ライフサイエンスコーパス: audiologist

1 were followed up solely by their dispensing audiologist.

2 eristics of the patient population served by audiologists.

3 ing scientists, cognitive psychologists, and audiologists.

4 ic effects were independently diagnosed by 2 audiologists.

5 owing categories: (1) characteristics of the audiologist, (2) characteristics of the hearing aids dis

6 ristics of the hearing aids dispensed by the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist's pa

7 First, a team comprising 2 CI audiologists, a CI surgeon, a hearing scientist, and 2 p

8 A trained audiologist adjusts the stimulation settings for good sp

9 xt of the author's personal experience as an audiologist and as a hearing aid wearer.

10 ults were assessed and graded by the testing audiologist and by two central review audiologists using

11 vel database of HHC professionals, including audiologists and hearing instrument specialists from 201

12 The audiologists and hearing instrument specialists included

13 Internists are a critical partner to audiologists and otolaryngologists in caring for the adu

14 ts suggested that personal differences among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to

15 end of 2022, 72.4% of the HHC workforce were audiologists, and 27.6% were hearing instrument speciali

16 linary approach involving otolaryngologists, audiologists, and speech/language pathologists.

17 for hearing status and tinnitus, referral to audiologists as clinically indicated, and hypertension c

18 Q permit risk stratification and referral to audiologists as needed, since HL adversely affects funct

19 To justify higher costs, HAs fitted by audiologists (AUD service model) and high-end HAs should

20 arable to those of hearing aids fitted using audiologist best practices.

21 nces among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to dispense are related more strongl

22 tting is not statistically different from an audiologist-controlled hearing assessment in a clinical

23 evel, this needs to be taken into account by audiologists creating programming maps for CIs, e.g. by

24 d clinical trial was conducted in offices of audiologists, family physicians, and a hospital-based ne

25 The audiologist-fit device group received the same hearing a

26 earing aids as an alternative to traditional audiologist-fit devices, understanding their long-term e

27 ith self-fit OTC hearing aids and those with audiologist-fit devices.

28 ed in the extension study (21 [47.7%] in the audiologist-fit group; 23 [52.3%] in the self-fit group)

29 At the long-term follow-up, self-fit and audiologist-fit groups showed no significant differences

30 s can offer comparable long-term benefits to audiologist-fit hearing aids for individuals with mild t

31 ial included 3 service models: AUD, in which audiologists fitted prescription HAs following best prac

32 In the audiologist-fitted group, audiologists fitted the same hearing aid according to th

33 p had an initial advantage compared with the audiologist-fitted group on the self-reported APHAB (Coh

34 In the audiologist-fitted group, audiologists fitted the same h

35 y assigned to either the self-fitting or the audiologist-fitted group.

36 p per request and by the audiologist for the audiologist-fitted group.

37 he self-fitting group per request and by the audiologist for the audiologist-fitted group.

38 Since the early 1980s, audiologists have become increasingly aware of the poten

39 h a detailed hearing assessment by a trained audiologist in a sound-controlled environment, using sta

40 tone audiometry, conducted by an experienced audiologist in the acute stage.

41 tandard audiometry and reviewed centrally by audiologists masked to allocation using American Speech-

42 support all the management decisions that an audiologist must make upon identifying an infant with mi

43 iatric Oncology, consisting of international audiologists, otolaryngologists, and leaders in the fiel

44 were defined using a threshold of 1 or fewer audiologists per 3500 individuals with hearing loss, and

45 HAs following best practices; OTC+, in which audiologists provided limited services for OTC HAs; and

46 oxicity grades were significantly related to audiologist recommendations for assistive devices such a

47 visit with a physician in addition to their audiologist's determined follow-up.

48 the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist's patient population, and (4) evidence-based

49 Thus, the audiologist's provision of appropriate and carefully sel

50 eferral were categorized as being due to the audiologist's recommendation or parental choice.

51 novel educative process for the parents and audiologists supporting decision-making for hearing aid

52 a direct relation between the belief by the audiologist that a feature might benefit patients and th

53 egression analyses from the responses of 257 audiologists to a dispensing practice survey.

54 There is a tendency for audiologists to focus on sensory management, aural rehab

55 ved the same hearing aids fit by a certified audiologist using best practices.

56 esting audiologist and by two central review audiologists using the American Speech-Language-Hearing

57 the central reviewers and the institutional audiologist was almost perfect for ASHA and Brock, where

58 population is increasing, and more clinical audiologists will be called upon to deliver hearing care