コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 =5 (women) and >=7 (men) units per instance (binge drinking).
2 ening young adults for a repeated history of binge drinking.
3 n have been implicated in sex differences in binge drinking.
4 , after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and binge drinking.
5 ncy, and quantity of alcohol consumption and binge drinking.
6 ore than 14% of men and 3% of women reported binge drinking.
7 ze injury to marginal fatty grafts caused by binge drinking.
8 y (less than once per month) had episodes of binge drinking.
9 s via hM4Di was sufficient to reduce alcohol binge drinking.
10 ts among subjects reporting higher levels of binge drinking.
11 students, and schools with medium levels of binge drinking.
12 ivity and adaptations to experiences such as binge drinking.
13 posure to abuse, substance use disorder, and binge drinking.
14 ocial defensiveness and abstinence-escalated binge drinking.
15 vioral maladaptations during withdrawal from binge drinking.
16 nd blocked the expression of withdrawal from binge drinking.
17 sodes of excessive alcohol drinking known as binge drinking.
18 t against severe intoxication in response to binge drinking.
19 inhibited target gene expression and blunted binge drinking.
20 and personality as important antecedents of binge drinking.
21 on targets, which plays an important role in binge drinking.
22 predicted all 3 levels of binge and extreme binge drinking.
23 hold (5 drinks) often used in definitions of binge drinking.
24 0.03; p < 0.001) and a higher probability of binge drinking (0.04 percentage points; 95% CI: 0.002, 0
25 -0.02, p = 0.02) and a higher probability of binge drinking (0.17 percentage points; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.
26 of 20.2% of high school seniors reported 5+ binge drinking, 10.5% reported 10+ extreme binge drinkin
27 l inactivity (31%), routine check-ups (14%), binge drinking (11%), lack of insurance (6%), and food i
28 ts; OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.39-2.20]; I(2)=91.0%), binge drinking (13 studies, 25 603 participants; 1.80 [1
29 rdous drinking (14.2 [5.91-34.0]), hazardous/binge drinking (18.9 [7.98-44.8]), and alcohol-related d
31 s of 2.00-59.99 g/day (n = 44,476), frequent binge drinking ( 5 units at least once per month) was no
32 ipants [44.4%] vs 136 participants [35.8%]), binge drinking (95 participants [17.9%] vs 46 participan
33 at least a 4.0-percentage-point increase in binge drinking (95% confidence interval: 0.9, 7.0) and a
34 n (ADE = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.02); not binge drinking (ADE = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.04); or
35 ve stress-induced social interactions and in binge drinking after forced abstinence in female mice.
37 In male, but not female mice, we found that binge drinking alcohol produced glutamatergic synaptic a
42 mong those who never drank, (2) the onset of binge drinking among those who were never binge drinkers
44 lcohol use has been studied extensively, but binge drinking among youth in the United States is not y
45 and understanding predictors of such extreme binge drinking among youth will benefit public health ef
46 orrelates of at-risk alcohol use (especially binge drinking) among middle-aged and elderly persons in
49 documented clinical relevance to adolescent binge drinking and alcoholism in humans to test whether
51 ddle-aged and older adults should screen for binge drinking and coexisting use of other substances.
52 al relevance of PKCepsilon translocation for binge drinking and determination of potential upstream s
53 h-risk alcohol consumption patterns, such as binge drinking and drinking before driving, and underage
55 l study compares trends in the prevalence of binge drinking and heavy alcohol consumption among pregn
56 trate a pronounced interaction between heavy binge drinking and high PRS, resulting in a relative exc
57 he sera of healthy individuals after alcohol binge drinking and in mice after binge or chronic alcoho
58 ed TLR4 expression in the CeA contributes to binge drinking and may be a key early neuroadaptation in
59 ts govern behavioral sequences that maintain binge drinking and may serve as a circuit-based biomarke
61 ratio was related to lower probabilities of binge drinking and of any alcohol use, with a 10-unit in
63 s study provides a foundation that shows how binge drinking and the oral microbiome dysbiosis lead to
67 ing patterns (ie, frequency of drinking and "binge" drinking) and consumption at different times of a
69 ded moderate drinking, 2812 (23.8%) reported binge drinking, and 4527 (38.3%) engaged in hazardous dr
70 + binge drinking, 10.5% reported 10+ extreme binge drinking, and 5.6% reported 15+ extreme binge drin
71 eded moderate drinking, 329 (23.4%) reported binge drinking, and 540 (38.4%) engaged in hazardous dri
72 aseline prevalence of heavy weekly drinking, binge drinking, and alcohol-related problems among Reser
75 t concentrations seen in blood alcohol after binge drinking, and diminished ALDH1a1 leads to enhanced
77 xiety disorder), (2) substance use (smoking, binge drinking, and illicit drug use), and (3) domestic
78 , current health insurance coverage, asthma, binge drinking, and physical activity) was not substanti
79 Participants were assessed for drinking, binge drinking, and problem drinking before randomizatio
80 characterized plasma exosomal contents in a binge-drinking animal model and their effect on ALC/APAP
81 OR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.17-2.44]), the onset of binge drinking (AOR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.08-1.77]), and the
82 associated with a high-risk trajectory were binge drinking (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.13-2.54), cigarette
88 on and increases in heavy episodic drinking (binge drinking) are a growing public concern, due to the
89 lcohol-induced steatosis in a mouse model of binge drinking as acute ethanol (EtOH) intoxication has
90 s caused profound and selective reduction of binge drinking associated with inhibition of alpha2 expr
91 rinking (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.56); the binge drinking association remained after adjustment for
93 creased MF behavioral score predicted higher binge drinking at age 21 but not its future development.
97 of comorbidity between binge eating (BE) and binge drinking (BD) behaviors, suggesting a common neuro
99 to alcohol cues in individuals who engage in binge drinking (BD) may play a role in motivation to con
100 e importance of assessing multiple levels of binge drinking behavior and their predictors among youth
103 in PV interneurons (PV:delta(-/-)) increased binge drinking behavior, reduced sensitivity to alcohol-
104 -0.259, SE = 0.132, P = .049) and growth of binge drinking (beta = -0.244, SE = 0.073, P = .001), du
105 = -0.400, SE = 0.179, P = .03) and growth in binge drinking (beta = -0.716, SE = 0.274, P = .009) and
106 tified between genetically predicted GCT and binge drinking (beta, -2.52; 95% CI, -4.13 to -0.91) and
109 4 siRNA vector (pHSVsiLTLR4a) also inhibited binge drinking, but neither vector functioned when infus
111 rican and less educated were associated with binge drinking, but race/ethnicity and educational level
112 ally significant consequences of their heavy/binge drinking, but they do not appear to be at greater
113 t in the mOFC that serves to protect against binge drinking by reducing alcohol intake, which may off
114 % CI: 0.3, 12.2; p = 0.041), and past-30-day binge drinking, by 3.5 percentage points (95% CI: -0.1,
116 t of past 30-day substance use (alcohol use, binge drinking, cannabis use, vaping cannabis, and vapin
117 lf-reported use of any tobacco, any alcohol, binge drinking, cannabis, and any other illegal or misus
118 with one large dose of ethanol, which mimics binge drinking, causes marginal fatty liver and decrease
120 e of prescription drugs were associated with binge drinking compared with no alcohol use among women.
122 was inversely associated with mortality, but binge drinking completely attenuated this relation.
123 to ethanol at concentrations obtained during binge drinking constricts cerebral arteries in several s
127 showed a notable reduction in mean predicted binge drinking days by 1.2 days (95% CI: [-2.3, -0.3]; p
128 f the intervention in reducing the number of binge drinking days, the trial's primary outcome, in the
129 h a significantly reduced reported number of binge-drinking days (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.74, 95
130 nth (IRR=0.69, 95% CI=0.50, 0.97), number of binge-drinking days (IRR=0.67, 95% CI=0.47, 0.95), and a
131 ing (IRR=0.84, 95% CI=0.71, 0.99), number of binge-drinking days (IRR=0.67, 95% CI=0.47, 0.96), and P
132 otionality, which were associated with fewer binge-drinking days and fewer alcohol related problems.
133 inge drinking in the past week; 3) number of binge-drinking days in the past week; and 4) number of d
135 iting AIC->DLS circuitry in male mice during binge drinking decreased alcohol, but not water consumpt
138 al confounders (age, sex, smoking, heavy and binge drinking, diabetes, use of preventive dental servi
143 19 eligible patients, 250 (94% men) reported binge drinking during the prior year, and a total of 318
144 period (aOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.08, 4.03), and binge drinking during the second month of pregnancy (aOR
146 , episodes of binge drinking (mean number of binge drinking episodes during previous 30 days decrease
148 had a significant reduction in the number of binge drinking episodes within the last 28 days at 12 mo
149 ths, the relative reduction in the number of binge drinking episodes within the last 28 days in the A
151 mary outcome was the self-reported number of binge drinking episodes within the last 28 days, assesse
152 Between 1993 and 2001, the total number of binge-drinking episodes among US adults increased from a
153 hest among those aged 18 to 25 years, 69% of binge-drinking episodes during the study period occurred
157 ng drinking limit guidelines in adults or on binge-drinking episodes or social consequences of alcoho
158 .2 billion to 1.5 billion; during this time, binge-drinking episodes per person per year increased by
162 reinforce evidence-based counseling against binge drinking even at the earliest stages of pregnancy.
163 ke has been associated with lower mortality, binge drinking, even among light drinkers, appears to be
166 ess norms were more strongly associated with binge drinking for women than for men (p(interaction) =
167 -0.176, SE = 0.073, P = .02), and growth in binge drinking frequency (beta = -0.183, SE = 0.092, P =
169 rinks per week [DPW] in 537 349 individuals, binge drinking frequency in 143 685 individuals, and alc
171 o enhance physique were more likely to start binge drinking frequently (2.06; 1.58-2.69) and using dr
172 for alcohol consumption (units per week and binge drinking) from Scottish Health Surveys done in 199
173 health insurance, body mass index, smoking, binge drinking, general health status, eyesight worry, a
174 erall, we demonstrate synergistic effects of binge drinking, genetics, and diabetes on ARC, with pote
176 hey are associated with reduced frequency of binge drinking >=6 drinks (B(IVW) = -0.198, 95% CI, -0.2
177 the last 3 months, the number of episodes of binge drinking (> or = 6 drinks per occasion), and the C
178 n in young adults with histories of repeated binge drinking (>/= 5 standard drinks in 2 h in men, >/=
179 nking (>2 drinks on a typical drinking day), binge drinking (>=6 drinks on 1 occasion), and hazardous
182 oncerning for adult morbidity and mortality: binge drinking has increased among both sexes, and heavy
183 Rates of 5+ binge drinking and 10+ extreme binge drinking have declined since 2005, but rates of 15
187 onfidence interval (CI): 1.05, 1.55) but not binge drinking; however, social network and individual d
188 year), hazard ratios were increased for ever binge drinking (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.45) or blacki
189 inhibit TLR4 or MCP-1 expression nor reduce binge drinking, identifying a neuronal TLR4/MCP-1 signal
190 s 30-44 without children (from 21% reporting binge drinking in 2006 to 42% in 2018); the exception wa
191 suggest that the shell critically regulates binge drinking in both sexes, with shell CP-AMPARs suppo
198 silencing of PL SST neurons reduced alcohol binge drinking in males and females, with no effect on s
200 y be an important pharmacotherapy to address binge drinking in populations with mild to moderate alco
203 days (IRR=0.67, 95% CI=0.47, 0.95), and any binge drinking in the past week (IRR=0.79, 95% CI=0.63,
204 number of drinks in the past 30 days; 2) any binge drinking in the past week; 3) number of binge-drin
211 th survey data were analyzed to determine if binge drinking increases the risk of incident major even
214 the amygdala to examine both idiopathic and binge drinking-induced changes in constitutive PKCepsilo
215 aches to examine the functional relevance of binge drinking-induced changes in glutamate receptors, t
217 ber needed to treat [NNT]=2), weeks with any binge drinking (IRR=0.83, 95% CI=0.72, 0.96; NNT=7.4), n
218 quency in the study), naltrexone reduced any binge drinking (IRR=0.84, 95% CI=0.71, 0.99), number of
230 differences in the estimated prevalences of binge drinking (mail = 20.3%, telephone = 13.1%) or beha
233 the present findings suggest that adolescent binge drinking may produce sex-specific and long-lasting
235 s for controls; t=4.33; P<.001), episodes of binge drinking (mean number of binge drinking episodes d
240 ake of alcohol, drinks per drinking episode, binge drinking odds, Alcohol Use Disorders Identificatio
241 -1.08]; P = .14) and effects on the risks of binge drinking (odds ratio [OR], 0.84 [99.17% CI, 0.67-1
243 Patients reported their usual frequency of binge drinking of beer, wine, and liquor, defined as int
245 he effects of familial alcoholism and future binge-drinking on white matter microstructural developme
247 ontrast, heavier alcohol consumption such as binge drinking or consuming on average >=3 drinks a day
250 white matter regions identified where future binge-drinking or familial alcoholism were significantly
251 drinking (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.39) and binge drinking (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.56); the bing
252 e were no differences in the odds of monthly binge drinking (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.56-1.13]) or hazardo
253 also associated with reduced odds of monthly binge drinking (OR, 0.87, [95% CI, 0.77-0.99]) and hazar
254 3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.96), binge drinking (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.71), and alcoho
255 unmarried, working long hours, more frequent binge drinking) or longer (e.g., being younger, Mexican
257 rol group; measured past 30-day alcohol use, binge drinking, or susceptibility to use alcohol among n
259 le diseases); health risks (tobacco smoking, binge drinking, overweight, and anaemia); and social det
260 ed with other risk-taking behaviors, such as binge drinking (P < .001 and P = .006, respectively), un
262 were indicators of psychosocial functioning (binge drinking; perceived stress; not being in education
263 ly than alcoholics in the COGA to experience binge drinking, physical fighting, driving while intoxic
264 8]), suicide attempts (PR 1.99 [1.62-2.44]), binge drinking (PR 1.10 [1.01-1.20]), sleep problems (PR
265 l neurons projecting to the brainstem before binge drinking predicted the ultimate emergence of compu
266 use problems (frequent alcohol use, frequent binge drinking, prescription drug misuse, and over-the-c
267 menstrual, follicular, and ovulatory phases (binge drinking probability and odds ratios vs. late lute
268 teal phase, females showed a lower predicted binge drinking probability of 13% and a higher predicted
269 pproaches within the context of two distinct binge drinking procedures, drinking in the dark and sche
271 may be useful for curbing and/or preventing binge drinking, protecting vulnerable individuals from p
272 tes (beta = -0.320, SE = 0.145, P = .03) and binge drinking rates (beta = -0.400, SE = 0.179, P = .03
277 sessed every 6 months) or an interview-based binge drinking score (grams of alcohol/occasion; assesse
279 ively associated with the development of the binge drinking score; MF reward prediction error blood o
280 iables, alcohol use (including at-risk use), binge drinking, serious psychological distress, and self
281 the mortality and morbidity associated with binge drinking should be widely adopted, including scree
287 GHSR inverse agonist and antagonist reduced binge drinking, suggesting direct actions of ghrelin.
292 re, we found that repeated cycles of alcohol binge drinking via the Drinking-in-the-Dark (DID) model
299 eased MB behavioral score was protective for binge drinking, while an increased MF behavioral score p
300 of alcohol intake in rats with a history of binge drinking without dependence is currently unknown.