戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  by maternal race group (as self-reported on birth certificates).
2  previous cesarean were so designated on the birth certificate.
3 and ethnic ancestry were identified from the birth certificate.
4 atus were used as reported on an infant's US birth certificate.
5 ntrols were hospital-matched and selected by birth certificate.
6 year of life at the address indicated on the birth certificate.
7 controlling for confounders available on the birth certificate.
8 ty drug use check boxes on the Massachusetts birth certificate.
9 se, 1,728 (88%) were matched to a California birth certificate.
10 s first year of life were also linked to the birth certificate.
11 ociodemographic variables were gathered from birth certificates.
12 essee, and had complete information on their birth certificates.
13 ncies, and birth outcomes were obtained from birth certificates.
14 r gestational age (SGA) were identified from birth certificates.
15 ion, preeclampsia, or eclampsia, recorded on birth certificates.
16 nd gestational duration) was determined from birth certificates.
17 ia Cancer Registry and matched to California birth certificates.
18 ertificates, and controls were selected from birth certificates.
19  Services and linked to 1995-2006 California birth certificates.
20 ased on medical and pharmacy claims data and birth certificates.
21                 Infants were identified from birth certificates.
22  population (GP) controls (n=418) from state birth certificates.
23 h parental ages and covariates obtained from birth certificates.
24 nters that selected controls from electronic birth certificates.
25 al records with a birth defects registry and birth certificates.
26 ession to analyze 1968-1985 data from 11,798 birth certificates.
27 ernal risk factors were gathered from 95,711 birth certificates (1994-1996).
28                The mother's address from the birth certificate and addresses reported from a resident
29 is cohort study is a retrospective review of birth certificate and delivery records from 2019 to 2022
30 ss-sectional study used Massachusetts linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 2012
31 ntrol study using 1992-1998 Washington State birth certificate and hospital discharge records to inve
32              None of the differences between birth certificate and ideal controls was significant, wh
33 except birth weight, the differences between birth certificate and ideal controls were smaller than t
34                     OVD was determined using birth certificate and International Classification of Di
35 her-infant dyads were identified from linked birth certificate and maternal and infant hospital claim
36 her-infant dyads were identified from linked birth certificate and maternal and newborn hospital clai
37                        Agreement between the birth certificate and maternal report was good for singl
38  267,213 children aged 12-15 years with both birth certificate and school records.
39                        Using 13,077,880 live-birth certificates and 11,942 linked SUID death certific
40 duce racial disparities in SMM, using linked birth certificates and claims from Medicaid beneficiarie
41  were linked with maternal health data using birth certificates and EHRs to determine prenatal medica
42 certainment ranged from 70.6% to 82.0% using birth certificates and from 86.2% to 90.3% using confide
43 orbidity diagnoses were obtained from linked birth certificates and hospitalization files.
44  For each case, we recruited 3 controls from birth certificates and interviewed identified adult clos
45 ntrol individuals were randomly sampled from birth certificates and matched 2:1 to cases by sex, birt
46                     Data were collected from birth certificates and maternally linked hospital discha
47 maternal birthplace data were extracted from birth certificates and neighborhood-level household inco
48 ness of ascertainment of prenatal smoking on birth certificates and on confidential questionnaires in
49                                         Both birth certificates and questionnaires underestimated the
50 and 2001, were retrospectively obtained from birth certificates and were linked to their clinical, la
51 f of the world's newborn babies do not get a birth certificate, and most neonatal deaths and almost a
52                Used linked ART surveillance, birth certificates, and birth defects registry data for
53  were had their records linked to California birth certificates, and controls were selected from birt
54 ere measured using administrative claims and birth certificates, and infants were followed up from da
55 e-time-control study using Taiwan's National Birth Certificate Application database and the National
56                   The authors concluded that birth certificates are an efficient means of locating ch
57 ence were correctly designated on the second birth certificate as a VBAC; 79.3% of women with a V- CS
58 ent between maternal morbidity fields on the birth certificate as compared with health insurance clai
59 g status (breast vs bottle) was coded on the birth certificate as the type of feeding the infant was
60            Marriage equality has established birth certificates as a promising new source of populati
61 Race and ethnicity were ascertained from the birth certificate, as reported by the birthing parent.
62                                              Birth certificate (BC) controls are an alternative, beca
63 dicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) data linked to birth certificates (BCs), we identified mother-infant dy
64                       The main outcomes were birth certificate birth weight measures including small
65 defects (control infants) were selected from birth certificates by stratified random sampling.
66 onnaires was validated with information from birth certificates (cases, n = 378; controls, n = 283).
67 etric estimate) revisions of the US standard birth certificate: clinical or obstetric estimate and LM
68                       In all six states, the birth certificates' completeness of ascertainment varied
69                      From 1980 through 1988, birth certificates contained a check box indicating a pr
70 eukemia (ALL) cases 0-7 years of age and 214 birth certificate controls matched on date of birth, sex
71                                              Birth certificate controls were frequency-matched on bir
72 ad been diagnosed with incident leukemia and birth certificate controls who were matched to them on a
73 w participation rate (49.0% for 560 enrolled birth certificate controls), using birth records to recr
74 end controls may be less representative than birth certificate controls.
75                                    Crude and birth certificate covariate-adjusted results for carbon
76                  We used US vital statistics birth certificate data 2016 to 2023.
77                                              Birth certificate data are also increasingly being used
78     The Medical Birth Registry of Norway has birth certificate data dating back to 1967 and allowed n
79 ch consists of linked hospital discharge and birth certificate data for 580,282 deliveries.
80                            National study of birth certificate data for live births to women in 45 US
81                                        Using birth certificate data for nearly all registered US birt
82                                              Birth certificate data frequently are used to monitor th
83                              Using 1999-2001 birth certificate data from 2 counties in North Carolina
84                   Linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data from 2010 to 2016 were examined f
85 This cohort study linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data from 2010 to 2019 to examine chan
86 cohort study used linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data from 2010 to 2020 with a differen
87                                      We used birth certificate data from Massachusetts for 201,873 si
88                           We used nationwide birth certificate data from singleton mother-infant pair
89 pulation-based cohort study using nationwide birth certificate data from the US National Vital Statis
90 eks of gestation during 2000-2005 using live birth certificate data from three states (Pennsylvania,
91 mined hospital discharge diagnoses linked to birth certificate data in the year following delivery fo
92                                              Birth certificate data linked to infant death certificat
93 nited States, researchers compared 1997-2003 birth certificate data linked to selected controls (n =
94 ive, repeated cross-sectional study examined birth certificate data of all live births in the US and
95 cohort study used linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data on live births to 4869 Latina pat
96                          This study compared birth certificate data on the amount, timing, and adequa
97 udy using linked New York City discharge and birth certificate data sets from 2010.
98  using National Center for Health Statistics birth certificate data to describe the frequency of preg
99                          Medicaid claims and birth certificate data were linked by Medicaid identific
100                                              Birth certificate data were used to create a sampling fr
101  encounters, hospital discharge information, birth certificate data, and prescription fills.
102 hildren, identified using publicly available birth certificate data, born in 1992, 1994, 1996, and 19
103 ntified through linking of annual California birth certificate data.
104 or greater between 2007 and 2019 with linked birth certificate data.
105    Maternal race and ethnicity obtained from birth certificate data.
106 th determined by a validated algorithm using birth certificate data.
107 regnancy characteristics were extracted from birth certificate data.
108 his retrospective cohort study of a 9-county birth certificate database in the Finger Lakes region of
109 uri Department of Health's maternally-linked birth certificate database, we performed a retrospective
110  four sources: hospital discharge diagnoses, birth certificates, death certificates, and a study of n
111     The birth prevalence of NTDs reported on birth certificates decreased from 37.8 per 100 000 live
112 bsence of transfusion and claims data versus birth certificate definitions.
113                          We examined whether birth certificate-derived maternal anthropometric charac
114  cancer diagnosis was randomly selected from birth certificate files (n = 12990) with frequency match
115 r 2013; CCR records were linked to statewide birth certificate files from January 2000 to December 20
116                             Florida resident birth certificates for 2004-2006 were linked to the Cent
117     Data were derived from maternally linked birth certificates for 6,325 African-American women whos
118 ntrols collected by random digit dialing and birth certificates for a Children's Oncology Group case-
119 ple of liveborn singleton births with linked birth certificates for birthing people and their infants
120              The authors used linked Georgia birth certificates for first and second deliveries to ex
121 k State Congenital Malformations Registry to birth certificates for the years 1992-2006.
122                                   Sixty-four birth certificate-friend control pairs were enrolled (n
123 trols were identified using Washington State birth certificates from 1984-1998.
124                          We analyzed Florida birth certificates from 1994 to 2002 linked to Florida p
125 We linked Arizona pesticide use records with birth certificates from 2006 to 2020 and estimated assoc
126 ional, population-based study, Massachusetts birth certificates from 3 large metropolitan areas (Bost
127 d fee-for-service billing records matched to birth certificates from Medicaid beneficiaries aged 0 to
128 ltigenerational dataset of maternally linked birth certificates from South Carolina, we investigated
129 NG, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used birth certificates from the National Vital Statistics Sy
130                                    From live birth certificates from three states, we constructed a c
131 hone interviews with 399 women whose child's birth certificate had at least one of the boxes checked
132 e proportion of children aged 0-4 years with birth certificates had increased by 1.5% (95% CI -7.1 to
133 of gestational age measurements derived from birth certificates has been in question.
134                          Previous studies of birth certificates have not fully evaluated how accurate
135 dren between the ages of 3 and 5 years, with birth certificates, height and weight measures, and info
136                                    We linked birth certificates, hospital discharge abstracts (includ
137 1,213) whose birth weight was collected from birth certificates in 1991.
138 1,186) whose birth weight was collected from birth certificates in 1991.
139 review was conducted of hospital records and birth certificates in the largest birth hospital in Loui
140 al Perinatal Data System combines electronic birth certificate information with questions asked of al
141                                        Using birth certificate information, we examined the relation
142 lation-based retrospective cohort study used birth certificates linked to all-payer childbirth claims
143 de retrospective cohort study used data from birth certificates linked to all-payer hospital data for
144 to December 31, 2009, using Washington State birth certificates linked to hospital discharge data.
145 rm birth using 2008-2010 New York City (NYC) birth certificates linked to hospital records.
146                                  We examined birth certificates linked with maternal hospitalization
147                                  Two control birth certificates, matched on date of birth and sex, we
148  Follow-up, which collected information from birth certificates, medical records, and mothers of a na
149          Data were from parental interviews, birth certificates, multiple-pass 24-h dietary recalls,
150 98-2007) who could be linked to a California birth certificate (n = 3,590).
151 h rates at the county level constructed from birth certificate natality data covering all births in t
152                       There was no access to birth certificates, obstetric or pediatric medical recor
153 r gestational age by analyzing data from the birth certificates of 173,205 singleton infants born ali
154 ory, and birth weight were obtained from the birth certificates of all 320 subjects.
155         HCV data were matched with 2011-2013 birth certificates of children aged >/=20 months to iden
156 , AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study linked birth certificates of children born in Iowa from 1989 to
157 ANTS: This retrospective cohort study linked birth certificates of children born in Iowa from 1989 to
158                                              Birth certificates of children born in Iowa in 1999-2009
159 amination Survey (NHANES III) were linked to birth certificates of US-born infants and children.
160 rically based variables collected on Georgia birth certificates: outcome of preceding pregnancy, hist
161 tion of children younger than 5 years with a birth certificate, proportion younger than 5 years with
162 NTS: This cohort study used linked data from birth certificate registration and the Taiwan National H
163  and were drawn from the New York State live birth certificate registry.
164 alence ratios (PRs) of maternal smoking from birth certificate report and ASDs using logistic regress
165                                              Birth certificate reports of spina bifida and anencephal
166                                Regardless of birth certificate revision, the median, 10th, and 90th p
167 irths and lower for postterm births for both birth certificate revisions.
168 y and race and ethnicity, as reported on the birth certificate, stratified as non-Hispanic American I
169 nd 2013 using data from newly revised Oregon birth certificates that allowed for the disaggregation o
170                           From the immediate birth certificates, the delivery method for each of the
171 rs, r = 0.84) was highly correlated with the birth certificates, there was differential measurement e
172 ecause of underreporting of amniocentesis on birth certificates, these data support an association be
173   Information was obtained from the infant's birth certificate to assess the relation between seizure
174 The authors used 1994 US singleton livebirth birth certificates to compare Mexican Americans with non
175 of Developmental Services records with state birth certificates to identify all siblings and half sib
176 ces records, which were then linked to state birth certificates to identify full sibs and half-sibs a
177 terrupted time series design to data from US birth certificates to test whether the log odds of low b
178                                              Birth-certificate variables were reviewed in both bivari
179 he 579 women with available information, the birth certificate was fully concordant with respect to i
180                     Information available on birth certificates was not sufficient to understand this
181            First, using monthly data from US birth certificates, we describe temporal patterning in 5
182   In this population-based study, California birth certificates were identified for 508 (86%) neurobl
183                                              Birth certificates were used to select women who had vag
184 ge (1981-1992), obtained from New York State birth certificates, were compared between lead-exposed a
185 ntial reporting by birth weights recorded on birth certificates would result in an overestimated asso

 
Page Top