コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 seroma and 7 of 83 (8%) with an isolated new breast mass.
2 are required to accurately evaluate a solid breast mass.
3 e in the preoperative triage of women with a breast mass.
4 ction with the B-mode to classify suspicious breast masses.
5 roved classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
6 diabetic mastopathy presented with palpable breast masses.
7 ng cyclosporin A therapy had newly developed breast masses.
8 benign components of small tissue samples of breast masses.
9 nce in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses.
10 uently validated in in vivo studies on human breast masses.
11 formance of ultrasound for classification of breast masses.
12 lone in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.
13 neck mass (4.2%), undescended testes (1.9%), breast mass (1.2%), club foot (1%), hypospadias (0.6%),
14 ng Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013
17 isease with expected avidity in two separate breast masses and multiple conglomerated 1-2 cm level I
18 onclusion OA/US increases the specificity of breast mass assessment compared with the device internal
19 8)Ga-FAPI PET/CT excels in detecting primary breast masses, axillary lymph nodes, and distant metasta
20 differentiation between malignant and benign breast masses, but it should be used in conjunction with
22 n this paper, we introduce the final step of breast mass classification and diagnosis using a stacked
23 f ten index surgically treatable conditions (breast mass, cleft lip/palate, club foot, hernia or hydr
24 e three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has th
25 Therefore, we hypothesized that malignant breast masses could be imaged and quantitated externally
26 a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for breast mass detection on digital breast tomosynthesis (D
27 Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of the breast mass diagnoses an invasive ductal carcinoma, poor
28 ls and Methods Lactating women with palpable breast masses evaluated at targeted US over a 17-year pe
30 rformed HMI scans in 10 female subjects with breast masses: five benign and five malignant masses.
32 ethod for biopsy of radiopharmaceutical-avid breast masses guided by data from PET and SPECT scanners
34 med in 151 consecutive solitary, nonpalpable breast masses in 151 women (age range, 23-80 years) by u
38 sk of classifying the detected and segmented breast masses into malignant or benign, and diagnosing t
40 esized that the PBMC response to a malignant breast mass involves elevated production of HSP70 and a
43 for injuries or wounds, hernias, hydroceles, breast mass, neck mass, obstetric fistula, undescended t
44 itions (injuries/wounds, hernias/hydroceles, breast masses, neck masses, obstetric fistulas, undescen
47 atients aged 18 years or older with palpable breast masses presenting to the FNAB Clinic at Muhimbili
48 l lymph node (SNL) mapping in a woman with a breast mass presents an unacceptable risk to her fetus.
49 ion and morphology of blood vessels in solid breast masses seen at power Doppler US is a potentially
50 y does not help determine whether a palpable breast mass should be biopsied and should not affect the
53 total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP.
56 A total of 1972 women (with a total of 2055 breast masses) underwent prebiopsy optoacoustic US in a
57 asks on small datasets-thyroid nodules (US), breast masses (US), anterior cruciate ligament injuries
67 ents with Carney complex often have multiple breast masses with variable imaging appearances that pro
68 nguishing between benign and malignant solid breast masses, with biopsy results as the reference stan