ライフサイエンスコーパス: bilingual

1 ference to studies of people who are deaf or bilingual.

2 this has only been tested in spoken language bilinguals.

3 Sign Language in hearing early, sign-speech bilinguals.

4 al access in color terms in Tsimane'-Spanish bilinguals.

5 vioural differences between monolinguals and bilinguals.

6 cantly larger for the multilinguals than the bilinguals.

7 n looking occurred in the early but not late bilinguals.

8 new language (Kazakh) for multilinguals and bilinguals.

9 ing the results reported for older and early bilinguals.

10 ching the pattern observed in Chinese/French bilinguals.

11 rom the perspective of grammatical gender in bilinguals.

12 n made predictions for both monolinguals and bilinguals (33 patients; 18 males and 15 females; age at

13 orted disadvantages in English vocabulary in bilinguals(7,16,17).

14 ited larger MMN and P3a responses than early bilinguals, across all deviant conditions.

15 investigating semantic cognition shows that bilinguals activate similar patterns for the same words

16 e to answer this question because proficient bilinguals activate the same brain regions irrespective

17 Additionally, bilinguals' activation of the basal ganglia was inversel

18 For the bilinguals, activations in the basal ganglia/thalamus an

19 Here we show that early bilingual adults are faster at disengaging attention to

20 t 2 was completed by 50 older and 50 younger bilingual adults.

21 ng changes between visual stimuli, than late bilingual adults.

22 States, that there is little evidence for a bilingual advantage for inhibitory control, attention an

23 Therefore, the crucial assumption of the bilingual advantage hypothesis, that there is a close re

24 ther, our results predict that the so-called bilingual advantage should be limited to individuals who

25 on mind and brain, often referred to as the "bilingual advantage." In doing so, we highlight work fro

26 Bilinguals also recruited more neural resources to manag

27 However, bilinguals also require language control to manage langu

28 We examined language lateralization in 24 bilingual and 46 monolingual adults with temporal lobe e

29 Effective bilingual and culturally adapted brief interventions are

30 We show that bilingual and English-speaking users play more central r

31 ve exclusively relied on comparisons between bilingual and monolingual individuals.

32 In a word-referent association task, both bilingual and monolingual infants display a pattern of o

33 The remarkable human capacity for bilingual and multilingual acquisition raises fundamenta

34 We tested Spanish-English bilinguals and control native speakers of English in a s

35 al organization in adults, in early and late bilinguals and in people who have acquired language thro

36 Bilinguals and monolinguals remembered English competito

37 Bilinguals and monolinguals showed similar behavioural p

38 target letter in words and nonwords between bilinguals and monolinguals.

39 enting of attention between monolinguals and bilinguals as they processed complex tones.

40 experience-related tuning of attention, the bilingual auditory system becomes highly efficient in au

41 Text messages were bilingual, automated, interactive, customized, and gamif

42 alibrated to their own experiences: Tests of bilingual babies reveal that an infant's sociolinguistic

43 l connectivity was observed for simultaneous bilinguals between the left and right IFG, as well as be

44 rvention group received 5 home visits from a bilingual, bicultural lay patient navigator; participant

45 isits with a pediatric endocrinologist and a bilingual, bicultural registered dietitian to discuss di

46 can be facilitated through the employment of bilingual/bicultural staff and the development of cultur

47 nd stimuli-responsive assembly behavior of a bilingual biopolymer that integrates both amino acid and

48 However, whether the bilingual brain differs from the monolingual in the effi

49 How does the bilingual brain distinguish and control which language i

50 Here we test whether the bilingual brain is affected by word class and word posit

51 They support the view that the bilingual brain is not simply the sum of two monolingual

52 only in native signers (hearing, ASL-English bilinguals) but not in those who acquired ASL after pube

53 other-creating an electronically controlled 'bilingual' cell.

54 Monolingual and bilingual children aged 7-12 attended to a narrative pre

55 lent behavioral performance, monolingual and bilingual children encoded attended speech differently,

56 merican monolingual children and 12 Japanese bilingual children with second-order false-belief story

57 ing is likely to explain previously observed bilingual cognitive advantages across the lifespan.

58 st direct evidence of a neural basis for the bilingual cognitive control boost in aging.

59 The advantage of being bilingual comes at the expense of increased processing d

60 language, and suggests that even successful bilingual communicators likely think with "semantic acce

61 creased N-acetyl aspartate concentrations in bilinguals compared to monolinguals.

62 control and the default mode networks in the bilingual, compared with the monolingual, AD patients.

63 executive function ability, suggesting that bilinguals compensated for lower levels of cognitive con

64 2, younger and older adult monolinguals and bilinguals completed the same perceptual task-switching

65 I suggest considering bilingual complexity including these demands and costs.

66 It also compared bilingual control, and age-group differences, to control

67 A 16-week bilingual controlled clinical trial compared a group rec

68 cial to the comprehension of a fully natural bilingual conversation recorded "in the wild." Our resul

69 Importantly, for bilinguals, counting backward decreased their threshold

70 SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, bilingual, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 SCD

71 Mama Sana (Spanish for healthy mother) is a bilingual, culturally tailored program that aims to redu

72 al to evaluate the efficacy of exposure to a bilingual, culturally targeted website, Informate, for i

73 Transfer learning expedited training of the bilingual decoder by enabling neural data recorded in on

74 Bilinguals derive the same semantic concepts from equiva

75 Here, we show that computational analyses of bilingual dictionaries can be used to test claims about

76 introducing BILA, a dataset including 1,574 bilingual dictionaries, and showing that it confirms 147

77 We developed GUIA, a bilingual digital application that facilitates disclosur

78 y, we tested a single group of Welsh-English bilinguals engaged in a nonverbal conflict resolution ta

79 entrations correlate with relative amount of bilingual engagement.

80 Sixteen right-hand-dominant, bilingual English-Dravidian speakers (mean [SD] age, 23.

81 How can mere exposure to a bilingual environment affect an infant's cognitive devel

82 important modulator of auditory responses in bilinguals even when processing non-speech signals.

83 n by gender inconsistency in Spanish-English bilinguals, exclusively.

84 dings introduce a new level of plasticity in bilingual executive control dependent on fast changing l

85 nd large-sample(5,6) studies have reported a bilingual executive function advantage (see refs.

86 are only necessary up to a certain level of bilingual experience.

87 gh cognitive training, physical activity and bilingual experience.

88 stigate the non-linear effects of quantified bilingual experiences on the basal ganglia and the thala

89 a sample of bilinguals with a wide range of bilingual experiences.

90 ests that cognitive processes adapt to early bilingual experiences.

91 en and thalamus were positively predicted by bilingual experiences.

92 leus accumbens were significantly related to bilingual experiences.

93 assigned cultural frames through language in bilingual Facebook users in India (N = 2,065).

94 Bilinguals for whom codeswitching is common practice pro

95 sified as French speaking, English speaking, bilingual French-English speaking, or neither French nor

96 English-speaking, bilingual French-English-speaking, and allophone childre

97 c language of Gaul (modern France), by using bilingual Gaulish-Latin inscriptions.

98 anxiety disorder were more prevalent in the bilingual group assigned to English than in the group in

99 Most research with bilinguals has used speech stimuli to demonstrate differ

100 volumetric measurements of HG revealed that bilinguals have, on average, larger Heschl's gyri than m

101 Infants growing up in bilingual homes learn two languages simultaneously witho

102 ctable (language) environments, infants from bilingual homes may gather more information (sample more

103 Infants raised in bilingual homes redirect attention faster than infants r

104 For a bilingual human, every utterance requires a choice about

105 Our results suggest that highly proficient bilinguals implement a language-independent mechanism, s

106 372, native Chinese or English speakers, and bilingual in Chinese and English) and LLMs (for example,

107 Hearing people with signing deaf parents are bilingual in sign and speech: languages conveyed in diff

108 ed at cortical activation in Spanish-English bilinguals in response to phonological competition eithe

109 ted to age of second language acquisition in bilinguals in this cortical area.

110 Since the bilinguals in this study were not a self-selected group,

111 onstant management of competing languages in bilinguals increases attentional capacity, or draws on t

112 Here we evaluated whether bilingual individuals have advantages in visual tracking

113 Whether the native language of bilingual individuals is active during second-language c

114 Highly proficient Arabic-English bilingual individuals participated in maximally parallel

115 These results suggest that bilingual individuals rely on adaptive language control

116 Notably, bilingual individuals were on average 5 y older than the

117 mes from research looking at early and older bilingual individuals who have been using both their fir

118 pometabolism was more severe in the group of bilingual individuals with AD.

119 In a naturalistic eye-tracking procedure, bilingual infants were more accurate at recognizing obje

120 areas of AD in dynamic cognitive adaptation, bilingual interaction, and secure real-time personalized

121 was predicted and correctly simulated by the bilingual interactive-activation model (BIA+).

122 tory, and physical activity was collected by bilingual interviewers during pregnancy.

123 nts underwent a comprehensive examination by bilingual interviewers.

124 exciting yet controversial(1) findings about bilinguals is a reported advantage for executive functio

125 lingual English-speaking and monolingual and bilingual Japanese subjects.

126 onnectivity using fMRI in 38 Spanish-English bilingual (L1-Spanish) and English monolingual (L1-Engli

127 in the brain structures postulated to form a Bilingual Language Control (BLC) network.

128 ults put constraints on the current model of bilingual language control by precisely disentangling th

129 The current study examined how this bilingual language control differs between younger and o

130 Are bilingual language networks flexible enough to dynamical

131 tended to be over-optimistic when predicting bilingual language outcomes: our bilingual patients tend

132 A standard assumption in the bilingual language processing literature is that the eas

133 Bimodal bilingual language provides further evidence for the vie

134 If bilingual language recruits qualitatively different netw

135 , Branigan & Pickering (B&P) briefly discuss bilingual language representation, focusing primarily on

136 ctural priming drives real-life phenomena of bilingual language use beyond the priming of unilingual

137 ffects of experience-based factors (EBFs) in bilingual language use on brain structure and functional

138 r adults, is not the same across within- and bilingual-language competition.

139 rom semistructured interviews conducted by a bilingual Latine interviewer.

140 We make efforts to extract a bilingual lexicon from English and Chinese discharge sum

141 Here, we measured fMRI in human bilingual listeners and reveal that response patterns to

142 We found that adolescent bilinguals, listening to the speech syllable [da], encod

143 Spanish-English bilinguals living in an L2 environment named pictures in

144 A bilingual medical lexicon of Chinese and English is need

145 However, monolinguals and bilinguals might have different baseline cognitive abili

146 es native language translations in the human bilingual mind.

147 We found that the bilingual models' political knowledge and attitude were

148 king evidence from infancy to adulthood that bilinguals monitor their languages for efficient compreh

149 y operationalized as a categorical variable (bilingual/monolingual), whereas it is a complex and dyna

150 Adult bilingual (n = 35) and monolingual (n = 35) participants

151 Beginning in January 2022, a bilingual native Spanish-speaker licensed as a registere

152 inical fMRI language tasks and characterized bilingual networks using connectivity metrics to provide

153 During a 12-month intervention, bilingual nurses counseled patients on diet, medication

154 continuous attended speech in early balanced bilinguals of typologically similar (Dutch-English) and

155 However, like younger adults, bilingual older adults outperformed their monolingual pe

156 social programs and interventions to support bilingual or multilingual education and the maintenance

157 A new study with sign-speech bilingual participants has found that neural representat

158 In a separate cohort of bilingual participants, this encoding of word- and seque

159 predicting bilingual language outcomes: our bilingual patients tended to have poorer language skills

160 In a group of primarily early sequential bilingual patients, the first acquired language (L1) sho

161 e activation is present even when proficient bilinguals perform a task only in one language.

162 That is, several studies suggest that bilinguals perform better than monolinguals on tasks ass

163 Spanish-English/English-Spanish bilinguals performed a meaningfulness decision task in r

164 Japanese-English bilinguals performed a semantic categorization task in t

165 Bilinguals performed significantly better than predicted

166 Together, these properties establish bilingual PNA as a powerful biopolymer that combines two

167 trategy to curtail vaccine hesitancy amongst bilingual populations.

168 was translated and back-translated by three bilingual professional translators.

169 An interviewer-administered bilingual questionnaire collected immigration, reproduct

170 nt 1 ERPs were recorded while French-English bilinguals read pure language lists of French and Englis

171 Adult bilinguals read short stories in English containing 8 ta

172 e implicit access to the first language when bilinguals read words exclusively in their second langua

173 Together, these bilingual "read-write" proteins form an interdependent p

174 glish monolingual and 16 early Welsh-English bilingual readers undergoing event-related brain potenti

175 Here, we show that balanced Welsh-English bilinguals reading in English unconsciously apply a morp

176 Taken together, these results suggest that bilinguals recruit different language control strategies

177 Using data from a bilingual region in Austria, we show that the most impor

178 anism in a within-person experiment in which bilingual research participants (nine language pairs) we

179 In an additional experiment, bilingual research participants (seven language pairs) w

180 We asked bilingual research participants, people fluent in two la

181 A bilingual researcher facilitated each group, using a sem

182 oup were translated into English by the same bilingual researcher.

183 from 33 to 75 years were interviewed by two bilingual researchers in a Midwestern state.

184 and backward translations were performed by bilingual researchers, and face validity and semantic eq

185 Bilingual respondents from the Latino section of the NLA

186 ncy varies across semantic categories of the bilingual's two languages.

187 odeswitched speech in a richly-characterized bilingual sample.

188 External factors like bilingual schools or parish language have only a minor i

189 In Experiment 1, older adult bilinguals showed better perceptual switching performanc

190 Specifically, bilinguals showed enhanced encoding of the fundamental f

191 oss-language coactivation in hearing bimodal bilinguals (Spanish-Spanish Sign Language) and unimodal

192 (Spanish-Spanish Sign Language) and unimodal bilinguals (Spanish/Basque).

193 ched for disease duration (45 German-Italian bilingual speakers and 40 monolingual speakers) were inc

194 Bilingual speakers of Spanish and English and a comparis

195 For bilinguals, speaking in a second language (L2) compared

196 Hence, the extent to which bilingual speech production relies on unique or shared c

197 ree virtual BCT sessions were facilitated by bilingual staff and conducted via Zoom.

198 rained with monolingual patient data, are to bilingual stroke patients who had been ordinarily reside

199 or monolinguals might not generalize well to bilingual stroke patients.

200 The Japanese bilingual subjects use a model more like English when pe

201 cond languages acquired in adulthood ('late' bilingual subjects) are spatially separated from native

202 ge acquisition stage of development ('early' bilingual subjects), native and second languages tend to

203 In both late and early bilingual subjects, the temporal-lobe language-sensitive

204 For bilinguals, such an act potentially involves competing s

205 the pattern of encoding across conditions in bilinguals suggesting a redistribution of the available

206 llowed by plateauing in the most experienced bilinguals, suggesting that experience-based volumetric

207 duction of manual work required to compile a bilingual sydictionary of clinical terms.

208 ons accounted for 82% of the variance in the bilingual task-switching reaction time advantage.

209 alysis showing larger gray matter volumes in bilinguals than in monolinguals.

210 lated with age of acquisition for sequential bilinguals; the earlier the second language was acquired

211 Twenty-two Tsimane'-Spanish bilinguals took part in a picture naming task where part

212 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This bilingual unblinded parallel-group randomized clinical t

213 (second language learned after age 5 years) bilinguals using a seed-based resting-state MRI approach

214 aled higher fractional anisotropy values for bilinguals vs. monolinguals in several WM tracts that ha

215 ine, the average speed tracking threshold of bilinguals was not better than that of the monolinguals.

216 tions of German-English and Japanese-English bilinguals, we suggest that the left caudate plays a uni

217 In this randomized clinical trial, adding a bilingual web-based self-management program to EHR-integ

218 mage in the same sets of regions, though the bilinguals were more sensitive than the monolinguals.

219 ls and a group of proficient Spanish-English bilinguals were presented with a multiple-deviant oddbal

220 Chinese-English bilinguals were required to decide whether English words

221 Proficient German-English adult bilinguals were scanned whilst either translating or rea

222 In the behavioral experiment, bilinguals were slower when naming items in switch relat

223 d by words determines language activation in bilinguals, where potentially disturbing stimuli trigger

224 esponses in highly proficient Spanish-Basque bilinguals while they overtly name pictures in a mixed-l

225 fMRI to look at simultaneous and sequential bilinguals who differed only in age of acquisition, and

226 Heschl's gyrus by comparing Spanish-Catalan bilinguals who have been exposed to two languages since

227 ask matched those observed in Chinese/French bilinguals who have had continual exposure to Chinese si

228 en language and cognitive control regions in bilinguals who learned their two languages simultaneousl

229 P3b results show that bilinguals who learnt to read simultaneously in an opaqu

230 We found that only bilinguals who use each of their languages in separate c

231 visual modality, and (iii) normally hearing bilinguals who were native signers of ASL and speakers o

232 ment 1) and 48 German-English (Experiment 2) bilinguals, who classified randomly presented L1 and L2

233 Late bilinguals, who learned English after age 10, exhibited

234 rom speech-motor cortex of a Spanish-English bilingual with vocal-tract and limb paralysis into sente

235 Bilinguals with a high proficiency in their first (L1) a

236 asal ganglia and the thalamus in a sample of bilinguals with a wide range of bilingual experiences.

237 guals and eight native Spanish-speaking (L1) bilinguals with acquired English (L2).

238 Predicting language therapy outcomes in bilinguals with aphasia (BWA) remains challenging due to

239 dence showing cross-language permeability in bilingual word recognition, a phenomena that was predict

240 stigated whether young, highly immersed late bilinguals would also show structural effects in the WM