ライフサイエンスコーパス: assortative

1 to error unless the network is transitive or assortative.

2 ustering, whereas the transmodal network was assortative.

3 features, indicates that the pain network is assortative.

4 cation, with work-place contacts being least assortative.

5 gh, the two methods produced highly similar, assortative age-mixing matrices.

6 l organization, including male eviction, sex-assortative alloparental care, and adult sex ratio.

7 r duration of infectiousness in men, and age-assortative and sex-assortative mixing.

8 CH2-L2 and CH2-L3, perform consistently for assortative as well as disassortative networks.

9 ncluding heritability of network position or assortative associations, can be understood as consequen

10 Group assortative biases are stronger in regions where pathoge

11 In contrast, when the sought-after assortative community structure is not strong in the obs

12 We conclude that, with heterogeneous and assortative contact patterns relevant to respiratory inf

13 different genetic backgrounds suggests that assortative (entire gene) recombination has also contrib

14 ing a history of horizontal DNA transfer and assortative (entire gene) recombination.

15 Involving either positive assortative fertilization (as opposed to self-incompatib

16 Potential mechanisms leading to assortative fertilization are discussed, as are their ev

17 Examples of assortative fertilization in Drosophila are reviewed and

18 opposed to self-incompatibility) or negative assortative fertilization, it occurs after mating but pr

19 ity, resulting in an increased proportion of assortative GRNs that are simultaneously robust and evol

20 Transgender women were assortative in the network (assortativity 0.06, p<0.001)

21 ave emerged, they contribute towards greater assortative interactions among individuals using a share

22 blic goods game that involves no repeated or assortative interactions, so that non-cooperation would

23 n which symbols become the dominant force in assortative interactions.

24 based preferential node selection and degree-assortative link placement are necessary to replicate th

25 Moreover, when assortative matching and conformity interact, authoritie

26 However, assortative matching by bias can favor the positive-sum

27 -specific traits when choosing a mate (i.e., assortative mate preference).

28 butterflies exhibited partial, color-based, assortative mate preference.

29 e hypotheses for the genetic architecture of assortative mate preferences.

30 hanisms that lead to variation in active age-assortative mate selection (as seen in mute swans); and

31 ed by size-dependent competition that drives assortative mate-pair formation.

32 t increase by 1.5-fold after 1 generation of assortative mating (>/=2.4-fold in the long term) depend

33 ct parental effects (22-27% attenuation) and assortative mating (21-27%) following our calculations.

34 To investigate assortative mating (AM), participation bias and socioeco

35 re ill-suited for replicating the effects of assortative mating (AM).

36 r the diversification of seahorses, and that assortative mating (in this case as a result of male par

37 ncrease by more than 5% from 1 generation of assortative mating (maximally 13% across multiple genera

38 igations have described benefits of positive assortative mating (PAM) for forest tree breeding, the a

39 ted to favour evolution of traits that allow assortative mating (reinforcement).

40 to search studies reporting measures of size-assortative mating (SAM).

41 Here, we introduce cross-trait assortative mating (xAM) as an alternative explanation.

42 these analyses are confounded by cross-trait assortative mating (xAM), leading to many false-positive

43 processes, our knowledge on the variation in assortative mating across populations and breeding perio

44 few studies have assessed the robustness of assortative mating against temporal changes in social co

45 the effects of gene drift and consanguinity, assortative mating also may have played a key role in th

46 Additionally, evidence for substantial assortative mating among individuals with ADHD was obser

47 ecently proposed that the intense phenotypic assortative mating among the deaf might have greatly acc

48 Patterns of assortative mating and a low incidence of invasive sperm

49 sed estimators are biased in the presence of assortative mating and derive corrected heritability est

50 thought possible through the association of assortative mating and genomic regions protected from ge

51 oid heterospecifics during adulthood promote assortative mating and hence speciation.

52 static selection, recombination suppression, assortative mating and meiotic drive.

53 that thermal carryover effects can generate assortative mating and selection on adult reproductive m

54 ating probabilities through ancestry-related assortative mating and sex bias parameters.

55 amework can be used to estimate the rates of assortative mating and sex-specific gene flow in hybrid

56 itioning the relative importance of indirect assortative mating and shared common environment will re

57 likely to be behavioral and characterized by assortative mating and species-specific courtship and ne

58 se conspicuous genotypic patterns are due to assortative mating and strong postzygotic barriers, rath

59 ossibility that spouse effects may be due to assortative mating and the relatively small polygenic ri

60 ed for recombination between loci underlying assortative mating and those under divergent ecological

61 logical selection on frequency might lead to assortative mating and ultimately reproductive isolation

62 Both species show age-assortative mating and variable assortment between years

63 Such assortative mating appears to be widespread throughout t

64 ding sensory biases, context dependence, and assortative mating apply to BT-dependent mate choice.

65 and sample sizes for real traits subject to assortative mating are congruent with expected assortati

66 is unclear whether the apparent ubiquity of assortative mating arises primarily from mate choice ("l

67 Few studies have distinguished between assortative mating arising from preferences for similar

68 Here, we explore a second, indirect role of assortative mating as a postzygotic barrier to gene flow

69 e variably expressive variants and implicate assortative mating as a risk factor for increased diseas

70 ous trait in samples with the same levels of assortative mating as those considered for the two-locus

71 nition by song and plumage traits and strong assortative mating associated with genomic regions under

72 es an opportunity to understand evolution of assortative mating at a molecular level.

73 shows that sub-population-specific positive assortative mating at the genotypic level results in pop

74 ion, driven by intraspecific competition and assortative mating based on ecological characters values

75 fic fertilization advantage have been shown: assortative mating based on gamete type, rare allele adv

76 populations can be largely accounted for by assortative mating based on one trait, body size, which

77 r more generally about the genetic basis for assortative mating behaviors.

78 Assortative mating between populations of the same ecolo

79 tial swarm segregation plays a major role in assortative mating between sympatric populations of the

80 Assortative mating between the sister species means that

81 d Anopheles gambiae, have been attributed to assortative mating between the two species.

82 via reduced hybrid viability and/or positive assortative mating but are then replenished by dispersal

83 udy (N = 5,786) and found strong evidence of assortative mating by ancestry proportion: couples' ance

84 Males and females exhibited significant assortative mating by body size: the largest males and f

85 We found evidence for assortative mating by diet at generation 60, but not 90.

86 robiome, was reported to result in immediate assortative mating by diet, which could be eliminated by

87 y selection and evolved significant positive assortative mating by diet.

88 netic similarity explains at most 10% of the assortative mating by education levels.

89 ts of the alternate type, and some degree of assortative mating by form may exist as well.

90 ies at AqAP3-3 indicate a degree of positive assortative mating by morphology.

91 s also displayed two contrasting patterns of assortative mating by personality (activity level).

92 ects of differential migration of the sexes, assortative mating by pure type females, and census time

93 a breeder's RTL predicts offspring quality, assortative mating by RTL does not enhance fitness, and

94 Demonstrations of 'parallel speciation', or assortative mating by selective environment, link ecolog

95 components of fitness may govern patterns of assortative mating by telomere length.

96 Assortative mating by telomere lengths has been observed

97 ouple substance use associations were due to assortative mating by testing the association between pa

98 or population structure and ancestry-related assortative mating by using individual-specific allele f

99 Assortative mating can be explored through both phenotyp

100 ; and provided important case studies of how assortative mating can evolve and facilitate speciation

101 ng evidence for the important influence that assortative mating can have on the frequency of common g

102 g a simulated population, we also found that assortative mating can lead to increases in disease liab

103 hat shape ecological interactions and confer assortative mating can lead to reproductive barriers and

104 While assortative mating can limit hybridization in the first

105 the form of predation, mimicry pattern-based assortative mating caused community-level mimetic divers

106 spatially or temporally pooling data and the assortative mating consistency across populations and br

107 The results show that (1) introduction of assortative mating does not, in itself, markedly affect

108 Moreover, in those data, assortative mating effectively disappeared when both par

109 ing involve high-stakes decision making, and assortative mating ensures that status matters for fitne

110 t enforces habitat specialization and causes assortative mating even in sympatry.

111 t enforces habitat specialization and causes assortative mating even in sympatry.

112 Most studies quantifying assortative mating focus on testing for correlations amo

113 Raw spousal correlations showed assortative mating for age, weight, body mass index, lea

114 erns of host acceptance that in turn lead to assortative mating for insects that mate exclusively on

115 om random mating, suggesting strong negative-assortative mating for MHC is not present in these South

116 We aimed to assess the level of assortative mating for obesity by using dual-energy X-ra

117 These data confirm that assortative mating for obesity exists when dual-energy X

118 Previous studies of assortative mating for obesity have indicated that it ma

119 This suggests inbreeding driven by assortative mating for size in GoM but not in CAN.

120 Despite the important roles of assortative mating for understanding evolutionary proces

121 This suggests that assortative mating has been enhanced in sympatry.

122 Assortative mating has been hypothesized to play a role

123 ies between extended family members and that assortative mating has taken place for several generatio

124 demonstrate that during a brief breakdown in assortative mating in 2006, A. coluzzii inherited the en

125 Likewise, we also found no evidence for assortative mating in a direct experimental test for mut

126 compelling meta-analytical evidence for size-assortative mating in birds (r = 0.178, 95% CI 0.142-0.2

127 nts (P < 0.05), demonstrating height-related assortative mating in both populations.

128 Alleles conferring high or low assortative mating in D. pseudoobscura produce the same

129 eight to assess the degree of height-related assortative mating in European-American and African-Amer

130 Prior studies of assortative mating in humans focused on trait similarity

131 The finding of possible assortative mating in OCD is intriguing and should be in

132 the theoretical and empirical importance of assortative mating in speciation with the ease with whic

133 ly arose via pollution-mediated breakdown of assortative mating in the 1990s.

134 omones mediating mate selection resulting in assortative mating in the Mus musculus species complex.

135 lly smaller than the strength of educational assortative mating in the same sample.

136 ization, supported by evidence of asymmetric assortative mating in the species producing faster, more

137 We provide evidence for genetic assortative mating in this population but the strength o

138 ng longstanding theoretical predictions that assortative mating induces long range dependence across

139 Assortative mating is a nonrandom mating system in which

140 (iii) Assortative mating is greater for intelligence (spouse c

141 Assortative mating is the nonrandom mating of individual

142 generation after generation to a limit, but assortative mating is unlikely to balance the impact of

143 A temporal analysis revealed that assortative mating is unstable and periodically breaks d

144 Phenotype-based assortative mating is well established in humans, with t

145 Age-assortative mating is, therefore, largely passive, with

146 ural selection and traits that contribute to assortative mating maintained?

147 nforcement, suggesting that the evolution of assortative mating may be more complicated than expected

148 Thus, our findings suggest that assortative mating may constitute an intermittent and un

149 We hypothesize that assortative mating may have contributed to the obesity e

150 Overall, assortative mating moderately exhibited low repeatabilit

151 frequencies strongly reflect the directional assortative mating observed in behavioral trials, illust

152 We furthermore found evidence for assortative mating of females with males from their own

153 We also examine the effect of assortative mating on heritability estimates from differ

154 Assortative mating on heritable traits can have implicat

155 out the effects of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis.

156 % CI, 1.31-6.25), suggesting either positive assortative mating or a shared environmental contributio

157 ng because it might lead to the evolution of assortative mating or dominance [1, 2].

158 Biologists have devoted much attention to assortative mating or homogamy, the tendency for sexual

159 s, and (3) associations were unconfounded by assortative mating or passive gene-environment correlati

160 ns of this study include potential bias from assortative mating or pleiotropic effects of genetic var

161 We describe assortative mating patterns across and within animal tax

162 elated risks and traits to quantifying human assortative mating patterns.

163 We showed that ancestry-positive assortative mating permeated Brazilian history.

164 ther support to the hypothesis that positive assortative mating plays a role in ASD.

165 We show that assortative mating plays a role in maintaining subpopula

166 Assortative mating pumps additive genetic variance into

167 ns and suggest that the apparent ubiquity of assortative mating reported in the literature is overest

168 ulation stratification, dynastic effects and assortative mating that can induce spurious or biased SN

169 tits, pair fidelity has a weak effect on age-assortative mating through pair retention; variation in

170 tion; they are selected to evolve or enhance assortative mating to prevent costly intergroup matings

171 ecological conditions, the process requires assortative mating to protect the nascent species from h

172 We also examined assortative mating using phenotype data on the parents t

173 The expected assortative mating was demonstrated when the Geospiza sc

174 ng pooled measures, the average estimate for assortative mating was moderate and positive.

175 ansition in this sexual signal that mediates assortative mating was offset from other traits and gene

176 However, we also find that assortative mating was plastic, varying in strength over

177 This route to assortative mating was suggested by Parker.

178 ,000 moth species acts as a powerful form of assortative mating whereby females attract conspecific m

179 g across generations as a result of positive assortative mating with obese husbands and wives contrib

180 Such preferences induce assortative mating with respect to ecological characters

181 empirical evidence that genetic coupling of assortative mating with traits under divergent ecologica

182 Thus, assortative mating's bundling effect contributes substan

183 tween 1.2-fold (in a baboon system with weak assortative mating) and 14-fold (in a swordtail system w

184 ve to demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and familial (indirect genetic) effe

185 cts), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effe

186 e been reports of nonrandom mating (negative-assortative mating) or preference for individuals of dif

187 leiotropy, and family-level confounders like assortative mating), the accuracy of causal effect estim

188 d 14-fold (in a swordtail system with strong assortative mating).

189 ng effects (such as population structure and assortative mating).

190 at explain spatial and temporal variation in assortative mating, after its detection.

191 cautious that cryptic population structure, assortative mating, and dynastic effects may influence t

192 confounding from population stratification, assortative mating, and dynastic effects.

193 nclude effects of population stratification, assortative mating, and environmentally mediated parenta

194 s process results from geographic sorting or assortative mating, and it is unknown whether genotypes

195 n causal inference by biological pleiotropy, assortative mating, and the nonrandom sampling of study

196 ation in this pair is associated with strong assortative mating, but ecological isolation and local a

197 ted if ecological adaptation directly causes assortative mating, but few natural examples are known.

198 DERSON's experiment, in the form of negative assortative mating, could also account for the mtDNA fre

199 w, through culturally mediated migration and assortative mating, culture can shape population genetic

200 ors, for example, population subdivision and assortative mating, generate similar signals to those of

201 ional transmission process occurring through assortative mating, genetic inheritance, and the inherit

202 the extent to which the prediction is due to assortative mating, genotype-environment correlation, or

203 overwintering habitats were associated with assortative mating, implicating a central contribution o

204 report, we show by computer simulation that assortative mating, in fact, can accelerate dramatically

205 Despite widespread evidence for age-assortative mating, little is known about what drives th

206 as subsequent gene flow and/or sex-specific assortative mating, may have confounded the analyses of

207 les, including partial self-mating, positive assortative mating, non-random outbreeding, and simulati

208 this is due to shared environmental factors, assortative mating, or indirect genetic effects.

209 Under assortative mating, parents covary in their ancestry, ca

210 estimates of direct effects using models of assortative mating, population stratification, and stabi

211 nsition zone, neutral genetic divergence and assortative mating, suggesting that divergent selection

212 To study the evolution of assortative mating, we evolved mating discrimination in

213 ses solely from additive genetic effects and assortative mating, we find that they describe much of o

214 Assortative mating, when individuals of similar phenotyp

215 servations provided evidence of asymmetrical assortative mating, while reduced brood sizes and male-b

216 erum metabolite measures, supporting initial assortative mating, with diet-derived metabolites sugges

217 Many traits are subject to assortative mating, with recent molecular genetic findin

218 sortative mating are congruent with expected assortative mating-induced biases.

219 polymorphism is maintained through negative assortative mating.

220 parapatric speciation even in the absence of assortative mating.

221 is maintained in the population by negative assortative mating.

222 ounding due to population stratification and assortative mating.

223 ng, when the female choice strategy produces assortative mating.

224 icularly rapid when such shifts also promote assortative mating.

225 logical barriers, promoting the evolution of assortative mating.

226 that the two genes interact to contribute to assortative mating.

227 it is both ecologically relevant and entails assortative mating.

228 positive biases in detecting and estimating assortative mating.

229 ean that are reproductively isolated through assortative mating.

230 ggesting that it results instead from social assortative mating.

231 es, and permit ecological differentiation or assortative mating.

232 is very small or when there is considerable assortative mating.

233 .e. 0.04) after accounting for the effect of assortative mating.

234 etic effects, population stratification, and assortative mating.

235 ly explained by additive genetic effects and assortative mating.

236 the bundling effect from standard metrics of assortative mating.

237 over 25 generations through strong ancestry-assortative mating.

238 h has quantified the genetic consequences of assortative mating.

239 netic nurturing, population subdivision, and assortative mating.

240 a nearby population did not show evidence of assortative mating.

241 formation increases the strength of positive assortative mating.

242 netic nurturing, population subdivision, and assortative mating.

243 resident, although there was no evidence of assortative mating.

244 as well as the fitness consequences of rare assortative mating.

245 ffects at different loci, which is caused by assortative mating.

246 the integrity of species boundaries through assortative mating.

247 patterns of thermotolerance differences and assortative mating.

248 f power is greater with increasing levels of assortative mating; and (3) for a heterogeneous genetic

249 mate recognition, an essential precursor to assortative mating; frequency matching occurs more consi

250 Random-mating and assortative-mating samples were generated.

251 four different mixing scenarios ranging from assortative (maximising within-group mixing) to disassor

252 edges of any order and that interactions are assortative, meaning that edges are formed by nodes with

253 odel for hypergraphs that does not impose an assortative mechanism to explain observed higher-order i

254 Race-assortative mixing alone could not sustain a pre-existin

255 ite lower numbers of contacts in workplaces, assortative mixing among adults with high rates of smear

256 and vice versa), which mimicked the observed assortative mixing among playmates.

257 We explored the impact of assortative mixing and factors differentially affecting

258 While evidence of this type of assortative mixing and temporal clustering of behaviors

259 Clusters with >=3 members demonstrated assortative mixing by sex, age, and sample region.

260 This assortative mixing could amplify differences from other

261 ord homophily via conformity, which measures assortative mixing via distance and features.

262 ence data, large differences in the level of assortative mixing were seen between the fits identified

263 rity men are further concentrated because of assortative mixing, adverse life experiences (including

264 Due to such resource-based assortative mixing, network-based diffusion analysis est

265 rganization, nodal cartographic assignments, assortative mixing, rich club organization, and network

266 % (0.7%, 42.5%) to 11.8% (1.2%, 32.5%) under assortative mixing.

267 iousness in men, and age-assortative and sex-assortative mixing.

268 An assortative model based on node population size captures

269 block model (SBM), that does not assume that assortative modules exist.

270 algorithms expect genes to be organized into assortative modules, that is, groups of genes that are m

271 ghbor-based local measures are effective for assortative networks, our proposed combination of common

272 n Monte Carlo, reliably and quickly find the assortative or disassortative structure as directed by t

273 nd mating performance, and whether mating is assortative or disassortative with respect to exploratio

274 ppen if one accounts for male heterogeneity, assortative pair formation, and evolution of female choi

275 In mute swans, age-assortative pairing through mate selection may also be d

276 However, there was no evidence of assortative pairing with respect to migratory strategy:

277 tructure, and evidence exists for active age-assortative pairing.

278 ocial network structure and (5) emergence of assortative population structure with spatial clusters o

279 allow subspecific mate discrimination, with assortative preferences evident in the hybrid zone but n

280 ed in the LOD scores, is somewhat lower with assortative rather than random mating.

281 the extent to which social interactions are assortative rather than random, and the distribution of

282 opulation structure, with little evidence of assortative recombination between strains of different s

283 and number of groups in the population, and assortative relatedness due to the distribution of genot

284 of parasite-stress while devaluing in-group assortative sociality in areas with low levels of parasi

285 logical adaptation that facilitates in-group assortative sociality in the face of high levels of para

286 This is because in-group assortative sociality is more important for the avoidanc

287 Thornhill (F&T) present a model of in-group assortative sociality resulting from differing levels of

288 al and the interstate analyses that in-group assortative sociality was positively associated with par

289 a causal factor in the variation of in-group assortative sociality, cross-nationally and across the U

290 account for intra-regional heterogeneity in assortative sociality, which, we argue, can be better ex

291 derlies certain cultural practices promoting assortative sociality.

292 n together, graph theory analysis unveils an assortative structural pain network in the brain that pr

293 ork partitions, ranging from the traditional assortative structures to the disassortative structures.

294 Contacts are highly assortative with age across all countries considered, bu

295 Contact patterns were highly age-assortative, with clear intergenerational mixing between

296 sertive or receptive role) and the extent of assortative (within-group) mixing are known to affect HI

297 , mixing scenarios with increased amounts of assortative (within-group) mixing tended to give rise to