コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tions of type 2 biomarkers (eg, periostin or blood eosinophils).
2 he early glucocorticoid-induced reduction in blood eosinophils.
3 nd decreased IL-5 and eotaxin receptors than blood eosinophils.
4 acerbations did not increase with increasing blood eosinophils.
5 ren based on the molecular patterns of their blood eosinophils.
6 reduced levels of allergen-specific IgE and blood eosinophils.
7 phosphorylation after IL-5 priming of human blood eosinophils.
8 se, and adherence to fibronectin relative to blood eosinophils.
9 at CD127 is present in highly purified human blood eosinophils.
10 putum and this may be reflected by increased blood eosinophils.
11 inhibitory receptor (IR) expressed on human blood eosinophils.
12 changes at 8 weeks in lung function, FeNO or blood eosinophils.
13 alysis in a CCR3(+) eosinophil cell line and blood eosinophils.
17 ving high-dosage ICS plus LABA with baseline blood eosinophils 300 cells per muL or greater (intentio
21 ied subjects who demonstrated low peripheral blood eosinophils accompanied by increased expression of
23 d ERK1/2 phosphorylation observed in primary blood eosinophils after priming with IL-3/GM-CSF, and sm
29 icant associations, Feno levels, IgE levels, blood eosinophil and neutrophil counts, FEV1 percent pre
31 or associations between activation states of blood eosinophils and features of asthma are reviewed he
32 of control, and markers of TH2 inflammation (blood eosinophils and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide).
33 cs with mepolizumab significantly attenuated blood eosinophils and increased EoP numbers consistent w
34 ilization were conducted in human peripheral blood eosinophils and mouse bone marrow-derived eosinoph
35 thma) parameters of inflammation (peripheral blood eosinophils and neutrophils) and markers of hemost
36 ne asthma (EPA) phenotype and the utility of blood eosinophils and plasma IL-6 as predictive biomarke
38 t, smoking status, use of airway medication, blood eosinophils, and immunoglobulin E (adjusted OR [aO
39 stitutively active in freshly isolated human blood eosinophils, and inhibition of Notch signaling or
40 uated aeroallergen sensitization, peripheral blood eosinophils, and serum periostin as potential biom
42 93.8%), and 534 (62.8%) patients for FE(NO), blood eosinophils, and serum periostin, respectively.
47 greater exacerbation frequency, and whether blood eosinophils are predictive of sputum eosinophils.
48 life aeroallergen sensitization and elevated blood eosinophils are robust predictors of asthma develo
49 his review was to summarize the evidence for blood eosinophils as a predictive biomarker for corticos
50 We prospectively investigated the value of blood eosinophils as a predictor of responsiveness to an
51 opoietin receptor was observed on peripheral blood eosinophils as well as on tissue infiltrating eosi
52 EoE treatment, association of platelets with blood eosinophils, as reported by CD41, predicted esopha
54 ol, lung function, bronchial responsiveness, blood eosinophils, atopy and treatment level were assess
55 ce in distinguishing eosinophilic N-ERD (for blood eosinophils, AUC = 0.72; for periostin, AUC = 0.75
56 sinophils from the circulation requires that blood eosinophils become activated, leading to their arr
57 ction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) values, blood eosinophil (bEOS) counts, serum CCL26 expression,
64 benralizumab-treated patients with baseline blood eosinophil concentrations of 200 cells per muL or
67 hilic phenotype were stratified according to blood eosinophil count (>/=150 per cubic millimeter at s
68 % and >/=3%, and <5% and >/=5%) and absolute blood eosinophil count (<150 cells/mul, 150 to <300 cell
69 ith pneumonia events, stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count (<2% vs >/=2% of blood leucocytes
70 x life-threatening exacerbations with median blood eosinophil count (5-95th percentiles) of 0.270 x 1
72 Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) and blood eosinophil count (B-Eos) values, markers of local
73 st total serum IgE level (median, 733 kU/L), blood eosinophil count (median, 400 cells/mm(3)), and al
74 tion of IL-6 (non-Type 2 asthma) and FeNO or blood eosinophil count (Type 2 asthma) identified asthma
75 randomly allocated them (1:1; stratified by blood eosinophil count [<300 cells per muL vs >/=300 cel
76 shown a close relationship between baseline blood eosinophil count and clinical efficacy of mepolizu
78 The most well established of these are the blood eosinophil count and serum periostin, both of whic
79 of the IMPACT trial shows that assessment of blood eosinophil count and smoking status has the potent
80 gressively with nine ascending categories of blood eosinophil count as compared with a reference cate
82 ife-threatening asthma, we found that a spot blood eosinophil count correlates with severity of respi
84 e relationship between observed efficacy and blood eosinophil count for moderate or severe exacerbati
85 the previous 12 months, and had a screening blood eosinophil count greater than or equal to 1000 cel
86 c significance of the "treatable trait" high blood eosinophil count in COPD is the same as for asthma
87 g inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and baseline blood eosinophil count in patients with chronic obstruct
93 eroid treatment for COPD have shown that the blood eosinophil count is associated with the risk of CO
94 fit 1 with mepolizumab versus placebo in the blood eosinophil count less than 150 cells/muL subgroup
95 vilanterol was 0.88 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.04) at blood eosinophil count less than 90 cells per muL and 0.
97 than 2% and it was therefore postulated that blood eosinophil count might also have an effect on the
98 0.48, 0.39-0.58) in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 150 cells per muL to
100 persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells per microli
101 patients and among subgroups with a baseline blood eosinophil count of less than 150 cells/muL, basel
102 assessed the trends and correlations between blood eosinophil count on admission with arterial blood
103 flares (worsening of HES-related symptoms or blood eosinophil count requiring therapeutic escalation)
106 maximum of up to 4 days) on days when their blood eosinophil count was at least 0.3 x 10(9) cells pe
108 The T2 phenotype was defined by using a blood eosinophil count with a threshold of 300 cells/muL
111 pred of 75.1%, median values of 300/mm(3) of blood eosinophil count, 323 kU/L of serum total IgE, and
112 ht to determine the relationship between the blood eosinophil count, clinical characteristics and gen
113 e exacerbations increased in proportion with blood eosinophil count, compared with a non-ICS dual lon
115 neous lesions, treatment of rash, peripheral blood eosinophil count, tumor response, and skin histolo
116 ificant positive association with the linear blood eosinophil count, whereas in U-BIOPRED, 1197 genes
117 To elucidate the relationship between a spot blood eosinophil count-measured at the onset of a life-t
120 blood counts, and so were stratified by mean blood eosinophil count: 1262 patients with low (<200 cel
122 sly increased Feno levels (>/=20-25 ppb) and blood eosinophil counts (>/=0.3 x 10(9)/L) had a higher
125 il counts or singly increased Feno levels or blood eosinophil counts (85.7% vs 35.8% or 63.3% or 60%,
126 exhaled nitric oxide values (14.5 ppb), and blood eosinophil counts (96 cells/muL) than all other gr
127 hase were evaluated with respect to baseline blood eosinophil counts (eosinophils <300/muL [low] vs >
128 a (odds ratio, 32.6; P = 6.9 x 10(-7)), high blood eosinophil counts (odds ratio, 9.1; P = 2.6 x 10(-
129 nts and subjects with normal Feno levels and blood eosinophil counts (P = .02) after adjusting for co
131 correlation found was between IgE levels and blood eosinophil counts (r = 0.33, P < .001); furthermor
132 Patients were stratified (2:1) by baseline blood eosinophil counts 300 cells per muL or greater and
133 re, a count-response relation exists between blood eosinophil counts and asthma-related outcomes.
135 To assess the relationship between baseline blood eosinophil counts and efficacy of mepolizumab we d
137 irin reactions correlated with reductions in blood eosinophil counts and lung function and increases
138 i-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, reduces blood eosinophil counts and may have value in the treatm
139 number of controller medications, and total blood eosinophil counts and negatively with the Asthma C
141 subjects with both increased Feno levels and blood eosinophil counts and subjects with normal Feno le
142 each on serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, blood eosinophil counts and three on lung function as me
143 cationic protein in nasal washes, along with blood eosinophil counts and total and allergen-specific
144 sone); and pre-randomisation measurements of blood eosinophil counts and were of at least 24 weeks in
146 hial brushings transcriptional signal versus blood eosinophil counts as well as differential expressi
148 267 in the benralizumab 30 mg Q8W group had blood eosinophil counts at least 300 cells per muL and w
153 s to determine whether an algorithm based on blood eosinophil counts could safely reduce systemic cor
154 asthma with recurrent exacerbations and high blood eosinophil counts despite use of inhaled corticost
156 verall, 20 929 (16%) of 130 248 patients had blood eosinophil counts greater than 400 cells per muL.
157 eroids, 40 (3.8%) patients with less than 2% blood eosinophil counts had a pneumonia event versus 48
158 s a threshold, patients with COPD with lower blood eosinophil counts had more pneumonia events than d
160 in urinary eicosanoid metabolite levels and blood eosinophil counts in patients with AERD who tolera
161 ght to investigate increased Feno levels and blood eosinophil counts in relation to lung function, br
162 notyping with aeroallergen sensitization and blood eosinophil counts is useful for guiding treatment
163 vidence that patients with COPD and baseline blood eosinophil counts less than 2% have a poorer respo
169 are odds of asthma control for patients with blood eosinophil counts of 400 cells per muL or less ver
171 Patients were stratified 2:1 according to blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 cells per muL an
172 symptom score at week 48, for patients with blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 cells per muL.
173 in 1 s (FEV1 in L) in patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 eosinophils per
175 on of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) levels and blood eosinophil counts offer additive information in re
177 evere BHR than having normal Feno levels and blood eosinophil counts or singly increased Feno levels
179 comparisons of symptoms, lung function, and blood eosinophil counts revealed differences that were m
182 ificantly higher total IgE levels and higher blood eosinophil counts than those with the lower-risk g
185 aire 5 score was reduced by 0.47 points, and blood eosinophil counts were reduced by 78%, with simila
186 lizumab in patients with asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts who are inadequately controlled
187 ssess whether patients with COPD with higher blood eosinophil counts would be more likely to have exa
189 very severe airflow limitation, had elevated blood eosinophil counts, and at least two exacerbations
190 etermine the predictive value of IgE levels, blood eosinophil counts, and fraction of exhaled nitric
191 EV1, PC20, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophil counts, and inhaled steroid treatment d
192 ic inflammation, including serum IgE levels, blood eosinophil counts, and tissue eosinophil counts.
193 levels, and FEV1 percent predicted, but not blood eosinophil counts, correctly predicted 69% of sput
196 ociation with sputum eosinophil percentages, blood eosinophil counts, Feno levels, and total IgE leve
197 in patients with increased serum IgE levels, blood eosinophil counts, or both were also negative.
198 mab clinical development program showed that blood eosinophil counts, rather than sputum or tissue eo
199 gnificantly greater than AUCs for peripheral blood eosinophil counts, sputum neutrophil counts, and c
202 ures of gastric biopsy specimens, as well as blood eosinophil counts, were analyzed in patients with
203 re examined, patients with elevated baseline blood eosinophil counts, with three or more exacerbation
213 atient experienced an increase in peripheral blood eosinophils during the clinical course and receive
216 analysis, we previously observed that human blood eosinophils express mRNA for IL-7R alpha (CD127) a
221 significantly different between low and high blood eosinophil groups, but differences were less than
223 rker-high patients (periostin >/=50 ng/mL or blood eosinophils >/=300 cells per muL), analysed with a
224 were followed-up over a median of 52 months, blood eosinophils >=1.200 x 10(9) /L was associated with
225 2-high asthma (subgroups including baseline blood eosinophils >=150/300 cells/uL and/or fractional e
226 improvement by AZD9412 in patients with high blood eosinophils (>0.3 x 10(9) /L) at screening and low
227 y corticosteroid response and the biomarker 'blood eosinophils' has emerged as an attractive candidat
228 RATIONALE: Post hoc analyses suggest that blood eosinophils have potential as a predictive biomark
229 airway hyperresponsiveness, more airway and blood eosinophils, higher serum IgE, more subepithelial
232 ing in GM-CSF-primed transmigration of human blood eosinophils in vitro and in the airway accumulatio
234 r Lyn before cytokine (IL-5/IL-3) priming of blood eosinophils inhibited the synergistic increase of
236 5), more frequent exacerbations (P = .0042), blood eosinophil level less than or equal to 100 cells/m
237 th COPD in the general population, increased blood eosinophil levels above 0.34 x 10(9) cells per lit
239 In patients with allergic asthma, baseline blood eosinophil levels and/or clinical markers of asthm
242 t signal tagged by rs992969 associating with blood eosinophil levels, asthma, and eosinophilic asthma
243 exhaled nitric oxide (<35 and >=35 ppb) and blood eosinophil (<250 and >=250 cells/uL) subgroups.
244 neously increased local (Feno) and systemic (blood eosinophil) markers of type 2 inflammation related
245 examined by flow cytometry using peripheral blood eosinophils, mast cell lines, and Siglec-8-transdu
247 try for age, asthma duration, lung function, blood eosinophil measurement, ACQ-6 scores, and diabetes
248 of this study were to determine whether the blood eosinophil molecular pattern of children with EoE
250 the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, blood eosinophil numbers are one marker that helps to gu
252 uding sex, age, body mass index, IgE levels, blood eosinophil numbers, Feno levels, and serum periost
253 led corticosteroid based therapy and who had blood eosinophils of 400 cells per muL or higher and one
254 ncontrolled eosinophilic asthma and baseline blood eosinophils of at least 300 cells per muL, possibl
256 (P < 0.05), plasma tryptase (P < 0.01), and blood eosinophil (P < 0.01) and basophil (P < 0.01) coun
257 dicators of TH2-like inflammation, including blood eosinophils (P = .001), exhaled nitric oxide (P =
258 atopy (IgE positive to >/= 1 allergen), and blood eosinophil percent (dichotomized at the median) we
259 We compared treatment efficacy according to blood eosinophil percentage (<2% and >/=2%, <3% and >/=3
260 d airway wall eosinophil counts (P = 0.003), blood eosinophil percentage (P = 0.03), bronchodilator r
261 age at recruitment, higher total IgE, higher blood eosinophil percentage and number, and higher treat
262 n of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), peripheral blood eosinophil, periostin, YKL-40, and IgE levels and
263 ar patterns may partly explain the different blood eosinophil phenotypes in children vs adults with E
266 muL, and >/=500 cells per muL) and baseline blood eosinophil ranges (<150 cells per muL, >/=150 cell
268 l activation of beta1 and beta2 integrins on blood eosinophils, reported by monoclonal antibodies (mA
269 dependent eosinophil cytolysis of IL3-primed blood eosinophils seeded on heat-aggregated immunoglobul
270 with elevated baseline levels of peripheral blood eosinophils, serum IgE, or periostin exhibited a g
271 baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil subgroups (207 mL [95% CI: -283, 698];1
272 ime to exacerbation outcomes on the basis of blood eosinophil subgroups of increasing cutoff levels.
273 baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil subgroups, respectively) and were susta
274 In contrast, using a cutpoint of 2% for blood eosinophils, the risk of exacerbations was increas
275 combined with clinical judgement, a baseline blood eosinophil threshold of 150 cells/muL or greater o
276 of 150 cells/muL or greater or a historical blood eosinophil threshold of 300 cells/muL or greater w
277 cebo for patients with a combination of high blood eosinophil thresholds and a history of more freque
278 lizumab for patients with different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds and exacerbation histories.
279 rates were reduced increased with increasing blood eosinophil thresholds and with greater exacerbatio
282 better biomarker than high concentrations of blood eosinophils to identify a patient subgroup with mo
283 In contrast to the transfer of untreated blood eosinophils to the lungs of recipient eosinophil d
297 draining lymph nodes (LDLN), pretreatment of blood eosinophils with GM-CSF prior to transfer elicited
298 lted in the near complete loss of peripheral blood eosinophils with no apparent impact on any other h
299 ere incubated with purified human peripheral blood eosinophils with or without activation in the pres
300 sinophils and GBM, we cultured human primary blood eosinophils with two separate human GBM-derived ce