ライフサイエンスコーパス: birth rate

1 diagnostic method (despite a favorable live-birth rate).

2 or have not consistently reduced the preterm birth rate.

3 n interactions to include seasonality in the birth rate.

4 this respect and must have a lower intrinsic birth rate.

5 in the tumor and the age-dependent cellular birth rate.

6 increasing life expectancy and a decreasing birth rate.

7 d stable, resulting in a 26% increase in the birth rate.

8 transfers was associated with a higher live birth rate.

9 mice born during the M-SOB with the highest birth rate.

10 to explain disparities in the NTSV cesarean birth rate.

11 l women in order to estimate cumulative live-birth rates.

12 astocyst transfer resulted in higher preterm birth rates.

13 ted using meta-analysis and national preterm birth rates.

14 nced higher rates of illness but also higher birth rates.

15 ication did not significantly reduce preterm birth rates.

16 timulation was associated with improved live birth rates.

17 ue to high maternal HSV-2 infection and high birth rates.

18 nology and infertility services, and preterm birth rates.

19 Primary outcomes were pregnancy and live birth rates.

20 nd New England, which had the lowest preterm birth rates.

21 lar patterns were observed for early preterm birth rates.

22 size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates.

23 antly improve semen quality or couples' live birth rates.

24 ers have significantly higher copulation and birth rates.

25 e multiple gestations while maintaining live birth rates.

26 d sub-Saharan Africa has the highest preterm birth rates.

27 51 978 MS patients were compared to expected birth rates.

28 , Ecuador, and Estonia), had reduced preterm birth rates 1990-2010.

29 years of follow-up (risk, 2.13 per 1000 live births; rate, 2.63/10000 child-years).

30 the change in RSV transmission dynamics: (1) birth rates, (2) temperatures, and (3) viral interferenc

31 465 children with a diagnosis, 14 were twin births (rate 30.0/1,000) compared to 9,640 children of m

32 istically significant differences in vaginal birth rates (31.8% in both groups; adjusted absolute ris

33 ears and 30 to 34 years of age, maximum live-birth rates (43 % and 36%, respectively) were achieved w

34 hich we then replace with the time dependent birth rate a(t), to investigate how this effects the dyn

35 f the model with a constant time-independent birth rate, a, which we then replace with the time depen

36 The cumulative prognosis-adjusted live-birth rate across all cycles continued to increase up to

37 Despite observing deficits in birth rates across all 17 different types of adolescent

38 h rate per IVF cycle and the cumulative live-birth rates across all cycles in all women and by age an

39 ere was substantial heterogeneity in preterm birth rates across maternal racial and ethnic groups, pa

40 IVF, the cumulative prognosis-adjusted live-birth rate after 6 cycles was 65.3%, with variations by

41 ndergoing 14,248 cycles, the cumulative live-birth rate after 6 cycles was 72% (95% confidence interv

42 Primary outcome was cumulative live-birth rate after up to three transfers.

43 Low birth rates after A.D. 1200 mark the beginning of the de

44 Overall, live birth rates after BC were significantly higher among wom

45 Live-birth rates after treatment with assisted reproductive t

46 and their higher thermal optima and maximal birth rates allow them to take advantage of the warmer p

47 Among these sexually experienced teenagers, birth rates also declined between 1980 and 1985 and then

48 The annual first birth rate among HCT recipients was 0.45%, which is >6 t

49 Cesarean birth rate among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (N

50 T treatment were associated with higher live birth rates among a population exposed to folic acid for

51 levothyroxine treatment would increase live-birth rates among euthyroid women who had thyroid peroxi

52 Main outcomes were cesarean birth rates among nulliparous individuals and multiparou

53 Live-birth rates among older women are lower than those among

54 We estimated cumulative live-birth rates among patients undergoing their first fresh-

55 Birth rates among people with CHDs, relative to the gene

56 Cesarean birth rates among self-reported racial and ethnic groups

57 Between 1980 and 1985, birth rates among teenaged girls aged 15 to 19 years dec

58 Lower birth rates among women with RA may at least in part ref

59 ation cannot persist no matter how large its birth rate, an effect not seen in previous simpler model

60 nistration significantly reduced the preterm birth rate and altered placental immune profile with dec

61 k women, for example, have twice the preterm birth rate and higher rates of growth restriction than d

62 Secondary outcomes included the live-birth rate and late pregnancy complications.

63 paradox of steep and sustained reductions in birth rate and mortality alongside continued burdens of

64 The primary outcome was the live birth rate and secondary outcomes included gestational a

65 ssed the evidence for seasonal variations in birth rate and tested the extent to which these are subj

66 The significant correlations between birth rates and both place (latitude) and time (year of

67 oth models are capable of inferring variable birth rates and correctly rejecting variable models in f

68 lt in an increase in CRS burden for specific birth rates and coverage levels.

69 A correlation between birth rates and disease activity and progression appears

70 common features of eusociality - saturating birth rates and group size-dependent helping decisions -

71 severe metabolic complications, lowest live birth rates and highest PCOS remission rate; PCOS with h

72 n trial (NCT03673592) showed equivalent live-birth rates and miscarriage rates across 484 euploid, 28

73 It was also associated with increased birth rates and rates of abortion during the second trim

74 im of this study was to quantify deficits in birth rates and risks of obstetric complications for fem

75 Despite increasing facility birth rates and substantial focus on routine health data

76 s disorder is growing in global relevance as birth rates and survival of babies with low gestational

77 stetric histories of subjects, study preterm birth rates and the periodontal treatment response.

78 This study updated national preterm birth rates and trends, plus novel estimates by gestatio

79 ery small decreases in preterm birth and SGA birth rates and very small increases in induction of lab

80 5, notably on indicators MDG 5.4 (adolescent birth rate) and 5.6 (unmet need for family planning).

81 us during pregnancy on gestational age, live birth rate, and small for gestational age babies.

82 011 were used to determine national multiple birth rates, and data on in vitro fertilization (IVF) fr

83 of peak pandemic exposure and depressions in birth rates, and identified pregnancy stages at risk of

84 flicted due to its condense population, high birth rates, and multiple exposures in crowded religious

85 identified periods of unusually low or high birth rates, and quantified births as "missing" or "in e

86 graphic transition, as a result of declining birth rates, and reduced measles prevalence, due to impr

87 s or Washington, DC, also had higher preterm birth rates (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12).

88 Our results indicate that live-birth rates approaching natural fecundity can be achieve

89 e Australian gecko family Pygopodidae (where birth rates are interpretable as speciation rates), the

90 m HIV subtype A in Russia and Ukraine (where birth rates are interpretable as the rate of accumulatio

91 It is generally accepted that birth rates are negatively associated with income.

92 that robust clonal expansion, where cellular birth rates are significantly greater than death rates,

93 If birth rates are uniform across sites, then K </= u.

94 sex education and data on age-specific teen birth rates at the county level constructed from birth c

95 Preterm birth rates at the national level may mask important geo

96 ell at the end of the 19th century, European birth rates began to plummet.

97 ates were increasing, with only the trend in birth rates being statistically significant.

98 High adult birth rates between 1970 and 1980 would have resulted in

99 statistically significant change in preterm birth rates between 2007 and 2019 at the national level

100 tantial differences were observed in preterm birth rates between exposed and unexposed newborns (RR =

101 n accompanied by a significant drop in crude birth rates beyond that predicted by past trends in 7 ou

102 on dry or rainfed farming experienced higher birth rates but less initial sociopolitical complexity.

103 pendent societies experienced relatively low birth rates but were quick to achieve a high degree of s

104 etrics, gestational weight gain, and preterm birth rate, but not in maternal age, parity, socioeconom

105 sive sex education reduced county-level teen birth rates by more than 3%.

106 Preterm birth rates by racial and ethnic group and by public and

107 data shows that spatiotemporal variation in birth rate can explain the timing of rotavirus epidemics

108 or women with low prognosis in terms of live birth rate compared with a freeze-all strategy.

109 CSI use was associated with a lower multiple birth rate compared with conventional IVF (30.9% vs 34.2

110 utheast consistently had the highest preterm birth rates compared with counties in California and New

111 ander individuals experienced higher preterm birth rates compared with US-born Pacific Islander indiv

112 In order to allow for differences in birth rates, contact rates and movement rates among diff

113 disease remains a major killer in some high birth rate countries of the Sahel.

114 s a several-hundred-year period of increased birth rates coupled with stable mortality rates, resulti

115 Birth rates declined in all study populations in spring

116 Live-birth rates declined with increasing maternal age and in

117 The cumulative live-birth rate decreased with increasing age, and the age-st

118 proportions as life expectancy increases and birth rate decreases.

119 , graft survival, and uterus transplant live birth rate (defined as live birth per transplanted recip

120 Neither gestational age nor preterm birth rate differed with vitamin A or beta-carotene supp

121 However, birth rates differed in subsequent years; overall, famil

122 11.8 to 13.7 percentage points]) and preterm birth rates (difference, 9.4 percentage points [CI, 8.2

123 However, birth rates drop dramatically during famines.

124 mined the relationship between influenza and birth rates during the 1918 pandemic in the United State

125 ded divergent data on the changes in preterm birth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is a

126 pected when comparing such a collection with birth rates estimated by averaging population-specific n

127 f the total population by age and sex, crude birth rate, estimated prevalence of active tuberculosis,

128 ated depression were associated with preterm birth rates exceeding 20%.

129 s of previous studies, which assume that the birth rate exhibits a monotonic temperature response, th

130 First, when the resource species' birth rate exhibits a unimodal temperature response, as

131 udies, report improved outcomes with preterm birth rates falling from 20% to 9%-13% in AIH pregnancie

132 Live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer vs cryopreser

133 feasible and was associated with a high live birth rate following successful graft survival.

134 oocytes, data have demonstrated higher live birth rates following cryopreserved-thawed embryo transf

135 Crude annual birth rate for 4-month survivors of SCT was lower than t

136 pated mortality benefit from a lower preterm birth rate for Blacks has been blunted by suboptimal imp

137 For women aged 40 to 42 years, the live-birth rate for the first cycle was 12.3% (95% CI, 11.8%-

138 In all women, the live-birth rate for the first cycle was 29.5% (95% CI, 29.3%-

139 n 40 years using their own oocytes, the live-birth rate for the first cycle was 32.3% (95% CI, 32.0%-

140 The preterm birth rate for twins increased from 40.9% in 1981 to 55.

141 regional, and national estimates of preterm birth rates for 184 countries in 2010 with time trends f

142 al models were developed to estimate preterm birth rates for 2010.

143 regnancy in the United States, pregnancy and birth rates for that group continue to be the highest am

144 g time was associated with decreased preterm birth rates for women who experienced intense storm expo

145 predicted a 5% relative reduction of preterm birth rate from 9.59% to 9.07% of livebirths: smoking ce

146 n tree shapes, but can bias inference of the birth rate from trees.

147 nflammatory cytokines, and increases preterm birth rates from 13 to 28%.

148 We compiled monthly birth rates from 1911 through 1930 in 3 Scandinavian cou

149 DC birth rates from 1999 to 2007 correlated with proxies fo

150 he genealogy as a function of the individual birth rate gamma, the individual death rate mu, and the

151 an to disentangle the effects of IVF on twin birth rates, gender composition, and parental preference

152 Secondary pregnancy outcomes were live birth rate, gestation, very preterm birth (<32 weeks), v

153 Pregnancy outcomes including live birth rates, gestational age, and proportion of babies w

154 Those patients with birth rates greater than 0.35% per day were much more li

155 The birth rate has been stable since 1994.

156 on of family planning in countries with high birth rates has the potential to reduce poverty and hung

157 dengue in Thailand, combined with declining birth rates, have decreased the absolute risk of infant

158 matin-based mechanism that underpins the low birth rate in ROSI remains to be determined.

159 The live birth rate in the Canadian cohort (86.4%) was significan

160 ng fetal levels, and maintaining the preterm birth rate in vivo in a pregnant mouse model.

161 rin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm

162 To assess pregnancy and birth rates in a contemporary cohort, we conducted a nat

163 rmeability, and strikingly increased preterm birth rates in a mouse model of ascending vaginal infect

164 Birth rates in Canada and the United States declined sha

165 Birth rates in DC also increased versus Baltimore City a

166 g a set of dominance parameters which affect birth rates in each social level and movement rates betw

167 worldwide and persistently high ART multiple-birth rates in several countries highlight the need for

168 comes of interest were variations in preterm birth rates in the context of baseline characteristics a

169 The reasons for the variations in birth rates in the general population are unclear, but n

170 showed that Zishen Yutai Pill increased live birth rates in women aged 35-42 undergoing IVF, without

171 ould not be explained by the slightly higher birth rates in women with CHDs.

172 0 years will likely see further increases in birth rates in women with subfertility, a greater awaren

173 ns do not increase ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates in women with unexplained RPL.

174 AS) of two fertility traits (family size and birth rate) in 269 married men who are members of a foun

175 , leading to lower fertility (that is, lower birth rates) in urban than in rural areas.

176 nsive prenatal care utilization, the preterm birth rate increased from 35.1% to 55.8%, compared with

177 In this cohort study, preterm and early-term birth rates increased after heat waves, particularly amo

178 Multiple-birth rates increased as high as 45.7% for women aged 20

179 of whether embryos were cryopreserved, live-birth rates increased if more than 2 embryos were transf

180 Overall in the Southwest, birth rates increased slowly from 1100 B.C. to A.D. 500,

181 We confirm that seasonality in birth rate is ubiquitous and subject to highly significa

182 Anticipatory planning for birth rates is important for health care systems and gov

183 tial of preimplantation embryos and the live birth rate, it might represent a novel means to improve

184 vivorship, and healthy females maintain high birth rates late into life.

185 The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) following oocyte donor cycles.

186 rate (CPR), secondary outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), misc

187 (IR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR).

188 roductive technology (ART) face reduced live birth rates (LBR) and remain a major clinical challenge.

189 indow of opportunity that opens when falling birth rates lead to a relatively higher proportion of th

190 Live-birth and multiple-birth rates may vary by patient age and embryo quality.

191 ife histories, Darwinian fitness is equal to birth rate minus death rate.

192 nual cycles tended to have higher per capita birth rates, more household crowding, more children per

193 e ability, the form with the lower intrinsic birth rate must be compensated by a more than proportion

194 However, neither the preterm birth rate nor the rate of long-term neurologic disabili

195 n the context of this variation we show that birth rates observed in typical case collections are hig

196 Furthermore, the highest preterm birth rates occur in low-income settings where the cause

197 nued due to poor prognosis and having a live-birth rate of 0 had they continued.

198 categories, from the lowest overall preterm birth rate of 217 of 2873 births (7.55%) in the zip code

199 hieving a cumulative prognosis-adjusted live-birth rate of 31.5% (95% CI, 29.7%-33.3%).

200 ng a 50% clinical pregnancy rate with a live birth rate of 42% overall.

201 l Desirable" and the highest overall preterm birth rate of 427 of 3449 births (12.38%) in the zip cod

202 chieved a cumulative prognosis-adjusted live-birth rate of 68.4% (95% CI, 67.8%-68.9%).

203 Finally, the birth rate of apoB-27.6 homozygotes (Apob(27.6/27.6)) fr

204 Our results suggest that there is a high birth rate of new miRNA genes, accompanied by a comparab

205 n rising to large numbers, despite their low birth rate of one offspring every seven to nine days.

206 However, the very low birth rate of SC pups limits practical use of this appro

207 al stage and seasonal forcing applied to the birth rate of the host.

208 that considers the Allee effect, in that the birth rate of tumor cells increases with cell number in

209 anslated into an adjusted difference in live birth rates of 26% (95% CI: 10%, 48%; P = 0.02).

210 ty and pregnancy outcomes emerged, with live birth rates of 48% in women dialyzed </=20 hours per wee

211 ve target of a relative reduction in preterm birth rates of 5% by 2015.

212 ve target of a relative reduction in preterm birth rates of 5% by 2015.

213 uperiority) = 0.003) (1-year cumulative live birth rates of 75.7% versus 68.9%).

214 A tumour grows when the total division (birth) rate of its cells exceeds their total mortality (

215 traits, shifts in the dynamics (for example, birth rates) of populations and finally abundance declin

216 The impact of trends in preterm birth rates on neonatal and infant mortality was also ev

217 x vaccination had no effect on pregnancy and birth rates or adverse birth outcomes.

218 lastocyst transfer increases cumulative live-birth rates over single cleavage-stage transfer.

219 age group, trends in pregnancy, abortion and birth rates over the decade were similar to those for ol

220 ere has been no measurable change in preterm birth rates over the last decade at global level.

221 re associated with the recent decline in the birth rate overall in the US.

222 est were the pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate per cycle.

223 The overall live birth rate per embryo transfer was similar to the US nat

224 Live-birth rate per IVF cycle and the cumulative live-birth r

225 The live birth rates per embryo varied from as high as 43% for fr

226 Live-birth and multiple-birth rates (percentage of live births that were multipl

227 To maximize birth rates, physicians who perform in vitro fertilizati

228 regarding the impact of long-term shifts in birth rates, population-level infection risks, and mater

229 episode volume changes can be monitored and birth rates projected in real-time during major societal

230 ity Index was associated with higher preterm birth rates (quartile 4 vs quartile 1 risk ratio, 1.34;

231 52 women in the water group (28.1%) had live births (rate ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.64; P<0.001)

232 ell competition that either results in total birth rate reduction or death rate increase.

233 countries with VHHDI achieved annual preterm birth rate reductions of the best performers for 1990-20

234 countries with VHHDI achieved annual preterm birth rate reductions of the best performers for 1990-20

235 dynamics for industrialized countries, high birth rate regions should experience regular annual epid

236 ping MS coincide with the lowest and highest birth rates, respectively.

237 s domination by the most superior species in birth rate, resulting in the coexistence of inferior spe

238 rental notification law in early pregnancy), birth rates rose by 4 percent relative to those of teens

239 The primary outcome was live birth rate; secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy r

240 ontact, our results suggest that even in low birth rate settings high vaccine coverage must be mainta

241 Trends in teen pregnancy and birth rates show continued decline, but state and racial

242 Chimpanzee and human birth rates show similar patterns of decline beginning i

243 tes assumed that these women would have live-birth rates similar to those for women continuing treatm

244 The decline in under-18 conception and birth rates since 1998 and evidence that the declines ha

245 ality rates of biomedical journals, but that birth rates so exceeded death rates that numbers of biom

246 e disparity countered the changes in preterm birth rates so that the percentage decline in neonatal m

247 dy of county-level preterm and early preterm birth rates, substantial geographic disparities were obs

248 permatid injection (ROSI) results in a lower birth rate than intracytoplasmic sperm injection, which

249 t study on the COVID-19 pandemic and preterm birth rates, the duration of exposure to mitigation meas

250 y rates in children younger than 5 years and birth rates, the numbers of deaths by cause were calcula

251 ly 2 decades of declining teen pregnancy and birth rates, the problem persists, with significant disp

252 easing death rate) or cytostatic (decreasing birth rate) therapy while keeping the effect of the ther

253 butions, to approximate arbitrary changes in birth rate through time.

254 op progressive disease than those with lower birth rates Thus, B-CLL is not a static disease that res

255 cidence in women aged 15-49 years to 2010-15 birth rates to estimate infections during pregnancy.

256 y and quantity of data, we estimated preterm birth rates using country-level loess regression for 201

257 emporal model) and percent change in preterm birth rates using log-linear regression models.

258 Multiple-birth rates varied by age and the number of embryos tran

259 r of embryos needed to achieve maximum live- birth rates varied by age and whether extra embryos were

260 Preterm birth rates varied significantly among counties, with an

261 patient had definable and often substantial birth rates, varying from 0.1% to greater than 1.0% of t

262 The crude 3-year birth rate was 11.0 per 1000.

263 2007, the national age-standardized preterm birth rate was 12.6 (95% CI, 12.6-12.7) per 100 live bir

264 Live birth rate was 19.2% and lowest average SPTRX3 levels we

265 The live-birth rate was 22.5% (47 of 209 subjects) in the clomiph

266 The overall NTSV cesarean birth rate was 28.5% (n = 8632); the rate increased from

267 mong women aged 35 to 39 years, the multiple-birth rate was 29.4% if 3 embryos were transferred.

268 The live birth rate was 37.2%.

269 The live-birth rate was 37.4% (176 of 470 women) in the levothyro

270 Preterm birth rate was 37.7% and cesarean delivery rate was 76%.

271 e death rate was 43.2 per 1000 and the crude birth rate was 8.8 per 1000.

272 quity as those where the overall EBS optimal birth rate was greater than the national 75th percentile

273 Second, the overall preterm birth rate was higher among Mexican Americans (10.6%) th

274 The rate of cell cycle or cell birth rate was increased by 29% (P<0.05) in cells overex

275 ng women 40 to 44 years of age, the multiple-birth rate was less than 25% even if 5 embryos were tran

276 The cumulative live birth rate was lower in the frozen embryo transfer group

277 However, the live birth rate was lower only for those in the first quartil

278 us, marital status, living arrangements, and birth rate were compatible with normal living patterns.

279 t were born during the M-SOB with the lowest birth rate were less susceptible to EAE than mice born d

280 With 2 embryos transferred, multiple-birth rates were 22.7%, 19.7%, 11.6%, and 10.8% for wome

281 The live birth rates were 33.7% (175/520) in the time-lapse imagi

282 Live-birth rates were 74.8% in blastocyst-stage group versus

283 The live-birth rates were 86.0% (185 of 215 women) and 86.7% (183

284 Birth rates were calculated from the kinetic profiles.

285 Before the pandemic, marriage and birth rates were decreasing, while divorce and death rat

286 s-adjusted, and conservative cumulative live-birth rates were estimated, reflecting 0%, 30%, and 100%

287 e end of 2020, marriage, divorce, death, and birth rates were higher compared to pre-pandemic levels.

288 Overall preterm birth rates were lower among non-US-born individuals com

289 Among women 35 years of age and older, live-birth rates were lower overall and regardless of whether

290 Birth rates were not immediately affected to the time la

291 Low birth rates were observed in survivors after advanced-st

292 Preterm birth and SGA birth rates were slightly lower during the pandemic (6.0

293 ive and optimal estimates of cumulative live-birth rates were, respectively, 42.7% and 65.3% for tran

294 64 type II MADS-box genes, implying a higher birth rate when compared with Arabidopsis (64 vs.47).

295 risk but was associated with increased live-birth rates when fewer embryos were transferred.

296 nses have focused on reducing the adolescent birth rate whereas efforts to support pregnant adolescen

297 ower rates of illness, but also showed lower birth rates, while in large groups, females with strong

298 early neonatal mortality, as well as preterm birth rate with a lag period, suggesting the importance

299 e conservative and optimal estimates of live-birth rates with autologous oocytes had declined from 63

300 an stimulation and a negative impact on live birth rates with fresh embryo transfer.