ライフサイエンスコーパス: attack rate

1 Twenty-four cases were identified (14% attack rate).

2 orted by 79 of 702 household contacts (11.3% attack rate).

3 accompanied by a reduction in the angioedema attack rate.

4 has an advantage that increases with the T6S attack rate.

5 2 on a fishing vessel associated with a high attack rate.

6 pirical estimates of H3N2's population level attack rate.

7 t rule of thumb based on household secondary attack rate.

8 on coronal caries incidence, increment, and attack rate.

9 ith a significant reduction in the secondary attack rate.

10 accinated population contributed to the high attack rate.

11 c correlation between population density and attack rate.

12 g of future hospitalizations and the overall attack rate.

13 s develop clinical prion disease with a 100% attack rate.

14 age and effectiveness) to estimate influenza attack rates.

15 We calculated attack rates.

16 ce age-specific and population-level illness attack rates.

17 tivated vaccine in a year with low influenza attack rates.

18 imilarity of mimics can thus lead to greater attack rates.

19 re it was associated with high infection and attack rates.

20 o work remotely and in within-home secondary attack rates.

21 ential for apparent competition and realised attack rates.

22 eptible individuals and local variability in attack rates.

23 e cost savings and better outcomes at higher attack rates.

24 tion, which is consistent with 2009 pandemic attack rates.

25 significant public health impact given high attack rates.

26 ke location-specific projections of epidemic attack rates.

27 ation of antigenic variants, and high annual attack rates.

28 ng HELP Study); for nonrollovers: historical attack rate 1 attack/12 weeks.

29 ts in the lower Danube valley and Bucharest (attack rate 12.4/100000 people) with a seroprevalence of

30 tible residents, 14 became acutely infected (attack rate, 16%), and 74 remained uninfected.

31 buted among the network, yielding an illness attack rate 17% lower.

32 in administration (median [range] annualized attack rate 2.0 [0.0-37.0]).

33 were only one third as contagious (secondary attack rate, 23.4%; RR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.19-0.53]).

34 With a 2% attack rate ($5 vaccination), compared to no vaccination

35 e through contacts at 2 day care facilities (attack rate, 88.1 per 1000); and (3) 15 (18%) were young

36 sitively affected by temperature as juvenile attack rates (a) increased as a function of increased te

37 treatment reduced the hereditary angioedema attack rate, a finding that supports potential prophylac

38 ed Fisher's exact test to compare unadjusted attack rates according to dose status and years since re

39 Attack rates according to street increased with the stre

40 e found consistent temperature dependence of attack rates across experimental settings, though the ma

41 ng abnormal prion protein resulted in a 100% attack rate after its inoculation in transgenic mice ove

42 Annual attack rate among adjusted North American studies was 1.

43 transmission (P = .009) and higher secondary attack rate among household contacts (P = .03), after ad

44 he primary agent of infection included a low attack rate among incompletely vaccinated children and a

45 The attack rate among maintenance employees (16 of 53 [30%])

46 e only significant predictor of illness; the attack rate among people who consumed oysters was 29 per

47 The attack rate among persons who ate a potato-based dip was

48 The attack rate among persons who ate an eggplant-based dip

49 The median attack rate among persons who consumed the implicated se

50 nsity settings such as colleges, with a high attack rate among young adults, many of whom had the rec

51 Based on return on investment and higher attack rates among children, we recommend prioritizing c

52 The attack rates among HIV-uninfected IIV3 recipients and th

53 number of household contacts, and secondary attack rates among household contacts.

54 During the measles epidemic of 1989-1991, attack rates among nonwhite children <5 years of age wer

55 The attack rates among the children are higher than among th

56 Cholera attack rates among the exposed and non-exposed cohorts w

57 t difference in ILI, influenza, or pneumonia attack rates among those receiving the pH1N1 vaccine wit

58 The attack rates among unvaccinated and fully vaccinated stu

59 nd indirect VE was assessed by comparing the attack rates among unvaccinated members between high and

60 e facilities, including higher-than-expected attack rates among vaccinated staff, were reported in so

61 High attack rates among vaccinated young adults reported duri

62 e (MP) in closed communities can have a high attack rate and can last several months.

63 ately strong, the parasitoid with the higher attack rate and conversion efficiency (Ooencyrtus) achie

64 In contrast, the parasitoid with the lower attack rate and conversion efficiency but the shorter ha

65 For pandemics with a lower attack rate and fewer cases (eg, 2009-like pandemic), th

66 ndividuals, we estimated a variable seasonal attack rate and found that most children had >=1 infecti

67 ndividuals, we estimated a variable seasonal attack rate and found that most children had at least on

68 The high attack rate and lack of coverage of this serotype by the

69 was to identify a dose at which the cholera attack rate and the geometric mean purge were sufficient

70 as latent epidemiological processes such as attack rates and age-stratified infection risk.

71 c influenza viruses have consistently higher attack rates and are typically associated with greater m

72 rolonged infectiousness led to extraordinary attack rates and case-fatality rates among HIV-infected

73 impact of early vaccination on age-specific attack rates and evaluate the outcomes of different vacc

74 ary ALA and porphobilinogen levels and acute attack rates and improved quality of life.

75 prey activity, and rapid locomotion reduces attack rates and increases chances of surviving predator

76 the CWD inocula, as evidenced by incomplete attack rates and long incubation periods.

77 metimes generating broad outbreaks with high attack rates and occasional fatalities.

78 to simultaneously estimate the prey-specific attack rates and predator-specific interference (facilit

79 , but other aspects of the pandemic, such as attack rates and risk factors, are poorly understood.

80 High attack rates and the ability of Staphylococcus aureus to

81 omatic infections, without which the overall attack rates and the level of herd immunity cannot be ac

82 irect relationship between data on secondary attack rates and transmissibility in the agent-based SIR

83 studies on root caries incidence, increment, attack rate, and annual total (root + coronal) caries in

84 The safety profile, attack rate, and duration of illness make GI.1 Lot 001-0

85 iage and disease events, household secondary attack rate, and emm-linked household transmission event

86 sceptibility, the basic reproductive number, attack rate, and infectious period, for 115 cities durin

87 of a pandemic, reducing the overall and peak attack rate, and reducing the number of cumulative death

88 red deer-adapted BSE resulted in 90% to 100% attack rates, and BSE from cattle failed to transmit, in

89 es, including 3 fatalities, were identified (attack rate [AR], 30 cases per 100,000 population).

90 uals, defence is less often required because attack rates are lower and the costs of defence may be h

91 for outbreak peak timing, peak intensity and attack rate, are substantially improved for predicted le

92 Attack rates (ARs) after the final exposure (weeks 19-30

93 We compared attack rates (ARs) among detainees and staff, between Ig

94 We calculated attack rates (ARs) by vaccination status and estimated m

95 age, sex, vaccination status, arrival date, attack rates (ARs), and case fatality ratios (CFRs) for

96 d fractionation can greatly reduce infection attack rate as long as VE exceeds 1/n.

97 stat demonstrated a significant reduction in attack rate at both 110 mg (1.65 attacks per month; P =

98 asures could substantially lower the illness attack rate before a highly efficacious vaccine could be

99 -year, with end-of-study adjusted annualised attack rates being similar in the any inebilizumab-AQP4-

100 ates also differed significantly (P=.045) in attack rate between TAMU (86%) and Iowa (52%) or UCP (59

101 Overall VE was assessed by comparing the attack rates between high and low vaccine coverage strat

102 ll pandemic and helps explain differences in attack rates between populations.

103 experienced the highest influenza infection attack rates, but overall only a quarter of all infected

104 eactive school closure could reduce clinical attack rates by 40-50%.

105 ropod predators, with no systematic trend in attack rates by birds or mammals.

106 re logistically challenging but might reduce attack rates by over 75%.

107 ases by 13-17% (18-23% in children) and peak attack rates by up to 39-45% (47-52% in children).

108 uring the peak of a pandemic can reduce peak attack rates by up to 40%, but has little impact on over

109 Estimates of influenza attack rates can be obtained in other settings using ana

110 For instance, vegetation-dependent attack rates can generate alternative stable states, in

111 f either 20% or 30% gross influenza clinical attack rate (CAR), with a "low severity" scenario with c

112 ition is in turn influenced by daily illness attack rate, climate, and other environment factors.

113 and 150-mg doses of berotralstat reduced HAE attack rates compared with placebo and were safe and gen

114 ty data (eg, to estimate household secondary attack rate, contact patterns within hospitals, and effe

115 k that mechanistic models of high-resolution attack rate data may reach spurious conclusions if the p

116 Annualised attack rates decreased year-on-year, with end-of-study a

117 ipants diagnosed with typhoid infection (ie, attack rate), defined as persistent fever of 38 degrees

118 that the feedback between basal biomass and attack rates destabilizes the trophic interactions, lead

119 47% to 67%) in 2000-2001; however, influenza attack rates differed between these 2 periods (in the pl

120 rs: 1 attack/4 weeks (based on run-in period attack rate during HELP Study); for nonrollovers: histor

121 : >=1 attack/4 weeks (based on run-in period attack rate during HELP Study); for nonrollovers: histor

122 orial capacity translated into a significant attack rate during the 2015 outbreak, with a subsequent

123 likely to occur, despite an increase in the attack rate during the first wave.

124 The mean breakthrough attack rate during the treatment period was 0.4 attacks/

125 eillance data can be used to gauge influenza attack rates during future influenza seasons.

126 lance data can be used to estimate influenza attack rates during the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons

127 ergistic effect of interventions in reducing attack rates during the course of 1 year among a synthet

128 Attack rate estimates through 31 August 2020 are 6.2% [9

129 nce of a pandemic could significantly reduce attack rates even if of low efficacy.

130 nce of acute coccidioidomycosis, the highest attack rate ever reported for a military unit.

131 We found that the reduction of attack rates following the start of vaccination campaign

132 The attack rate for consumers was 6.6 percent.

133 The global annual attack rate for influenza is estimated to be 10%-20% in

134 Least-squares mean monthly HAE attack rate for lanadelumab was compared with placebo.

135 The diarrheal attack rate for Mirpur is 4.69 episodes per child per ye

136 States, we estimated the household secondary attack rate for pandemic H1N1 to be 27.3% [95% confidenc

137 The attack rate for patients receiving PN in March was 35%.

138 Among HIV-infected women, the attack rate for placebo recipients was 17.0% and the rat

139 Baseline attack rate for rollovers: >=1 attack/4 weeks (based on

140 Baseline attack rate for rollovers: 1 attack/4 weeks (based on ru

141 The attack rate for RT-PCR-confirmed influenza among both HI

142 The unadjusted attack rate for sepsis syndrome between individual cente

143 ack rate for severe rotavirus diarrhea, a 3% attack rate for severe nonrotavirus diarrhea in the popu

144 Assuming a 1% attack rate for severe rotavirus diarrhea, a 3% attack r

145 The estimated influenza attack rate for the early vaccinated Flu Near You member

146 There were no significant differences in the attack rates for diarrhoea, dysentery, or respiratory in

147 ajor influenza season, to estimate influenza attack rates for that period.

148 Epidemic curves and overall attack rates for the 1968 pandemic, based on clinical an

149 Attack rates for VDPV were as high as those for WPV.

150 ns of such measures for studies of secondary attack rates, for the persistence of infection in human

151 ive (12 months) virus-associated symptomatic attack rates from 12 countries and symptomatic case fata

152 ed hospitalization-related (in-hospital) VTE attack rates from 2005 to 2010 ranged from 251 to 306 (1

153 Seven epidemic districts had cumulative attack rates greater than 100 per 100 000 population.

154 ng HELP Study); for nonrollovers: historical attack rate >=1 attack/12 weeks.

155 The model included estimates of attack rate, healthcare-seeking behavior, prescription r

156 Attack rates, hospitalization rates, and rotavirus genot

157 spective cohort, case-control, and secondary attack rate (household contact) designs.

158 ts who exhibit symptoms [household secondary attack rate (hSAR)], this metric is difficult to interpr

159 By minimizing the illness attack rate (i.e., the percentage of people in the popul

160 /14) in household contacts, and the clinical attack rate (ie, the proportion of persons seropositive

161 provides the largest reduction in infection attack rate if the efficacy of 5-fold fractional-dose va

162 yet, unanswered questions (specifically, the attack rate in children and the role of children as vect

163 (2) The secondary attack rate in contacts of people with asymptomatic infe

164 The attack rate in infants and young children is similar reg

165 e and for antibody waning, we estimate a 66% attack rate in June, rising to 76% in October.

166 in southeastern Brazil, where the estimated attack rate in October was 29%.

167 ing the index case), and 1 in Spain (overall attack rate in the chalet: 75%).

168 of transmission in 7 (58%), and high (>10%) attack rates in 7 (58%).

169 existing heterologous immunity which reduced attack rates in adults during 2009 had substantially dec

170 Clinical attack rates in children in La Gloria were twice that in

171 re consistent with previously published high attack rates in children.

172 Attack rates in the plants were high (14.4 per 1000 vs 0

173 The attack rates in women and men were similar each season.

174 At the ball, attack rates increased with time since vaccination: 12.5

175 Limited data on attack rate indicate that children are just as susceptib

176 We show analytically that a uniform local attack rate is typically only possible for individual pi

177 e of Bahia in Brazil which suggests that the attack rate is unidentifiable with monthly data in Bahia

178 cause a severe worldwide epidemic, with high attack rates, large numbers of deaths and hospitalizatio

179 pathogens with variable seasonal phasing and attack rates, most existing process-based forecasting sy

180 orkers at the outbreak hospital, yielding an attack rate of 10% among potentially exposed outbreak ho

181 -5 x 103 CFU (group 1), which resulted in an attack rate of 12 of 20 (60%).

182 n U.S. laboratories yearly and calculated an attack rate of 13/100,000 microbiologists between 1996 a

183 ry infections within 14 days, for an overall attack rate of 18.9%.

184 the model predicts a reduction to an illness attack rate of 2% (95% Cl: 0.2, 16) and a death rate of

185 An outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 with an attack rate of 26.5% among approximately 1150 workers at

186 , 18 primary illnesses occurred, yielding an attack rate of 29%.

187 ion, the model predicts an influenza illness attack rate of 33% of the population (95% confidence int

188 , nausea (60.0%), and diarrhea (10.4%) at an attack rate of 5.7-16.9%.

189 malaria (9.1 person-years), resulting in an attack rate of 5.8 cases per person-year (95% CI, 4.3 to

190 firmed, 71 probable) were identified, for an attack rate of 50.9% (86/169 residents).

191 hi (Quailes strain) inoculum required for an attack rate of 60%-75% in typhoid-naive volunteers when

192 cities in Hunan Province, with a mean total attack rate of 7.04% (95% CI: 4.97-9.11%).

193 idated in a follow-on study demonstrating an attack rate of 80% with 10(11) CFU of H10407 ETEC.

194 attack rate, with a maximal reduction in the attack rate of 85%.

195 The overall attack rate of clinical West Nile virus infection was at

196 The attack rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is over 50% in soli

197 Understanding the attack rate of influenza infection and the proportion wh

198 The attack rate of Oroya fever was 13.8% (123 cases); the ca

199 The attack rate of rotavirus hospitalization was 0.34 per 10

200 The overall attack rate of SAB in SOT was 22.9/1000 transplant patie

201 The attack rate of serogroup Y meningococcal disease increas

202 We report a 100% attack rate of T. nativa from bear meat among those who

203 to infection in both mice and ticks, a high attack rate of ticks on mice, a high density of larval t

204 We estimated efficacy by comparing the attack rate of typhoid in the vaccine group with that in

205 The attack rate of verruga peruana was 17.6%.

206 incorporating epidemic curves with clinical attack rates of 20% or 30% in a single wave of illness,

207 erlands, we estimated combined influenza A/B attack rates of 29.2% (95% credible interval (CI): 21.6,

208 se-range effect was obtained, with diarrheal attack rates of 40% to 80%, validated in a follow-on stu

209 Attack rates of 45% and 57% were seen during Delta and O

210 achieve the primary objective, resulting in attack rates of 55% (11/20) or 65% (13/20), respectively

211 Control animals vaccinated with PBS had attack rates of 70 to 90% on challenge.

212 as a function of varying values of true VE, attack rates of rotavirus and nonrotavirus diarrhea in t

213 oyed by extremely large dispersals and large attacking rates of insects, thus creating multiple attra

214 ted during the follow-up period, yielding an attack rate on board of 85.2% (104/122 individuals).

215 on the intermediate predator, as long as the attack rate on the intermediate predator is relatively l

216 researchers have shown that crypsis reduces attack rates on resting prey, predation risk increases w

217 e prey are vigilant, increasing top predator attack rates on the intermediate predator reduces compet

218 e numbers of undetected infections, and high attack rates on- and off-farm, even beyond a 5-km high-r

219 of this model should minimize differences in attack rates or severity when groups are challenged at d

220 ubstantially reduce population-level illness attack rates over a wide range of scenarios.

221 Measles attack rates per 100,000 population were highest among i

222 Cumulative average attack rates per outbreak were 37-203 cases/100 000 popu

223 Most outbreak-associated attack rates range from 15% to 40%.

224 Outbreak-associated attack rates range from 15% to 40%.

225 nor respiratory diseases (1933 and 1935), an attack rate ratio analysis of the decline of diphtheria

226 Age-adjusted attack rate ratios comparing Mexican Americans with non-

227 Attack rate ratios for influenza in infants and older ad

228 ed heart problems 2 to 3 years following the attacks (rate ratios, 4.67 at 2 years and 3.22 at 3 year

229 rable outcomes in terms of optimal infection attack rate reduction, peak incidence reduction or peak

230 The average annual VTE attack rates related and unrelated to hospitalization we

231 DCP also significantly reduced attack rates relative to placebo in the HypoPP subjects.

232 In the PSPP trial, DCP significantly reduced attack rates relative to placebo.

233 Estimates of sea otter attack rate revealed spatial heterogeneity in sea otter

234 were PCR-positive at baseline, the secondary attack rate (SAR) among household contacts was 32% (33 o

235 monstrate that estimates of ferret secondary attack rate (SAR) explain 66% of the variation in human

236 October 19, 2020, found an overall secondary attack rate (SAR) of 16.6% (95% CI, 14.0%-19.3%).

237 An overall household secondary attack rate (SAR) of 18.9% (95% CI, 16.2%-22.0%) through

238 a meta-analysis of Ebola household secondary attack rate (SAR), disaggregating by type of exposure (d

239 ie, test-positive, or symptomatic) secondary attack rates (SARs) among household contacts.

240 Clinical features and secondary attack rates (SARs) based on the onset of symptoms were

241 For a 15% clinical attack rate scenario, 1 week closure would delay the pea

242 at day 5 of introduction and a 30% clinical attack rate scenario, epidemic peak would be delayed by

243 Different attack rate scenarios for catastrophic (30.15%), strong

244 In each facility, attack rates seemed to differ by residential setting, wi

245 uenza pandemic that has age-specific illness attack rates similar to the Asian pandemic in 1957-1958

246 ed intestinal colonization and yet diarrheal attack rates similar to those of the wild type.

247 and brain homogenate achieving the same 100% attack rate, similar incubation periods (in both cases e

248 estimated SIA coverage tended to have lower attack rates (Spearman Correlation Coefficient=-0.63), p

249 associated with a 79% lower mean annualized attack rate than that observed with placebo (exploratory

250 ulinic acid and porphobilinogen, and a lower attack rate than that observed with placebo.

251 r time, and crowded cities have larger total attack rates than less populated cities.

252 tive strategy for reduction of the infection attack rate that would be robust with a large margin for

253 ver transmission, we calculate the infection attack rate (the proportion of population infected over

254 The attack rate there is an estimate of the final size of th

255 escalated according to predefined safety and attack rate thresholds.

256 ens over the last few years have reduced the attack rate to around 20% overall.

257 e doses can be estimated from the cumulative attack rate up to the point antibiotic prophylaxis begin

258 nd adolescents aged 1 to 14 years, secondary attack rates varied according to age and by disease and

259 ed on estimates for Antioquia, Colombia, the attack rate varies between 4% and 26% for a low (below 1

260 te-to-severe rt-PCR-confirmed influenza, the attack rate was 0.62% (16 cases) in the QIV group and 2.

261 The prison attack rate was 10.4% (95% confidence interval, 7.0%-13.

262 4 recipients, the RT-PCR-confirmed influenza attack rate was 2.2% (96 cases among 4303 participants)

263 preexposure immunity, the overall secondary attack rate was 25% (3 of 12).

264 56%) were fully vaccinated and the secondary attack rate was 28%.

265 Among IIV4 recipients, the attack rate was 3.2% (138 cases among 4301 participants)

266 g an aerosol-generating procedure (AGP), the attack rate was 35.7%.

267 In the 24 urban case families, the secondary attack rate was 35.8% (19/53) vs 0% (0/11) in controls (

268 The nephritis attack rate was 4.5 per 1000 in Nova Serrana but 18 per

269 The cumulative attack rate was 5.1% at the end of the first year and 6.

270 he cholera epidemic in Haiti, the cumulative attack rate was 6.1%, with cases reported in all 10 depa

271 in the 24 rural case families, the secondary attack rate was 7.8% (5/64) vs 0% (0/21) in controls (P

272 exposed to unvaccinated cases, the secondary attack rate was 71.5% if they were unvaccinated and 15.1

273 Serological attack rate was 92% (24/26) in index-farm residents/empl

274 The attack rate was associated with the number of visits (p<

275 Lanadelumab efficacy was durable-HAE attack rate was consistently lower vs placebo, from the

276 The attack rate was lower among the students who had receive

277 1-50.0%) in Colombia which suggests that the attack rate was most likely less than 50%; and 32.4% (95

278 During days 0-69, mean monthly attack rate was significantly lower with lanadelumab (0.

279 The CR low-dose attack rate was then compared against known low-dose rab

280 hough the magnitude and activation energy of attack rate were specific to each predator, which varied

281 45% and 3%, respectively, and the estimated attack rates were 29% and 0%, respectively, for an appar

282 Attack rates were 295 of 535 (55.1%) and 102 of 189 (54.

283 Rakai District, the estimated infection and attack rates were 68% and 41%, respectively, and 55% of

284 Moreover, we estimated that the infection attack rates were 78.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6

285 Age-adjusted, sex-specific stroke attack rates were computed for each survey year by using

286 study, declines in white shark abundance and attack rates were documented between 2015-2018, with ano

287 children < or = 2 years old, and the highest attack rates were for infants 9-11 months (65/100,000) a

288 Attack rates were highest among sophomores (72 of 414, 1

289 For the urban population, attack rates were lowest for children younger than 5 yea

290 wever, for the remote population, the lowest attack rates were obtained for adults older than 50 year

291 Attack rates were of 3.2% and 2.3% in the adult and pedi

292 Attack rates were positively correlated to the amount of

293 Attack rates were spatially heterogeneous, varying by a

294 Even though, by design, cumulative attack rates were the same for all resolutions and mobil

295 ections produced more intuitively consistent attack rates when households were stratified by the spee

296 up to 40%, but has little impact on overall attack rates, whereas case isolation or household quaran

297 Among 2-dose recipients, attack rates with first immunization at 12 and >/=15 mon

298 strategies substantially reduced the illness attack rate, with a maximal reduction in the attack rate

299 with CTB or LTB, resulted in a reduction of attack rates, with vaccine efficacies of 66.7% (P = 0.02

300 conomic status was associated with influenza attack rates within categories of crowding, but not the