ライフサイエンスコーパス: atomizer

1 ng from the hydride generator as well as the atomizer.

2 of samples were directly dispensed into the atomizer.

3 tion of arsane in the optical arm of the DBD atomizer.

4 o a standard miniature diffusion flame (MDF) atomizer.

5 of that of the externally heated quartz tube atomizer.

6 plied at will) and further injected into the atomizer.

7 always employed a separate light source and atomizer.

8 contamination was found beneath the chamber atomizer.

9 h encapsulated Dp yields using an ultrasonic atomizer.

10 aerosol generated by a medical nebulizer or atomizer.

11 udy water concentration in gases leaving the atomizer.

12 due to fluctuations of hydride supply to an atomizer, a new design of a gas-liquid separator was imp

13 This study uses an atomizer and fluorescent markers to simulate contaminati

14 cal sensitivity of 0.48 s ng (-1) As in both atomizers and limits of detection (LOD) of 0.15 ng mL(-1

15 nts/metals that appeared to originate in the atomizers, and concentrations increased with increasing

16 ults support previous work reporting the SAW atomizer as a fast and inexpensive tool for ultrasound,

17 This study employed a system hyphenating the atomizer (ATM), differential mobility analyzer (DMA), an

18 When interfaced with MALDI MS, the SAW atomizer constitutes a valuable tool for rapid cell stud

19 Here, an advanced flame-in-gas-shield atomizer (FIGS) was interfaced to HG-CT and its performa

20 mized to receive intranasal mometasone in an atomizer for 12 weeks (1 application per nostril, once p

21 ort the use of a surface acoustic wave (SAW) atomizer for fast sample handling in matrix-assisted las

22 The model with fewest metal parts in the atomizer had the fewest metals in its aerosols.

23 The high fraction of Bi deposited in the atomizers indicates significant reactivity of free Bi at

24 ial of in-atomizer preconcentration in a DBD atomizer is outlined.

25 ser wave mixing in a common graphite furnace atomizer is presented as a zeptomole-level, sub-Doppler,

26 to that of a multiple microflame quartz tube atomizer (MMQTA) for atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS

27 the generator of continuum radiation and the atomizer of the analytes.

28 e aerosols have been found previously in the atomizers of EC.

29 The graphite furnace atomizer offers advantages including fast and convenient

30 nitric acid leachates from deposition in the atomizer on the one hand and quantification of the Bi fr

31 of the Bi fraction transportable outside the atomizer on the other, were in excellent agreement, prov

32 cal method and those of the graphite furnace atomizer, one can obtain both excellent spectral resolut

33 The potential of in-atomizer preconcentration in a DBD atomizer is outlined.

34 human influenza virus (H1N1), and HSV1 from atomizer-produced droplet-aerosols were each fully destr

35 atomizers was investigated, with the former atomizer providing superior performance.

36 mpared to that of a conventional quartz tube atomizer (QTA) for atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

37 te atoms in an externally heated quartz tube atomizer (QTA) were investigated employing selected ion

38 a conventional externally heated quartz tube atomizer (QTA).

39 ported beyond the confines of the DBD or QTA atomizers, quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass

40 The performance of the DBD as an atomizer reflects both effects, i.e., atomization effici

41 in acidic leachates of the interiors of both atomizers, representing the fraction retained on their s

42 00 ppb) ions were measured in the humic acid atomizer solutions compared to the other organics that c

43 l method developed for nasal delivery via an atomizer spray mist to the nostrils (dose estimated 1.0

44 y absent outside the central part of the DBD atomizer, suggesting their high reactivity.

45 oratory, Argonne, IL, U.S.A., 1987) using an atomizer system on December 3, 2009 after chemical separ

46 lfactory epithelium using a refillable nasal atomizer that deposits mist onto the olfactory neuro-epi

47 viruses and virucides in a fine-mist bottle atomizer to mimic the generation of oral droplet-aerosol

48 Modification of the inner surface of the DBD atomizer using dimethyldichlorsilane (DMDCS) was essenti

49 sidual aerosol and moisture transport to the atomizer was found to improve the response by 25%.

50 a planar dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) atomizer was investigated using a variety of probes, inc

51 ar quartz dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) atomizer was optimized and the performance of this devic

52 ar quartz dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) atomizer was optimized, and its performance was compared

53 Here the SAW atomizer was used for ultrasound (acoustic) extraction o

54 Se) on Bi response by AAS using DBD and QTA atomizers was investigated, with the former atomizer pro

55 The yielded LODs with the FIGS atomizer were 0.44, 0.74, 0.15, 0.17 and 0.67 ng L(-1) f