ライフサイエンスコーパス: cadaveric

1 iving-donor, 11,466 living-donor, and 32,416 cadaveric).

2 ial recipient received another organ (living/cadaveric) (20.0% versus 7.9%, P<0.01).

3 We undertook nine cadaveric abdominal wall composite allograft transplants

4 illed perpendicular to the cartilage of four cadaveric acetabula (two specimens).

5 arallel histologic analysis was performed on cadaveric Achilles tendon entheses to determine whether

6 work for Organ Sharing on 19,404 first-time, cadaveric, adult liver transplantations performed in the

7 StrataGraft and cadaveric allograft were placed side by side on 15 patie

8 ay be performed with autologous fascia lata, cadaveric allograft, or permanent suture material.

9 Data on 19,706 recipients of cadaveric allografts were obtained from the United State

10 All children received cadaveric allografts with rabbit anti-human thymocyte gl

11 insulin, share an ultrastructure similar to cadaveric alpha cells, express and secrete glucagon in r

12 dy involved 39 renal transplant patients (19 cadaveric and 20 living donor).

13 overcome this problem in seven recipients (2 cadaveric and 5 living donors) by constructing third-par

14 Validation for safety and efficacy on cadaveric and clinical models is necessary.

15 etection provides a promising alternative to cadaveric and device-dependent therapies in the treatmen

16 cross cultured RPE cells isolated from human cadaveric and fetal eyes.

17 maturing of liver transplantation using both cadaveric and living donors has allowed better results t

18 ate excellent 3-year graft survival for both cadaveric and living-donor renal-transplant patients rec

19 Materials and Methods: Ten cadaveric ankle specimens were obtained and used in acco

20 In this study of five cadaveric ankles, multi-detector row CT arthrography was

21 fold, may present a new alternative to these cadaveric biologic grafts.

22 However, the use of cadaveric biologic mesh has been expensive and plagued b

23 Despite widespread application of cadaveric biologic mesh, little data exist on the superi

24 nd value-based benefit compared with porcine cadaveric biologic mesh.

25 in the last decade after the introduction of cadaveric biologic scaffolds.

26 prospective study was performed in phantoms, cadaveric brain specimens, healthy volunteers, and patie

27 ts were in accord with recent dissections of cadaveric brains, and analysis of postoperative VFDs and

28 Ischemia-reperfusion injury in cadaveric (CAD) kidney allografts is associated with tub

29 ared the development of CAN in recipients of cadaveric (CAD), living-related donor (LRD), and living-

30 Fresh cadaveric canine femoral condyles were subjected to 20-2

31 ells and epithelial cells were obtained from cadaveric conjunctival tissue.

32 unctival epithelial cells were isolated from cadaveric conjunctival tissues and cultured in 24-well p

33 HCEs were acquired by enzymatic digestion of cadaveric conjunctival tissues.

34 ft substitute can alleviate this reliance on cadaveric corneal graft material.

35 In addition, a global shortage of cadaveric corneal graft tissue critically limits accessi

36 The TM from human cadaveric corneal rim tissue was incised using 3 instrum

37 d from corneal epithelial cells scraped from cadaveric corneas and from cultured HCECs, and RT-PCR wa

38 All epithelial tissue collected from cadaveric corneas expressed mRNA for hBD-1.

39 predict gravimetric water content from human cadaveric cortical bone was created using NIRSI data obt

40 Participants on cadaveric courses were highly satisfied with the teachin

41 acheal transplantation has advanced from the cadaveric decellularized scaffolds initially used to tru

42 nvestigations that compared radiographic and cadaveric dissection data with respect to identifying th

43 Current ECG criteria for RVH were based on cadaveric dissection in small studies.

44 Cadaveric donation rates have remained static, whereas t

45 Cadaveric donation was uncommon from within the Asian co

46 CI, 2.19 to 4.02), allograft rejection, and cadaveric donation were independently associated with ps

47 s have resulted in the critical appraisal of cadaveric donor acceptability criteria and the gradual r

48 -restoring corneal transplant have access to cadaveric donor corneal tissue.

49 heart, and liver transplants that a typical cadaveric donor generates.

50 Just prior to declamping, ischemic cadaveric donor grafts had higher expression of CXCL10/I

51 Minorities wait longer for a cadaveric donor kidney transplant than whites.

52 examined as a diagnostic aid for GvHD after cadaveric donor liver transplantation.

53 Cadaveric donor livers were subjected to IP prior to ret

54 In total, 9,449 patients were included (cadaveric donor n=6,011; living donor n=3,438).

55 5-yr survival (65.9 +/- 10.7%) compared with cadaveric donor organs (34.1 +/- 9.8%; P = 0.004).

56 Human islets isolated from three cadaveric donor organs were cultured in M-SFM for 1, 3,

57 relative hazard of 3-year graft failure for cadaveric donor patients taking tacrolimus versus Neoral

58 At 3 years posttransplant, the proportion of cadaveric donor recipients experiencing all causes of gr

59 t increases during reperfusion of living and cadaveric donor renal allografts.

60 This study determines whether cadaveric donor renal transplantation (CRT) can demonstr

61 PK can represent a successful alternative to cadaveric donor SPK.

62 rently severely limited by the reliance upon cadaveric donor tissue.

63 ained by metal stents, but, after failure, a cadaveric donor tracheal scaffold was decellularised.

64 antation using separate grafts from the same cadaveric donor.

65 study consisted of African Americans (71%), cadaveric donors (100%), donors aged more than 50 years

66 Analysis of human islets from cadaveric donors (age 16-70 years) was performed using g

67 Human articular chondrocytes isolated from cadaveric donors (mean +/- SD age 38 +/- 13 years) were

68 ted islets from pancreata of type 2 diabetic cadaveric donors (n = 14) and compared them with islets

69 pients of livers procured from heart-beating cadaveric donors (P=0.74, log-rank test).

70 rformed more transplantations of livers from cadaveric donors and more transplantations from living d

71 ultivated by using eyes harvested from adult cadaveric donors and were assessed by Northern blot anal

72 in diabetes, and islet transplantation from cadaveric donors can cure the disease.

73 ncreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) from cadaveric donors has become a widely accepted therapeuti

74 However, a scarcity of cadaveric donors has led to a critical shortage of organ

75 3) Do recipients of whole pancreata from cadaveric donors have twice the amount of insulin secret

76 Presently, cadaveric donors remain the sole source of pancreatic ti

77 infused with pancreatic islets from multiple cadaveric donors simultaneously receive immunosuppressiv

78 Islets from cadaveric donors were cultured in FPCM, CM, or two-dimen

79 ed in Italy, 108 of them with organs from 59 cadaveric donors with various risk of neoplasia.

80 easing rates of renal allograft failure from cadaveric donors, independent of renal function.

81 in adverse pathophysiologic effects in many cadaveric donors, resulting in cardiovascular instabilit

82 the donor pool include expanded criteria for cadaveric donors, such as older or sicker donors and so-

83 gand (CCL2) was observed in the pancreata of cadaveric donors, suggesting that beta-cells are prone t

84 from confirmed diabetic BTBR mice and human cadaveric donors, with increased EP3 expression, PGE2 pr

85 01 for the first time exceeded the number of cadaveric donors.

86 than for those recipients receiving standard cadaveric donors.

87 nsplants of islets isolated from two to four cadaveric donors.

88 ed a burden on the provision of corneas from cadaveric donors.

89 te antigen-typed allolimbal transplants from cadaveric donors.

90 Fifty consecutive liver transplants (47 cadaveric donors; 3 living donors) were analyzed.

91 d angiopathy following childhood exposure to cadaveric dura (by neurosurgical grafting in 2 patients

92 on of amyloid-beta seeds (prions) present in cadaveric dura and have diagnostic relevance for younger

93 Specimens from 49 cadaveric entheses were processed for histologic study,

94 s (SpA) with microanatomic studies of normal cadaveric entheses, with the aim of exploring the relati

95 on) on the surface of both porcine and human cadaveric epidermis.

96 We use cadaveric experiments and computational models to perfor

97 th ICL exposed were prepared from five human cadaveric eyes (donor ages, 69-84 years) and treated wit

98 Total RNA was isolated from TM of cadaveric eyes derived from donors with diagnosed glauco

99 re initiated from tissue isolated from human cadaveric eyes or trabeculectomy specimens.

100 Lastly, the use of cadaveric fascia lata as an alternative to polypropylene

101 al tape (n = 6), colposuspension (n = 1) and cadaveric fascia transvaginal sling (n = 1) procedure re

102 cho MR imaging of 48 lesser MTP joints of 12 cadaveric feet was performed.

103 In two cadaveric feet, the region of the lateral component of t

104 In one cadaveric femur, imaging and histologic analysis were pe

105 To test the proposed method, ten human cadaveric femurs with and without simulated defects were

106 tion in patients with RA corresponded to the cadaveric findings.

107 dy evaluates early and late risk factors for cadaveric graft loss in pediatric recipients.

108 ictors of renal allograft loss included HCV, cadaveric graft, PRA >20%, HLA mismatch > or =5, retrans

109 vely to 500 implantation biopsy specimens of cadaveric grafts, and death-censored graft survival was

110 rence between recipients of living donor and cadaveric grafts.

111 aft loss: age less than 6 months and reduced cadaveric grafts; and of patient loss: age less than 6 m

112 images of 22 wrists derived from fresh human cadaveric hands were obtained after tricompartmental art

113 sts rated artifacts on CT and MR images of a cadaveric head specimen with no grid, a conventional gri

114 ics board approval was not necessary because cadaveric hearts from individuals who donated their bodi

115 ensity and sprouting were also quantified in cadaveric hearts.

116 MR arthrographic images of 10 fresh human cadaveric hips were obtained by using a positioning devi

117 ARC overexpression increases IOP in perfused cadaveric human anterior segments resulting from a quali

118 Osteochondral cores from femoral condyles of cadaveric human donors were harvested.

119 cala tympani (P(ST)) at the basal cochlea in cadaveric human ears, and estimated hearing by the cochl

120 ysis was performed on tissues dissected from cadaveric human eyes.

121 Cadaveric human islet cells were encapsulated with algin

122 ed paclitaxel absorption and distribution in cadaveric human peripheral arteries.

123 cting third-party "vascular extenders" using cadaveric iliac vessels retrieved previously and preserv

124 The full potential of cadaveric islet transplantation will only be realized by

125 Here, we probed effects of Isx on human cadaveric islets and MIN6 pancreatic beta cells.

126 Pancreas transplantation and the infusion of cadaveric islets are currently implemented clinically, b

127 However, the dearth of cadaveric islets available for transplantation hampers t

128 lternative to pancreatic progenitor cells or cadaveric islets for the treatment of diabetes.

129 diabetes, the limited availability of human cadaveric islets for transplantation will preclude its w

130 ng differentiated hESCs as an alternative to cadaveric islets for treating patients with diabetes.

131 Adult cadaveric islets were transduced with doxycycline (Dox)-

132 ng lost beta-cell mass is transplantation of cadaveric islets; however, this approach is limited by l

133 nable to corneal transplantation using human cadaveric keratoplasty techniques.

134 Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive t

135 arable or increased compared with CRT if the cadaveric kidney donor is much younger or with fewer HLA

136 2002 and August 2004, 43 dialysis dependent cadaveric kidney recipients were enrolled into a study u

137 F) occurs in 15 to 25% (range, 10 to 62%) of cadaveric kidney transplant recipients and up to 9% of l

138 One had received a cadaveric kidney transplant, one a simultaneous kidney-p

139 renal disease patients who underwent either cadaveric kidney transplantation alone or simultaneous p

140 ts of only certain sets of patients awaiting cadaveric kidney transplantation unless ECDs dramaticall

141 Eleven patients underwent simultaneous cadaveric kidney transplantation.

142 sion analysis was conducted on 19246 primary cadaveric kidney transplants during 1995 to 1998.

143 short-term graft survival rate of pediatric cadaveric kidney transplants has significantly improved,

144 nine, we reviewed our database of almost 500 cadaveric kidney transplants.

145 no significant difference between living and cadaveric kidney transplants.

146 justment for age, race, and sex, receiving a cadaveric kidney, having an estimated glomerular filtrat

147 January 1994 to December 2002, 2,597 primary cadaveric kidney-alone transplants (donor age 5-45 years

148 The authors analyzed 202 cadaveric kidney-only recipients that underwent transpla

149 ntially wait 10 or more years for a suitable cadaveric kidney.

150 rom ambulatory blood pressure and receipt of cadaveric kidney.

151 The cohort consisted of all cadaveric kidneys (n= 3,444) with reported biopsy result

152 ce (CrCl) of both discarded and transplanted cadaveric kidneys and examined their effect on graft sur

153 2.0-4.0 mm) were randomly placed in 14 human cadaveric kidneys and scanned with a 16-detector CT scan

154 for kidney transplantation, more than 10% of cadaveric kidneys are discarded each year because of mar

155 abolomic profile of HMP perfusate from human cadaveric kidneys awaiting transplantation and to identi

156 matching as a priority for the allocation of cadaveric kidneys could reduce the existing racial imbal

157 servation has greatly facilitated the use of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation but damage occurs

158 st are the primary criteria used to allocate cadaveric kidneys for transplantation in the United Stat

159 Retrospective review of 14 cadaveric kidneys imported for repeat PP at our center a

160 Perfusate of 26 transplanted cadaveric kidneys was analyzed; 19(73%) with IGF and 7(2

161 equal to 5 years with 69 recipients of adult cadaveric kidneys.

162 the sole criterion for discarding recovered cadaveric kidneys.

163 Embalmed cadaveric knees were used for the study.

164 MATERIAL/METHODS: 20 human cadaveric L3 vertebrae were included in the study.

165 dactic lectures, participating in a hands-on cadaveric laboratory, and being provided an instructiona

166 stom-made device was designed to mount human cadaveric lenses, with the zonule, ciliary body, and scl

167 H and low-dose Tac to 40 adult recipients of cadaveric liver allografts between December 2001 and Apr

168 neutrophil infiltration after reperfusion of cadaveric liver allografts.

169 etitive repopulation experiments showed that cadaveric liver cells had a repopulation capacity simila

170 Cadaveric liver transplant recipients were enrolled from

171 tional biliary surgery and at our center for cadaveric liver transplant.

172 Both liver resection (LR) and cadaveric liver transplantation (CLT) are potentially cu

173 nfused with 30 mg alemtuzumab before primary cadaveric liver transplantation and maintained afterward

174 d Network for Organ Sharing on 50,306 adult, cadaveric liver transplantations performed in the United

175 lysis on data collected prospectively of 397 cadaveric liver transplants.

176 ing donor LDL/SBT an alternative to combined cadaveric liver-small bowel transplant.

177 A patient status-postorthotopic cadaveric-liver transplant, with an uncomplicated immedi

178 antation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation.

179 the comprehensive cost of LDLT with that of cadaveric-liver transplantation.

180 Prolonged waiting times for cadaveric livers, however, may lead to dropout from the

181 tation other than those from discarded human cadaveric livers.

182 nd long-term outcomes of patients undergoing cadaveric LT can be predicted using a scoring system bas

183 adjusting for potential confounders, DLT and cadaveric LT had a similar 5-year survival rate (59% vs

184 feasible and achieves equivalent results to cadaveric LT.

185 is more severe compared with the results of cadaveric LTx (CLTx), because the smaller sized graft in

186 Thirty-four samples of three cadaveric lumbar spines (from subjects who died at ages

187 Five cadaveric lumbar spines (mean age, 61 years +/- 11) were

188 uman small airways dissected from allogeneic cadaveric lungs.

189 ty of autologous grafts, infectious risks of cadaveric materials, and durability of synthetic substit

190 Five cadaveric (mean age, 86 years +/- 4) patellae were image

191 Ten human cadaveric menisci were imaged with high-spatial-resoluti

192 cutive contiguous group treated with porcine cadaveric mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction

193 (6.5% vs 23.8%; P < 0.049) than the porcine cadaveric mesh group (n = 42).

194 e analysis for infection identified: porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 2.82, length of stay odds rati

195 plications: drinker odds ratio 6.52, porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 4.03, African American odds ra

196 s ratio 1.11; and hernia recurrence: porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 5.18, drinker odds ratio 3.62,

197 in $9570.07 per case advantage over porcine cadaveric mesh.

198 solated from the livers of non-heart-beating cadaveric mice long after death and transplanted into fu

199 Cadaveric models currently provide the best value for tr

200 ese consisted of bench, virtual reality, and cadaveric models.

201 Biopsies were obtained from cadaveric (n=23) and living-related donor (LRD) (n=10) l

202 All children received cadaveric (n=53) or live donor (n=25) liver allografts w

203 ) matching and the development of GvHD after cadaveric OLT, we undertook a retrospective, single-cent

204 During the study period, 1522 adult cadaveric OLTs were performed, and 169 patients (13%) ha

205 50-patient, randomized, three-armed trial in cadaveric or human leukocyte antigen non-identical livin

206 pancreas donation in conjunction with either cadaveric or live donor renal transplant.

207 The frequency of DGF was evaluated in first cadaveric or living donor kidney allograft recipients (n

208 number of donor islets required from either cadaveric or living donors.

209 1,241 patients had received either a living, cadaveric, or combined kidney-pancreas transplant at our

210 ecimens from patients without TED as well as cadaveric orbital fat served as controls.

211 es the benefits and costs that accrue when a cadaveric organ donor is procured.

212 s obtained from pubertal and adult age group cadaveric organ donors were harvested and profiled using

213 A types on a series of 10,000 consecutive UK cadaveric organ donors.

214 favorable changes in metabolism, optimizing cadaveric organs before transplantation.

215 ys in 50 patients with HCC transplanted with cadaveric organs during the same time period (P = 0.0001

216 Despite the acute shortage of cadaveric organs for kidney transplantation, more than 1

217 Shortage of available cadaveric organs is a significant limiting factor in liv

218 The availability of cadaveric organs is the major problem in transplantation

219 Given the scarcity of cadaveric organs, efforts are intensifying to increase t

220 iver transplantation and a limited supply of cadaveric organs, there is renewed interest in the use o

221 38-year-old male who received a simultaneous cadaveric pancreas and live donor kidney transplant.

222 nsplant is the most common approach, using a cadaveric pancreas donation in conjunction with either c

223 ase 1 was a 27-year-old female who underwent cadaveric pancreas transplant 9 months after a successfu

224 marked beta-cells were rarely found in human cadaveric pancreases but were in the range of 0.2-0.5% i

225 eatitis studies in human acini isolated from cadaveric pancreata from organ donors.

226 urative approach are an inadequate supply of cadaveric pancreata, lifelong immunosuppression, and chr

227 transplantation is an insufficient supply of cadaveric pancreata.

228 In conclusion, human cadaveric pancreatic acini maintain physiological functi

229 Twenty human cadaveric patellae were evaluated by using ultrashort-TE

230 ly infused into coronary artery walls of six cadaveric pig hearts with MR monitoring and an MR imagin

231 re was locally infused into CBD walls of six cadaveric pigs using a microporous balloon catheter.

232 reatment, typically in childhood, with human cadaveric pituitary-derived growth hormone contaminated

233 based artificial tears (LBAT)-were tested in cadaveric porcine eyes imaged with hand-held spectral-do

234 Cadaveric porcine eyes were pressurized and stabilized f

235 Ten cadaveric porcine eyes with exposed corneal stroma and p

236 medial and lateral equatorial regions of 60 cadaveric porcine eyes.

237 Corneas were dissected from 90 cadaveric porcine eyes.

238 e, intraretinal, and subretinal maneuvers in cadaveric porcine eyes.

239 Control subjects (n = 10) performed 5 cadaveric porcine LCs each; VR-trained subjects (n = 10)

240 The cadaveric portion of this study was approved by the inst

241 able hepatocytes also could be isolated from cadaveric primate liver (monkey and human) efficiently.

242 Fresh cadaveric rabbit eyes with intact epithelium were left f

243 LDLT and cadaveric recipient costs include medical care 90 days p

244 institution were recorded for 24 LDLT and 43 cadaveric recipients with greater than 1 year follow-up

245 We retrospectively reviewed 145 cadaveric renal allograft recipients who received either

246 information that may aid in the selection of cadaveric renal allografts for transplantation.

247 his study is a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric renal allografts procured locally by our cente

248 8 human serum samples from patients awaiting cadaveric renal allotransplantation for reactivity again

249 ients who were administered no induction and cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients who were adm

250 risk factors for DGF in adult (age >/=16 yr) cadaveric renal transplant recipients by means of a mult

251 rical cohort study was conducted of US adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients from January 1, 19

252 ween January 2001 and January 2002, 58 adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomized to

253 ative Thymoglobulin administration, in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients, is associated wit

254 of Thymoglobulin induction therapy in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

255 s with chronic hepatitis C virus prohibiting cadaveric renal transplantation (CRT).

256 creased patient and allograft survival after cadaveric renal transplantation and that other factors b

257 reviewed to identify all patients undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States fro

258 hese bioflavonoids improve early outcomes in cadaveric renal transplantation, possibly through HO-1 i

259 r prolong delayed graft function (DGF) after cadaveric renal transplantation.

260 olate mofetil (CI-free regimen) in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation.

261 DGF) is frequently observed in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants.

262 Adult cadaveric renal-transplant recipients who received trans

263 ically strong enough to penetrate into human cadaveric sclera and that the drug coating rapidly disso

264 f diffusion were measured in strips of human cadaveric sclera for up to 1 week.

265 n, and DNA; inserted into nonpreserved human cadaveric sclera; and imaged.

266 Four fresh cadaveric shoulder specimens (two male subjects, 40 and

267 Histologic examination and US of the cadaveric shoulders demonstrated an articular-sided fibr

268 Cadaveric specimens demonstrated fatty infiltration from

269 ies of the inferior alveolar nerve have used cadaveric specimens in small patient groups.

270 CNRs in cadaveric specimens were higher for double R-R than for

271 Sagittal MR images of 49 human calcaneus cadaveric specimens were obtained (mean age of donors, 7

272 In cadaveric specimens, MRI and histologic measurements of

273 ion (CP) at the cochlear base of fresh human cadaveric specimens.

274 es obtained from corresponding regions in 40 cadaveric specimens.

275 instability have been described, and recent cadaveric studies are now guiding surgical interventions

276 ility and Accountability Act-compliant human cadaveric study was approved by the Department of Anatom

277 Clinical data on patients and cadaveric subjects were reviewed.

278 rozen pancreas samples were obtained from 45 cadaveric T1D donors with disease durations ranging from

279 Absence of a bare area was noted in cadaveric tissue at the periligamentous erosion-prone re

280 ndral cores were harvested from the knees of cadaveric tissue donors and from discarded fragments fro

281 The sites of cadaveric tissue microdamage corresponded to CT-determin

282 ion coefficients between living and embalmed cadaveric tissues were within 3% for the tissues investi

283 92,053) transplant patients, followed by the cadaveric transplant ($229,449) and dialysis ($250,348)

284 atients, followed by the dialysis ($73,730), cadaveric transplant ($70,369), and living-donor transpl

285 Total mean cadaveric transplant costs (pretransplant recipient care

286 age, diabetes, higher body mass index, and a cadaveric transplant donor.

287 living-donor, laparoscopic living-donor, and cadaveric transplant patients compared with the dialysis

288 alysis of a large and modern cohort of adult cadaveric transplant recipients with DGF, induction immu

289 risk of death for patients receiving a first cadaveric transplant versus all patients on dialysis lis

290 ibodies (PRA), were more likely to receive a cadaveric transplant, and were more likely to develop de

291 g-donor transplant, living-donor transplant, cadaveric transplant, or dialysis patients.

292 m recurrence are comparable to results after cadaveric transplant.

293 rcent did not meet criteria for receipt of a cadaveric transplant; cancer, retransplantation, and acu

294 c donor nephrectomy compared with living and cadaveric transplantation and continued dialysis.

295 LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluati

296 omprehensive cost of LDLT is 21% higher than cadaveric transplantation, although this difference is n

297 ntional open donor nephrectomy procedure and cadaveric transplantation, and it provides considerable

298 dney transplants, higher PRA, and to receive cadaveric transplants.

299 In this study, cadaveric VOCs were collected from the decomposition hea

300 Many patients on the cadaveric waiting list have a prospective live kidney do