ライフサイエンスコーパス: carbon sequestration

1 for inshore carbon cycling and (potentially) carbon sequestration.

2 y changes towards management of farmland for carbon sequestration.

3 for carbonate mineral formation in geologic carbon sequestration.

4 predictions of the long-term trend of global carbon sequestration.

5 osystem services such as food production and carbon sequestration.

6 est community biodiversity, composition, and carbon sequestration.

7 ion, flood mitigation, habitat provision and carbon sequestration.

8 tudied in situ, with relevance to geological carbon sequestration.

9 leakage of CO2 through caprocks in geologic carbon sequestration.

10 of plant residue and organic manure to soil carbon sequestration.

11 hese ecosystems through nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration.

12 tly in arid lands, thus may be important for carbon sequestration.

13 nderstanding of SIC dynamics and its role in carbon sequestration.

14 equipped with postcombustion CO2 capture for carbon sequestration.

15 a soil amendment is a potential strategy for carbon sequestration.

16 t be partially offset by increased ecosystem carbon sequestration.

17 p toward the safe implementation of geologic carbon sequestration.

18 nderestimated their contribution to European carbon sequestration.

19 ral important ecological functions including carbon sequestration.

20 te magnesium carbonates can result in stable carbon sequestration.

21 ons, including land-atmosphere feedbacks and carbon sequestration.

22 al shelves could become sites of significant carbon sequestration.

23 attractive repository for permanent geologic carbon sequestration.

24 mental safety and the efficacy of geological carbon sequestration.

25 rest species, and climate regulation through carbon sequestration.

26 major risk factor to the success of geologic carbon sequestration.

27 g, gas exchange, biological productivity and carbon sequestration.

28 reduce ecosystem productivity and associated carbon sequestration.

29 licy-making on risk associated with geologic carbon sequestration.

30 potentially reduce emissions and/or increase carbon sequestration.

31 ion for coastal cities, nutrient removal and carbon sequestration.

32 ally also on rates of primary production and carbon sequestration.

33 which land-use regimes optimize or increase carbon sequestration.

34 ble for massive nutrient transfer and global carbon sequestration.

35 ntion has been paid to the microbial role in carbon sequestration.

36 , in turn stimulating ocean productivity and carbon sequestration.

37 which regulates both root function and soil carbon sequestration.

38 agriculture, ecosystem restoration, and soil-carbon sequestration.

39 ystems are an important sink for terrestrial carbon sequestration.

40 composition, and ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration.

41 as water purification, flood mitigation, or carbon sequestration.

42 forestation attenuate global warming through carbon sequestration.

43 nking flux of this new production results in carbon sequestration.

44 s important as these are hotspots of genuine carbon sequestration.

45 d also a sink of CO(2) exchange and helps in carbon sequestration.

46 nomics of biochar production and atmospheric carbon sequestration.

47 Ocean is the prevailing explanation for this carbon sequestration.

48 f ecosystem services including high rates of carbon sequestration.

49 damental regulator of ocean productivity and carbon sequestration.

50 cascading ecological effects and impacts on carbon sequestration.

51 gly recognised as an important ecosystem for carbon sequestration.

52 f the senescent and dead diatoms helps drive carbon sequestration.

53 on of coastal vegetated ecosystems to global carbon sequestration.

54 etermines rates of biomass turnover and soil carbon sequestration.

55 the potential for even greater quantities of carbon sequestration.

56 from plant pathology and forest ecology, to carbon sequestration.

57 can have direct implications for atmospheric carbon sequestration.

58 ry production, thus limiting the increase of carbon sequestration.

59 ir blooms contributing disproportionately to carbon sequestration(1), and most phytoplankton producti

60 on reactions have important consequences for carbon sequestration: (1) CO(2) absorption by swelling c

61 nfish [+9.4 million Canadian dollars (CA$)], carbon sequestration (+2.2 million CA$), and ecotourism

62 on stocks not only directly through enhanced carbon sequestration (62 GtC by 2100) but also indirectl

63 n woody vegetation may be enhanced ecosystem carbon sequestration, although the responses of arid and

64 The annual carbon sequestration amount in surface soils reached 10.

65 ser (CG, Utah, USA), an established geologic carbon sequestration analogue, provides high volumes of

66 tmospheric CO(2) concentrations through soil carbon sequestration and afforestation; reducing predict

67 Tropical rainforests play important roles in carbon sequestration and are hot spots for biodiversity.

68 e potential for negative emissions from soil carbon sequestration and biochar addition to land, and a

69 Results indicate that soil carbon sequestration and biochar have useful negative em

70 zation of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and s

71 Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under

72 e show that despite BECCS offering twice the carbon sequestration and bioenergy per unit biomass, BEB

73 he Populus-specific genes are candidates for carbon sequestration and biofuel research.

74 are of disproportionate importance to global carbon sequestration and carbon storage.

75 agricultural techniques, and better predict carbon sequestration and climate change.

76 rock formations considered for both geologic carbon sequestration and CO(2)-enhanced oil recovery ope

77 eadows, key ecosystems supporting fisheries, carbon sequestration and coastal protection, are globall

78 These results challenge our view of carbon sequestration and dissolution rates in the subsur

79 feedbacks will improve models of terrestrial carbon sequestration and ecosystem services.

80 Their cell sizes impact carbon sequestration and energy transfer to higher troph

81 t are also essential to our understanding of carbon sequestration and exchange with the world ocean--

82 ht and precipitation leads to lower rates of carbon sequestration and favors broad-leaved deciduous t

83 ecosystem structure and function (declining carbon sequestration and forest stature).

84 These include the global public good of carbon sequestration and local and national level contri

85 otoassimilate into mannitol and glycerol for carbon sequestration and osmolyte production appear to d

86 t) contribute to plant growth, productivity, carbon sequestration and phytoremediation.

87 valuable insights linking nitrogen inputs to carbon sequestration and remobilization in terrestrial e

88 tain biochars are safe and benign for use as carbon sequestration and soil amendment.

89 concerns in the context of global change for carbon sequestration and soil health.

90 ntives designed to increase the provision of carbon sequestration and species conservation across het

91 ed with the maximum feasible combinations of carbon sequestration and species conservation on the lan

92 vation payment policies produce increases in carbon sequestration and species conservation that appro

93 e Basin, Oregon, we compare the provision of carbon sequestration and species conservation under five

94 ms in mitigating climate change by promoting carbon sequestration and storage and by buffering agains

95 ulomonas spp., a process that was coupled to carbon sequestration and storage in a curdlan-type biofi

96 ng biochar production are not compensated by carbon sequestration and that briquette making is labor-

97 Soil carbon sequestration and the conservation of existing so

98 understanding of plant root effects on soil carbon sequestration and the sensitivity of SOC stocks t

99 ved in many important soil processes such as carbon sequestration and the solubility of plant nutrien

100 cean that can enhance ocean productivity and carbon sequestration and thus influence atmospheric carb

101 ily increase water supply, but does increase carbon sequestration and timber production.

102 evelop best management practices to maximize carbon sequestration and to minimize soil CO(2) emission

103 ncy of the BCP can significantly alter ocean carbon sequestration and, thus, atmospheric CO(2) and cl

104 terms of mitigating global warning (through carbon sequestration) and as a strategy to manage soil p

105 try activities exerted the highest impact on carbon sequestration, and also showed the largest increa

106 idual trapping, and safe-storage in geologic carbon sequestration, and currently is the factor impart

107 carcinogenics) linked to energy recovery and carbon sequestration, and environmental impacts worse th

108 oles of giant panda nature reserves (NRs) in carbon sequestration, and explore the co-benefits of hab

109 atersheds are primary sources of freshwater, carbon sequestration, and other ecosystem services.

110 ause they increase vegetative cover, enhance carbon sequestration, and reduce dust to other countries

111 ests such as water provision, flood control, carbon sequestration, and sources of livelihood for rura

112 T-P-X conditions likely to be encountered in carbon sequestration applications.

113 ns of disease transmission, and processes of carbon sequestration are all altered by changes in speci

114 Limitations of soil carbon sequestration as a NET centre around issues of si

115 while grazing does decrease potential future carbon sequestration as a result of lower NEP, it does n

116 are sensitive to the timing of emissions and carbon sequestration as well as the time horizon over wh

117 1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment.

118 agricultural land and their significance for carbon sequestration at a global level, along with recen

119 The rate of carbon sequestration at some mine sites appears to be li

120 onal carbon uptake did not lead to increased carbon sequestration at the ecosystem level.

121 oach that could enhance our understanding of carbon sequestration at the whole plant level and provid

122 ecosystem processes such as productivity or carbon sequestration because of diversity change and com

123 ime particle fluxes and fuels more efficient carbon sequestration because of low remineralization dur

124 aralleled contributions to peatland ecology, carbon sequestration, biogeochemistry, microbiome resear

125 on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody

126 well-known for their ecological functions in carbon sequestration, but complete carbon budgets that i

127 at terrestrial ecosystems can be managed for carbon sequestration, but it is not certain to what exte

128 reased use of farm inputs and increased soil carbon sequestration, but it might also exacerbate emiss

129 rsion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quan

130 doubles the previous estimates of deep-ocean carbon sequestration by biological processes in the Nort

131 assessments of management effects on future carbon sequestration by forests in other locations.

132 Results indicate that in situ carbon sequestration by greenery varied moderately acros

133 change which can release carbon stocks, and, carbon sequestration by in situ vegetation.

134 ed to be a major mechanism facilitating soil carbon sequestration by increasing carbon inputs to soil

135 Carbon sequestration by land ecosystems across the regio

136 Carbon sequestration by sediments and vegetated marine s

137 The efficiency of carbon sequestration by the biological pump could declin

138 annually, and there is potential to increase carbon sequestration capacity by ~20% (-187.7 million me

139 Grazing exclusion did not increase carbon sequestration capacity for this alpine grassland

140 global change has affected food security and carbon sequestration capacity in China.

141 d productivity which could negatively affect carbon sequestration capacity of Northern Hemisphere (NH

142 CO(2) emissions and the potential to enhance carbon sequestration capacity on productive forestland.

143 vegetation feedbacks of nutrient addition on carbon sequestration capacity, we investigated vegetatio

144 t tropospheric ozone may not diminish forest carbon sequestration capacity.

145 In geologic carbon sequestration, capillary pressure (Pc)-saturation

146 .70) or Class C (R(50) < 0.50) recalcitrance/carbon sequestration classes.

147 In geologic carbon sequestration, CO(2) is injected into geologic re

148 al assessments that forest regrowth and peak carbon sequestration coincided with European arrival.

149 Carbon sequestration could further increase under modera

150 Enhanced soil carbon sequestration could offset only a small part of t

151 olicies aimed at increasing the provision of carbon sequestration do not necessarily increase species

152 thern Ocean, which played a critical role in carbon sequestration during glacial times.

153 as been implicated as the likely location of carbon sequestration during Pleistocene glaciations.

154 generated much concern, driving the ongoing carbon sequestration effort.

155 sing MapBiomas 3.1 and recently refined IPCC carbon sequestration estimates, we mapped the age and ex

156 Carbon sequestration experiments were conducted on uncem

157 Northwest National Laboratory led a geologic carbon sequestration field demonstration where ~1000 ton

158 be particularly significant in key areas for carbon sequestration, fisheries, and marine conservation

159 and power production is an option to achieve carbon sequestration for cities relying on biomass-fuell

160 The importance of managing land to optimize carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation is wi

161 nities and the critical ecosystem service of carbon sequestration for mitigating climate change.

162 Carbon sequestration from large sources of fossil fuel c

163 ime has the potential to efficiently enhance carbon sequestration from the atmosphere with a rate as

164 Estimates of potential carbon sequestration from tree (15) N recovery amounted

165 ng thermal, hydrological, water quality, and carbon sequestration functions, were predicted by the fo

166 r-brine interactions in a simulated geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) environment at 100 atm of CO(

167 Sub-surface activity such as geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) has the potential to contamin

168 Geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) in deep saline aquifers resul

169 lved CO2 for leakage detection at a geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) site.

170 a major risk factor associated with geologic carbon sequestration (GCS).

171 bonate mineral precipitation during geologic carbon sequestration (GCS).

172 supercritical (sc) CO2 following geological carbon sequestration (GCS).

173 eyburn-Midale, Bass Islands, and Grand Ronde carbon sequestration geologic formations.

174 creasing total impacts on bird diversity and carbon sequestration globally, despite a reduction of la

175 olubility in brine at conditions relevant to carbon sequestration (i.e., high temperature, pressure,

176 ts taken at other nearby sites, we find that carbon sequestration in above-ground biomass may have of

177 lighted the importance of crop management on carbon sequestration in agricultural lands.

178 n, thus pointing out that the role of FSa in carbon sequestration in agricultural soils at a global s

179 which contributed an estimated 43% of total carbon sequestration in all of China's cropland on just

180 work in which to comprehensively assess soil carbon sequestration in biochars.

181 It appears that carbon sequestration in diverse and structurally complex

182 An unparalleled interval of carbon sequestration in Earth's history occurred during

183 oxide and ozone will impact productivity and carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems.

184 tion, and atmospheric pollutants will impact carbon sequestration in forested ecosystems.

185 one and methane concentrations and enhancing carbon sequestration in forests.

186 of land use and land use change (LULUC) and carbon sequestration in grasslands.

187 loyed in ex situ reactors or during geologic carbon sequestration in magnesium-rich formations.

188 ased watershed land management, that aims at carbon sequestration in mitigating climate change while

189 This time lag caused net ecosystem carbon sequestration in previously warmed ecosystems to

190 Carbon sequestration in recovering forests is estimated

191 particles (NPs) under conditions specific to carbon sequestration in saline aquifers.

192 forests are disproportionately important to carbon sequestration in semiarid climates where low elev

193 s the first step toward implementing in situ carbon sequestration in serpentinite mine tailings via m

194 The implications of these results for carbon sequestration in soils as a climate change mitiga

195 undant plant symbiont and a major pathway of carbon sequestration in soils.

196 inued and strong potential for enhanced soil carbon sequestration in some ecosystems to mitigate incr

197 off between bioenergy production and biochar carbon sequestration in Stockholm's context is dominated

198 such fungi contribute to soil structure and carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems.

199 uld alter productivity, marine food webs and carbon sequestration in the Arctic Ocean.

200 reases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and net carbon sequestration in the biosphere have the potential

201 ponsible for over a quarter of total organic carbon sequestration in the California Current and other

202 rface risks associated with commercial-scale carbon sequestration in the Kevin Dome, Montana.

203 The contribution of DOC to the carbon sequestration in the North Atlantic Ocean (62 Tg-

204 Linking microbial metabolomics and carbon sequestration in the ocean via refractory organic

205 and they play an important role in mediating carbon sequestration in the ocean.

206 tribute to efficient chemical weathering and carbon sequestration in the Southeast Asian islands.

207 s the main process for long-term atmospheric carbon sequestration in vegetation.

208 eakage can be eliminated by supplying forest carbon sequestration incentives to non-Annex I countries

209 ng to a lack of accommodation space and that carbon sequestration increases according to the vertical

210 major role in global primary production and carbon sequestration into the deep ocean.

211 iverse as the dynamics of disease, wildfire, carbon sequestration, invasive species, and biogeochemic

212 ce in ecosystem services of water supply and carbon sequestration is expected to intensify under high

213 We highlight that the major potential for carbon sequestration is in cropland soils, especially th

214 ce because of higher food costs after forest carbon sequestration is promoted at a global scale.

215 the R(50), for assessing biochar quality for carbon sequestration is proposed.

216 om unconventional oil and gas development or carbon sequestration is subsurface fluid leakage in the

217 e episodic disturbances on long-term on-site carbon sequestration is unclear.

218 than previously thought and thus its role in carbon sequestration may also be underestimated.

219 The implementation of soil carbon sequestration measures requires a diverse set of

220 ossible that increasing crop albedo and soil carbon sequestration might contribute towards mitigation

221 ies to scavengers; altered disease dynamics; carbon sequestration; modified stream morphology; and cr

222 h can have detrimental consequences for soil carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate p

223 backbone of important soil functions (e.g., carbon sequestration, nutrient and contaminant storage,

224 uctivity of AM fungi, thereby modifying soil carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and host plant su

225 ing future patterns of primary productivity, carbon sequestration, nutrient fluxes to aquatic systems

226 The negative effects of N saturation on carbon sequestration occurred primarily in temperate for

227 d land-use change, there is a small foregone carbon sequestration of 0.2-0.4 Pg CO(2)-e by natural fo

228 e, such as temperature anomalies, on NEE and carbon sequestration of ecosystems at interannual timesc

229 toral and silvopastoral systems can increase carbon sequestration, offset greenhouse gas (GHG) emissi

230 s the capacity to alter our understanding of carbon sequestration on a global scale.

231 rather than in biogas, offering yet another carbon sequestration opportunity during biosolids handli

232 ated assessment models do not represent soil carbon sequestration or biochar.

233 (2) amplitude is attributed to reductions in carbon sequestration over North America associated with

234 f tremendous relevance to biomineralization, carbon sequestration, paleogeochemistry, and the vulnera

235 h and seagrass) sustain the highest rates of carbon sequestration per unit area of all natural system

236 ecosystem services, including potential for carbon sequestration, pollination potential and groundwa

237 ystem functions--specifically decomposition, carbon sequestration, pollination, pest control and cult

238 cted SOC dynamics indicated that the average carbon sequestration potential across the entire region

239 in order to estimate the future soil organic carbon sequestration potential and related ecosystem ser

240 effectiveness of NT depends not only on its carbon sequestration potential but also on soil-derived

241 metric tons of stored carbon and will reduce carbon sequestration potential by 5,734-7,241 metric ton

242 Class A and Class C biochars would have carbon sequestration potential comparable to soot/graphi

243 rates geographical and climatic variation in carbon sequestration potential during forest regrowth.

244 Terrestrial carbon sequestration potential is widely considered as a

245 Consequently, ESMs overestimated the carbon sequestration potential of soils by a factor of n

246 blooms elsewhere and consequently the biotic carbon sequestration potential of the entire ocean.

247 an increase in the estimated global biochar carbon sequestration potential to over 2.6 Gt CO(2)-C(eq

248 et, more importantly, due to its much higher carbon sequestration potential, AM-enriched biochar faci

249 ll wall polymer lignin affect plant fitness, carbon sequestration potential, and agro-industrial proc

250 for these forests, possibly further limiting carbon sequestration potential.

251 eas Class B biochars would have intermediate carbon sequestration potential.

252 for improving estimates of secondary forest carbon sequestration potential.

253 in biochar production can increase biochar's carbon sequestration potential; by up to 45% in this stu

254 cal recalcitrance, density and porosity) and carbon sequestration potentials of PyC materials formed

255 formed at the highest temperatures had lower carbon sequestration potentials than most slow-pyrolysis

256 analogues for each other to infer respective carbon sequestration potentials, production conditions,

257 n status, crop yield gap, and the associated carbon-sequestration potentials, as well as the provisio

258 Sustainable soil carbon sequestration practices need to be rapidly scaled

259 al forest growth and expansion are important carbon sequestration processes globally.

260 g of unconventional reservoirs, and geologic carbon sequestration produces a complex geochemical sett

261 (e.g., aeolian transport) for biochar-based carbon sequestration programs.

262 ions for the Illinois Basin-Decatur Geologic Carbon Sequestration Project.

263 ar facilitates viable biochar deployment for carbon sequestration purposes with reduced need to rely

264 rature, biogenic magnesite precipitation for carbon sequestration purposes.

265 Research on geologic carbon sequestration raises questions about potential im

266 on using the water chemistry data produced a carbon sequestration rate of 33.34 t of C/ha per year.

267 creased soil OM accumulation, accretion, and carbon sequestration rates even with modest levels of sa

268 Fluid composition was monitored to determine carbon sequestration rates.

269 Subsidizing afforestation for carbon sequestration reduced crop cover and increased na

270 dress climate change and soil degradation by carbon sequestration, reducing soil-borne greenhouse-gas

271 Groups providing decomposition and carbon sequestration remain relatively stable, as fewer

272 arbon-nitrogen feedback safeguards ecosystem carbon sequestration remains unclear.

273 er conservation, ecosystem productivity, and carbon sequestration represent important components of f

274 Geologic carbon sequestration represents a promising option for c

275 Terrestrial carbon sequestration represents an important option for

276 Unintended release of CO(2) from carbon sequestration reservoirs poses a well-recognized

277 Assessments of carbon sequestration resources that have been made for N

278 and when productivity exceeds decomposition, carbon sequestration results.

279 echnologies (GGRTs); one such GGRT uses soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in agricultural land.

280 ticle, we explore two CDR technologies: soil carbon sequestration (SCS), and carbon capture and stora

281 ential CO2 leakage into shallow sediments at carbon sequestration sites.

282 environmental impacts of As mobilization at carbon sequestration sites.

283 osystem services, including food production, carbon sequestration, soil retention, sandstorm preventi

284 Novel carbon sequestration strategies such as large-scale land

285 ial to their successful deployment as a soil carbon sequestration strategy.

286 res, and ionic strengths typical of geologic carbon sequestration systems.

287 has resulted in its production and use as a carbon sequestration technique (biochar).

288 st worldwide for its potential use as both a carbon sequestration technique and soil amendment.

289 soils are widely recognized to be capable of carbon sequestration that contributes to mitigating CO2

290 loor is biophysically unique and the site of carbon sequestration, the benthos, faces less anthropoge

291 o accelerate natural geological processes of carbon sequestration through application of crushed sili

292 urial in marine sediments more strongly than carbon sequestration through silicate weathering.

293 may serve to maximize biomass production and carbon sequestration, thus merging calls to conserve evo

294 indicate that the sensitivity of terrestrial carbon sequestration to mean annual temperature (T) brea

295 In this case, the positive effects of carbon sequestration to the soil and the economic value

296 munity resistance to drought via stimulating carbon sequestration, whereas neither daytime nor nightt

297 ndicate that the trajectory of this region's carbon sequestration will be sensitive to reduced or del

298 project that decadal semiarid montane forest carbon sequestration will remain relatively stable in th

299 n United States to extrapolate the status of carbon sequestration within a framework of projected war

300 of reservoirs are pressure limited, geologic carbon sequestration would require approximately twice t