戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 en underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding).
2 ariatric surgery (gastric bypass and gastric banding).
3 increased in debanding compared with sham or banding.
4 have a surgical procedure other than gastric banding.
5 ongside mechanisms such as kinking and shear banding.
6 basis of morphology and reverse DAPI (rDAPI) banding.
7 ng II stimulation, as well as chronic aortic banding.
8 strectomy have a greater effect than gastric banding.
9 ocedures following failed adjustable gastric banding.
10 ocedures following failed adjustable gastric banding.
11 similar plastic morphology governed by shear banding.
12 tricular hypertrophy (LVH) induced by aortic banding.
13 elected for unbalanced 1q12 aberrations by G-banding.
14  and 2008 for patients who had prior gastric banding.
15 strectomy and 1 following adjustable gastric banding.
16 ls that had undergone exercise before aortic-banding.
17 blished cardiac dysfunction caused by aortic-banding.
18 sually correlated with recognized chromosome banding.
19 d enhances myofibrillogenesis and sarcomeric banding.
20 ene expression is determined before afferent banding.
21 on rate than laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
22 ore than doubled within 30 mins after aortic banding.
23 se hearts at 7, 14, and 21 days after aortic banding.
24             Newborn rabbits underwent aortic banding.
25 ular remodeling induced by transverse aortic banding.
26 te atrial pressure overload caused by aortic banding.
27 s observed at 3 wk but not at 1 wk after the banding.
28 ) after gastric bypass but not after gastric banding.
29  a myriad of mechanisms to rationalize shear banding.
30  hemodynamics were measured at 4-months post-banding.
31 e chain reaction testing, and no oligoclonal banding.
32 ad undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
33 in Yorkshire swine by partial pulmonary vein banding.
34 s, sleeve gastrectomy, or adjustable gastric banding.
35 y patients underwent gastric bypass (13.2%), banding (18.7%), or vertical banded gastroplasty (68.1%)
36 c dysfunction improved simultaneously (E/E': banding, 18.5+/-4.1, debanding, 15.1+/-1.8, P=0.029).
37 ular velocity ratio, E/E': sham, 13.6+/-2.1, banding, 18.5+/-4.1, P=0.014) accompanied by increased o
38 ts in the bariatric-surgery cohort underwent banding (19%), vertical banded gastroplasty (69%), or ga
39 23.8+/-6.9 years) had prior pulmonary artery banding (2-stage ASO).
40 reater initial weight reduction than gastric banding (2.77 kg/mo).
41 dative stress (dihydroethidium fluorescence: banding, 2.6x10(8)+/-4.5x10(7), debanding, 1.96x10(8)+/-
42 m fluorescence: sham, 1.6x10(8)+/-6.1x10(7), banding, 2.6x10(8)+/-4.5x10(7), P<0.001) and augmented m
43 f the myocyte minor axis for isolated aortic banding (36 +/- 9%, n = 3) and MI cardiomyocytes located
44          Retrospective analyses suggest that banding a sleeve using a silicone ring may decrease weig
45 bjected LUM knock-out (LUMKO) mice to aortic banding (AB) and treated cultured cardiac fibroblasts (C
46 fically in the heart are resistant to aortic banding (AB)-induced cardiac hypertrophy, whereas mice l
47 sted RR, 16.6; 95% CI, 4.7-58.4) and gastric banding (adjusted RR, 6.9; 95% CI, 3.1-15.2).
48 s (RYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) are 2 of the most commonly performed baria
49  gastric bypass (RYGB) or adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and En
50  study was to analyze the adjustable gastric banding (AGB) natural history on a national basis.
51 erans who underwent RYGB, adjustable gastric banding (AGB), or sleeve gastrectomy (SG).
52 ody weight (BW) more than adjustable gastric banding (AGB), which does not trigger increased GLP-1 se
53    Myocardial infarction and thoracic aortic banding amplified the NEC pool, increasing fibroblast di
54 or numerical) identified by using chromosome-banding analysis (CBA) may be relevant for treatment dec
55                                        Our G-banding analysis revealed that the chromosome number var
56 is and assessment of karyotype by chromosome banding analysis.
57 d as a rescue procedure after failed gastric banding and (2) study trends in the frequency of reopera
58 ure overload, transverse aortic constriction banding and angiotensin II infusion, and a genetic model
59 frequency of reoperations related to gastric banding and associated short-term outcomes are unknown.
60 es an animal model for nonadjustable gastric banding and characterizes the effect of gastric banding
61  by describing the competition between shear banding and diffusive relaxation processes, and is remin
62                                 We used bird banding and encounter data for American kestrels (Falco
63 n of rhythmic features such as compositional banding and foliation in rocks that are reacting or diss
64 and Atcayos mutant mice by transverse aortic banding and found that absence of these lincRNAs did not
65 ictive procedures such as adjustable gastric banding and gastroplasty were excluded.
66 s, including laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
67 nemoralis crosses that segregate for colour, banding and pigmentation, and several other unlinked she
68 y and mitophagy-related markers increased in banding and remained higher in debanding rats.
69                                    Using gel banding and retardation as a read-out for protein adsorp
70 lays various patterns, including nodulation, banding and scallops and fingers.
71  documented benefit for combination therapy (banding and sclerotherapy).
72                                       Weight banding and size correction methods for normalizing dose
73 ere, chronic (2 years) LVH induced by aortic banding and then were compared with controls.
74 olecular karyotype arrays, Giemsa banding (G-banding) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) ex
75 % sleeve gastrectomy, 10% adjustable gastric banding, and 1% other.
76 -Y bypass, 62% (95% CI, 46-79) after gastric banding, and 60% (95% CI, 51-70) after sleeve gastrectom
77 s, 13% underwent gastric bypass, 19% gastric banding, and 68% vertical-banded gastroplasty.
78 paroscopic), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and biliopancreatic diversion (with or without
79  induced in athymic rats by pulmonary artery banding, and cells were implanted into the RV free wall.
80 timates of recombination between both colour/banding, and colour/pigmentation loci are zero, incomple
81 istone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4 and for C-banding, and forms huge condensed middle chromosome regi
82 alve repair or replacement, pulmonary artery banding, and implantation of an assist device into the s
83 tric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
84 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and most recently sleeve gastrectomy for both s
85 ry hypertension, the murine pulmonary artery banding, and rat monocrotaline and Sugen5416/hypoxia mod
86 ), dilated cardiomyopathy induced via aortic banding, and sham surgery confirmed and quantified heter
87 c bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and their effects on weight loss, comorbidities
88              After 8 to 9 weeks, half of the banding animals underwent overload relief by an aortic d
89         This is an extension of the temporal banding approach including a Temporal Error Score that f
90   The use of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding approached one-third (32.1%) of all procedures b
91 y distributed, without apparent gradients or banding arrangements.
92                Although laparoscopic gastric banding as a primary treatment of morbid obesity has bee
93  after gastric bypass and 1.9% after gastric banding at latest follow-up (P < 0.001 for both groups).
94  is characterized by shear and concentration banding at the polar/isotropic interface.
95        Second, we analysed effects of aortic banding because NCX1 currents do not mirror the increase
96 izens who received gastric bypass or gastric banding between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2012,
97 ere prepared, showing the reproducibility of banding between sister chromatids, homologue pairs and f
98          These findings suggest that gastric banding causes esophageal outlet obstruction and subsequ
99          When subjected to the new protocol, banding characteristic of L. purpureus were detected whi
100 logical cardiac hypertrophy following aortic banding, confirming and extending our previous data that
101 After mechanical overload obtained by aortic banding constriction, the Ca(2+) transient was prolonged
102 tic abnormalities, identified by classical G-banding, correlate with prognosis.
103 iety of different mechanisms including shear banding, crack formation and delamination.
104  distances determined from ring-and-recovery banding data, and used allometric scaling equations to q
105 increasing the spatial frequency of axial OS banding decreases OS rigidity, reducing its fragility.
106  mice at baseline and after abdominal aortic banding demonstrated that KO mice developed less ventric
107 nt primary prophylaxis (sclerotherapy and/or banding, depending on age and weight).
108                          We show that visual banding develops at a given stress and host-rock permeab
109  of the couples were almost identical, minor banding differences existed between the source and susce
110 y resolved reduction of order prior to shear banding due to increased strain.
111              Rats with POH (ascending aortic banding) evolved into either compensated-concentric POH
112 subjected to oxidative stress by transaortic banding exhibited exaggerated cardiac hypertrophy and su
113 elasticity theory, representing the axial OS banding explicitly via a spring-bead model.
114                                      Using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and spectra
115 form higher order structures, and mimics the banding found in natural collagen fibers.
116 to their widespread distribution and regular banding frequency.
117 se include a series of ranges known as Texas banding (from the Texas Risk Reduction Program) as well
118 esolution molecular karyotype arrays, Giemsa banding (G-banding) and fluorescent in situ hybridizatio
119 ty, 13 to RY gastric bypass; 71 gastroplasty/banding (GP/B): all revised to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
120 ry procedure after failed adjustable gastric banding (group 2).
121              Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been demonstrated to permit important weight
122 cadianly regulated spore formation (conidial banding), has remained an integral tool in the study of
123 m mice that have undergone transverse aortic banding have increased MDM2 levels associated with decre
124 astric bypass procedure after failed gastric banding have more adverse outcomes than those undergoing
125 ve operations, especially adjustable gastric banding, have a lower risk but are somewhat less effecti
126 Manometric measures were equivalent prior to banding in all groups.
127  This transformed behaviour suppresses shear-banding in bulk samples in normal uniaxial (tensile or c
128 tered buoyant density and can be purified by banding in cesium chloride (CsCl) gradients.
129                                      Density banding in coral skeletons provides a record of growth o
130 ng different methods: cytological chromosome banding in human cells and DNA isotopic-labeling techniq
131         Most secreted RNA was noninfectious, banding in isopycnic gradients at a density of 1.04-1.07
132  pathologic cardiac hypertrophy after aortic banding in mice.
133 te that fibroblast accumulation after aortic banding in murine hearts arises almost exclusively from
134 no changes in motility or lipopolysaccharide banding in the mutants, implying a role that is limited
135 ensional finite-element simulations of shear banding in this type of specimens are the first of their
136                                       Aortic-banding in untrained non-Tg controls led to pathological
137 of GRK5 is enhanced in myocytes after aortic banding in vivo and in vitro in myocytes after increased
138 in recurrence was due to the need for repeat bandings in the RBL group.
139 ations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding include stomal stenosis, malpositioned bands, po
140 fibre remains displaying approximately 67 nm banding, indicating the possible preservation of the ori
141 nics of the overlap and gap regions in the D-banding individually.
142                Compared with WT mice, aortic banding induced a similar degree of cardiac hypertrophy
143               Echocardiography revealed that banding induced concentric hypertrophy and diastolic dys
144          Pressure overload induced by aortic banding induced heart failure and greatly increased card
145                         In a model of aortic banding-induced chronic pressure overload, heart functio
146 ia or Monocrotaline) versus pulmonary artery banding-induced RVH (PAB-RVH).
147 atomistic simulations demonstrate that shear banding instability no longer afflicts the 5- to 10-nm-t
148  and 171) exhibited reduced and more diffuse banding intensity and slightly upshifted mobility (HBc 1
149  in N. dutertrei and suggest that diurnal Mg-banding is an intrinsic component of biomineralization i
150                                 The observed banding is consistent with tandem coassembly of alternat
151     The number of reoperations after gastric banding is rapidly increasing in the United States.
152                   Strain localization (shear banding) is observed on the boundaries of the flows at i
153  kg/m(2)) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) (n = 10, BMI 46.5 +/- 8.8 kg/m(2)).
154 ss (RYGB) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are not well described.
155   The enthusiasm for laparoscopic adjustable banding (LAGB) has been tempered by high reoperation rat
156 s induced by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surger
157 t studies of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) reported data on 352 patients (mean BMI 4
158 omy (LSG) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) were included in the study.
159 pass (RYGB), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and an intensive lifestyle weight loss i
160 ss (RYGB) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), we assessed percent weight change from b
161 ho underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).
162 re and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).
163 after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).
164 ss [RYGB] or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding [LAGB]) followed by low-level lifestyle interven
165         Because of the lack of an endoscopic banding ligation device for pediatric patients, EIS is u
166 set, in which all patients were treated with banding ligation, MELD predictions were accurate up to t
167 ergene' containing tightly linked colour and banding loci and more loosely linked pigmentation, sprea
168  Patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding lost less weight (change in BMI, 6.4 +/- 0.7) th
169 rwent the same stress using pulmonary artery banding (Low-PAB).
170          Further modifications to the carbon banding may be made as requested for risk assessment.
171  compared our method with the other temporal banding method.
172                                    Classical banding methods provide basic information about the iden
173 equences not identifiable using conventional banding methods.
174         In vivo, in the supracoronary aortic banding+MetS animals, reducing IL-6, either by anti-IL-6
175 h sham conditions, only supracoronary aortic banding+MetS rats developed precapillary PH, as measured
176                   PH in supracoronary aortic banding+MetS was associated with macrophage accumulation
177 DAC inhibitors in a physiologically relevant banding model of hypertrophy, observing dose-responsive
178 ional RV hypertrophy in the pulmonary artery banding model showed normal expression of peroxisome pro
179                                In the aortic banding model, the sensitivity of systolic Ca(2+) to LCC
180 fibrosis progression in the pulmonary artery banding model, without improving RV functional parameter
181 ax avenae subsp. citrulli (Aac), chilli vein-banding mottle virus (CVbMV, potyvirus), watermelon silv
182 2 most common procedures, adjustable gastric banding (n = 109) and gastric bypass (n = 109), were com
183                  Adjustable or nonadjustable banding (n = 61), vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 227)
184     Procedures included laparoscopic gastric banding (n=1053), gastric bypass (795), and sleeve gastr
185  (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, n = 162; gastric banding, n = 32; sleeve gastrectomy, n = 23), a mean exc
186 ric surgery (laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; n = 30).
187 ssive RV pressure overload (pulmonary artery banding, not associated with structural alterations of t
188       Animals then underwent thoracotomy and banding of ascending aorta producing left ventricular fa
189               By performing pulmonary artery banding of different diameters for 7 weeks, mild RV dysf
190 tains a ciliary root with a pronounced cross-banding of electron-dense material that should be import
191 a periodicity consistent with the D-periodic banding of higher-order fibers assemblies.
192           In contrast, under elevated CO2 no banding of Mg is recognisable and overall Mg concentrati
193 ding and characterizes the effect of gastric banding on esophageal physiology.
194 with alternating dark and light "tiger tail" banding on polarized light microscopy.
195 wined fiber morphologies, each with periodic banding on the nanometer scale.
196 nd two were stable after esophageal variceal banding or diuretic therapy of ascites.
197 007, per-protocol) underwent gastric bypass, banding or vertical banded gastroplasty, and matched con
198  with those who underwent adjustable gastric banding (OR, 8.37 [95% CI, 7.44-9.43]; OR, 21.43 [95% CI
199  diabetic patients undergoing either bypass, banding, or very low calorie diet were followed up for 4
200 sleeve gastrectomy and 16% following gastric banding (P<0.0001).
201 ctomy, and 50% of patients following gastric banding (P=0.004).
202 oss, 72% (16/22) of bypass and 17% (2/12) of banding patients (P = 0.001) fulfilled the definition of
203  analysis of EBV terminal repeats revealed a banding pattern consistent with the integration of het D
204       The protocol yielded a distinct triple-banding pattern for L. purpureus, whereas L. synagris an
205                                          The banding pattern is characterized by an axially repeating
206  C-terminal Panx2 truncation mutant showed a banding pattern more consistent with an octamer.
207 L. synagris and O. chrysurus showed a double banding pattern of different sizes, thereby allowing dif
208 te status, which is defined as an incomplete banding pattern of HTLV protein Gag (p19 or p24) or Env
209 as generated by allelic replacement, and the banding pattern of O-PS was observed by immunoblot analy
210 or generating the characteristic 6-nt ladder banding pattern of telomeric DNA products in vitro.
211 at their light coloration stems from a novel banding pattern on individual hairs produced by an incre
212   Expression of EAAT4 follows a parasagittal banding pattern that allows us to compare regions of hig
213  smooth mini-fibrils with the cross-striated banding pattern typical of fibrillar collagens.
214                                     The same banding pattern was observed using Ca2+ imaging.
215 nternal transcribed spacer) and protein band banding pattern were most similar to a subset of B. baci
216         These fibrils are characterized by a banding pattern with a D-period of 67 nm.
217 fined by field-inversion gel electrophoresis banding pattern), emm types, and emm clusters at visits
218  nonclassic protease-resistant prion protein banding pattern, with a prominent approximately 8-kDa pr
219 lypeptides corresponding to 14+15 and type 2 banding pattern.
220 e level, we detect no difference between the banding patterns along chromosomes from primary lymphocy
221                                     However, banding patterns and available sequences suggest variati
222 ased typing techniques that generate complex banding patterns and lack uniform interpretation criteri
223 ential predictive relationships between PFGE banding patterns and particular serotypes.
224                                   Chromosome banding patterns are correlated with unique patterns of
225 rom the same patient exhibited identical LPS banding patterns by silver staining and indistinguishabl
226                            However, only the banding patterns from the ERIC primers and BOX primers w
227 ally assessed by direct visualization of the banding patterns from whole-cell lysates on SDS-PAGE gel
228                                              Banding patterns generated with ERIC primers, REP primer
229                                              Banding patterns were analyzed both visually and with Bi
230                                  Five RS-PCR banding patterns were identified.
231                 Although the retrotransposon banding patterns were unstable after prolonged incubatio
232 in-in-sap-in-resin double emulsions, showing banding patterns with differential content of resin-in-s
233 oral host age by quantifying annual skeletal banding patterns, and utilise high-throughput sequencing
234  distinctly identified by unique ladder-like banding patterns.
235 istent and clearly defined immunofluorescent banding patterns.
236 re calculated to predict electrophoretic gel banding patterns.
237 wn USA types into 11 clusters and six unique banding patterns.
238  of chromosomes on the basis of their unique banding patterns.
239 and some covariance between shell colour and banding patterns.
240 d from different individuals showed distinct banding patterns; only samples obtained from the same pa
241 the benA amplicon with BccI generated unique banding patterns; the results were validated by screenin
242 d prebanding, at 2-week intervals during the banding period (up to 14 weeks), and 2 and 4 weeks after
243 iseus having larger centromeres with large C-banding positive regions.
244 ent sham or ascending (supravalvular) aortic banding procedure.
245  is drastically reduced following the aortic banding procedure; however the cells are able to compens
246 rils with a PrP(res)-like protease-resistant banding profile.
247 otein isolates exhibited complex polypeptide banding ranging from molecular weight of 11-75 kDa.
248  number of reoperations after failed gastric banding rapidly increased in the United States during th
249 onic pathway densities in compensated aortic banding rats maintain Ca(2+) function and efficiency.
250 d the pressure-loaded RV in pulmonary artery banding rats.Conclusions: RVX208, a clinically available
251                                              Banding remains the therapy of choice for this group of
252                           Adjustable gastric banding represented the most common bariatric procedure
253 I, 0.08-3.56) for gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.
254 I, 0.40-3.75) for gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.
255 , 0.12-11.49) for gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.
256 atients receiving gastric bypass and gastric banding, respectively.
257                        Nonadjustable gastric banding results in impaired esophageal body motility, a
258 gery, stratified by type of surgery (gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, o
259                   Moreover, pulmonary artery banding-RV tissue exhibited preserved transcription fact
260             The broad indication for gastric banding should be reaffirmed for the US population.
261  as well as HBc 167, exhibited no detectable banding signal, indicating loss of capsid integrity or s
262                 Surgical management (gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en Y gastric bypas
263  bariatric surgery models, including gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (R
264 r 10-20 mum in length, with a quantifiable D-banding spacing variation of 0.2%.
265                                    We used G-banding, spectral karyotyping (SKY), and locus- and regi
266 PG) from aqueous solutions to form nanosized banding structures whose sizes can be systematically tun
267                                  The gastric banding subset was composed of 800 (74.7%) women and 271
268  reason for revision with adjustable gastric banding surgery.
269  murine hearts subjected to transverse aorta banding surgery.
270 el of hypertrophy induced by thoracic aortic banding (TAB).
271               Accordingly, transverse aortic banding (TAC) was performed in mice to determine the eff
272 e's efficiency is the development of a novel banding technique for multiple RNA alignment.
273 , upon exposure to pressure overload (aortic banding), TG hearts developed more eccentric remodeling,
274 .5-folds within 14 days of transverse aortic banding that induced cardiac hypertrophy in adult mouse
275 a group of snake species with variable black banding, the genera Sonora, Chilomeniscus, and Chionacti
276                                       During banding, there was a 36% decrease in baseline mean resti
277 r when young animals are subjected to aortic banding, they develop an unexpected phenotype of progres
278 from 49% for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to 76% for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
279  ductal stent and bilateral pulmonary artery banding to a 2-mm diameter.
280                           The use of gastric banding to treat obesity has increased drastically in th
281 lowed by 1 week of pressure overload (aortic-banding) to induce pathological remodeling.
282 es to confine any initial deformation (shear banding) to the glassy regions separating dendrite arms
283 c bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding-to treat T2DM in severely obese patients.
284                      After 4 weeks of aortic banding (transverse aortic constriction (TAC)), increase
285 ilk from mammary glands infected with RS-PCR banding type 1 (RSP type 1) than in milk from those infe
286 h frequency for the colour (pink/yellow) and banding (unbanded/banded) loci has been examined for a l
287                                        Shear banding was initiated with both microcompression and nan
288  sclerotherapy or cyanoacrylate injection as banding was not suitable for those patients due to profu
289 sis and psoriatic arthritis, whereas gastric banding was not.
290 pertrophy (PoH) produced by ascending aortic banding, we correlated mechanical and structural changes
291 rdiac hypertrophy induced by thoracic aortic banding, we found that functional upregulation of SK2 ch
292                   Using supracoronary aortic banding, we induced diastolic dysfunction in rats.
293  undergoing either gastric bypass or gastric banding were followed up for 36 months.
294 tient radiation doses normalized with weight banding were not significantly different from those that
295 l sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding were performed in 66%, 28%, and 6% of patients,
296 ressure overload induced by pulmonary artery banding were treated with RVX208 in three independent la
297 ion remained stable until 7 to 8 weeks after banding, when there was significant deterioration (fract
298         Combining bilateral pulmonary artery banding with arterial duct stenting, the hybrid approach
299 rocedure combining surgical pulmonary artery banding with catheterization stenting of the ductus arte
300 eatment for diabetes than adjustable gastric banding within 6 to 12 months.

 
Page Top