currents for
262 used on the questions of the site of origin (appendix versus ovary), mechanisms of peritoneal spread
263 alization of any portion of appendix, entire appendix, wall thickening, distention, inflammation, flu
264 n in pediatric patients with a nonvisualized appendix was 98.7% (95% CI: 95.5%, 99.8%); that with a v
265                                   The normal appendix was always identified.
266                                 The proximal appendix was collapsed (n = 6) or was filled with contra
267                                          The appendix was considered normal at MR imaging if its diam
268                                    A healthy appendix was depicted in 17 (89.5%) of 19 patients witho
269                                              Appendix was detected in 20 (86.9%) of 23 patients.
270                                          The appendix was evaluated on CT scans for morphology, locat
271 dergoing each year appendectomy in which the appendix was healthy were evaluated.
272                                     A normal appendix was identified by ultrasonography in 2 (2.4%) o
273                                          The appendix was larger in patients with perforated appendic
274 oire diversification in rabbits in which the appendix was ligated shortly after birth to prevent micr
275  acute appendicitis, nonvisualization of the appendix was negative for appendicitis in 98% (95% CI: 7
276 th focused CT in two patients whose inflamed appendix was not included in the imaging of the right lo
277 hree patients with inconclusive results, the appendix was not seen in two patients and was borderline
278 performed retrospectively for patients whose appendix was not visualized to determine whether appendi
279                  In 59 patients (14.8%), the appendix was not visualized.
280                         Conversely, when the appendix was seen at multidetector CT and was abnormal,
281                           Perforation of the appendix was the only independent risk factor for the de
282                             Pathology of the appendix was verified manually.
283                                          The appendix was visualized in 349 of 402 patients (86.8%; 9
284         The computer model, described in the Appendix, was used to determine the effect of the mean l
285                                        In an Appendix, we show that an epidemic percolation network c
286                    Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix were found in 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoi
287    Visualization rates for portion or all of appendix were higher for combined transverse and coronal
288  diversification patterns in the clones from appendix were strikingly different from those found prev
289 e whether RAG2 protein was present in rabbit appendix, where cells that recently underwent gene conve
290 tions improve confidence in visualization of appendix (whether diseased or normal) and in diagnosis o
291   Some of this diversification occurs in the appendix, which is a gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GAL
292 organs, particularly lymph node, spleen, and appendix, while murine 6Ckine has a broader tissue distr
293                                           An appendix with a diameter of 6-7 mm was considered an inc
294                                  Although an appendix with diameter less than 6 mm may be considered
295                 Dilatation of a thick-walled appendix with increased enhancement and adjacent strandi
296                                     A normal appendix with no other cause for pain was seen in 182 pa
297 1, definitely absent; score 2, nonvisualized appendix with no secondary signs of inflammation; score
298 her sensitivities for detecting the inflamed appendix with nonfocused enhanced CT.
299 practice, is similarly reviewed in an online appendix, with proposals for future multiparametric dire
300 maging and helps predict the location of the appendix within the right upper quadrant of the abdomen

 
Page Top