戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s from three species (human, chimpanzee, and bonobo).
2 ta are available (eg humans, chimpanzees and bonobos).
3 12 humans, 10 chimpanzees, 7 gorillas, and 1 bonobo.
4 nts from three hosts: human, chimpanzee, and bonobo.
5  15 communities and one suspected killing by bonobos.
6 r closest primate relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos.
7 ferences resulting in less skill among adult bonobos.
8 (SAdV) genomes isolated from chimpanzees and bonobos.
9 th was found only in humans, chimpanzees and bonobos.
10 83 new haplotypes of western chimpanzees and bonobos.
11 and morphologies shared with chimpanzees and bonobos.
12 could contribute to lentiviral resistance in bonobos.
13 lved in regulating out-group prosociality in bonobos.
14 , we find temporally stable clusters only in bonobos.
15 ial species from wild-living chimpanzees and bonobos.
16 s relationship remains to be investigated in bonobos.
17 al data obtained from a recent dissection of bonobos.
18 ion, a trait shared with chimpanzees but not bonobos.
19 e differences between common chimpanzees and bonobos.
20 zees and gorillas, have not been detected in bonobos.
21 the vasopressin 1a receptor gene (Avpr1a) in bonobos.
22  and personality traits should be present in bonobos.
23 vealed that the nucleotide diversity (pi) in bonobos (0.077%) is actually lower than that in humans (
24 rn and western gorillas, and chimpanzees and bonobos [1].
25 yield a total sample of 19 chimpanzees, four bonobos, 14 gorillas, and six orangutans, in which inter
26 vity and attractiveness are more extended in bonobos [2], males compete less intensely for each matin
27 re more patient and more risk-prone than are bonobos, (2) both species exhibit affective and motivati
28 e fitness consequences of male aggression in bonobos.(2)(,)(15)(,)(16) Nonetheless, the extent to whi
29 e to our closest relatives - chimpanzees and bonobos [3].
30 ults [31-33], human toddlers [34], and adult bonobos [35] prefer high-status individuals to low-statu
31  FOXP2 coding sequence in 63 chimpanzees, 11 bonobos, 48 gorillas, 37 orangutans and 2 gibbons and ob
32 the scanty paternity data available for wild bonobos [5].
33 mologous 5' noncoding region in chimpanzees, bonobos, a gorilla, an orangutan, and a baboon.
34          Here, we report two cases of a wild bonobo adopting an infant from a different social group,
35                                              Bonobos also showed evidence for involuntary, contagious
36 observe a twofold increase in the chimpanzee-bonobo ancestor (P = 4.79 x 10(-9)) and increased deleti
37 llectively, these results offer insight into bonobo and chimpanzee evolutionary history and suggest c
38 in anticipation of an identical competition, bonobo and chimpanzee males showed differential endocrin
39 virus was detected in the human, chimpanzee, bonobo and gorilla genomes, but not in the orang-utan ge
40                                              Bonobo and gorilla groups demonstrated a stronger lookin
41                   We generated assemblies of bonobo and orangutan Ys from short and long sequencing r
42 e browsers for various assemblies, including bonobo and zebrafish; new gene annotation sets; improvem
43 randomly chosen from the nuclear genome in 9 bonobos and 17 chimpanzees.
44 nces in the social behavior and cognition of bonobos and chimpanzees derive from shifts in their onto
45               Despite being closely related, bonobos and chimpanzees show remarkable behavioral diffe
46 ccumulated at significantly greater rates in bonobos and chimpanzees than in humans, provide insights
47 occurred after our last common ancestor with bonobos and chimpanzees, and before the origin of presen
48 le-genome sequences from the autosomes of 71 bonobos and chimpanzees, representing all five extant Pa
49 species differences in personality traits of bonobos and chimpanzees.
50 cs, we investigated compositionality in wild bonobos and found that not only does each call type of t
51 hly divergent species infecting chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas across central Africa.
52 l amino acid substitutions from chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas, with an additional fixed substitut
53                     Our results suggest that bonobos and humans experience TTS in similar ways and th
54 he last common ancestor (LCA) of chimpanzees/bonobos and humans.
55 bove chance level except for threat calls by bonobos and macaques.
56 her evolutionarily shared or convergent with bonobos and not unique to our species as previously prop
57 d, human-like adolescent length-GSs exist in bonobos and probably also many other non-human primates.
58 at B07 Papa-B occur at high frequency in TL2 bonobos and that malaria appears to have independently s
59 ample of spontaneous tempo coordination in a bonobo), and there is no experimental evidence to indica
60  in human and African great ape (chimpanzee, bonobo, and gorilla) genomes, substantially less is know
61 orldwide sample) and four great apes (chimp, bonobo, and gorilla).
62                                  Chimpanzee, bonobo, and human neurites eventually reached the same l
63 .1-kb+ allele was found in 16 chimpanzees, 3 bonobos, and 2 Bornean orangutans; however, 9 chimpanzee
64  3 kb of NRY DNA from 101 chimpanzees, seven bonobos, and 42 humans to investigate: (i) relative leve
65 stral Pan, the shared predecessor of humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees, lived in social dominance hier
66  gut communities of hundreds of chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas and developed a phylogenetic appro
67 or some fraction of the genome, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas are more closely related to each o
68 e via cospeciation with humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas over the past 15 million years.
69 c and allopatric populations of chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas residing throughout equatorial Afr
70 n well-defined cell populations from humans, bonobos, and gorillas.
71 lations, as well as wild-living chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas.
72  422 brain samples from humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and macaques representing 33 anatomical regions
73 orn bonobos, the whole genomes of 10 captive bonobos, and the mtDNA of 136 wild individuals.
74  great apes (43 groups of naive chimpanzees, bonobos, and western gorillas across 14 field sites in A
75                                              Bonobos approached ambiguous stimuli to search for rewar
76                     Gorilla, chimpanzee, and bonobo are humans' closest living relatives.
77 ng between human and chimpanzee or human and bonobo are non-randomly distributed and that genes withi
78 ent preregistered study investigated whether bonobos are capable of attributing knowledge or ignoranc
79               Here, we show that wild-living bonobos are endemically Plasmodium infected in the easte
80                              Chimpanzees and bonobos are highly capable of tracking other's mental st
81                            Common chimps and bonobos are our closest living relatives but almost noth
82                              Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives.
83 onobos, so with respect to HN-FL musculature bonobos are the better model for the last common ancesto
84 th common chimpanzees and pygmy chimpanzees (bonobos) are polymorphic for maximum length of any CTG/C
85 parisons have established the chimpanzee and bonobo as our closest living relatives.
86 terization of iPS cells from chimpanzees and bonobos as new tools to explore factors that may have co
87                 Xenophilia likely evolved in bonobos as the risk of intergroup aggression dissipated
88 enile orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos, as well as tickle-induced laughter produced by
89                                     Although bonobo associations are flexible (i.e., fission-fusion d
90                             For each sample, BONOBO assumes a Gaussian distribution on the log-transf
91 omparing chimpanzees at Kalinzu (Uganda) and bonobos at Wamba (DRC).
92  predicted, results consistently showed that bonobos' attention was biased toward the location of the
93  engaged in intensive warfare if we consider bonobo behavior, but modern human foragers have the pote
94 r cells compared to those of chimpanzees and bonobos both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting heterochro
95 xture has been identified in chimpanzees and bonobos but the possibility of such events has not been
96  These experiments reveal that xenophilia in bonobos can be unselfish, proactive and automatic.
97 duals - the first experimental evidence that bonobos can identify individuals utilising vocalisations
98                                           If bonobos can represent a partner's ignorance and are moti
99 onstrate experimentally that chimpanzees and bonobos can take into account what others can see in coo
100 common chimpanzee), and Homo (Pan) paniscus (bonobo chimpanzee).
101 ha1 domain, which is broadly conserved among bonobo, chimpanzee, and gorilla.
102 telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genomes of human, bonobo, chimpanzee, gorilla, Bornean orangutan, and Suma
103 telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genomes of human, bonobo, chimpanzee, gorilla, Bornean orangutan, Sumatran
104                       Primates, specifically bonobo, chimpanzee, orangutan, and human, exhibited pial
105  membrane anchor loss in three clades: human/bonobo/chimpanzee, guinea pig/degu/tuco-tuco/mole rat, a
106 g-term effective population sizes of humans, bonobos, chimpanzees, and gorillas are, respectively, 10
107 n and its relative contrast with the iris in bonobos, chimpanzees, and humans.
108                               The great apes-bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans-are critic
109 nstrated to a sample of nonhuman great apes (bonobos, chimpanzees, orangutans; N = 24) how to operate
110  Using direct percussion, language-competent bonobo-chimpanzees Kanzi and Pan-Banisha produced a sign
111                       Several chimpanzee and bonobo clades (and even single social groups) have retai
112 verlap and frequent interactions between the bonobo clusters, we identified significant association p
113 lition formation, we reinforce the idea that bonobo coalitions do not serve as a form of group defens
114                                     Further, bonobo coalitions included both in- and out-group partne
115 24)-to compare rates of male aggression in 3 bonobo communities at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Dem
116 rmation from 18 chimpanzee communities and 4 bonobo communities studied over five decades.
117 eased attacks on outgroup competitors in the Bonobo condition versus the Chimpanzee condition, sugges
118 , the 9.1-kb+ chromosomes of chimpanzees and bonobos contain a 1030-nucleotide sequence, absent in hu
119 re recent contact (after 200,000 years ago), bonobos contributed less than 1% to the central chimpanz
120 when the prize is easily monopolizable food: bonobos cooperate more than their less socially tolerant
121                                              Bonobo cooperative attitudes toward in-group members inf
122               Through examining variation in bonobo cooperative behavior, specifically coalition form
123                                              Bonobos could receive a reward that they had watched bei
124 tions and plasma from chimpanzees; gorillas; bonobos; cynomolgus monkeys; wild-type, apoE(-/-), LDLR(
125  induces positive emotions and may thus bias bonobos' decision making, including foraging or search b
126 anipulated and played more with objects than bonobos, despite similar levels of solitary and social p
127                   Given that chimpanzees and bonobos differ markedly in their food-sharing behavior,
128                              Chimpanzees and bonobos differ on these traits, leading some to believe
129 and debates on whether the common chimpanzee-bonobo divergence is linked to heterochrony.
130 us Pan; and (iii) the date of the chimpanzee/bonobo divergence.
131                        Thus, food sharing in bonobos does not depend on kinship or harassment and sug
132                        Nor do chimpanzee and bonobo endocast data support the assertion that delayed
133 cifics,(9)(,)(10)(,)(11)(,)(12) whereas male bonobos exhibit less sexual coercion(13)(,)(14) and no r
134 emales commonly outrank males, we found that bonobos exhibited lower rates of male-female aggression
135 of long-sightedness (presbyopia) in old wild bonobos, exhibited during grooming.
136 the genus Pan, which includes chimpanzee and bonobo, experienced accelerated substitution rates.
137 ht the importance of sexual interactions for bonobo female social relations.
138                                              Bonobo females frequently form close bonds, which give t
139  dynamics), cluster membership predicted the bonobo fission compositions and the spatial cohesion of
140 th has evolved independently of body size in bonobos for the purposes of signal diminution (i.e., red
141               Despite increased competition, bonobos formed fewer coalitions in the presence of out-g
142 hole genomes of 75 wild-born chimpanzees and bonobos from 10 countries in Africa.
143                                      Mapping bonobo genetic diversity in space is, however, challengi
144  we describe a fully annotated, high-quality bonobo genome assembly, which was constructed without gu
145          Some pygmy chimpanzees (also called Bonobos) give much simpler patterns of hybridization on
146 in the inferior frontal gyrus of chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, and orangutan brains through direct cyt
147 tween humans and the great apes (chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, and orangutan).
148 ive analyses of six ape species: chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, Bornean orangutan, Sumatran orangutan a
149 , human TEE exceeded that of chimpanzees and bonobos, gorillas and orangutans by approximately 400, 6
150  (TEE; kcal day(-1)) in humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans to test the hypothesis
151 l as the other closely related "great apes" (bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) express several CD33-
152 inforest-sanctuary-housed apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) with 5 diverse human
153 rily related nonhuman hominids (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans), comparative studies
154 ip with humans, non-human apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons, including si
155 esent in humans and chimpanzees, but also in bonobos, gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons.
156                           Alternatively, the bonobo grouping patterns may be homologous to observatio
157                              To characterize bonobo grouping patterns, we compare the social structur
158 tion in prey preference between neighbouring bonobo groups that associate and overlap space use.
159                    Subjects were two captive bonobo groups, a total of 13 individuals, and two captiv
160                                          TL2 bonobos harbour P. gaboni, formerly only found in chimpa
161                  Because only chimpanzee and bonobo have strict orthologs of all HLA class I, their s
162 vailable that, contrary to expectation, male bonobos have a higher reproductive skew and a stronger r
163 e success depends on strong coalitions, male bonobos have more individualistic reproductive strategie
164                                              Bonobos have rich, social emotional lives and are known
165 ur closest living relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos, have a complex demographic history.
166 ndigenous human populations, consistent with bonobo having experienced narrower population bottleneck
167 n of the assembled genomes of chimpanzee and bonobo highlights that the inversion on chromosome 14 is
168  is a genetic basis to personality, and that bonobos homozygous for shorter RS3 alleles were lower in
169 ivergence with their gorilla, chimpanzee and bonobo hosts, suggesting a timescale for their evolution
170 oral observations on 39 adult and adolescent bonobos housed in 5 European zoos to study the role of p
171 himpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are, along with bonobos, humans' closest living relatives.
172 New evidence that neighboring communities of bonobos hunt different prey species, despite extensive o
173                                              Bonobos indeed flexibly adapted the frequency and speed
174 man affiliative vocalizations, than those of bonobos, indicating a potential derived vocal evolution
175 milar facial morphology; panins (chimpanzees/bonobos), inexperienced social targets, but close geneti
176 t 2 weeks of differentiation, chimpanzee and bonobo iNs showed repetitive action potentials and more
177 human iNs develop slower than chimpanzee and bonobo iNs, and this difference in timing likely depends
178  relatives but almost nothing is known about bonobo internal anatomy.
179 vidence suggest that gene flow occurred from bonobos into the ancestors of central and eastern chimpa
180                                 However, the bonobo is often overlooked as a candidate model.
181               Surprisingly, the pi value for bonobos is only 0.078%, even somewhat lower than that (0
182 networks obtained by assimilating omic data (BONOBO) is a scalable Bayesian model for deriving indivi
183       We analyzed beckoning in two groups of bonobos, kept under near natural environmental and socia
184                              Chimpanzees and bonobos, like humans, drum on instrumental substrates.(2
185 panzees, and in this respect humans are more bonobo-like.
186 g a potential derived vocal evolution in the bonobo lineage.
187                                  Conversely, bonobos live exclusively in the Democratic Republic of C
188 , in terms of which hormone was affected; in bonobo males the shifts occurred in cortisol, whereas in
189 ology, indicating that hunting techniques in bonobos may be culturally transmitted.
190 eve that the absence of the DupB deletion in bonobos may be partly responsible for these differences,
191                 Our study also suggests that bonobos may cease to discriminate between familiar and u
192 ort the idea that elephants, like humans and bonobos, may be self-domesticated.
193 ly intolerant of sharing food, whereas adult bonobos (n = 24) maintained high, juvenile levels of foo
194        In two different tests, we found that bonobos (n = 30) exhibited developmental delays relative
195 at the time of the offspring's conception in bonobos (N = 39 paternities from 4 groups) but not in ch
196                  In Experiment 3, we endowed bonobos (N = 4) and orangutans (N = 5) with either one o
197 7 repeats in the gibbon, gorilla, orangutan, bonobo, neanderthal, and human Liat1, respectively, sugg
198 groom slapping) transmitted socially through bonobo networks across six European zoos.
199         The tolerant intergroup relations of bonobos offer an ideal context to explore drivers of beh
200 group distinction and out-group tolerance in bonobos, offering a unique referential model for the evo
201  has genetically divergent subpopulations of bonobos on each side.
202  is of gorilla origin and not of chimpanzee, bonobo or ancient human origin.
203       We defined polymorphism of Papa-B, the bonobo ortholog of HLA-B, for six wild bonobo population
204                                  Papa-B, the bonobo ortholog of HLA-B, includes variants having a B*5
205                                              Bonobos, our closest living relatives together with chim
206 the X and Y chromosomes for five great apes (bonobo (Pan paniscus), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), wes
207 eferences of our more tolerant relative, the bonobo (Pan paniscus), have never been studied experimen
208 iments we demonstrate that semi-free ranging bonobos (Pan paniscus) - both juveniles and young adults
209           We conducted five experiments with bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
210 munication of our closest primate relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
211 ession look to our closest living relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
212 occurred among our closest living relatives: bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
213  The two closest living relatives of humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
214 nt of socio-emotional competence in juvenile bonobos (Pan paniscus) at a sanctuary in the Democratic
215                   Laverania parasites infect bonobos (Pan paniscus) at only one (TL2) of many sites s
216                          Sexual behaviour in bonobos (Pan paniscus) functions beyond mere reproductio
217                             We also screened bonobos (Pan paniscus) in the DRC, a species not previou
218 e present data on the body composition of 13 bonobos (Pan paniscus) measured during anatomical dissec
219 vations of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) provide valuable comparative data
220 this study, we experimentally tested whether bonobos (Pan paniscus), a close relative to humans, are
221 eights for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), addressing potential call variat
222 ification in the lineages leading to humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus), and chimpanzees (P. troglodytes)
223 relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), exhibit notable constraints on t
224 ing, coalition, and food-sharing patterns in bonobos (Pan paniscus), one of our closest living relati
225                         This is the case for bonobos (Pan paniscus), which, together with chimpanzees
226 relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), with a dyadic food competition a
227 relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus).
228 en humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus).
229 ot in eastern gorillas (Gorilla beringei) or bonobos (Pan paniscus).
230 us), 14 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and 4 bonobos (Pan paniscus).
231 s macaques (Macaca mulatta), chimpanzees and bonobos (Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus).
232 Pan troglodytes, and the pygmy chimpanzee or bonobo, Pan paniscus.
233                            Here we show that bonobos, Pan paniscus, demonstrate reliable vocal recogn
234                                We identified bonobo personality dimensions using behavioral measures
235 ies widespread in chimpanzees, gorillas, and bonobos places the origin of Plasmodium malariae in Afri
236          Thus, the geographic restriction of bonobo Plasmodium reflects still unidentified factors th
237 be explained by parasite seasonality, nor by bonobo population structure, diet or gut microbiota.
238                                              Bonobo populations have 3-14 Papa-B allotypes.
239 , the bonobo ortholog of HLA-B, for six wild bonobo populations.
240  the common ancestor with the chimpanzee and bonobo, potentially affecting recognition by a variety o
241  because they challenge the view that female bonobos' preferences for less aggressive males favored a
242 zing food or actively sharing: we found that bonobos preferred to release a recipient from an adjacen
243                     Gorillas and chimpanzees/bonobos present generally low and high MSY diversity, re
244                                              Bonobos provide insight into the origins of partner-spec
245      Notably, chimpanzees, and in particular bonobos, provide a remarkable case of evolutionary stasi
246             The divergence of chimpanzee and bonobo provides one of the few examples of recent homini
247 e within groups, it is unclear whether these bonobos really do belong to separate groups.
248 on in 3 bonobo communities at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo, and 2 chim
249                     We experimentally tested bonobos' responses to the calls of previous group member
250 e self-domesticated besides humans so far is bonobos, resulting in a narrow scope for investigating t
251 ng newly generated MAGs from chimpanzees and bonobos, revealed significant co-diversification within
252        Finally, we found that chimpanzee and bonobo SAMD9Ls have enhanced anti-HIV-1 functions compar
253                 In contrast, none of the 543 bonobo samples from six sites was antibody positive.
254 nmental and social conditions at the Lola Ya Bonobo sanctuary near Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of C
255                                 Like humans, bonobos' sclerae are lighter relative to the color of th
256 thesis is that some species, like humans and bonobos, "self-domesticated" and have been under selecti
257 ison of our haplogroups to two chimp and one bonobo sequences, and assuming a chimp-human coalescent
258 g non-conceptive periods, such as humans and bonobos, sexual intercourse is known to be pleasurable f
259                              Chimpanzees and bonobos show different cooperative tendencies when the p
260                     Humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos show the highest rates of Alu accumulation--the
261                                    Moreover, bonobos showed greater flexibility in this regard than c
262 e present study, we investigated (i) whether bonobos, similar to humans, have an attentional bias tow
263 o split c.2 Ma there have been no changes in bonobos, so with respect to HN-FL musculature bonobos ar
264                    A deeper understanding of bonobo social systems allows us to reevaluate the precon
265 ive and affiliative behaviors are pivotal in bonobo society and therefore attract immediate attention
266        Moreover, since the common chimpanzee-bonobo split c.2 Ma there have been no changes in bonobo
267 th children and Pan species (chimpanzees and bonobos) spontaneously used relational similarity, albei
268                                           In bonobos, strong bonds have been documented between unrel
269                Here, pairs of chimpanzees or bonobos (Study 1) and 4-year-old children (Study 2) were
270  results highlight the need to attend to the bonobo substructure, both in terms of research and conse
271 ven by other evolutionary adaptive traits of bonobos, such as their strong attraction to infants and
272                   A new study has found that bonobos take longer to reach adult levels of two behavio
273 e of mothers (and females more generally) in bonobo than chimpanzee societies.
274  during iNs maturation in the chimpanzee and bonobo than the human cells.
275 of coalition formation are lower, among male bonobos than among male chimpanzees.
276 d higher rates of male-male aggression among bonobos than chimpanzees even when limiting analyses to
277 of male reproductive skew should be lower in bonobos than in chimpanzees [1].
278 d to the evolution of shorter vocal folds in bonobos than in chimpanzees.
279 icantly higher on the NRY of chimpanzees and bonobos than on the human NRY.
280  undescribed human-like beckoning gesture in bonobos that has potentially both deictic and iconic cha
281                            We gave unrelated bonobos the choice of either monopolizing food or active
282 alyze the exomes and mtDNA from 20 wild-born bonobos, the whole genomes of 10 captive bonobos, and th
283 ions according to affective content, but not bonobo threat vocalizations nor any macaque vocalization
284 t, in our other closest living relative, the bonobo, tolerant between-group associations are observed
285  external and middle ears of chimpanzees and bonobos transfer sound better than human ones in the fre
286 chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging.
287 udy in humans and another in chimpanzees and bonobos, using 50 DNA segments randomly chosen from the
288 l and middle ears of humans, chimpanzees and bonobos, using laser-Doppler vibrometry and finite eleme
289 mpositionality is a prominent feature of the bonobo vocal system, revealing stronger parallels with h
290 lyses revealed that agonistic chimpanzee and bonobo vocalizations were similarly distant from agonist
291                                              Bonobos voluntarily aided an unfamiliar, non-group membe
292 ased divergence time between chimpanzees and bonobos was estimated at approximately 1.8 million years
293 7, and GRCh38, as well as the chimpanzee and bonobo, we show that hundreds of megabases of sequence a
294                   To explore the TTS in wild bonobos, we investigated physiological changes in urinar
295                                              Bonobos were also more likely to show alarm and other fe
296 duplications remains significantly higher in bonobos, Western chimpanzees, and Sumatran orangutans-po
297 ntense in male-dominated chimpanzees than in bonobos, where the highest-ranking individuals are femal
298 relationship compatibility was found between bonobos with similar Activity scores.
299 mpare the social structure of the Kokolopori bonobos with the chimpanzee group of Ngogo.
300 ne coexpression with the prior distribution, BONOBO yields a closed-form solution for the posterior d

 
Page Top