戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 binding proteins with erythrocytes from each blood type.
2 t or specific details regarding a particular blood type.
3 tested pretransfusion to determine the donor blood type.
4 endent markers, mitochondrial sequences, and blood type.
5                 All patients were group A(1) blood type.
6 sified according to the candidates' race and blood type.
7 onsecretor) rather than Le(a- b+) (secretor) blood type.
8 ng error affecting priority of candidates by blood type.
9 tential blood substitute for the rare Bombay blood type.
10 nal creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL and AB blood type.
11 xicities in individuals with the rare Lan(-) blood type.
12 lood group antigens correlated strongly with blood type.
13 fter adjustment for study center and patient blood type.
14  the alpha-Gal antigen, also correlated with blood type.
15 (6-14, 15-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-40), age, and blood type.
16 1 (rs45458701) is responsible for the At(a-) blood type.
17 c.589+1G>C) and thus have the Augustine-null blood type.
18 paper-based assay for the detection of human blood type.
19 orovirus infected humans regardless of A/B/O blood type.
20 or and recipient pairs were matched based on blood types.
21 antation (LT) waitlist experiences among ABO blood types.
22 ting current LT allocation may favor certain blood types.
23 ast 10 days would not be possible with other blood types.
24 ess pronounced effect for infants with other blood types.
25  and specific microscale multiplex assay for blood typing.
26 ermatomyositis and some with polymyositis, a blood type 1 interferon-signature correlates with diseas
27 ers with blood group O than those with non-O blood types (10,353 g versus 3,555 g, P < 0.001).
28  AOR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.24-4.70]); maternal AB blood type (4.9% stillbirths, 3.0% live births) (vs type
29  of transplantation prepolicy was similar by blood type (8-month incidence 81.0% vs 80.5% for blood t
30 cidence of transplantation relative to other blood types (8-month incidences 86.3% vs 92.1%, respecti
31  resulting in 2-way exchanges mainly between blood type A and B recipients and donors.
32  endogenous antibodies that react with human blood type A antigens in neurons.
33                     Low Ccr at screening and blood type A are risk factors for IEC-defined CMV diseas
34 r alpha-D-GalNAc end groups and binds to the blood type A determinant GalNAcalpha1, as well as to ter
35 received a left single-lung allograft from a blood type A donor.
36 cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases), with blood type A or AB, and at an early COVID-19 stage (low
37 derived antibodies must be screened for anti-blood type A reactivity to avoid misidentification of vi
38 nsplantation with a blood group O donor to a blood type A recipient is described.
39                           Transplantation of blood type A subgroup 2 (A2) livers into non-A recipient
40                                              Blood type A was also associated with less lung injury r
41                    Lastly, we tested whether blood type A was associated with less donor lung injury
42           Apparent VZV neuronal staining and blood type A were strongly associated (by a chi(2) test,
43 tetra+) in the human milk (HM) of women with blood type A, suggesting genetic origins determining the
44 side hydrolase 109 (GH109) that is active on blood type A-antigen, along with a new subfamily of glyc
45 rons of the 30 to 40% of individuals who are blood type A.
46 and recipients for potential recipients with blood types A, B, and AB; and (2) all recipients who hav
47                             Of the four main blood types, A, B, AB, and O, only O can be given to any
48 d type (8-month incidence 81.0% vs 80.5% for blood types-A, B, or AB and blood type-O, respectively,
49 ntified a replicable association between ABO blood type A1 and risk of ARDS among the critically ill,
50 iminating the payback system, and allocating blood type A2 and A2B kidneys to blood type B candidates
51                  Kidney transplantation from blood type A2/A2B donors to type B recipients (A2->B) ha
52 , we identified a strong association between blood type and COVID-19 diagnosis, as well as a gene-ric
53         The independent contributions of ABO blood type and RBC transfusion to the risks of antepartu
54                                          ABO blood type and RBC transfusion were found to be independ
55 to assess the association between ABO and Rh blood types and infection, intubation, and death.
56 is approach, proof-of-concept ABO and D (Rh) blood typing and group A subtyping were successfully per
57 ex, blood product characteristics (including blood type), and transport time.
58 alysis showed that after adjusting for MELD, blood type, and diagnosis, patients listed in the latter
59 several noroviruses is linked to human histo-blood type, and its determinant histo-blood group antige
60 d VTE risk factors, such as body mass index, blood type, and markers of inflammation.
61 imes differ substantially by listing status, blood type, and recipient weight.
62 med according to donor blood type, recipient blood type, and transplant center ABOi volume.
63 he need for assist devices, nonidentical ABO blood types, and younger age.
64 CR1), leucocyte differentiation (BCL11A) and blood-type antigen secretor status (FUT2).
65 YPA) and B (GYPB), which determine MN and Ss blood types, are two major receptors that are expressed
66                                    Using ABO blood typing as a proof-of-concept, we developed i) an i
67           We selected patients who underwent blood typing as potential live kidney donors for recipie
68      The concept of presenting a paper-based blood typing assay in a barcode-like pattern significant
69                                              Blood typing assay is a critical test to ensure the sero
70     These channels were then used to perform blood typing assays by introducing a blood sample.
71 atient groups, particularly older, diabetic, blood type B and O and shorter pre-listing dialysis time
72  allocating blood type A2 and A2B kidneys to blood type B candidates.
73 re significantly thinner in individuals with blood type B compared to those with other ABO blood grou
74 ells specifically; however, only tissue from blood type B donors, but not type A or O donors, showed
75             Immune tolerance to alpha-Gal in blood type B individuals might reduce the risk to this a
76   Because of a clerical error, a 67-year-old blood type B patient with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
77 new policy, candidates with a CPRA>20%, with blood type B, and aged 18-49 years were more likely to u
78 fied donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier can increase transplants by 10% (PG0.
79 fied donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier in kidney exchange.
80 dney donation and transplantation across the blood-type barrier in kidney exchange.
81 When compared with LTx candidates with other blood types, blood type O candidates have longer waiting
82  with FVIII half-life in patients with non-O blood type, but no correlation was observed for type O p
83 h donors to patients, not only with extended blood typing, but also by using genetically determined s
84                    Predictors were age, sex, blood type, calculated panel-reactive antibodies, donati
85                                              Blood type can be visually identified from eluting lengt
86 or/recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) status or blood type, cold ischemic times, or the incidence of out
87                             Gender, age, ABO blood-type, cold ischemia, splenectomy and allograft typ
88 ere no clinically significant differences in blood type compatibility, degree of HLA mismatch, number
89                                     Although blood-type-compatible transplant is a gold standard, typ
90                     The SNP rs514659 (tags O blood type) contributed 15.4% of the variance.
91                                     Extended blood typing decreases alloimmunization in SCD but is no
92 atterns were associated with different histo-blood types, defined by Lewis, secretor, and ABO types.
93 nvestigated, only one pair with the same ABO blood type demonstrated identity at both alleles.
94 bly found at the nonreducing terminus of the blood type-determining A-antigen and as the initial poin
95 ced a barcode-like design into a paper-based blood typing device by integrating with smartphone-based
96                     The proposed paper-based blood typing device is rapidly read by smartphones and e
97 etween participants adhering to a particular blood type diet (experimental group) and participants co
98 the evidence to support the effectiveness of blood type diets has not previously been assessed in the
99 ished studies that presented data related to blood type diets were identified and critically appraise
100 tudies that showed the health effects of ABO blood type diets were identified.
101 to validate the purported health benefits of blood type diets.
102 ing question: In humans grouped according to blood type, does adherence to a specific diet improve he
103 revious sternotomy (P = .0003), nonidentical blood type donor (P = .01), recipient non-blood group A
104  antigen expression, creating a risk for Vel blood typing errors and transfusion reactions.
105 d to donor variables including age, sex, ABO blood type, ethnicity, donor type and recipient variable
106 ts were robust to all transplant regions and blood types, except type AB.
107 study examines LT access discrepancies among blood types, focusing on type AB, and seeks equitable st
108 ability model estimated the total number and blood type frequencies of donor-recipient pairs that wou
109 s on erythrocyte membranes uniquely for each blood type, generating differential interactions of the
110 forms to determine the association of the A1 blood type genotype with ARDS risk.
111 del with smoking, current smokers with non-O blood type had an adjusted OR of 2.68 (95% CI, 2.03-3.54
112                Compared with type O, A and B blood types have higher risk of antepartum and postpartu
113  lung allocation score, body mass index, and blood type (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval,
114 th donor acceptance were for male donor sex, blood type, hepatitis C antibody, donor age, left ventri
115                                       Beyond blood typing, hereditary hemochromatosis-associated HFE
116 e activity measurements and calculated whole-blood type I IFN gene and chemokine scores.
117 eukocytes on day 1, whereas the secretion of blood type I IFNs, which peaked on day 4, did not.
118                       Up-regulation of whole blood type I interferon (IFN)-driven transcripts and che
119 e of neurological syndromes; HLA haplotypes; blood type I-IFN signature [RNA quantification of 6 or 2
120 individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 with known blood type in the New York Presbyterian (NYP) hospital s
121 Incorporating size incompatibility alongside blood type incompatibility further enhances the efficacy
122 r intended recipients due to factors such as blood type incompatibility or size incompatibility.
123 a live donor transplant due to crossmatch or blood type incompatibility.
124 n red blood cells with a rare Augustine-null blood type is associated with macrocytosis, anisopoikilo
125  issued immediately for patients in whom the blood type is known.
126 e updates fitted as time-dependent variable, blood type, listing for malignant disease, and age.
127 e the risk of waiting list death across era, blood types, liver disease diagnosis, and severity (Mode
128 truction of the transplant renal artery with blood type-matched iliac artery grafts should be conside
129             The authors have used preserved, blood type-matched, iliac artery grafts procured from ca
130                     Recent evidence suggests blood type may affect risk of severe COVID-19.
131 d to the growing body of evidence suggesting blood type may play a role in COVID-19.
132 109 days) than the 399 candidates with other blood types (median 58 days) (P=0.001).
133                                While current blood typing methods are well established, results are s
134 ells (RBCs, erythrocytes) means that careful blood-typing must be carried out prior to transfusion to
135 r African American (23 777 [47.0%]), had ABO blood type O (22 879 [45.2%]), and were Rhesus factor po
136  (27 vs. 25 kg/m2, p = .03), less frequently blood type O (36% vs. 80%, p < .001), and had higher eGF
137 age 29 years), and most were male (90%), and blood type O (79%).
138                            Patients with ABO blood type O and B have smaller chances.
139 >3 months after KPD entry included recipient blood type O and calculated panel reactive antibodies >=
140 ction would be different between donors with blood type O and those with non-O.
141 n wait-list mortality; however, infants with blood type O assigned an ABO-I listing strategy were mor
142 the goal of increasing transplant access for blood type O candidates after an error was discovered in
143  with LTx candidates with other blood types, blood type O candidates have longer waiting times and hi
144  with the H-antigen trisaccharide from human blood type O erythrocytes, at 1.67 angstrom resolution.
145                                              Blood type O is associated with a lower risk of myocardi
146                                              Blood type O liver transplantation (LT) candidates in th
147 There were more blood type O recipients than blood type O NDDs participating.
148                                       The 40 blood type O NDDs triggered a mean chain length of 6.0 (
149             Especially highly sensitized and blood type O patients benefit.
150                              There were more blood type O recipients than blood type O NDDs participa
151                     One hundred thirty-three blood type O recipients were transplanted.
152  and in those with blood type O; The <25 kg, blood type O subgroup experiences longer wait times and
153 n such exchanges to ensure that the standard blood type O wait-list candidates are made better off.
154 orally problematic because it harms standard blood type O wait-list candidates who already have the l
155 s, median wait times were 108 days (<=25 kg, blood type O), 80 days (<=25 kg, non-O), 47 days (>25 kg
156                                Compared with blood type O, the ORs for pancreatic cancer in subjects
157 o have a nonischemic cause of heart failure, blood type O, United Network for Organ Sharing status 2
158 lant (n = 90) was greater than the number of blood type O-non-directed donors (n = 32) initiating cha
159                                The number of blood type O-patients receiving a transplant (n = 90) wa
160 % CI, 2.03-3.54) compared with nonsmokers of blood type O.
161  241 (96.4%) were White, and 104 (41.6%) had blood type O.
162 isk of myocardial infarction associated with blood type O.
163 hose redemptions were among individuals with blood type O.
164 5 transplants on average, more if the NDD is blood type O.
165 lower in candidates <25 kg and in those with blood type O; The <25 kg, blood type O subgroup experien
166                      The incidence rates for blood types O, A, AB, and B were 28.9, 39.9, 41.8, and 4
167 g participants by genotype-derived serologic blood type (O, A, AB, and B).
168                         Following CD policy, blood type-O candidates had lower incidence of transplan
169 e impact of initial policy implementation on blood type-O candidates has not been rigorously evaluate
170                                              Blood type-O candidates were more likely Hispanic and 'O
171  transplants performed prior to CD, 48% were blood type-O recipients compared to 40% post-CD, represe
172 pared to 40% post-CD, representing 138 fewer blood type-O transplants than expected.
173 .0% vs 80.5% for blood types-A, B, or AB and blood type-O, respectively, P = .57).
174                                   Subsequent blood typing of affected family members confirmed the po
175 t an advance for point of care applications, blood typing of newborns, and general blood assays in sm
176 luated the effects of age, race, gender, and blood type on anti-glycan antibody profiles in the serum
177 sitivity analyses included stratification by blood type or region and potential negative consequences
178 ntered in transfusions of patients with rare blood types or chronically transfused patients who becom
179 or donor RBCs, especially those of universal blood types or free of known and unknown pathogens, has
180 val were seen by donor blood type, recipient blood type, or transplant center ABOi volume.
181 risk of death by era of listing (P = .25) or blood type (P = .31), whereas the risk of death was sign
182 e assist devices (P = .02), nonidentical ABO blood types (P = .05), and younger age (P = .10).
183 ated more African Americans had incompatible blood types (P=0.01) or ineligible recipients (26.7% vs.
184 ted for recipient age, sex, race, ethnicity, blood type, panel reactive antibody, year of placement o
185 nicity, original disease, retransplants, ABO blood type, panel-reactive antibody, previous treatment,
186 ard diet (control group) within a particular blood type population.
187                                            A blood type rare in one country may not be considered rar
188 recipients were performed according to donor blood type, recipient blood type, and transplant center
189 o differences in survival were seen by donor blood type, recipient blood type, or transplant center A
190 , tumor doubling time, tumor growth pattern, blood type, regional transplant volume, initial tumor si
191 m and current panel reactive antibodies, ABO blood type, retransplants, pretreatment, time on dialysi
192 age, marital status, race and ethnicity, ABO blood type, Rhesus (Rh) factor, and year of delivery.
193 continuous distribution before and after the blood type score modification.
194                                     Although blood typing showed a very weak expression of Rh antigen
195 Willebrand factor (VWF) protein and purified blood type-specific VWF at arterial shear and measured p
196           This paper presents a microfluidic blood typing system using a small quantity of blood samp
197 to self-manage and need to know if ancillary blood type testing is necessary.
198 ential blood substitutes for the rare Bombay blood type that is characterized by a deficiency of H2 a
199 new, paper-based analytical device (PAD) for blood typing that allows for the simultaneous determinat
200 nded to include the 24,736 patients with any blood type, the results were similar, with rates of deat
201                      We estimate Rh-negative blood type to have a protective effect for all three out
202 n LDL-cholesterol responses of different MNS blood types to a low-fat diet.
203 s worldwide but requires careful matching of blood types to avoid serious adverse consequences.
204 itive hematopoiesis may produce many diverse blood types via a common multipotent progenitor, primiti
205 e population attributable fraction for non-O blood type was 19.5%.
206                                       Rhesus blood type was associated with better survival in HF pat
207   Neither Lewis antigen nor salivary antigen blood type was associated with seroconversion.
208                        Rhesus-negative (Rh-) blood type was protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection (
209                                ABO and Lewis blood typing was done for 38 women with RVVC (case-patie
210 ender, peak panel-reactive antibody, and ABO blood type were not found to be significant risk factors
211      Advantages with respect to the need for blood typing were balanced with various undesirable prop
212 ith A, B, and O secretors and Lewis positive blood types, were sensitive to the virus, while the non-
213                 The exposure measure was ABO blood type, which is not inherently related to outcome,
214          The Augustine-negative alias At(a-) blood type, which seems to be restricted to people of Af
215  subgroup, we determined the associations of blood type with plasma levels of endothelial glycoprotei
216 lf a century ago but remains one of the last blood types with no known genetic basis.

 
Page Top