コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 CRF in the VTA during the experience of the aversive stimulus.
2 environment by the introduction of a mildly aversive stimulus.
3 ere taught to regulate fear responses to the aversive stimulus.
4 led for the subject to successfully avoid an aversive stimulus.
5 cations shortly after the presentation of an aversive stimulus.
6 lation of LA pyramidal neurons instead of an aversive stimulus.
7 ced postingestive thermogenesis generates an aversive stimulus.
8 espite normal electrodermal responses to the aversive stimulus.
9 stimulus in the absence of the unconditioned aversive stimulus.
10 ified dopamine neurons were inhibited by the aversive stimulus.
11 tions to avoid further presentations of this aversive stimulus.
12 gic response may depend on the nature of the aversive stimulus.
13 in naive mice and those exposed to an acute aversive stimulus.
14 ring approach to reward or by delivery of an aversive stimulus.
15 mbiguation, even in the absence of a salient aversive stimulus.
16 r was never presented in contiguity with the aversive stimulus.
17 ned responses produced by anticipation of an aversive stimulus.
18 rograms, ethanol preference and avoidance of aversive stimulus.
19 r the introduction of another highly salient aversive stimulus.
20 g stimulus was repeatedly associated with an aversive stimulus.
22 ew sensory stimulus was paired with the same aversive stimulus, about half of these neurons generaliz
24 learn to associate a neutral context with an aversive stimulus and display fear responses to a contex
26 head movement, and avoidance response to an aversive stimulus-and we found that, if individually ove
28 responses to anticipation and receipt of an aversive stimulus are modulated by this fundamental soci
29 ses at 30 mg/kg), which impairs memory of an aversive stimulus as assessed via a contextual fear cond
30 sis that exposure to peer verbal abuse is an aversive stimulus associated with greater symptom rating
31 n switched morphine reward signaling into an aversive stimulus, blockade of CB1 transmission potentia
33 mygdala were unable to avoid the conditioned aversive stimulus by their choice behaviour, but exhibit
34 d that exercising behavioral control over an aversive stimulus can persistently diminish threat respo
35 ound that pairing a 10 or 100 ms gap with an aversive stimulus caused a robust enhancement of gap det
36 iring the association between context and an aversive stimulus depend on corticohippocampal circuitry
37 als learn to associate a neutral cue with an aversive stimulus despite their separation in time by a
38 showing signs of distress in response to an aversive stimulus directed at themselves (APH), and usin
39 d to elicit the FRN in response to a primary aversive stimulus (electric shock) using a design that v
42 notype MWD, 1) lower posture after the first aversive stimulus given by handlers was associated with
43 ateral amygdala activation in response to an aversive stimulus (i.e., receiving an electrical shock).
44 logical and behavioral responses to the same aversive stimulus in different designs to determine if t
46 the idea that fear learning is instructed by aversive stimulus-induced activation of LA pyramidal cel
47 and excitotoxic RMTg lesions greatly reduce aversive stimulus-induced inhibitions in VTA neurons, pa
49 vation of dopamine neurons in response to an aversive stimulus is attenuated by conditional genetic i
51 at place cells respond to the presence of an aversive stimulus, modify their firing patterns during e
54 2 or 10 mug) nor intermittent exposure to an aversive stimulus (predator stress) altered sensitivity
57 cond regulation of dopamine signaling by the aversive stimulus, quinine, and tested its ability to ca
58 ucleus accumbens (NAc) medial shell while an aversive stimulus selectively modified synapses on DA ce
59 rats consume alcohol despite pairing with an aversive stimulus such as quinine, a paradigm considered
60 oned stimulus), comes to predict an innately aversive stimulus, such as a mild footshock (the uncondi
63 bertally (62%, P < 0.0001) in response to an aversive stimulus, suggesting that increases in L5PL syn
64 s was not potentiated following an arousing, aversive stimulus, suggesting that oxA/hcrt-1-mediated g
66 ne's own are more readily associated with an aversive stimulus than individuals of one's own race, am
67 ditioned stimulus predicts the arrival of an aversive stimulus, the animal encodes the time interval
68 using high-intensity laser irradiation as an aversive stimulus, this laser tracking system can be use
69 ly detected after training with a relatively aversive stimulus; thus, it may be a function of level o
70 ioning of discrete responses learned with an aversive stimulus - to the anterior interpositus nucleus
71 tyrosine did not affect EDA responses to the aversive stimulus (UCS) or alter participants' mood.
72 ditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned, aversive stimulus (US) but also involves encoding the ti
73 ponses by dopamine neurons in response to an aversive stimulus was associated with impaired condition
74 ed reduced skin conductance responses to the aversive stimulus, which contributed significantly to th
75 ith a history of partial association with an aversive stimulus, with potential implications for under
76 esponses to a neutral stimulus preceding the aversive stimulus within a few instances of their pairin