ライフサイエンスコーパス: axial length

1 high hyperopia or nanophthalmos (<= 21.0 mm axial length).

2 ), and (ii) contact lenses (RIS changed with axial length).

3 ong (>/=24.5 to <26 mm), and long (>/=26 mm) axial length.

4 apy restored retinal function and normalized axial length.

5 ociation with age, gender, ONH diameter, and axial length.

6 ly associated with high myopia and increased axial length.

7 ngle nor BMO area was associated with age or axial length.

8 ssibly related to a slightly greater average axial length.

9 d after manual correction and adjustment for axial length.

10 correlation only with cup-to-disc ratio and axial length.

11 rneal thickness; anterior chamber depth; and axial length.

12 ty, refractive error, corneal topography and axial length.

13 correlations with age, refractive error and axial length.

14 correlations with age, refractive error and axial length.

15 0.11/mm, r = 0.96, P < 0.01) were related to axial length.

16 ns were measured and correlated with age and axial length.

17 GCC volume, RNFL thickness, patient age, or axial length.

18 al power of the eye and its excessively long axial length.

19 d predictability in eyes with short and long axial lengths.

20 ia (-1.00 to -16.00 diopters), and increased axial lengths.

21 cant difference before and after dilation in axial length (0.005 mm; P = .476), corneal power (0.001

22 (+13.5 OD and +14 OS diopters) with reduced axial length (16.27 mm OD and 15.93 mm OS).

23 How axial length-a sum of the anterior chamber depth, lens t

24 Cycloplegic refraction, axial length, accommodation amplitude, pupil diameter, a

25 DTRS rings was significantly correlated with axial length after adjustment for age (P < 0.0001), age

26 The mean (95% confidence interval) change in axial length after surgery was -0.03 mm (-0.34 to 0.40)

27 The CCT, axial length, age, and gender did not significantly affe

28 ly associated variables (including LV, PCAL, axial length, age, and iris area) explained 80.5% of the

29 to maximal CRT reduction was not related to axial length, age, lens status, or history of injections

30 127 eyes of 127 patients with axial length (AL) >=26 mm were included.

31 sed on axial length: emmetropic, myopic with axial length (AL) < 25 mm, and myopic with AL > 25 mm, t

32 To report the longitudinal change in axial length (AL) from the time of unilateral cataract s

33 of spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and axial length (AL) in two population-based cohorts of whi

34 This study compared the optical axial length (AL) obtained by composite and segmental me

35 ve proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and axial length (AL) of the eye upon the anatomical outcome

36 Axial length (AL) of the eyes was measured by non-contac

37 imaging was used to determine the effect of axial length (AL) on globe rotational axis and horizonta

38 as the most accurate formula over the entire axial length (AL) spectrum and in both the short eye (AL

39 The median (range) axial length (AL) was 24.2 mm (22.4-27.7 mm).

40 ent was -9.03 +/- 5.11 diopters (D) and mean axial length (AL) was 27.36 +/- 2.09 mm.

41 Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), accommodation amplitude, pupil diamet

42 Correlations among LT, LD, LV, age, axial length (AL), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were

43 erence tomography, IOP, blood pressure (BP), axial length (AL), and anterior chamber depth (ACD).

44 We assessed effects of age, gender, race, axial length (AL), and central subfield thickness on FAZ

45 The results of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and ante

46 Ocular biometry including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and cor

47 Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratom

48 male gender, hypertension, diabetes, greater axial length (AL), bigger disc area, and lower scan sign

49 ictor variables age, corneal curvature (CC), axial length (AL), CCT and IOP.

50 s who underwent an eye examination to obtain axial length (AL), central corneal thickness, vitreous c

51 Evaluate agreement and repeatability of axial length (AL), corneal curvature, and anterior chamb

52 c data included values for refractive error, axial length (AL), corneal curvature, anterior chamber d

53 ), lens thickness (LT), vitreal length (VL), axial length (AL), lens position and relative lens posit

54 rmed to obtain anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), lens thickness, and vitreous cavity l

55 etry (IOPk), scleral pneumatonometry (IOPs), axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), and centra

56 es in cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), visual acuity, pupil size, and accomm

57 s to evaluate the association between ocular axial length (AL), vitreous chamber depth (VCD) and both

58 After stratifying eyes by axial length (AL), we found higher unexpected refractive

59 ens thickness (LT), vitreous depth (VD), and axial length (AL), were measured and compared with a par

60 derived using the targeted CL power and the axial length (AL).

61 Axial length (AL); anterior chamber depth (ACD), defined

62 ve error and ocular components measurements (axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth [ACD], corneal

63 ctive error and its associated determinants (axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth, and corneal c

64 sing myopic refractive error, and increasing axial length (all P < .001).

65 Difference between measured preoperative axial length and age-matched mean axial length (prior st

66 ere corrected for magnification secondary to axial length and analyzed.

67 tear-film break-up time, Schirmer I testing, axial length and anterior chamber depth measurement, cor

68 he MH closure rate, the relationship between axial length and closure rate, the best-corrected visual

69 ge, gender, ethnicity, intraocular pressure, axial length and corneal curvature, the LC-GSI was most

70 PPCIs were compared and correlated with the axial length and corneal power in both groups of eyes, a

71 rwent a full biometric evaluation, including axial length and corneal power measurements, and macular

72 Axial length and corneal radius (CR) were measured with

73 had reduced visual acuity, hyperopia, short axial length and crowded optic discs.

74 onnaire and ocular evaluations that included axial length and cycloplegic autorefraction at the begin

75 affected and fellow eyes after adjusting for axial length and intraocular pressure.

76 ular parameters (intraocular pressure [IOP], axial length and mean ocular perfusion pressure [MOPP])

77 ns between subfoveal choroidal thickness and axial length and myopic refractive error were obtained (

78 Axial length and scleral thickness were measured after s

79 No associations with axial length and smoking were observed.

80 ed that visual impairment is associated with axial length and spherical equivalent and may be unavoid

81 ce of visual impairment rose with increasing axial length and spherical equivalent, with a cumulative

82 Axial length and visual field mean deviation are the mai

83 The median (interquartile range, [IQR]) axial length and visual field mean deviation were 24.5 (

84 al equivalent and negatively associated with axial length and vitreous depth.

85 Experimental glaucoma led to increases in axial length and width by comparison to fellow eyes (6%

86 Although lens thickness, vitreous length, axial length, and anterior chamber volume were moderatel

87 Refractive error, axial length, and BCVA correlated significantly with mac

88 Measurement of refractive error, axial length, and complete ophthalmic examination.

89 , lens thickness, vitreous cavity depth, and axial length, and dependent variables, including angle o

90 heavier had thicker cornea and lens, longer axial length, and flatter corneal curve.

91 associated with shorter baseline AOD750 and axial length, and greater baseline anterior chamber dept

92 mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, axial length, and intraocular pressure (IOP), decreased

93 der age, rural region of habitation, shorter axial length, and lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus.

94 Axial length, and myopic ammetropy are highly associated

95 They were masked to the refractive error, axial length, and OCT findings.

96 dom sample of manual cases with similar age, axial length, and preoperative cylinders.

97 nalysis demonstrated an effect of ethnicity, axial length, and refractive error on BMO-based paramete

98 sc and measurements of intraocular pressure, axial length, and refractive error.

99 even when variables such as age, ethnicity, axial length, and sex were taken into account.

100 , sex, race/ethnicity, eye color, refraction/axial length, and smoking status were evaluated as was m

101 eight, Tanner stage of pubertal development, axial length, and spherical equivalent refractive error.

102 he nontreated group after adjusting for age, axial length, and spherical power.

103 he latter adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, axial length, and the use of both eyes in the same subje

104 ween mode and OCT signal strength (SS), age, axial length, and visual field mean deviation (VFMD) was

105 Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and central cornea

106 is study is to determine the normal range of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, an

107 Male sex, younger age, and shorter axial length are the factors independently associated wi

108 rrection has a greater effect on the highest axial lengths are needed.

109 (SS-OCT) biometry repeatedly calculated the axial length as > 35.00 mm in both eyes.

110 Anisometropic eyes had greater axial length asymmetry than nonanisometropic eyes.

111 OK eye there was no change from baseline in axial length at 12 months (-0.04+/-0.08 mm; P=0.218).

112 lus intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and axial length at age 5 years.

113 5%CI 1.18 to 2.09, p = 0.0020) per mm longer axial length at baseline.

114 Axial length (AXL) and radius of corneal curvature were

115 valent (MSE) of refractive error (dioptres), axial length (AXL; mm), and radius of corneal curvature

116 -1.44, -0.13; beta: -0.03; P = .02]), longer axial length (B: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.42; beta: 0.07; P

117 central corneal thickness, WtW, ACD, LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia.

118 entation and increasing corneal diameter and axial length but a negative relationship was noted with

119 at a decrease in ONH diameter by 100 mum and axial length by 1 mm increased the odds of ONHD presence

120 ssment, including cycloplegic refractometry, axial length, Cardiff acuity, and neurodevelopmental ass

121 This corresponds to average axial length change values of approximately 0.3 mm for O

122 characterized by microcornea with increased axial length, coloboma of the iris and of the optic disc

123 was in the mid range, nonetheless, studying axial length components showed that the Iranian populati

124 epeat biometry of the patient calculated the axial length consistent with a hypermetrope (21.67 mm) a

125 In this prospective, case-control study, the axial length, corneal curvature radius, anterior chamber

126 ing refractive error (spherical equivalent), axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber de

127 on of postoperative lens position, including axial length, corneal power (K), preoperative anterior c

128 il dilation on the IOLMaster measurements of axial length, corneal power, and corresponding theoretic

129 fractive error at baseline, parental myopia, axial length, corneal power, crystalline lens power, rat

130 The parameters compared were axial length, corneal power, cylinder, and the correspon

131 Sex, axial length/corneal curvature ratio, and peak expirator

132 Alcohol consumption, age, axial length/corneal curvature ratio, cataract surgery,

133 The axial lengths did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .

134 calculated, and was defined as age-adjusted axial length difference (ALD) (minus and plus denotes my

135 Although increase in axial length drives refractive change during childhood a

136 In 3 cross-sectional studies with data on axial length, each millimeter increase in axial length w

137 Apparent shortening of axial length early in OK lens wear may reflect the contr

138 Axial length elongation and myopia progression with OK w

139 up was divided into three subgroups based on axial length: emmetropic, myopic with axial length (AL)

140 osition (LP and RLP, respectively), and lens axial length factor (LAF).

141 The GP lens-wearing eye showed progressive axial length growth throughout the study.

142 opia (spherical equivalent >/=-6 diopters or axial length >/=26 mm) and 96 eyes of 62 healthy patient

143 yze aqueous samples from highly myopic eyes (axial length >25 mm, n = 92) and ametropic or mild myopi

144 the Wang-Koch (WK) adjustment for eyes with axial length >25.0 mm on 4 of the formulas.

145 Forty-seven highly myopic eyes (with axial length >26 mm) were included in the study group an

146 After 6 months of lens wear, axial length had increased by 0.04+/-0.06 mm (mean+/-sta

147 Choroidal thickness, refraction and ocular axial length had no detectable effect on rod-mediated da

148 In the high myopia group, axial length had the best correlation with choroidal thi

149 While effects of axial length have been reported, the effects of anterior

150 and Yoruba ethnic groups, illiteracy, longer axial length, higher IOP, lower MOPP, greater severity o

151 or chamber (HR, 0.22; P = 0.008), and longer axial length (HR, 1.58; P = 0.01).

152 White race (HR, 8.75; P = 0.0002) and longer axial length (HR, 1.61; P = 0.03) were associated with g

153 ial elongation after adjustment for baseline axial length in nonmyopic eyes (beta = 27 mum/100 mum, 9

154 hange in both spherical refractive error and axial length in younger children when compared with teen

155 WT and Slitrk6-deficient mouse eyes revealed axial length increase in the mutant (the endophenotype o

156 Anatomic outcomes tended to decrease when axial length increased (P = 0.066).

157 Axial length increased by a mean of 0.84 mm (P < 0.0001)

158 Corneal power remained unchanged, but axial length increased.

159 ore, as these changes are only observed when axial length induced variations in RIS are accounted for

160 To explore the effects of axial length-induced variations in retinal image size (R

161 Axial length influenced the absolute prediction error wi

162 r regression, adjusted for age, sex, height, axial length, intraocular and systemic blood pressure, a

163 Axial length is especially associated with choroidal thi

164 llected included age, gender, visual acuity, axial length, lens status, and previous injections.

165 Axial length, lens thickness, and vitreous length were o

166 Nanophthalmos was defined as an axial length less than 20.0 mm and/or refractive error g

167 Ultrasonography measurements were made of axial length, logMAR VA, contrast sensitivity function (

168 Younger age at surgery, shorter axial length, longer follow-up, use of trypan blue, rein

169 we isolated 16 eyes from 10 patients with an axial length <26.5 mm for further analysis.

170 odel 1B (R(2) = 0.58), which included LV and axial length, LV (SRC = -0.46, SPCC(2) = 0.1) and IC (SR

171 clinical characteristics, refractive error, axial length, macular choroidal thickness, and best-corr

172 Demographic data, axial length (Master-Vu Sonomed Escalon, Lake Success, N

173 Longer axial length may increase the risk of anatomic failure.

174 Axial length (mean 16.25 mm [range 14.88-19.88]) had str

175 RSS56 mutations were associated with shorter axial lengths (mean 15.72 mm) than missense PRSS56 mutat

176 Axial length, mean deviation, and their interaction show

177 oidal volume as well as the association with axial length, mean ocular perfusion pressure, or IOP was

178 Exact ray-tracing was carried out after the axial length (measured either by immersion ultrasound bi

179 d examination, optical coherence tomography, axial length measurement, audiometry, visual evoked resp

180 All participants underwent axial length measurement, keratometry, corneal pachymetr

181 After a comprehensive eye examination and axial length measurement, RNFL and macular thickness mea

182 Ophthalmologic examination included axial length measurement, spectral domain optical cohere

183 Bland-Altman plots show good correlation for axial length measurements (95% limits of agreement rangi

184 ry (Topcon), Pentacam HR, IOL Master (Zeiss) axial length measurements and fundus optical coherence t

185 rations for ocular volume as calculated from axial length measurements did not alter regression analy

186 Moreover, axial length measurements of both eye bulbs were determi

187 The Bland-Altman analysis of axial length measurements with the IOL Master 500 and IO

188 0.6) years and 16.6 (0.3) years during which axial length (median (IQR)) increased by 243 (202) mum i

189 Application of the WK axial length modification generally resulted in a shift

190 os, with mean refraction of +11.8 D and mean axial length of 17.6 mm.

191 (1.3) for participants aged 75 years with an axial length of 24 to less than 26 mm and greater than 9

192 from 15.3 to 37.8 mm; 819 individuals had an axial length of 26 mm or greater.

193 han 26 mm and greater than 90% (8.1) with an axial length of 30 mm or greater.

194 The axial length of both eyes was normal.

195 rs are the product of a mismatch between the axial length of the eye and its optical power, creating

196 studies revealed that the regulation of the axial length of the eye occurs via a complex signaling c

197 t worldwide, results from an increase in the axial length of the eyeball.

198 The mean axial length of the eyes with a posterior staphyloma was

199 gh-performance separations and (ii) the full axial length of the separation gel.

200 s of IL-6 and MMP-2 in aqueous humor and the axial lengths of the eye globes (IL-6, beta = 0.065, p <

201 The inability to correct for axial length on spectral-domain (SD) OCT translates into

202 When controlling for axial length, only the macular inner circle thickness wa

203 alternative method that, when combined with axial length optimization, resulted in lower MAE (0.425)

204 g, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26; P<0.001), longer axial length (OR per mm, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80; P<0.00

205 ; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82; P = 0.003), and shorter axial length (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; P = 0.04).

206 ia (OR, 1.7; 95%, CI, 1.1-2.5; P<0.001), and axial length (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2 per millimeter; P

207 ge (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; P < .001), longer axial length (OR, 2.57; P < .001), presence of rhegmatog

208 between groups 1 and 2 in refractive status, axial length, or Cardiff acuity.

209 sis showed no relationship with age, gender, axial length, or ethnicity.

210 pit and FAZ metrics were not related to age, axial length, or refractive status.

211 The mode was not associated with SS, age, axial length, or VFMD, it circumscribed the thicker RNFL

212 ticipants with more severe myopia and longer axial length (P < .001).

213 r age (P < 0.0001), age after adjustment for axial length (P < 0.0001), and sex after adjustment for

214 h (P < 0.0001), and sex after adjustment for axial length (P < 0.05).

215 age but showed a negative relationship with axial length (P = .01).

216 ferences in age (P = .050), race (P = .039), axial length (P = .033), and retinal nerve fiber layer t

217 as age (P = .31), keratometry (P = .32), and axial length (P = .27) of the patient.

218 tory of cardiovascular disease (P = .49), or axial length (P = .52).

219 n multivariate analyses, age (P < 0.001) and axial length (P = 0.03) predicted GC/IPL measurements in

220 angle in multivariate analyses (P = .044 for axial length, P = .039 for mean deviation, and P = .028

221 beta = -2.51), female (beta = -1.57), longer axial length (per mm; beta = -1.54), and presence of chr

222 variable analysis adjusting for age, gender, axial length, presence of cataract, OCT signal strength,

223 eoperative axial length and age-matched mean axial length (prior studies) was calculated, and was def

224 t correlated strongly and inversely with the axial length (R = -0.62; P<0.0001).

225 ith PMF height (R = 0.68; P<0.0001), inverse axial length (R = -0.71; P<0.0001), and corneal power (R

226 gful correlations were found between FD% and axial length (|r| < 0.30).

227 diopter [D]) absolute error over the entire axial length range, and was comparable with the formulas

228 known methods and was better over the entire axial length range.

229 sity and eye size ( approximately 6-12 mm in axial length) range between approximately 2 and 4 cycles

230 Axial length ranged from 15.3 to 37.8 mm; 819 individual

231 Axial lengths ranged from 22 to 29.2 mm (mean: 24.9 +/-

232 od-intercept or the dark adaptation rate and axial length, refraction, gender or age.

233 elated significantly with cup-to-disc ratio, axial length, refractive error, astigmatism, and posteri

234 patients with ADAMTSL4 mutations, increased axial length, relative to age-matched controls, was obse

235 er trabeculectomy, especially IOP change and axial length, require further investigation.

236 ify WNT7B as a novel susceptibility gene for axial length (rs10453441, Pmeta=3.9 x 10(-13)) and corne

237 Axial length seemed to be a major parameter at the 15q14

238 pressure, increased lens thickness, shorter axial length, shallow anterior chamber depth, anteriorly

239 iations with greater lens vault were shorter axial length, shallower anterior chamber depth(ACD), hig

240 Posterior staphylomas in myopic eyes with an axial length shorter than 26.5 mm exhibit features resem

241 d treatment-specific factors, including age, axial length, socioeconomic status, IOL model, and posto

242 In univariate analyses, axial length, spherical equivalent, and mean deviation w

243 ectives: To evaluate the association between axial length, spherical equivalent, and the risk of visu

244 This study assessed the relationships among axial length, structural vitreous density, PVD, and visu

245 Corneal diameter decreases with decreasing axial length, suggesting posterior microphthalmos and na

246 y identified other patients with exaggerated axial lengths, supporting the theory that the biometer's

247 PM and its significant correlation with the axial length, the PMF severity and keratometry establish

248 ting for central corneal thickness, age, and axial length, the relationship of CH and CRF to RNFL thi

249 With increasing axial length there was greater vitreous echodensity (R:

250 Axial length-to-CR ratio at baseline showed statisticall

251 rescaled with magnification correction using axial length value.

252 The distributions of axial length, vitreous chamber depth, and lens thickness

253 l choroidal thickness in relationship to the axial length was -43.84 mum/mm.

254 The mean increase in axial length was 0.27+/-0.25, 0.28+/-0.28, and 0.41+/-0.

255 Forty-three eyes were studied; mean axial length was 18.1 +/- 1.1 mm (in 23 eyes, it was <18

256 Average axial length was 21.2 +/- 1.0 mm with mean spherical equ

257 Mean axial length was 22.74 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]:

258 +/-1.77(-4.25 to +5.00) diopters and average axial length was 23.5+/-1.0 (21.5 to 25.8)mm.

259 The axial length was 23.63 mm.

260 The mean axial length was 23.84 +/- 0.78 mm.

261 Mean +/- SD axial length was 26.6 +/- 0.6 mm [median: 26.2 mm; range

262 Mean +/- SD axial length was 26.6 +/- 0.6 mm [median: 26.2 mm; range

263 tients were recruited (20 eyes); the average axial length was 27.06 mm, and the average signal streng

264 Mean axial length was 27.49 +/- 2.53 mm.

265 The mean axial length was 28.5+/-2.2 mm in highly myopic eyes and

266 54.4 +/- 18.2 years (range, 18-99) and mean axial length was 29.17 +/- 2.44 mm (range, 26.00-35.63).

267 The mean axial length was 29.37+/-1.92 mm.

268 After controlling for LV and PCAL, axial length was a poor determinant of ACD (partial R(2)

269 nformation about LV and PCAL were available, axial length was a poor determinant of ACD, whereas lens

270 A negative correlation between the SFCT and axial length was also detected (P < 0.001).

271 on axial length, each millimeter increase in axial length was associated with a decreased odd of prev

272 Shorter axial length was associated with early AMD in both Singa

273 Longer baseline axial length was associated with greater five-year axial

274 Higher axial length was associated with lower odds of incident

275 n limbus-anterior chamber angle distance and axial length was established.

276 Compared to other studies, axial length was in the mid range, nonetheless, studying

277 ucing their value by -1.19 diopters (D); the axial length was measured by immersion biometry, and the

278 Axial length was measured using an interferometric devic

279 ereas for secondary congenital glaucoma only axial length was positively correlated.

280 The association with axial length was previously found only in a cross-sectio

281 ver, in the GP eye, the 12-month increase in axial length was significant (0.09+/-0.09 mm; P<0.001).

282 meter were comparable in both groups but the axial length was significantly longer in primary congeni

283 Ocular biometric analysis revealed that axial length was the most likely trait underlying the re

284 Change in axial length was the primary outcome for 10 of 13 studie

285 Axial length was the strongest determinant of RE (SRC =

286 glion cell peak density and eye size (29 mm, axial length), we estimated upper limits of spatial reso

287 of total ganglion cells and eye size (35 mm, axial length), we estimated upper limits of spatial reso

288 Age and axial length were associated with choroidal parameters i

289 ubclinical ONHD with smaller ONH and shorter axial length were found.

290 equivalent and 9074 individuals with data on axial length were included in the study; right eyes were

291 Age, gender, ONH diameter, and axial length were obtained from participants.

292 and systemic factors studied, age, sex, and axial length were the only significant predictors of cho

293 Globe axial lengths were 18.6 +/- 1.9 mm.

294 The patient's initial axial lengths were 25.55 mm in the right eye and 28.13 m

295 ger intervals between injections, and longer axial lengths were associated with lower IOP elevations

296 ely 2-5 mum diameter and approximately 4 mum axial length) were hydrogenated to develop a probe capab

297 Additionally, re-confirm the axial length with another modality.

298 ican deficiency in mice results in increased axial length with fibromodulin deficiency and thinner sc

299 r chamber angle distance with AS-OCT and the axial length with IOLMaster.

300 aphy and pachymetry with Scheimpflug camera, axial length with non-contact partial coherence interfer