コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 elated condition, and 1 due to high baseline bowel movements).
2 tinal effects (nausea, vomiting, and altered bowel movements).
3 ecreased stool consistency and time to first bowel movement.
4 was efficacy regarding change in spontaneous bowel movements.
5 f days per week with one or more spontaneous bowel movements.
6 ndardized questionnaires and daily number of bowel movements.
7 f patients with constipation have infrequent bowel movements.
8 S]) with incontinence, urgency, and frequent bowel movements.
9 eported on average 5 daytime and 1 nighttime bowel movements.
10 recovery across multiple parameters: earlier bowel movement (1.21 +/- 0.34 vs. 2.20 +/- 0.57 days, p
15 in the octreotide group, including nocturnal bowel movements (70% v 45%; P = .004), clustering of bow
16 vements (70% v 45%; P = .004), clustering of bowel movements (90% v 69%; P = .004), and bleeding with
17 istory of bloody diarrhea consisting of 8-12 bowel movements a day, weight loss of 10 kg and peripher
18 orter time to the first postdose spontaneous bowel movement and a higher mean number of days per week
19 Secondary endpoints included time to first bowel movement and length of postoperative hospital stay
21 estion, a correlation between the pattern of bowel movement and the type of excreted gas, a prevalenc
23 l habits, including frequency of spontaneous bowel movements and complete spontaneous bowel movements
24 rain interaction characterized by infrequent bowel movements and hard stools, which substantially aff
25 in 141 cloaca patients: 82 have spontaneous bowel movements and satisfactory control, 38 use enemas
26 al starch fibers on beneficial gut bacteria, bowel movements and stool consistency were evaluated aft
28 rollment, time to first postdose spontaneous bowel movement, and mean number of days per week with on
29 t urine leak, necrotic pancreatitis, delayed bowel movement, and severe shoulder pain secondary to di
30 urgent bowel movements, lack of control over bowel movements, and difficulty fully emptying the bowel
31 suggesting that high-fiber diet and frequent bowel movements are associated with a greater and not lo
32 A high-fiber diet and increased frequency of bowel movements are associated with greater, rather than
33 a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, reduces bowel movement (BM) frequency in patients with carcinoid
34 nal pain (80.4%) while passage of blood with bowel movements (BM) (86.6%) and loose/watery BMs (86.5%
35 data to 10 years show that median number of bowel movements (bms) was 6 bm/24 hours at all time inte
36 treatment as usual on defecation frequency [bowel movements (BMs)/wk] or treatment success rates in
42 ed to assess whether the clarity of the last bowel movement could predict inadequate bowel preparatio
43 vements and symptoms of frequency, nocturnal bowel movements, cramping, and bleeding returned close t
44 point was three or more complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week and an increase of one
45 o achieve three or more complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week, the stimulant diphenyl
46 d point was clinical cure (firm stools or <3 bowel movements daily) at day 14 and no disease recurren
48 hours (P=0.03), the median time to the first bowel movement decreased from 111 to 70 hours (P=0.01),
52 age (<75 vs >/=75 years), number of unformed bowel movements during previous 24 hours (<10 vs >/=10),
53 h men with daily bowel movements, men with a bowel movement every 3 days or less had a multivariate-a
54 s, the relative risks associated with having bowel movements every third day or less, compared with t
55 n increase from baseline of >/=1 spontaneous bowel movements for >/=9 of 12 weeks and for >/=3 of the
56 c output, specifically time and frequency of bowel movements, for all participants by daily post-slee
58 rapy is associated with a slight increase in bowel movement frequency and decrease in several patient
59 and 200 mg also had greater improvements in bowel movement frequency and urgency, global symptoms, q
60 d indicate that simple questions directed at bowel movement frequency are unlikely to enhance our abi
64 es (frequency of problematic abdominal pain, bowel movement frequency, facial oedema severity, and pe
65 ospectively examined the association between bowel movement frequency, laxative use, and the risk of
66 d to softened stool and a modest increase in bowel movement frequency, resulting from increased stool
67 owed colonic transit with consequent reduced bowel-movement frequency, and difficulty with the act of
69 k factors, as compared with women with daily bowel movement, having bowel movements more than once da
73 relative to manometric results, frequency of bowel movements, incontinence scores, or overall patient
74 by a combination of symptoms such as urgent bowel movements, lack of control over bowel movements, a
75 ot support an association between infrequent bowel movement, laxative use, and risk of colorectal can
79 In the HPFS, compared with men with daily bowel movements, men with a bowel movement every 3 days
80 with women with daily bowel movement, having bowel movements more than once daily was significantly a
81 rease in the number of spontaneous, complete bowel movements of one or more per week, on average, as
82 acterized by chronic abdominal pain, altered bowel movements, often accompanied by somatic and psychi
83 third day or less, compared with those with bowel movements once daily, were 0.94 (95% confidence in
85 surgery and then twice daily until the first bowel movement or until discharge from the hospital.
86 evelopment of symptomatic CDC (defined as >3 bowel movements per 24 hours and a positive cytotoxin as
91 y (P = .04); the GCD had a greater effect on bowel movements per day of HLA-DQ2/8-positive than HLA-D
92 ever, some had severe diarrhea with 10 to 40 bowel movements per day or had persistent/chronic diarrh
93 the 12-week response rate (>/=3 spontaneous bowel movements per week and an increase from baseline o
94 are both effective, increasing the number of bowel movements per week by 1.8 (95 % Crl 1.0, 2.8) and
95 wel movements per week, individuals with >15 bowel movements per week had a 70% greater risk for dive
96 nts with three or more spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week was 30.9% of those receiving 2
97 constipation (< or =2 spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week) received placebo or 2 or 4 mg
101 ant increase in the percentage of successful bowel movements (PRE: median 43% [0-100] vs ON: 89% [11-
102 believe that a high-fiber diet and frequent bowel movements prevent the development of diverticulosi
103 ous bowel movements and complete spontaneous bowel movements (primary end point), severity of straini
104 e identify alcohol consumption frequency and bowel movement quality as unexpectedly strong sources of
105 A responder had at least three spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week with an increase from ba
106 Symptom assessments included spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), complete SBMs, stool consistency
107 cantly higher (p = 0.023) and rates of loose bowel movements tended to be lower (p = 0.053) in the tr
108 roup had 1 more symptom-day of more frequent bowel movements than did controls (3.7 symptom-days comp
112 Subjects recorded the clarity of their last bowel movement using a 5-point scale prior to colonoscop
115 g skills who had a mean of >/= 3 spontaneous bowel movements/week and </= 1 episode of fecal incontin
117 s, mean times to passage of flatus and first bowel movement were 3.6 +/- 0.2 days and 4.4 +/- 0.2 day
119 f days per week with one or more spontaneous bowel movements were observed with 25 mg of naloxegol ve
120 sistency, ease of passage, and time to first bowel movement with a strong dose response for stool con
122 srectal catheter reported severe limitation (bowel movement), with no reports of any serious effect o
123 with a significantly increased frequency of bowel movements, with subjects reporting these as health
125 -2.5 h) and increased stool frequency by 1.3 bowel movements/wk (95% CI: 0.7, 1.9 bowel movements/wk)
126 MD: 1.5 bowel movements/wk; 95% CI: 0.7, 2.3 bowel movements/wk) but not for Lactobacillus casei Shir
127 by 1.3 bowel movements/wk (95% CI: 0.7, 1.9 bowel movements/wk), and this was significant for Bifido
129 t for Lactobacillus casei Shirota (WMD: -0.2 bowel movements/wk; 95% CI: -0.8, 0.9 bowel movements/wk
130 ificant for Bifidobacterium lactis (WMD: 1.5 bowel movements/wk; 95% CI: 0.7, 2.3 bowel movements/wk)