戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  fall) and nesting location (above-ground or below-ground).
2  enhanced by 18.2% (above-ground) and 41.2% (below-ground).
3 e to arsenite in roots, immobilizing arsenic below ground.
4 growth to shape plant architecture above and below ground.
5 ion and growth while decreasing partitioning below ground.
6 ) C remaining in the system was translocated below ground.
7 otentially amplifying asymmetric competition below ground.
8  of Earth's biodiversity is literally hidden below ground.
9 ce a wide array of secretions both above and below ground.
10 at a clawless primate is able to bury itself below ground.
11 ve-ground, but more challenging to visualize below-ground.
12 ure of recent photosynthate and its transfer below-ground.
13 ding to a strong decrease in carbon transfer below-ground.
14 ce exposure to extreme high temperatures for below-ground active species.
15 n body size and microhabitat use (above- vs. below-ground activity) would correspond to differences i
16 hanges in [CO2] is consistent with increased below-ground allocation, and the apparent homoeostasis o
17 r, we know little about associations between below-ground and above-ground hydraulic traits as well a
18 ctions between herbivores feeding above- and below-ground and their parasitoids, mediated by changes
19 ng season had consistent negative impacts on below-ground and total biomass.
20  data to environmental factors suggests that below-ground animal diversity may be inversely related t
21 nificantly moderated thermal environment for below-ground army ants, while maximum surface raid tempe
22                       Tight coupling between below-ground autotrophic respiration and the availabilit
23 vidence of the link between above-ground and below-ground biodiversity at a global scale.
24 organic N and lower pH could explain the low below-ground biodiversity found at locations of high abo
25    Soil fungi represent a major component of below-ground biodiversity that determines the succession
26 tion of soil animals and the relationship of below-ground biodiversity to above-ground biodiversity a
27 g further changed the capacity of above- and below-ground biodiversity to explain multifunctionality.
28 enomic approaches can be used to reconstruct below-ground biogeochemical and diversity gradients in e
29  to soil, potentially influencing above- and below-ground biogeochemical cycles.
30          Efficient partitioning of above and below-ground biomass in response to nitrogen (N) is crit
31 ve-ground leaf biomass, decreased the dense, below-ground biomass of bank-stabilizing roots, and incr
32 fines the boundary conditions for above- and below-ground biomass partitioning.
33 inhibited in the experimental setup when the below-ground biomass was immobilized in the artificial s
34 mass, and fast-growing species produced more below-ground biomass, in soils conditioned by species wi
35 nding ecological linkages between above- and below-ground biota is critical for deepening our knowled
36 inated via genetic coevolution of above- and below-ground biota.
37  have a strong effect as a result of greater below-ground C allocation.
38                    Post fire accumulation of below-ground C and N stocks was increased rapidly in N-t
39  results suggest that large herbivores alter below-ground carbon and nitrogen dynamics more through t
40 t systems are important for global models of below-ground carbon and nutrient cycling.
41  the involvement of microbial communities in below-ground carbon dynamics.
42 sis of over 250 studies reporting above- and below-ground carbon estimates for different land-use typ
43 n stocks, especially through a shift towards below-ground carbon pools in temperate, tropical and sub
44  uncertainty about the factors that regulate below-ground carbon sequestration in this region.
45  needed to provide better data of above- and below-ground carbon stocks before informed recommendatio
46 onies store the great majority of above- and below-ground carbon.
47 l neural networks (ANN) to examine above and below-ground community phenotype responses to elevated c
48 riation in root phenotypes and evidence that below-ground competition acts as an agent of selection o
49  may help explain why lianas are such potent below-ground competitors(2) and why their removal substa
50                         Consideration of the below-ground components in plant and ecosystem studies h
51 sodium are essential nutrients to above- and below-ground consumers.
52 lants, the weedy rice phenotype may minimise below-ground contact as a competitive strategy.
53 s in which the amount of C in both above and below ground crop residues are assumed to be proportiona
54 we derived the proportional contributions of below-ground crop biomass return (maize-derived carbon)
55                                              Below-ground data suggest that H(2)S interferes with car
56   Large herbivores can potentially influence below-ground decomposition through changes in soil micro
57 ion has been given to their interaction with below-ground development or diffusion of other gases.
58 osystems, the relationship of the above- and below-ground diversity with ecosystem multifunctionality
59                      Deserts are considered 'below-ground dominated', yet little is known about the i
60 nment and microbes, occurring both above and below ground, drive recognition, recruitment and coloniz
61  species richness enhanced per pot above- or below-ground dry mass.
62 ms, species diversity, and key components of below-ground ecosystem function.
63 tudents and scientists who desire working on below-ground ecosystems, but also by experts for consoli
64 e lags between above-ground assimilation and below-ground efflux, and the duration of antecedent peri
65 ts pine by D. pini significantly reduced the below-ground emissions of total MTs by approximately 80%
66 lement in understanding interactions in this below-ground environment.
67                     We present two series of below-ground food webs along natural productivity gradie
68  of arthropod species between the above- and below ground forest layers.
69 ry and spatial distance in the reassembly of below-ground fungal communities in a cold and fire-prone
70 f more resources to above-ground rather than below-ground growth is a candidate for the precursor.
71 ductions of biodiversity in soil communities below ground have consequences for the overall performan
72 efense, but the impact of root endophytes on below-ground herbivore interactions remains unknown.
73 of a root endophyte on plant defense against below-ground herbivores, adds to growing evidence that i
74  that: (1) high levels of drought stress and below-ground herbivory interact to reduce the performanc
75 w insights into the mechanisms through which below-ground hydraulic traits, especially those of deep
76               We therefore hypothesized that below-ground hypoxia may be an important, but thus far u
77                              Discovered 60 m below ground in a drill hole created for mineral explora
78 cle from crop establishment to sequestration below ground in geological formations.
79             The role of these metabolites in below-ground interactions and response to nutrient defic
80 out how such factors might affect above- and below-ground interactions and thereby alter ecosystem fu
81 tspot in the soil, take an essential part in below-ground interactions.
82 and water exchanges at stomatal, phloem, and below-ground interfaces were associated with mortality o
83 brown, Pleistocene sand at a depth of 35.2 m below ground level (mbgl).
84  drought has a strong effect on above-ground-below-ground linkages by reducing the flow of recent pho
85 nous and endogenous factors and above-ground-below-ground linkages modulate carbon dynamics is diffic
86  structural responses, "canopy-opening" and "below-ground-mass-depletion", govern the photoacclimator
87  between energy flows and the composition of below-ground microbial communities at a high taxonomic l
88 on efforts, given that even small changes in below-ground microbial diversity can have important impa
89                         Our results show how below-ground mutualisms can shift outcomes of plant comp
90 ected stronger shifts in above-ground versus below-ground nesters.
91 g species experienced stronger advances than below-ground nesting bees in spring; however, the opposi
92 81.1% and 85.3%, respectively) compared with below-ground-nesting bees.
93 -fixed carbon.(2) Mycorrhizal fungi can form below-ground networks(3)(,)(4)(,)(5)(,)(6) with potentia
94                      We mapped the real-time below ground O2 distribution and dynamics in the whole s
95  carbon cycling and the capture and transfer below-ground of recent photosynthate by plants.
96   We estimate that approximately half of the below-ground organic carbon within the study region is s
97         However, the ecological relevance of below-ground organisms on predator-prey interactions und
98 results in greater growth of both aerial and below-ground organs while overexpressing the gene brings
99 ulic conductance (K(h) ) of above-ground and below-ground organs, magnitude of deep water acquisition
100 c plant body plan and produce all above- and below-ground parts of plants, some vegetative meristems
101 op performance by implicating both above and below ground plant parts in crops like common beans that
102 mental parameters (pH, redox, and above- and below-ground plant biomass).
103 ly demonstrate close links between above and below-ground plant carbon dynamics but also allow plant
104 mbine a soil carbon model with an above- and below-ground plant carbon model to predict the increase
105 composition and transformation of above- and below-ground plant detritus (litter) is the main process
106 l step toward improving our understanding of below-ground plant ecology.
107 ackground knowledge useful for: (1) defining below-ground plant entities and giving keys for their me
108  study, an effect mediated by stimulation of below-ground plant productivity.
109 tment in a selection of key above-ground and below-ground plant traits.
110 e herein uncover the network architecture of below-ground plant-fungus symbioses, which are ubiquitou
111                                 In contrast, below ground platform PM(2.5) for another line increased
112 r this system reveals significant changes in below ground platform PM(2.5).
113                             The crown is the below ground portion of the stem of a grass which contai
114                                              Below ground processes, often mediated by soil microorga
115 as is providing opportunities to revisit how below-ground processes are represented in terrestrial bi
116 s provide opportunities to better understand below-ground processes in the terrestrial biosphere.
117 heless, developing models linking above- and below-ground processes is crucial for estimating current
118 cs responsible for decoupling the above- and below-ground processes.
119 t as a major driver of both above-ground and below-ground properties of grassland ecosystems.
120 nt community have marked indirect effects on below-ground properties, ultimately increasing rates of
121 otosynthetically fixed carbon were allocated below ground, raising concentrations of dissolved organi
122 plastics on soil ecosystems (e.g., above and below ground) remain largely unknown.
123                           Fine roots mediate below-ground resource acquisition, yet understanding of
124                                          All below ground resources must pass through this dynamic zo
125 ficulties in studying how plants compete for below-ground resources.
126 d temperature gave rise to a 50% increase in below ground respiration (ca. 0.4 kg C m(-2) ; Q10 = 3.5
127 urrent paradigm that canopy assimilation and below-ground respiration are tightly coupled and provide
128  season, the aerial tissues senesce, and the below-ground rhizomes become dormant.
129 ant tissue nutrient ratios and components of below-ground rhizosphere stoichiometry predominantly dif
130 ulates the above ground tissue response, the below ground root elongation is primarily regulated by E
131  Never ripe (NR) tomato plants produced more below-ground root mass but fewer above-ground adventitio
132 tremendous exploratory capacity also applies below-ground - roots of woody climbers (i.e., lianas) co
133 s demonstrate a central role for DIMBOA as a below-ground semiochemical for recruitment of plant-bene
134 t considerable depths, illustrating that the below ground shapes whole-tree allometry.
135 hormones that control plant architecture and below-ground signaling to mycorrhizae and are required t
136 l for linking plant community composition to below-ground soil microbial and nutrient characteristics
137  to enhance biological pest control, whereas below ground, soil organic carbon is a proxy for several
138                                              Below-ground species were more thermally sensitive, with
139 f CTmax change with body size was greater in below-ground species.
140 monstrate large increases in both above- and below-ground stocks of these elements in N-treated plots
141                                        These below ground structures allow plants to inhabit highly s
142 Consequently, ubiquitous symbionts of plants below-ground, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)
143 (2) footprint and a basement extending 1.5 m below ground surface (BGS).
144 thin the Fayette Sandstone Formation 340.8 m below ground surface using conventional oil field subsur
145 t 3.0 m (shallow test) and 7.9 m (deep test) below ground surface within distinct lithological units
146 estigated the effects of drought on an above/below-ground system comprising a generalist and a specia
147 that the larger quantities of C entering the below-ground system under elevated CO(2) result in great
148 o conceptualize the total allocation of C to below ground (TBCA) under current [CO2] and to predict t
149 ress these questions, we collected above and below ground temperature for a full year using temperatu
150              We collected data on above- and below-ground temperatures in habitats used by army ants
151 e selected for small size in both above- and below-ground terrestrial communities.
152 unities have on average sixfold more biomass below ground than above ground, but knowledge of the roo
153 st, with the buffering effect being stronger below-ground than one metre above-ground.
154 ls must be reformulated to allow C transfers below ground that result in additional N uptake under el
155 tworks likely promote asymmetric competition below ground, thereby exaggerating size inequality withi
156                    Strikingly, the above and below ground thermomorphogenesis is impaired in spaQ.
157              Here we show that the above and below ground tissue-response to high ambient temperature
158 ly the ability of seagrasses to aerate their below-ground tissue and immediate rhizosphere to prevent
159 cretion of dissolved organic carbon from the below-ground tissue into the rhizosphere.
160 tes with gene expression in either above- or below-ground tissue, thus spatially separating the produ
161 and root tip give rise to all the above- and below-ground tissues of a plant.
162 940 ESTs were generated from aerial tissues, below-ground tissues, and tissues challenged with the la
163 xes of plant function (e.g. above-ground and below-ground) to gain a holistic view of drought adjustm
164              Here we test whether above- and below-ground traits of tropical tree seedlings could exp
165 ght adjustment is common in above-ground and below-ground traits; however, whether this is adaptive a
166                 We permanently disrupted the below-ground transfer of recently assimilated C using st
167           miR156 overexpression (OE) reduces below-ground tuber yield, but stimulates aerial tubers i
168 ed leaf architecture/compounding and reduced below-ground tuber yield.
169 rofiles provides quantitative information on below-ground turnover and fluxes.
170 s (BXs) have also been implicated in defence below-ground, where they can exert allelochemical or ant
171 subsequent damage caused by larval herbivory below ground; whether P. indica protects plants against
172 g interest in studying microbial communities below ground, while little attention has historically be

 
Page Top