戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 T) with and without alveolar corticotomy and bone grafting.
2 nstructed with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting.
3               Case 1 did not need additional bone grafting.
4 efects contain skeletal components requiring bone grafting.
5  our quest to find new techniques to enhance bone grafting.
6  engineering is an exciting new technique in bone grafting.
7 18 and followed up more than 24 months after bone grafting.
8 rapy with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and bone grafting.
9  of infection at a mean of 18.5 months after bone grafting.
10 therapy using EMD with or without autologous bone grafting, 282 intrabony defects of 177 participants
11                                   History of bone grafting alters the clinical, physiological, and mo
12 ntities normally associated with periodontal bone grafting, although they do support the use of this
13 d for periodontal surgeries with and without bone grafting and acceptability of guidelines.
14                          Advances concerning bone grafting and arthroplasty procedures have resulted
15 re more likely to prescribe antibiotics with bone grafting and as complexity of the bone grafting pro
16  and CBVT images were taken prior to initial bone grafting and at the 6-month reentry surgery for 35
17 th a second graft site needed for autologous bone grafting and facilitate the surgical procedure.
18  implants using a surgical guide, performing bone grafting and soft tissue grafting at the time of im
19 onv) alveolar decortication and augmentation bone grafting, are matched in this case-control study fo
20                                              Bone grafting as a gold standard of bone repairing is li
21                      Guided implant surgery, bone grafting at implant placement, soft tissue augmenta
22                                              Bone grafting at time of placement was required in 25% o
23 after the removal of an LPC, GTR, along with bone grafting, can be a very useful tool for its treatme
24 or traditional periodontal surgeries without bone grafting compared with socket preservation, guided
25 e Fort I osteotomy and interpositional iliac bone grafting could be considered a viable protocol to r
26 wall, for yielding the additional benefit of bone grafting in combination with periodontal regenerati
27                  Adults scheduled to receive bone grafting in maxillary, non-molar, single-tooth extr
28 n DA at baseline >=40 degrees and adjunctive bone grafting in the reduction of RBD, regardless of the
29               One of the major challenges in bone grafting is the lack of sufficient bone vasculariza
30 were observed regarding percent of remaining bone grafting material and non-mineralized tissue.
31                   Porous hydroxyapatite (HA) bone grafting material has a clinically satisfactory res
32                   Porous hydroxyapatite (HA) bone grafting material has been used to fill periodontal
33 ermine the effect that socket filling with a bone grafting material has on the prevention of postextr
34                          However, a specific bone grafting material that is patently superior has not
35                  Total protein adsorption to bone grafting material was quantified using an enzyme-li
36       Autologous bone is the most successful bone-grafting material; however, limited supply and dono
37 valuate and compare the healing of different bone grafting materials adjacent to titanium plasma-spra
38 tion of exogenous proteins to the surface of bone grafting materials and the subsequent cellular beha
39                  General trends in synthetic bone grafting materials are shifting towards approaches
40 tion of EMD combined with different types of bone grafting materials in periodontal regenerative proc
41 linical esthetic outcome, when two different bone grafting materials were used.
42 ity of adsorbed amelogenin to the surface of bone grafting materials when enamel matrix proteins were
43 y defects using native collagen membrane and bone grafting materials.
44 nt; 2) surgical resection; 3) application of bone grafting materials; and 4) guided bone regeneration
45  safe prophylactic antimicrobial protocol in bone grafting may enhance osseous volume outcomes.
46  used in conjunction with pliable atraumatic bone grafting mixture and hydraulic pressure from a surg
47 is to retrospectively evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and t
48 ncrease after decortication and augmentation bone grafting offsets the concerns of orthodontic procli
49 cally correct regenerate that is better than bone grafting or revascularised free-tissue transfer.
50  NBM and DFDBA and adsorb to the interior of bone grafting particles.
51 l therapeutic modalities, such as autologous bone grafting, present myriad limitations and carry with
52  with bone grafting and as complexity of the bone grafting procedure increases.
53 quelae related to implant placement/advanced bone grafting procedures are a result of injury to surro
54                                              Bone grafting procedures have become increasingly common
55                                              Bone grafting procedures were performed at 194 sites in
56       However, millions of oral and non-oral bone-grafting procedures are performed annually, and onl
57                                              Bone grafting remains the standard treatment for bone de
58 with alveolar decortication and augmentation bone grafting resulted in a significant increase in KT h
59 y to prescribe antibiotics with more complex bone grafting such as guided bone regeneration and sinus
60 nancies, and other diseases is treated using bone-grafting techniques that suffer from numerous short
61 ll remains the undisputed "gold standard" in bone grafting, the realization that bone requirement in
62  with the exception of defect fill following bone grafting, the reduction in variability in clinical
63 e treated with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting to allow for implant-borne prosthetic reha
64 is systematic review, PhMT-b via particulate bone grafting together with CAOT may provide clinical be
65 of the detached cementum in combination with bone grafting using a minimally invasive surgical approa
66 al debridement, supracrestal implantoplasty, bone grafting using a mixture of human allograft with de
67 parison of computed tomographic scans before bone grafting versus 4 to 6 months after bone grafting w
68 ore bone grafting versus 4 to 6 months after bone grafting was performed.
69 n rationale for prescribing antibiotics with bone grafting was to decrease the chances of developing
70 esents a promising alternative to autologous bone grafting, which is considered the current gold stan
71 ion, short-term stabilization, and long-term bone grafting, which may include problematic allografts
72                        Adjunctive autologous bone grafting with enamel matrix derivative might be sig
73 rnover and inflammation after extraction and bone grafting with or without local simvastatin (SIM).
74 ded that the minimally invasive approach for bone grafting yielded results that were equivalent to mo