戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 assess the financial risks they accept under capitation.
2 ntives to eliminate capacity and move toward capitation.
3  We begin by reviewing the basic concepts of capitation.
4     For primary care, most IPAs used monthly capitation adjusted for patient age, sex, and selected d
5                                              Capitation adjustment based on demographic measures perf
6  it discusses physicians'-perceptions of how capitation affects their practice.
7 influence the behavior of physicians through capitation and utilization review, the major health plan
8 ded adjusted fee-for-service, referral-based capitation, and blends of both.
9 , varies by specialty, practice setting, and capitation, and therefore may increase with current tren
10  practices, those who received revenues from capitation, and those who served as gatekeepers for thei
11         We provide a blueprint for analyzing capitation arrangements.
12 based Payments for Primary Care (3PC), a new capitation-based primary care payment system, in 2016.
13 ons than those with little or no income from capitation (both P<.001).
14 paper discusses the basic issues involved in capitation contracting for pediatricians.
15 ertise in utilization management, and global capitation contracts with health insurance entities.
16 are more specific than common terms, such as capitation, fee for service, global payment, and cost re
17 rivate finance initiative; and the change to capitation funding streams, which allows the substitutio
18                             Managed care and capitation have placed new responsibilities on primary c
19 that includes a discussion of the effects of capitation, how preventive care can be cost effective, a
20 s that blend elements of fee-for-service and capitation in innovative ways for primary care and speci
21  models of remuneration (fee for service and capitation), less is known about pay for performance and
22 om a point-of-service managed care plan to a capitation payment plan.
23 -based purchasing, and with population-based capitation payment to catalyse coordinated care.
24 rotect vulnerable patients by risk-adjusting capitation payments and by focusing resources on care fo
25  managed care has had little experience with capitation payments for chronically ill patients, who co
26 be meeting its intended goal by aligning the capitation payments to the health care burden of the ind
27                                              Capitation places a large share of responsibility for QA
28 ity imaging services were provided under the capitation plan with financial savings by the employer.
29                                    Under the capitation plan, nonemergent outpatient diagnostic imagi
30                     Without risk adjustment, capitation rates are likely to overpay or underpay physi
31 Medicare diagnosis-related-group payment and capitation reimbursement, can also be effective in conta
32 cians with at least 30% of their income from capitation requested 38% more and were asked to provide
33                                       Annual capitation revenues grew from $190 million to $2.1 billi
34                        National expansion of capitation should be accompanied by efforts to ensure th
35    Under certain conditions, conversion to a capitation system for imaging can lead to improved quali
36 yment based in large part on empanelment and capitation to improve outcomes and accountability, suppl
37 care providers (PCPs) as gatekeepers, use of capitation to pay PCPs, and whether the plans themselves
38 ntly about caring for patients covered under capitation vs those covered through more traditional for
39 result from financial incentives inherent in capitation, while the focus on preventive services may s
40                                              Capitation will be the reimbursement mechanism to health
41 ods blending elements of fee-for-service and capitation will outperform exclusive reliance on either