コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 t vector ability there of C. variipennis for bluetongue.
2 n sheep, the animal species most affected by bluetongue.
3 heep, the animal species most susceptible to bluetongue.
4 characterize thoroughly the pathogenesis of bluetongue.
5 % of clusters were unlikely to be related to Bluetongue.
6 hin a serotype affect the clinical course of bluetongue.
7 e been implicated in the recent epizootic of bluetongue.
10 tongue virus (BTV) is the causative agent of bluetongue, a major infectious disease of ruminants with
11 host, two-vector formulation for the R(0) of bluetongue, a vector-borne infection of ruminants that c
12 vements as a method to control the spread of bluetongue, an infectious disease of livestock that is b
13 help identify geographic regions at risk for bluetongue and provide opportunities to prevent virus tr
14 m a veterinary perspective, the emergence of Bluetongue and Schmallenberg viruses show that northern
15 here are clear links between the severity of bluetongue and the mammalian host species infected, whil
17 just as effective at subduing the spread of bluetongue as the current strategy of the UK government.
22 ngue virus (BTV) is the etiological agent of bluetongue (BT), a hemorrhagic disease of ruminants that
23 (BTV) (Reoviridae) is the causative agent of bluetongue (BT), an economically important disease of do
24 ct long term (1992-2009) average patterns in bluetongue (BT), caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), in sh
29 umber of calvings among beef cows during the Bluetongue epizootic of 2007 and 2008, based on calving
32 g the calving season of primary infection by Bluetongue in 28% (n = 23) of the units first infected i
42 s of space and host, which is illustrated by bluetongue, Lyme disease, and West Nile virus, and it is
43 TV-8 strain isolated at the beginning of the bluetongue outbreak in 2006 was more virulent than a str
44 urves taken from two historical outbreaks: a bluetongue outbreak in cattle, and a whooping cough outb
45 a sheep that had been killed during a severe bluetongue outbreak that occurred in Rahuri, Maharashtra
46 highlight those areas of the epidemiology of bluetongue that are poorly understood, reflect upon why
48 C. variipennis genetic variation controlling bluetongue transmission will help identify geographic re
51 it pathogens of humans and livestock such as bluetongue virus (BTV) (Reoviridae), Oropouche virus (Bu
64 mber of infectious bites (IBs) generated per bluetongue virus (BTV) infected host (cattle) using esti
65 better define the molecular epidemiology of bluetongue virus (BTV) infection, the genetic characteri
80 and lentivirus-induced immunosuppression on bluetongue virus (BTV) pathogenesis as a mechanism for v
81 The entire genome of the reference strain of bluetongue virus (BTV) serotype 16 (strain RSArrrr/16) w
84 cally engineered the segmented RNA genome of bluetongue virus (BTV), a complex nonenveloped virus bel
86 t capsid structures of large viruses such as bluetongue virus (BTV), a member of the Orbivirus genus
90 gate genome packaging and capsid assembly of bluetongue virus (BTV), a member of the Reoviridae famil
92 tious diseases of ruminants and is caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), an arbovirus existing in nature
93 or infectious disease of ruminants caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), an arbovirus transmitted by Culi
94 ome penetration assay and cell biology, that bluetongue virus (BTV), an archetypal member of the Reov
95 tious diseases of ruminants and is caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), an arthropod-borne virus transmi
96 he Reoviridae, including the animal pathogen bluetongue virus (BTV), are multisegmented double-strand
97 erage patterns in bluetongue (BT), caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), in sheep in southern India, wher
100 Ca(2+) binding protein has been reported in bluetongue virus (BTV), the causative agent of bluetongu
113 arried out during unprecedented outbreaks of bluetongue virus in Europe, an arbovirus of wild and dom
114 loped for the wind-borne spread by midges of bluetongue virus in NW Europe in 2006 is here modified a
122 0, but not heat shock protein 70, stabilizes bluetongue virus proteins, safeguarding them from protea
123 ng the underlying mechanisms that facilitate Bluetongue virus replication and spread through the usur
124 full-genome sequence of an Indian isolate of bluetongue virus serotype 1 (BTV-1), strain IND1992/01.
125 enome sequence of an isolate (IND2004/01) of bluetongue virus serotype 10 (BTV-10) from Andhra Prades
127 f 19,188 bp) were sequenced from a strain of bluetongue virus serotype 3 (BTV-3) from India (strain I
129 ed by an RNA-binding phosphoprotein (NS2) of Bluetongue virus to serve as sites for subviral particle
131 odel based on the remotely related template, bluetongue virus VP7, improved from 8.7A to 6.0A, while
135 for epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus and bluetongue virus, failed to identify an etiologic agent.
137 ical vaccines that afford protection against bluetongue virus, the etiological agent, are not free fr
138 compared to the homologous protein (VP7) of bluetongue virus, which is also a member of the family o
139 re we focus on VP6, a minor viral protein of bluetongue virus, which is critical for genome packaging
142 fever, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever and bluetongue viruses - have complex transmission cycles in
145 rotavirus VP6 amplitudes were scaled to the bluetongue VP7 amplitudes derived from the atomic model
147 To compare VP6 and VP7, a projection map of bluetongue VP7 at 15 A resolution was generated using th
148 r their calving season of primary infection, Bluetongue was detected more rapidly after the start of
149 , although epizootic hemorrhagic disease and bluetongue were included in the differential diagnosis.