戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 bstrate modification of complex fractionated atrial electrograms.
2  electrodes per patient showed interpretable atrial electrograms.
3 linear ablations (40%), complex fractionated atrial electrogram (19.2%), and cavotricuspid isthmus ab
4 0.49; P<0.001), but not complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.18
5 ior wall isolation with complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (persistent and longstanding
6 oach of PVI followed by complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation and linear ablation (Substra
7 al analysis showed that complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation is ineffective and further s
8  group 1 in addition to complex-fractionated atrial electrogram ablation while in AF (group 2).
9 I in AF with additional complex-fractionated atrial electrogram ablation.
10                                   During AF, atrial electrograms (AEGs) were recorded for 1 to 5 minu
11 iscrete potential (P) was noted after the CS atrial electrogram and during tachycardia, the CS (P) pr
12                       Change of the local CS atrial electrogram and LA activation sequence to early a
13 se approach of PVI plus complex fractionated atrial electrogram and linear ablation.
14                         Complex-fractionated atrial electrograms and atrial fibrosis are associated w
15 refractory periods associated with organized atrial electrograms and long effective refractory period
16  In each patient, simultaneous intracavitary atrial electrograms and surface electrocardiograms were
17                             Various types of atrial electrograms are present at different locations d
18                       The characteristics of atrial electrograms associated with atrial fibrillation
19 The differential response of the SVE and the atrial electrogram at the initiation of continuous right
20 was performed to target complex fractionated atrial electrograms at the pulmonary vein ostial and ant
21 on between 2015 and 2017 with panoramic left atrial electrogram before ablation and clinical follow-u
22 formed 80 Holter recordings with telemetered atrial electrograms, both to validate the continuous det
23 gram mapping, including complex fractionated atrial electrogram but not spectral parameter mapping, C
24 of chronic AF guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms, but only after a second ablation pr
25 blation+linear ablation+complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation (CFAE arm) in patient
26 rate ablation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) mapping in 674 high-risk AF pa
27 dy compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective C
28                         Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) are targets of atrial fibrill
29 trogram voltage and (2) complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE), using CFAE mean (the mean in
30 ram features, including complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE).
31 ine whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) after antral pulmonary vein
32 on strategies targeting complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) are commonly employed to ide
33             Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) has been proposed as a strat
34 ied rotor sites did not exhibit quantitative atrial electrogram characteristics expected from rotors
35                                          The atrial electrogram characteristics of atrial fibrillatio
36                          During AF, unipolar atrial electrograms collected from a 64-pole basket cath
37 mentally demonstrated that positive unipolar atrial electrogram completion, when applying radiofreque
38 f these signals was used to calculate a left atrial electrogram density before, during, and after pac
39 s no significant change in the baseline left atrial electrogram density compared with baseline when p
40                                     The left atrial electrogram density was significantly greater tha
41 y domain analysis of a filtered wide bipolar atrial electrogram describes the global organization of
42                           Different types of atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation have been
43 nt (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and atrial electrograms (Egms) in persistent atrial fibrilla
44 illation (AF) guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms has been reported to eliminate AF in
45  demonstrated by a long stimulus to upstream atrial electrogram interval (S-Au) >75% TCL and was cons
46 with an increase in the complex fractionated atrial electrogram interval confidence level score, but
47 ctrograms, resulting in complex fractionated atrial electrogram-like activity.
48                                  During left atrial electrogram mapping, including complex fractionat
49 tions lasting 30 seconds irrespective of the atrial electrogram modification.
50                                          The atrial electrogram of atrial fibrillation and the atrial
51        During AF, multiple foci (QS unipolar atrial electrograms) of different cycle lengths (mean, 1
52 rsus delayed pace-related advancement of the atrial electrogram, once the local septal parahisian ven
53 tractions that either delayed the subsequent atrial electrogram or terminated the tachycardia (n=3),
54 on of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram (R morphology completion) during radi
55                                 In addition, atrial electrograms recorded close to the His bundle cha
56 pe I AF and consistently influences the left atrial electrograms recorded in the coronary sinus.
57                     The intracardiac bipolar atrial electrogram recordings were characterized by (1)
58 on of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram reflects, in general, irreversible tr
59                 ICNA might contaminate local atrial electrograms, resulting in complex fractionated a
60 oth), but no changes in complex fractionated atrial electrogram scores, dominant frequency or organiz
61 ed in these 16 patients by recording bipolar atrial electrograms simultaneously with at least one ele
62 with intracardiac standard deviations of: 1) atrial electrograms (temporal variability), and 2) bi-at
63                           The correlation of atrial electrogram type with the atrial effective refrac
64 refractory period corresponding to organized atrial electrograms (type I) and the longest atrial effe
65                    In both models, organized atrial electrograms (type I) were predominantly observed
66 right atrial appendage, whereas disorganized atrial electrograms (type III) were mainly observed at t
67 ractory period corresponding to disorganized atrial electrograms (type III).
68                      The distribution of the atrial electrogram types closely followed that of the at
69 cing group, p = 0.09) but did not change the atrial electrogram types during atrial fibrillation.
70 stribution types and possible determinant of atrial electrogram types during atrial fibrillation.
71 by analyzing quantitative characteristics of atrial electrograms used to identify rotors and describe
72 nated or all identified complex fractionated atrial electrograms were eliminated.
73                         Complex fractionated atrial electrograms were found in seven of nine regions
74 al effective refractory period, disorganized atrial electrograms were observed at sites with the long
75                         Complex fractionated atrial electrograms were observed during ICNA discharges
76                                              Atrial electrograms were recorded from a 20-pole cathete
77 activation sites (initial r or R in unipolar atrial electrograms) were also found.
78  and ablation targeting complex-fractionated atrial electrograms while in AF.
79 ctivity, left vagal nerve activity, and left atrial electrogram without pacing for 24 hours.