コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s from three species (human, chimpanzee, and bonobo).
2 ta are available (eg humans, chimpanzees and bonobos).
3 12 humans, 10 chimpanzees, 7 gorillas, and 1 bonobo.
4 nts from three hosts: human, chimpanzee, and bonobo.
5 15 communities and one suspected killing by bonobos.
6 r closest primate relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos.
7 ferences resulting in less skill among adult bonobos.
8 (SAdV) genomes isolated from chimpanzees and bonobos.
9 th was found only in humans, chimpanzees and bonobos.
10 83 new haplotypes of western chimpanzees and bonobos.
11 and morphologies shared with chimpanzees and bonobos.
12 could contribute to lentiviral resistance in bonobos.
13 lved in regulating out-group prosociality in bonobos.
14 , we find temporally stable clusters only in bonobos.
15 ial species from wild-living chimpanzees and bonobos.
16 s relationship remains to be investigated in bonobos.
17 al data obtained from a recent dissection of bonobos.
18 ion, a trait shared with chimpanzees but not bonobos.
19 e differences between common chimpanzees and bonobos.
20 zees and gorillas, have not been detected in bonobos.
21 the vasopressin 1a receptor gene (Avpr1a) in bonobos.
22 and personality traits should be present in bonobos.
23 vealed that the nucleotide diversity (pi) in bonobos (0.077%) is actually lower than that in humans (
25 yield a total sample of 19 chimpanzees, four bonobos, 14 gorillas, and six orangutans, in which inter
26 vity and attractiveness are more extended in bonobos [2], males compete less intensely for each matin
27 re more patient and more risk-prone than are bonobos, (2) both species exhibit affective and motivati
28 e fitness consequences of male aggression in bonobos.(2)(,)(15)(,)(16) Nonetheless, the extent to whi
30 ults [31-33], human toddlers [34], and adult bonobos [35] prefer high-status individuals to low-statu
31 FOXP2 coding sequence in 63 chimpanzees, 11 bonobos, 48 gorillas, 37 orangutans and 2 gibbons and ob
36 observe a twofold increase in the chimpanzee-bonobo ancestor (P = 4.79 x 10(-9)) and increased deleti
37 llectively, these results offer insight into bonobo and chimpanzee evolutionary history and suggest c
38 in anticipation of an identical competition, bonobo and chimpanzee males showed differential endocrin
39 virus was detected in the human, chimpanzee, bonobo and gorilla genomes, but not in the orang-utan ge
42 e browsers for various assemblies, including bonobo and zebrafish; new gene annotation sets; improvem
44 nces in the social behavior and cognition of bonobos and chimpanzees derive from shifts in their onto
46 ccumulated at significantly greater rates in bonobos and chimpanzees than in humans, provide insights
47 occurred after our last common ancestor with bonobos and chimpanzees, and before the origin of presen
48 le-genome sequences from the autosomes of 71 bonobos and chimpanzees, representing all five extant Pa
50 cs, we investigated compositionality in wild bonobos and found that not only does each call type of t
52 l amino acid substitutions from chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas, with an additional fixed substitut
56 her evolutionarily shared or convergent with bonobos and not unique to our species as previously prop
57 d, human-like adolescent length-GSs exist in bonobos and probably also many other non-human primates.
58 at B07 Papa-B occur at high frequency in TL2 bonobos and that malaria appears to have independently s
59 ample of spontaneous tempo coordination in a bonobo), and there is no experimental evidence to indica
60 in human and African great ape (chimpanzee, bonobo, and gorilla) genomes, substantially less is know
63 .1-kb+ allele was found in 16 chimpanzees, 3 bonobos, and 2 Bornean orangutans; however, 9 chimpanzee
64 3 kb of NRY DNA from 101 chimpanzees, seven bonobos, and 42 humans to investigate: (i) relative leve
65 stral Pan, the shared predecessor of humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees, lived in social dominance hier
66 gut communities of hundreds of chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas and developed a phylogenetic appro
67 or some fraction of the genome, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas are more closely related to each o
68 e via cospeciation with humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas over the past 15 million years.
69 c and allopatric populations of chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas residing throughout equatorial Afr
72 422 brain samples from humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and macaques representing 33 anatomical regions
74 great apes (43 groups of naive chimpanzees, bonobos, and western gorillas across 14 field sites in A
77 ng between human and chimpanzee or human and bonobo are non-randomly distributed and that genes withi
78 ent preregistered study investigated whether bonobos are capable of attributing knowledge or ignoranc
83 onobos, so with respect to HN-FL musculature bonobos are the better model for the last common ancesto
84 th common chimpanzees and pygmy chimpanzees (bonobos) are polymorphic for maximum length of any CTG/C
86 terization of iPS cells from chimpanzees and bonobos as new tools to explore factors that may have co
88 enile orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos, as well as tickle-induced laughter produced by
92 predicted, results consistently showed that bonobos' attention was biased toward the location of the
93 engaged in intensive warfare if we consider bonobo behavior, but modern human foragers have the pote
94 r cells compared to those of chimpanzees and bonobos both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting heterochro
95 xture has been identified in chimpanzees and bonobos but the possibility of such events has not been
97 duals - the first experimental evidence that bonobos can identify individuals utilising vocalisations
99 onstrate experimentally that chimpanzees and bonobos can take into account what others can see in coo
102 telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genomes of human, bonobo, chimpanzee, gorilla, Bornean orangutan, and Suma
103 telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genomes of human, bonobo, chimpanzee, gorilla, Bornean orangutan, Sumatran
105 membrane anchor loss in three clades: human/bonobo/chimpanzee, guinea pig/degu/tuco-tuco/mole rat, a
106 g-term effective population sizes of humans, bonobos, chimpanzees, and gorillas are, respectively, 10
109 nstrated to a sample of nonhuman great apes (bonobos, chimpanzees, orangutans; N = 24) how to operate
110 Using direct percussion, language-competent bonobo-chimpanzees Kanzi and Pan-Banisha produced a sign
112 verlap and frequent interactions between the bonobo clusters, we identified significant association p
113 lition formation, we reinforce the idea that bonobo coalitions do not serve as a form of group defens
115 24)-to compare rates of male aggression in 3 bonobo communities at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Dem
117 eased attacks on outgroup competitors in the Bonobo condition versus the Chimpanzee condition, sugges
118 , the 9.1-kb+ chromosomes of chimpanzees and bonobos contain a 1030-nucleotide sequence, absent in hu
119 re recent contact (after 200,000 years ago), bonobos contributed less than 1% to the central chimpanz
120 when the prize is easily monopolizable food: bonobos cooperate more than their less socially tolerant
124 tions and plasma from chimpanzees; gorillas; bonobos; cynomolgus monkeys; wild-type, apoE(-/-), LDLR(
125 induces positive emotions and may thus bias bonobos' decision making, including foraging or search b
126 anipulated and played more with objects than bonobos, despite similar levels of solitary and social p
133 cifics,(9)(,)(10)(,)(11)(,)(12) whereas male bonobos exhibit less sexual coercion(13)(,)(14) and no r
134 emales commonly outrank males, we found that bonobos exhibited lower rates of male-female aggression
136 the genus Pan, which includes chimpanzee and bonobo, experienced accelerated substitution rates.
139 dynamics), cluster membership predicted the bonobo fission compositions and the spatial cohesion of
140 th has evolved independently of body size in bonobos for the purposes of signal diminution (i.e., red
144 we describe a fully annotated, high-quality bonobo genome assembly, which was constructed without gu
146 in the inferior frontal gyrus of chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, and orangutan brains through direct cyt
148 ive analyses of six ape species: chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, Bornean orangutan, Sumatran orangutan a
149 , human TEE exceeded that of chimpanzees and bonobos, gorillas and orangutans by approximately 400, 6
150 (TEE; kcal day(-1)) in humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans to test the hypothesis
151 l as the other closely related "great apes" (bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) express several CD33-
152 inforest-sanctuary-housed apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) with 5 diverse human
153 rily related nonhuman hominids (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans), comparative studies
154 ip with humans, non-human apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons, including si
158 tion in prey preference between neighbouring bonobo groups that associate and overlap space use.
162 vailable that, contrary to expectation, male bonobos have a higher reproductive skew and a stronger r
163 e success depends on strong coalitions, male bonobos have more individualistic reproductive strategie
166 ndigenous human populations, consistent with bonobo having experienced narrower population bottleneck
167 n of the assembled genomes of chimpanzee and bonobo highlights that the inversion on chromosome 14 is
168 is a genetic basis to personality, and that bonobos homozygous for shorter RS3 alleles were lower in
169 ivergence with their gorilla, chimpanzee and bonobo hosts, suggesting a timescale for their evolution
170 oral observations on 39 adult and adolescent bonobos housed in 5 European zoos to study the role of p
172 New evidence that neighboring communities of bonobos hunt different prey species, despite extensive o
174 man affiliative vocalizations, than those of bonobos, indicating a potential derived vocal evolution
175 milar facial morphology; panins (chimpanzees/bonobos), inexperienced social targets, but close geneti
176 t 2 weeks of differentiation, chimpanzee and bonobo iNs showed repetitive action potentials and more
177 human iNs develop slower than chimpanzee and bonobo iNs, and this difference in timing likely depends
179 vidence suggest that gene flow occurred from bonobos into the ancestors of central and eastern chimpa
182 networks obtained by assimilating omic data (BONOBO) is a scalable Bayesian model for deriving indivi
188 , in terms of which hormone was affected; in bonobo males the shifts occurred in cortisol, whereas in
190 eve that the absence of the DupB deletion in bonobos may be partly responsible for these differences,
193 ly intolerant of sharing food, whereas adult bonobos (n = 24) maintained high, juvenile levels of foo
195 at the time of the offspring's conception in bonobos (N = 39 paternities from 4 groups) but not in ch
197 7 repeats in the gibbon, gorilla, orangutan, bonobo, neanderthal, and human Liat1, respectively, sugg
200 group distinction and out-group tolerance in bonobos, offering a unique referential model for the evo
206 the X and Y chromosomes for five great apes (bonobo (Pan paniscus), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), wes
207 eferences of our more tolerant relative, the bonobo (Pan paniscus), have never been studied experimen
208 iments we demonstrate that semi-free ranging bonobos (Pan paniscus) - both juveniles and young adults
210 munication of our closest primate relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
211 ession look to our closest living relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
212 occurred among our closest living relatives: bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
213 The two closest living relatives of humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
214 nt of socio-emotional competence in juvenile bonobos (Pan paniscus) at a sanctuary in the Democratic
218 e present data on the body composition of 13 bonobos (Pan paniscus) measured during anatomical dissec
219 vations of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) provide valuable comparative data
220 this study, we experimentally tested whether bonobos (Pan paniscus), a close relative to humans, are
221 eights for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), addressing potential call variat
222 ification in the lineages leading to humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus), and chimpanzees (P. troglodytes)
223 relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), exhibit notable constraints on t
224 ing, coalition, and food-sharing patterns in bonobos (Pan paniscus), one of our closest living relati
226 relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), with a dyadic food competition a
235 ies widespread in chimpanzees, gorillas, and bonobos places the origin of Plasmodium malariae in Afri
237 be explained by parasite seasonality, nor by bonobo population structure, diet or gut microbiota.
240 the common ancestor with the chimpanzee and bonobo, potentially affecting recognition by a variety o
241 because they challenge the view that female bonobos' preferences for less aggressive males favored a
242 zing food or actively sharing: we found that bonobos preferred to release a recipient from an adjacen
245 Notably, chimpanzees, and in particular bonobos, provide a remarkable case of evolutionary stasi
248 on in 3 bonobo communities at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo, and 2 chim
250 e self-domesticated besides humans so far is bonobos, resulting in a narrow scope for investigating t
251 ng newly generated MAGs from chimpanzees and bonobos, revealed significant co-diversification within
254 nmental and social conditions at the Lola Ya Bonobo sanctuary near Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of C
256 thesis is that some species, like humans and bonobos, "self-domesticated" and have been under selecti
257 ison of our haplogroups to two chimp and one bonobo sequences, and assuming a chimp-human coalescent
258 g non-conceptive periods, such as humans and bonobos, sexual intercourse is known to be pleasurable f
262 e present study, we investigated (i) whether bonobos, similar to humans, have an attentional bias tow
263 o split c.2 Ma there have been no changes in bonobos, so with respect to HN-FL musculature bonobos ar
265 ive and affiliative behaviors are pivotal in bonobo society and therefore attract immediate attention
267 th children and Pan species (chimpanzees and bonobos) spontaneously used relational similarity, albei
270 results highlight the need to attend to the bonobo substructure, both in terms of research and conse
271 ven by other evolutionary adaptive traits of bonobos, such as their strong attraction to infants and
276 d higher rates of male-male aggression among bonobos than chimpanzees even when limiting analyses to
280 undescribed human-like beckoning gesture in bonobos that has potentially both deictic and iconic cha
282 alyze the exomes and mtDNA from 20 wild-born bonobos, the whole genomes of 10 captive bonobos, and th
283 ions according to affective content, but not bonobo threat vocalizations nor any macaque vocalization
284 t, in our other closest living relative, the bonobo, tolerant between-group associations are observed
285 external and middle ears of chimpanzees and bonobos transfer sound better than human ones in the fre
287 udy in humans and another in chimpanzees and bonobos, using 50 DNA segments randomly chosen from the
288 l and middle ears of humans, chimpanzees and bonobos, using laser-Doppler vibrometry and finite eleme
289 mpositionality is a prominent feature of the bonobo vocal system, revealing stronger parallels with h
290 lyses revealed that agonistic chimpanzee and bonobo vocalizations were similarly distant from agonist
292 ased divergence time between chimpanzees and bonobos was estimated at approximately 1.8 million years
293 7, and GRCh38, as well as the chimpanzee and bonobo, we show that hundreds of megabases of sequence a
296 duplications remains significantly higher in bonobos, Western chimpanzees, and Sumatran orangutans-po
297 ntense in male-dominated chimpanzees than in bonobos, where the highest-ranking individuals are femal
300 ne coexpression with the prior distribution, BONOBO yields a closed-form solution for the posterior d