コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 However, CysLTR2-L129Q only poorly recruits beta-arrestin.
2 us of PSMalpha2 in promoting FPR2 to recruit beta-arrestin.
3 xin-sensitive G protein but did not activate beta-arrestin.
4 nstream cellular responses via G proteins or beta-arrestin.
5 locarpine on endogenous M3R is biased toward beta-arrestin.
6 llular binding partners (IBPs), e.g., Gs and beta-arrestin.
7 through the multifunctional adapter protein beta-arrestin.
8 )OXT showed reduced relative efficacy toward beta-arrestin.
9 is predicted to affect its interactions with beta-arrestin.
10 ased ability to signal via either Galphas or beta-arrestin.
11 ch for regulating receptor interactions with beta-arrestin.
12 the selective activation of G protein versus beta-arrestin.
13 signaling, with no measurable recruitment of beta-arrestin.
14 ependent pathways mediated by G proteins and beta-arrestins.
15 activate pathways mediated by G proteins or beta-arrestins.
16 upling to Galpha(s), but not to Galpha(q) or beta-arrestins.
17 the receptor increasingly unable to recruit beta-arrestins.
18 processes via heterotrimeric G proteins and beta-arrestins.
19 by linked G-proteins and the recruitment of beta-arrestins.
20 governs the structural rearrangements within beta-arrestins.
22 sent a cryo-electron microscopy structure of beta-arrestin 1 (betaarr1) in complex with M2 muscarinic
23 ular loop (V2R(DeltaICL3)) can interact with beta-arrestin 1 (betaarr1) only through the phosphorylat
24 or by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and by coupling of beta-arrestin 1 (betaarr1, also known as arrestin 2), wh
26 strate that ERK1/2 activation is mediated by beta-arrestin 1 from receptors localized exclusively at
27 and skeletal muscle hypertrophy were lost in beta-arrestin 1 knockout mice, implying that arrestins,
28 kinase A inhibition by H-89 and knockdown of beta-arrestin 1 or beta-arrestin 2 did not affect the de
30 in the beta(1)-adrenoceptor in complex with beta-arrestin 1 versus a G protein-mimicking nanobody.
31 rminal peptide competed for association with beta-arrestin 1, and phosphorylated central or distal C-
32 s, however, caused G-protein-independent but beta-arrestin 1-dependent phosphorylation of the downstr
38 ation assays in A549 cells, we observed that beta-arrestin-1 and unliganded GR interact in the cytopl
43 tates of a phospho-beta2 adrenergic receptor/beta-arrestin-1(beta-arr1) membrane protein signaling co
44 tion between the glucocorticoid receptor and beta-arrestin-1, a scaffold protein with a well-establis
48 thways and is dependent on signaling via the beta-arrestin-1/2 and Ras homolog family member A (RhoA)
51 ts of IFN signaling remained intact, despite beta-arrestin 2 activation, as IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, IFN-
52 t that strategies aimed at enhancing hepatic beta-arrestin 2 activity could prove useful for suppress
55 s confirmed with a NanoLuc Binary Technology beta-arrestin 2 assay, imaging of green fluorescent prot
59 by H-89 and knockdown of beta-arrestin 1 or beta-arrestin 2 did not affect the decreased cAMP produc
60 antly, hepatocyte-specific overexpression of beta-arrestin 2 greatly reduced hepatic GCGR signaling a
61 inactivation of the GPCR-associated protein beta-arrestin 2 in hepatocytes of adult mice results in
62 alization of the receptor and recruitment of beta-arrestin 2 in human embryonic kidney cell line 293
63 n of exon 7-associated C-terminal tails with beta-arrestin 2 in morphine-induced desensitization and
64 ression of a dominant negative dynamin 1 and beta-arrestin 2 knockdown had no effect, we concluded th
66 hifted the bias of several mu opioids toward beta-arrestin 2 over G protein activation compared with
67 Both in G protein-mediated pathways and in beta-arrestin 2 recruitment, no ligand-independent activ
69 exhibited improved functional potency (cAMP, beta-arrestin 2), metabolic stability, and aqueous solub
70 imaging of green fluorescent protein-tagged beta-arrestin 2, and PathHunter beta-arrestin 2 assay.
71 discover that excessive Krz, the Drosophila beta-arrestin 2, inhibits Smo sumoylation and prevents S
75 e report the novel finding that mice lacking beta-arrestin-2 (barr2) selectively in adipocytes show s
77 nt of agonists biased against recruitment of beta-arrestin-2 could provide analgesic efficacy with fe
81 In contrast, ECD-scFvhFc potently inhibits beta-arrestin-2 recruitment after PTH (1-34)-driven rece
82 ndent ERK1/2 phosphorylation, in addition to beta-arrestin-2 recruitment and downstream arrestin-depe
83 ced phosphorylation of FFA4-L and subsequent beta-arrestin-2 recruitment and extracellular-signal reg
84 pha(s), while they only show weak or even no beta-arrestin-2 recruitment at both beta(1)- and beta(2)
86 sequently represent biased agonists favoring beta-arrestin-2 recruitment over canonical G protein act
87 CXCR4-associated effects on thrombin-induced beta-arrestin-2 recruitment to and signaling of PAR1 cou
88 4 reduced the efficacy of thrombin to induce beta-arrestin-2 recruitment to recombinant PAR1 and enha
89 increase in KOR levels was also observed in beta-arrestin-2-deficient mice, highlighting the importa
93 However, compound 48/80 induced a robust beta-arrestin activation as determined by transcriptiona
94 e findings indicate that NTSR1 G protein and beta-arrestin activation produce discrete and separable
96 protein signaling, but they can also induce beta-arrestin activation, leading to such side effects a
97 GPCR signalling is negatively regulated by beta-arrestins, adaptor molecules that also activate dif
98 ation of the PAR4-P2Y12 heterodimer promotes beta-arrestin and Akt co-localization to intracellular v
100 alpha peptides lacked the ability to recruit beta-arrestin and induce neutrophil chemotaxis, supporti
101 G protein signaling to a greater extent than beta-arrestin and internalization signaling pathways.
102 sults are consistent with the involvement of beta-arrestin and suggest that these allosteric modulato
104 provide new insights into the activation of beta-arrestins and reveal their novel role in receptor c
105 ctant-scavenging receptor, does not activate beta-arrestins, and is widely expressed by many leukocyt
106 with large bias factors toward G protein or beta arrestin are required for investigating the transla
107 mma-subunit (Gbetagamma), GPCR-kinase 2, and beta-arrestin are central to various cardiovascular dise
109 differential engagement of G proteins versus beta-arrestins are commonly limited by the small respons
111 tion of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), beta-arrestins are essential scaffolds linking GPCRs to
114 signaling 2, RGS2; GPCR Kinase 5, GRK5; and beta-arrestin, Arrb2) using RT-PCR, qPCR, and western bl
115 ations in GPCR internalization and implicate beta-arrestin as a potential player mediating behavioral
119 tivation of ACE2, agonism of MAS1 receptors, beta-arrestin-based Angiotensin receptor agonists, and a
121 ein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and binds beta-arrestins (beta-arrs), which regulate AT1R signalin
123 ) subfamily of heterotrimeric G-proteins and beta-arrestins (betaarrs) following C5a stimulation.
125 tin-biased agonist but also extends profound beta-arrestin bias to the endogenous ligand by selective
126 taAR ligand screened, nor is it required for beta-arrestin-bias activated by the beta2AR subtype of t
127 ulations to determine how fentanyl, a potent beta-arrestin biased agonist, binds the mu-opioid recept
128 ide molecular insight into fentanyl mediated beta-arrestin biased signaling and a rational framework
133 , and has been demonstrated to function as a beta-arrestin-biased ligand for the beta(2)AR, stimulati
135 n this issue of Cell, Slosky et al. report a beta-arrestin-biased neurotensin receptor ligand that ma
137 t opioid peptides that efficaciously recruit beta-arrestin, bilorphin is G protein biased, weakly pho
139 urements in living cells are consistent with beta-arrestin binding to M1 muscarinic acetylcholine rec
140 erized (i.e., C-terminal phosphorylation and beta-arrestin binding), but a detailed analysis of melan
141 conformations that are capable of activating beta-arrestin but not heterotrimeric G(q) protein signal
142 ssociates in complexes with either CRIP1a or beta-arrestin, but CRIP1a and beta-arrestin fail to coim
143 PAR(2) coupling to Galpha(q), Galpha(s), and beta-arrestins, cathepsin-S (CS) and neutrophil elastase
144 e of 5-HT(2)R endocytic machinery, including beta-arrestin, clathrin, AP2, and dynamin, significantly
146 APK activation as well as endosomal receptor-beta-arrestin complex stabilization in the mitogenic res
147 opioid peptide DAMGO require M153 to induce beta-arrestin coupling, while M153 was dispensable for G
149 anism by which the PAR4-P2Y12 dimer controls beta-arrestin-dependent Akt signaling is not known.
150 m-sensing receptor (CaSR) internalization is beta-arrestin-dependent and sensitive to modulation by a
151 biased ligand for the beta(2)AR, stimulating beta-arrestin-dependent but not G protein-dependent sign
152 urthermore, beta-blocker carvedilol-mediated beta-arrestin-dependent ERK activation is significantly
153 es was greatly reduced, leading to decreased beta-arrestin-dependent ERK1/2 activation, faster recycl
155 ise, Thr(383) phosphorylation is involved in beta-arrestin-dependent Erk1/2 stimulation elicited by o
156 on of AT1R by angiotensin II (ANGII) elicits beta-arrestin-dependent inhibition and internalization o
158 cium imaging, phosphate radiolabeling, and a beta-arrestin-dependent luciferase assay, we characteriz
159 chains comprising K63 linkages (UbK63) in a beta-arrestin-dependent manner before BBSome-mediated ex
161 receptors, which engage Erk1/2 pathway via a beta-arrestin-dependent mechanism, promotes MEK-dependen
166 d significantly lower receptor upregulation (beta-Arrestin-dependent signaling pathway) upon stimulat
168 ellularly in ligand naive cells, yet exhibit beta-arrestin-dependent signaling responses, mitogen-act
170 elling evidence that CaSR internalization is beta-arrestin-dependent while interestingly being largel
173 dent pathway but are weaker agonists for the beta-arrestin engagement and subsequent endocytosis towa
174 of abuse, the effect of alcohol exposure on beta-arrestin expression and beta-arrestin-mediated GPCR
175 ther CRIP1a or beta-arrestin, but CRIP1a and beta-arrestin fail to coimmunoprecipitate with each othe
177 for the sustained binding between GPCRs and beta-arrestins, formed by phosphorylated serine-threonin
178 lathrin dependent and partially dependent on beta-arrestin in HEK293 cells, and nearly half of the in
180 rough distinct noncanonical pathways such as beta-arrestins in addition to the canonical G protein-de
181 preventing the recruitment of G proteins or beta-arrestins, in agreement with the lack of signalling
182 and CXCR4 receptors, but does not affect the beta-arrestin-independent Erk1/2 activation by 5-HT4 rec
183 re temporally correlated with increased GPCR/beta-arrestin interaction signals in response to agonist
184 s that occur later than agonist-induced GPCR/beta-arrestin interaction signals, indicating that GPCR/
185 ctivation pathways studied: cAMP production, beta-arrestin interaction, and MAP kinase activity.
186 bility lock not only stabilizes the receptor-beta-arrestin interaction, but also governs the structur
187 ternalization and infection, suggesting that beta-arrestin interactions with 5-HT(2A)R are critical f
188 ng AT1R variants that show distinct receptor-beta-arrestin interactions: A163T, T282M, and C289W.
190 the mu-opioid receptor and interaction with beta-arrestins is controlled by carboxyl-terminal phosph
192 Results from controlled expression of either beta-arrestin isoform demonstrate that beta-arrestin2 ac
193 similar 3D structures, the widely expressed beta-arrestin isoforms 1 and 2 play at times identical,
195 veal that PX exploits the antagonism between beta-arrestin isoforms; in low ligand conditions, PX fav
196 signaling, insensitive to pertussis toxin or beta-arrestin knock-out, and mimicked by Gs-DREADD stimu
199 the purinergic receptor P2Y12 to coordinate beta-arrestin-mediated Akt signaling, an important media
203 hol exposure on beta-arrestin expression and beta-arrestin-mediated GPCR trafficking is poorly unders
205 1R domains that could affect agonist-driven, beta-arrestin-mediated internalization of the CB1R.
206 cking and suggest conformationally dependent beta-arrestin-mediated MAPK activation as well as endoso
207 1 and CXCL12 and signals exclusively through beta-arrestin-mediated pathways, without activating cano
208 NFAT is dependent on Galphaq/11-mediated or beta-arrestin-mediated signaling but rather involves lib
210 ed safety profiles are due to a reduction in beta-arrestin-mediated signaling or, alternatively, to t
212 attributed to the preferential activation of beta-arrestin over G proteins, make methadone a standard
214 n, the effects of MRAP2 on the Galpha(q) and beta-arrestin pathways were independent and involved dis
215 , but the GLP-1 thiopeptides have much lower beta-arrestin potency, making them novel agonists with a
217 able of also altering CB1R interactions with beta-arrestin proteins that interact with the CB1R at th
218 M in the calcium flux assay while showing no beta-arrestin recruitment activity, is the most function
219 -L phosphorylation, as well as DHA-dependent beta-arrestin recruitment and DHA-dependent extracellula
221 4R variants exhibiting signaling bias toward beta-arrestin recruitment and increased mitogen-activate
222 ion, and NADPH oxidase activity, yet lack of beta-arrestin recruitment and neutrophil chemoattraction
223 not the late phase generally associated with beta-arrestin recruitment and receptor endocytosis, prom
224 (2+)/calmodulin-dependent manner, preventing beta-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization.
225 , displayed a 180-fold higher potency in the beta-arrestin recruitment assay (EC50 0.9 nM) compared w
227 dissociation kinetic measurements coupled to beta-arrestin recruitment assays to investigate ACKR3:ch
228 ing radioligand binding displacement assays, beta-arrestin recruitment assays, cyclic AMP inhibition
229 ctivation of G proteins (preferably Go) over beta-arrestin recruitment at dopamine D2 receptors.
231 C-mediated, KOPR phosphorylation followed by beta-arrestin recruitment desensitized U50,488H-induced
232 re unchanged or exacerbated, indicating that beta-arrestin recruitment does not contribute to the sev
234 nds were CCR2-selective, 39 and 43 inhibited beta-arrestin recruitment in CCR5 with high potency.
235 ficant bias toward G protein activation over beta-arrestin recruitment in comparison to quinpirole.
236 le: it preferentially and potently activated beta-arrestin recruitment in vitro and potently elicited
238 high potency in both G alphai signaling and beta-arrestin recruitment is mandatory and this translat
239 s, we showed that although a high potency in beta-arrestin recruitment is required to fully internali
240 hat the difference in G protein efficacy and beta-arrestin recruitment of the hybrid ( S)-22, the ful
243 C(50) ~ 2-6 nM) but minimally activating the beta-arrestin recruitment pathway (<=55% maximum signal
244 the PAR4-P2Y12 heterodimer is necessary for beta-arrestin recruitment to endosomes and Akt signaling
247 ate calcium signaling and is more potent for beta-arrestin recruitment triggered greater levels of pl
248 ations within other GPCRs similarly impaired beta-arrestin recruitment while maintaining G protein si
249 ing properties ([(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and beta-arrestin recruitment) of 22 peptides at each of the
250 n, cAMP inhibition, Ca(2+) mobilization, and beta-arrestin recruitment) which identified ERK1/2 phosp
251 pha(q/11)-coupled calcium-signaling pathway, beta-arrestin recruitment, and mitogen-activated protein
261 5940-mediated GFP-CB1R as well as endogenous beta-arrestin redistribution to punctae, and conversely,
263 horylation of the receptor or recruitment of beta-arrestin scaffolding proteins could preserve the an
264 at, when stably bound to phosphorylated M1R, beta-arrestin scaffolds and activates MEK-dependent ERK.
265 induce G protein signaling without inducing beta-arrestin signaling can alleviate pain while reducin
266 attenuates G protein signaling and augments beta-arrestin signaling downstream of KOR, exhibiting co
267 at preferentially engage either G-protein or beta-arrestin signaling in 'indirect pathway' medium spi
268 stic details of biased D2R/G-protein and D2R/beta-arrestin signaling in vivo has been challenging bec
269 heterotrimeric G protein signaling, whereas beta-arrestin signaling is considered central to their d
272 onic kidney (HEK) cells, we demonstrate that beta-arrestin signaling plays a role in hERG regulation.
274 , consistent with the augmented KOR-mediated beta-arrestin signaling seen upon RGS12 over-expression.
275 ficient mice, highlighting the importance of beta-arrestin signaling to establishing steady-state KOR
276 ment-Ca(2)(+) response, we hypothesized that beta-arrestin signaling would increase myofilament-Ca(2)
277 ced conditioned place aversion (considered a beta-arrestin signaling-dependent behavior), consistent
285 the n-aniline ring of fentanyl mediates muOR beta-arrestin through a novel M153 "microswitch" by synt
287 ernalization was required for recruitment of beta-arrestin to endocytic vesicles, which was dependent
288 nonical activation of G proteins and engages beta-arrestins to mediate distinct cellular signaling ev
289 motaxis, supporting the previous notion that beta-arrestin translocation is of importance for cell mi
290 , ML417 (20), potently promotes D3R-mediated beta-arrestin translocation, G protein activation, and E
291 nstrated ERK1/2 phosphorylation mediated via beta-arrestin unlike the orthosteric CP55,940 that does
292 roteins and/or scaffolding proteins, such as beta-arrestin, we find that the effects of D2Rs on prefr
293 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) recruit beta-arrestin, which desensitizes heterotrimeric G-prote
294 n of ERK1/2-RSK3 signaling, mediated through beta-arrestin, which may have a novel role in increasing
295 GPCR) family, signals through G proteins and beta-arrestins, which act as adaptors to regulate AT1R i
296 rofiles, being equally efficacious on Gq and beta-arrestin, while Val(3)Pro(8)OXT showed reduced rela
297 suggest that the cooperative interactions of beta-arrestin with both the receptor and the phospholipi
298 ompound 48/80 signals via both G protein and beta-arrestin with distinct differences in receptor regu