ライフサイエンスコーパス: appointment

1 ce of winning pound1000 if they attend their appointment).

2 t to follow-up (LTFU, >90 days late for last appointment).

3 nd within 96 hours in 22.6% (n = 223) of the appointment.

4 erative month 1 and at the last noted clinic appointment.

5 were granted to the author with an academic appointment.

6 2015, who did not attend their first offered appointment.

7 at the respective sites at a 6-month recall appointment.

8 event of non-attendance at the first offered appointment.

9 ly associated with attendance at a follow-up appointment.

10 oot planing of the tooth prior to a surgical appointment.

11 ome will be whether or not they attend their appointment.

12 3 (7.9%) are awaiting an upcoming scheduled appointment.

13 gimen of systemic antibiotics at the initial appointment.

14 complaints about your vision?" before their appointment.

15 for failing to attend an initial HIV clinic appointment.

16 ade 2 or 3 days before a scheduled follow-up appointment.

17 nic and 136/153 (88.9%) completed at least 1 appointment.

18 n the control group attended their scheduled appointment.

19 ss any electronic information also booked an appointment.

20 view shortly after their first KT evaluation appointment.

21 mplaints prior to their first allergy clinic appointment.

22 view shortly after their first KT evaluation appointment.

23 amination, 935 (52.9%) attended their clinic appointment.

24 tients with more than one prior primary care appointment.

25 e visits to women who missed an ANC or PMTCT appointment.

26 eographical location) on the risk of missing appointments.

27 st likely to have patients who serially miss appointments.

28 o the likelihood of missing general practice appointments.

29 ) significantly more likely to miss multiple appointments.

30 ite visits and, ultimately, more new patient appointments.

31 period timed in accordance with dermatologic appointments.

32 ples were taken at initial and re-evaluation appointments.

33 compromised in 48/105 (46%) of the recorded appointments.

34 d opening and served both urgent and routine appointments.

35 increase attendance at subsequent follow-up appointments.

36 ne, 1 month, and 6 months after dermatologic appointments.

37 ctivities (28%) to provide transportation to appointments.

38 d enrollees seeking new-patient primary care appointments.

39 ent schedules rewarded on-time attendance at appointments.

40 r the patient to schedule additional imaging appointments.

41 ent at baseline and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month appointments.

42 cidence of acute rejection and missed clinic appointments.

43 charged, 29 referred, and 141 offered review appointments.

44 ved referrals accounted for 50% (n = 493) of appointments.

45 als longer than 6 months or 1 year between 2 appointments.

46 mary care practitioner offering prescheduled appointments.

47 rdination that includes outpatient follow-up appointments.

48 titutions than faculty with less prestigious appointments.

49 more intensive reminders to help donors keep appointments.

50 after completion of the first 4 group clinic appointments (2 months post randomization).

51 g a voucher for pound10 if they attend their appointment) 3.

52 nation of copay (46%), and transportation to appointment (39%).

53 r proportion attending a scheduled follow-up appointment (45 of 153 [29.4%] vs 38 of 201 [18.9%]; adj

54 up arranged (52%), of whom 97 attended their appointment (61%).

55 by reminder message (73%), transportation to appointment (63%), and elimination of copayment (59%).

56 pants were enrolled in the study and, in one appointment; a dentist performed the self-reported quest

57 ns conveyed equipoise during RCT recruitment appointments across six RCTs, with a view to (i) identif

58 ial determinants of health, including missed appointments, active substance abuse, homelessness, and

59 ates eight weeks prior to enrollment, median appointment adherence after using the system increased b

60 A cross-over study design evaluated appointment adherence between intervention and control g

61 lysis demonstrates a 1:36 savings ratio from appointment adherence.

62 g mental health conditions may influence HIV appointment adherence.

63 ntions related to time (weekend appointment, appointment after 5 pm) and telemedicine.

64 sults indicate that compliance with clinical appointments among patients with PDR is a substantial cl

65 The mean (range) wait time for appointments among the remaining listings was 45.5 (1-41

66 s (24.6 %) attended the recommended referral appointment and 153 (75.4 %) did not.

67 ed men, 100,444 (44%) attended their initial appointment and 82,429 (82%) of attenders had a PSA test

68 on was independently associated with faculty appointment and K/RPG award receipt.

69 identified independent predictors of faculty appointment and K/RPG award, reporting adjusted odds rat

70 each of full-time academic-medicine faculty appointment and mentored-K and/or Research Project Grant

71 d, the physician ensured the patient made an appointment and offered follow-up.

72 r pack failed to return for their subsequent appointment and therefore defaulted prior to receiving a

73 even percent of patients failed to attend an appointment and were considered "no-show".

74 up intervention consisted of 4 weekly clinic appointments and 1 booster clinic at month 6, where mult

75 esigned to take place during routine service appointments and conducted in a community-based pain man

76 tive in reducing the frequency of outpatient appointments and emergency/critical care admissions.

77 umber of missed appointments from individual appointments and investigated the risk of missing a gene

78 ess to hemodialysis care may decrease missed appointments and reduce patient morbidity.

79 the management of patients who miss multiple appointments and the effectiveness of existing strategie

80 investigated factors associated with missed appointments and whether such nonadherence poses signifi

81 of patients attending a previously scheduled appointment) and efficiency (attendance/[measures of sta

82 (appointment near home, transportation, home appointment) and reminder for visit compared with low-ra

83 baseline, 2 weeks after the initial therapy appointment, and 8 weeks after the completion of treatme

84 FFDM was performed at the screening appointment, and DBT images were acquired when participa

85 (95% CI, 21.9%-30.1%) by providing expedited appointments, and 19.8% (95% CI, 16.1%-23.5%) by providi

86 nvitation, provision of results or follow-up appointments, and patient navigators), 5 provider-level

87 tient education, arranging timely outpatient appointments, and providing telephone follow-up) have su

88 lity of information received during clinical appointments, and the potential benefits of communicatio

89 ood caries, one study on adherence to dental appointments, and two studies on abstinence of illicit d

90 t keeping at least 75% of scheduled HIV care appointments, and; 2) for those with VS at Index, having

91 are those who have been invited to screening appointments annually, but who have not attended, or tel

92 ts were more likely to have received faculty appointments (AOR 1.790; 95% CI 1.573-2.037) and federal

93 nking interventions related to time (weekend appointment, appointment after 5 pm) and telemedicine.

94 People who miss multiple appointments are an under-researched group who might hav

95 when the costs of medications and healthcare appointments are at odds with basic food and housing nee

96 Frequency and duration of appointments are primary drivers of indirect costs; the

97 His research talent at du Pont earned him an appointment as a Research Associate allowing him to purs

98 Subsequent appointment as chairman of the newly established Institu

99 % of those who did not attend the follow-up appointment as the reason for non-attendance.

100 9 or 10) or DSM-IV code, or inferred from an appointment at a specialist eating disorder clinic.

101 ease who were scheduled for an in-person eye appointment at the Atlanta VA.

102 hort study while attending routine antenatal appointments at one of two peri-urban community-based cl

103 ears, my work as a Berkeley professor led to appointments at the Western Human Nutrition Research Cen

104 choices between hypothetical painful dental appointments at time points of up to approximately eight

105 Among physicians with faculty appointments at US medical schools, there were sex diffe

106 fectious diseases (ID) faculty with academic appointments at US medical schools.

107 n as well as what motivated HIV primary care appointment attendance in the absence of ART.

108 The pooled effect on appointment attendance using text message (short message

109 asured as the proportion of scheduled clinic appointments attended (i.e., visit adherence) or the pro

110 d, and 21 (55.3%) individuals with confirmed appointments attended their initial visit with a liver s

111 l written consent to be interviewed and have appointments audio-recorded.

112 t's sex, age, years since residency, faculty appointment, authored publications, National Institutes

113 tatus) and practice-level factors (including appointment availability and geographical location) on t

114 Appointment availability and wait time.RESULTS Among 475

115 ted in the ACA, was associated with improved appointment availability for Medicaid enrollees among pa

116 ries of participating dermatologists,and the appointment availability of listed physicians.DESIGN, SE

117 age point; P=0.002), (4) arranging follow-up appointments before discharge (0.19 percentage point; P=

118 unt Sinai Health System for their postpartum appointment between January 2, 2020 and June 30, 2020, c

119 Patients with physician appointments between January 26 and July 24, 2012, were

120 dependence, CCM compared with a primary care appointment but no CCM did not increase self-reported ab

121 with anesthesia is increasing and no-show to appointments carries significant patient health and fina

122 A dental appointment commonly prompts fear of a painful experienc

123 ipating patients made 19% fewer face-to-face appointments, compared with 11% fewer in patients with h

124 e number to call to book their new screening appointment (control) in the event of non-attendance at

125 evant plan, and asked for the next available appointment date.

126 s: loss to follow-up (>12 months with no HIV appointment), death, administrative censoring (2011-2014

127 e MRI unit, concluding that delayed terms of appointments, despite numerous facilities being availabl

128 These sex differences in promotions and appointments did not diminish over time and were not sma

129 03; P < 0.0001) and "Ease of scheduling your appointment" (Diff[1-2]=0.99; P < 0.0001) best correlate

130 care being delayed because of wait times for appointments (difference-in-differences estimate, 2.6 pe

131 A 72-year-old male came for his first appointment due to an asymmetric worsening of visual acu

132 were randomized to receive a CR orientation appointment either within 10 days (early) or at 35 days

133 o interval recommendations for follow-up eye appointments, even though cost and accessibility were mi

134 es were invited to attend a specialist nurse appointment for a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)

135 ble,accepted the listed plan, and offered an appointment for our fictitious patient.

136 We confirmed initial follow-up appointments for 38 (70.4%) RNA-positive individuals suc

137 obile-phone-based reminders of scheduled HIV appointments for carers of paediatric patients in low-re

138 come was the number of unscheduled physician appointments for concerning lesions.

139 Early appointments for CR significantly improve attendance at

140 le phone call increase attendance at medical appointments for HIV care in a population of children in

141 aid to assess whether willingness to provide appointments for new Medicaid enrollees was related to t

142 he attending radiologist to set up follow-up appointments for patients who underwent procedures with

143 9%) vs 17,354 men (28.6%) had full-professor appointments, for an absolute difference of -16.7% (95%

144 calculated the per-patient number of missed appointments from individual appointments and investigat

145 onal (teaching, board certification, faculty appointment, general cardiology practice, and hospital e

146 applicable]) days for the early and standard appointment groups, respectively (P<0.001).

147 versus 59% (44/74) in the early and standard appointment groups, respectively, which demonstrates a s

148 iates, survivors given follow-up psychiatric appointments had significantly lower likelihood of subse

149 Additionally, cancer follow-up or imaging appointments have been delayed in many clinics around th

150 health services outcomes (attending medical appointments, having a medical home, and avoidance of un

151 ls with at least 1 attended scheduled clinic appointment (i.e., visit constancy).

152 test group than in the control group at the appointment immediately before SRP.

153 ients booked for their second virtual clinic appointment in a tertiary eye care referral center betwe

154 patients lost Snellen' visual acuity before appointment in group B compared to 12 in group A.

155 aught in the Bonn Anatomy Department, had an appointment in the University Clinic, and ran a small pr

156 ed the availability of and waiting times for appointments in 10 states during two periods: from Novem

157 Among 3810 cardiologists with faculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% of all US cardiologists), 63

158 of US physicians with medical school faculty appointments in 2014 (91,073 physicians; 9.1% of all US

159 US cardiologists with medical school faculty appointments in 2014 by using the American Association o

160 adiologists with U.S. medical school faculty appointments in 2014, men and women were similarly likel

161 of US physicians with medical school faculty appointments in 2014.

162 rimester of pregnancy, attended four or more appointments in antenatal care, and received four compon

163 tion adherence became erratic, and he missed appointments in clinic.

164 reasing attendance at diabetic eye screening appointments in London.

165 In total, 661 patients attended their appointments in person and were reviewed by trained staf

166 04 461 (19.0%) patients missed more than two appointments in the 3 year study period.

167 women, but were somewhat more likely to miss appointments in the adjusted model (1.05, 1.04-1.06).

168 to the recommended interval of follow-up eye appointments in the facility's ophthalmology service as

169 The availability of primary care appointments in the Medicaid group increased by 7.7 perc

170 Appointments in which these clinicians presented the RCT

171 Telephone appointments included a structured protocol enabling med

172 Preventive goals are agreed, and a review appointment is made with child's general dental practiti

173 recovery due to impaired self-management and appointment-keeping, clinicians may consider serious men

174 ing patient-specialist visits and minimizing appointment lead time.

175 Missed scheduled HIV appointments lead to increased mortality, resistance to

176 ed to develop a scheduling template based on appointment length (short, medium, or long).

177 A scheduling template using predicted appointment length improves clinic efficiency and may ge

178 charge summary, a family physician follow-up appointment less than 1 week after discharge, and, for h

179 he ED visit (P < .001), additional follow-up appointments (<.001), no prior history of ophthalmology

180 be adherent at 6 weeks if they had follow-up appointments made before discharge and had a provider ex

181 After controlling for the number of appointments made, patterns of non-attendance could be d

182 negative binomial model offset by number of appointments made.

183 LUTS patients attending their first clinical appointment (mean age, 48.7 years; standard deviation [S

184 RT) naive, had at least 1 viral load and HIV appointment measure after ART initiation, and a depressi

185 ng allergists with US medical school faculty appointments, men and women were similarly likely to be

186 al-level patterns of missed general practice appointments might thus provide a risk marker for vulner

187 both patient and practice factors to predict appointments missed gave a higher pseudo R(2) value (0.6

188 waited to start treatment and percentage of appointments missed were negatively associated with outc

189 r called about a new patient, 31.7% of these appointments (n = 131) led to surgery versus 10% (n = 14

190 ed about an existing patient, 37.5% of these appointments (n = 27) led to surgery versus 12.8% (n = 4

191 re similarly ranked: reminder message (48%), appointment near home (46%), elimination of copay (46%),

192 h-ranking interventions related to location (appointment near home, transportation, home appointment)

193 low-income patients hospitalized with HF, an appointment near the patient's home and a reminder messa

194 An appointment near the patient's home was the most desired

195 LMM) to estimate the risk and odds ratios of appointment non-attendance or unsuppressed viral load at

196 ons, and 4% for tobacco use, with 31% clinic appointment nonadherence in the past year.

197 ween the second and sixth years of follow-up appointments, none of the subjects received treatment un

198 At the second- and third-year follow-up appointments, none of the volunteers received treatment

199 Our success was probably due to (1) appointment of staff to oversee implementation, (2) enga

200 by SRP with (test) and without (control) two appointments of professional tooth cleaning but with mot

201 Rates of new appointments offered, whether buprenorphine prescription

202 n uptake of hospital-based Lung Health Check appointments offering LDCT screening.Methods: In a two-a

203 The caller sought an appointment on behalf of his fictitious father who had s

204 ot associated with attendance at a follow-up appointment on multivariate analysis.

205 cation on the Internet, scheduling a medical appointment on the Internet, communicating with healthca

206 oriented eHealth practices (e.g., scheduling appointments on the Internet, communicating with provide

207 he effects of multidisciplinary group clinic appointments on the primary outcome of time to first hea

208 me of the observed disparity by limiting new appointment opportunities.

209 s find opportunities for discussion at later appointments or if results become relevant as medical ne

210 buprenorphine prescribers did not offer new appointments or rapid buprenorphine access to callers re

211 ther medical comorbidities leading to missed appointments or scheduling errors.

212 .007); missing more than 10% of non-eye care appointments (OR, 1.61; P = .038); and receiving only PR

213 e followed for up to 2 yrs at regular recall appointments, or as dictated by tooth symptoms.

214 or home care as needed, and recommendations, appointments, or both for follow-up care with physicians

215 ic floor muscle training (five physiotherapy appointments over 16 weeks, and annual review) plus Pila

216 Men missed fewer appointments overall than women, but were somewhat more

217 Significantly more patients kept first appointment (p = 0.0002) in group B.

218 s (<.001), no prior history of ophthalmology appointments (P = .045), a visual acuity of 20/40 or bet

219 Failure was associated with missed appointments (P = .05) and missed doses (P < .01).

220 aseline, defined as the average IOP of the 2 appointments prior to the SLT procedure, was 18.7 mm Hg.

221 tly, as clinics begin to re-open for routine appointments, protocols have been put in place to reduce

222 cine by comparing the number of face-to-face appointments provided in 2016 to 2019 with the number pr

223 ribute to non-attendance of general practice appointments raise important questions for both the mana

224 ry care clinicians may eliminate unnecessary appointments, reduce wait time for treatment, lower cost

225 ds, waiting times to a scheduled new-patient appointment remained stable over time in the two study g

226 eturning for care visit, interim visit call, appointment reminder calls, missed visit call); EC + ski

227 laboratory test timing, flexible scheduling, appointment reminder methods, and stigma support service

228 laboratory test timing, flexible scheduling, appointment reminder methods, and stigma support service

229 Availability of text appointment reminders (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24) and

230 Availability of text appointment reminders (RR:1.13; 95% CI:1.03-1.24) and st

231 Availability of text appointment reminders and stigma support services was as

232 Availability of text appointment reminders and stigma support services was as

233 reatment-eligible participants, mobile phone appointment reminders, health educational packages, and

234 rt message service (SMS) health messages and appointment reminders.

235 iage call disposition for patient 'same-day' appointment requests in general practice using multivari

236 etinal specialty clinics, 41% of after-hours appointment requests resulted in an intervention within

237 as a triage mechanism to reduce face-to-face appointment requirements.

238 linical recommendations and missed scheduled appointments, resulting in intervals longer than 6 month

239 cs are continuing to monitor and adapt their appointment schedules based on local outbreaks of COVID-

240 time spent with the practitioner and ease of appointment scheduling are the 2 variables that best cor

241 fined as 90 or more days late for their last appointment), selected a random sample, and intensively

242 ity to find items around the house, remember appointments, shop and pay for items, do laundry, drive

243 6; 95% CI, 1.92-2.81), were unable to get an appointment soon enough (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.73-2.41), h

244 My subsequent faculty appointment there enabled me to develop novel isotopic a

245 if WES were performed at the first genetics appointment, there would be an incremental cost savings

246 s, or later than 180 days of the recommended appointment time or never, respectively.

247 accination completion with full adherence to appointment times and within a 3 month window.

248 red included year of board certification and appointment to program director, academic rank, National

249 nvitations for breast screening with a timed appointment to women who did not attend their first offe

250 Clinicians offered new appointments to 54% of Medicaid contacts and 62% of unin

251 azard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.81) and appointments to department chair (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95

252 control parents attended individual coaching appointments to receive linguistic feedback, listen to l

253 ch' book plus 3-4 short face to face support appointments totalling up to 2 hours of guided support,

254 was common to cancel or postpone a physician appointment until losing weight.

255 on uptake, change in BP, change in clinician appointment use, and participants' views on features tha

256 gated the risk of missing a general practice appointment using a negative binomial model offset by nu

257 and prospectively at three 9-month follow-up appointments using the Inventory of Depression and Anxie

258 d samples were collected at routine clinical appointment visits, clinical data were collected within

259 visit length) and 2 access-to-care metrics (appointment wait time and no-show rate) were tracked.

260 ese inaccuracies occurred in areas with long appointment wait times and where plans are terminating s

261 the accuracy of network directories and the appointment wait times varied substantially by health pl

262 ctices in affluent areas that typically have appointment waiting times of 2-3 days the most likely to

263 The mean age at appointment was 42.9 years old.

264 The median wait time to the first appointment was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2 to

265 to assistance in making a follow-up eye care appointment was associated with nonadherence (odds ratio

266 cipation within 90 days of the first offered appointment was significantly higher in the intervention

267 Percent adherence to follow-up appointments was alarmingly low, and decreased adherence

268 in the pregnancy and who attended screening appointments was beneficial in encouraging the responsib

269 A sample of appointments was independently coded by three researcher

270 he pooled effects on the number of cancelled appointments was not significantly increased RR 1.08 (95

271 hin 90 days of the date of the first offered appointment; we used Poisson regression to compare the p

272 years who did not attend their first offered appointment were eligible for the analysis.

273 The appointments were analysed using thematic and content an

274 Multidisciplinary group clinic appointments were associated with greater adherence to s

275 Factors associated with adhering to interval appointments were having an advanced age (odds ratio, 1.

276 rm, AED plasma levels were available at each appointment, whereas in the rescue TDM arm, levels were

277 ometimes multiple times-for these short-term appointments, which creates challenges that can dispropo

278 s also associated with longer wait times for appointments, which suggests that challenges in access t

279 2009, 228,966 men were invited to attend an appointment with a specialist nurse.

280 no treatment (attendance of one reassessment appointment with a specialist shoulder clinician 3 month

281 0.81), patients who attended a pre-operative appointment with an anesthesiologist (OR 0.52; CI 0.32-0

282 ical record-based messages shortly before an appointment with an anticoagulation-eligible but untreat

283 r 1 plan, our caller was unable to obtain an appointment with any listed dermatologist.

284 d (1:1) to receive an invitation to a second appointment with fixed date and time (intervention) or a

285 ide follow-up or an initial in-person clinic appointment with primary care physicians providing usual

286 nrolled during their preoperative outpatient appointment with the following criteria: greater than 1

287 uninsured-self-pay contacts were offered an appointment with the possibility of buprenorphine prescr

288 es and beliefs to inability to book a timely appointment with their local medical practice.

289 y outcome was the elimination of unnecessary appointments with a dermatologist.

290 The PPT group had four appointments with a nurse who assessed nine symptoms on

291 These findings show that a policy of second appointments with fixed date and time for non-attenders

292 ociation criteria and adherence to follow-up appointments with primary care clinicians.

293 tely did not improve attendance at follow-up appointments with primary care providers, improve asthma

294 lier with shorter waiting times for hospital appointments with the new Scottish general ophthalmic se

295 Patients were stratified according to appointment (with a dentist or hygienist).

296 We hypothesized that an appointment within 10 days would improve attendance at C

297 women who did not attend their first offered appointment within the NHS Breast Screening Programme (N

298 ed by a member of the adult team and a first appointment within this new healthcare setting, were imp

299 not attended, or telephoned to rearrange an appointment, within the last 24 months.

300 After the appointment, women and their surgeons completed question