ライフサイエンスコーパス: cardiologist

1 gy and critical care medicine ("dual-boarded cardiologists").

2 ith reduced ejection fraction diagnosed by a cardiologist.

3 CU admissions were treated by a dual-boarded cardiologist.

4 by a cardiac physiologist and/or consultant cardiologist.

5 ased management for both the patient and the cardiologist.

6 otocols were adopted by only 42% of surveyed cardiologist.

7 m the perspective of the consulting clinical cardiologist.

8 soon be relevant for the clinical pediatric cardiologist.

9 erformance for the practicing interventional cardiologist.

10 toring, which are relevant to the practicing cardiologist.

11 r GCs, 50 GCs from other specialties, and 23 cardiologists.

12 d 200 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 100 cardiologists.

13 nical trials were available for all academic cardiologists.

14 ote and support the training of dual-boarded cardiologists.

15 rdiac ICU admissions treated by dual-boarded cardiologists.

16 independent, blinded gastroenterologists and cardiologists.

17 propriate TTEs ordered by attending academic cardiologists.

18 ing of outpatient TTEs by attending academic cardiologists.

19 nts were independently adjudicated by masked cardiologists.

20 and alterations to the training pathway for cardiologists.

21 ions independently classified by experienced cardiologists.

22 enced physiologists and confirmed by trained cardiologists.

23 be managed by or with the assistance of ACHD cardiologists.

24 h were retrospectively assigned by 2 blinded cardiologists.

25 e accuracy performance level of professional cardiologists.

26 rization were seen among patients treated by cardiologists.

27 as not discussed with any patients by 71% of cardiologists.

28 adulthood and come to the attention of adult cardiologists.

29 epresent a challenge for rheumatologists and cardiologists.

30 ialists, infectious disease specialists, and cardiologists.

31 final diagnosis adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists.

32 composed of six independent oncologists and cardiologists.

33 r use of genetic testing of patients seen by cardiologists.

34 nts to consider regarding best practices for cardiologists.

35 gh diagnostic performance similar to that of cardiologists.

36 asting >=6 minutes was adjudicated by senior cardiologists.

37 evidence-based medications than low ordering cardiologists.

38 l diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists.

39 for the DNN (0.837) exceeded that of average cardiologists (0.780).

40 mplication causes (relative risk for general cardiologists: 1.10 [1.05-1.15]; thoracic surgeons: 1.16

41 iologists: 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]; general cardiologists: 1.13 [1.08-1.18]; thoracic surgeons: 1.20

42 plications (relative risk for interventional cardiologists: 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]; general cardiol

43 related complications (14.1%; interventional cardiologists, 15.3%; general cardiologists, 15.4%; thor

44 interventional cardiologists, 15.3%; general cardiologists, 15.4%; thoracic surgeons, 16.4%; other sp

45 Among 473 dual-boarded cardiologists, 16 (3.4%) were women; 468 (99%) and 85 (1

46 (electrophysiologists, 16.7%; interventional cardiologists, 17.0%; general cardiologists, 18.0%; thor

47 interventional cardiologists, 17.0%; general cardiologists, 18.0%; thoracic surgeons, 18.4%; other sp

48 using a standardized data collection form, 3 cardiologists (2 interventional, H.S.G. and D.S.M.; 1 no

49 ition of categories of early career academic cardiologists; 2) general challenges to all categories a

50 Overall, 98 dual-boarded cardiologists (21%) submitted 1,215 total claims for cri

51 CI, 24.2%-25.3%] for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists; 36.1% [95% CI, 34.3%-38.0%] for thoracic

52 767 included patients, 17% were evaluated by cardiologists, 58% were evaluated by PCPs alone, and 25%

53 (9.2% versus 10.6%; P<0.001) and weakest for cardiologists (6.4% versus 6.7%; P=0.485).

54 aculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% of all US cardiologists), 630 (16.5%) were women.

55 fessional Life Survey was completed by 2,313 cardiologists: 964 women (42%) and 1,349 men (58%).

56 es pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital cardiologists, a cardiac care associate, and a fellow-in

57 iographic examination, reviewed by an expert cardiologist, according to 2012 World Heart Federation c

58 the AC/PC Council, which includes pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital cardiologists, a cardiac

59 g a comprehensive, contemporary cohort of US cardiologists after adjustment for several factors that

60 The cardiologist agreed with the computer interpretation in

61 itivity to confidently rule-out AMI, whereas cardiologists aim to minimize false-positive results.

62 Interventional cardiologists also reported beliefs for study patients w

63 SMR lower by 0.70 percentage points), having cardiologists always on site (lower by 0.54 percentage p

64 This paper summarizes a discussion between a cardiologist and an internist about how each clinician w

65 ose of this study is to update the perinatal cardiologist and obstetrical care provider on the presen

66 and postdischarge collaborative care with a cardiologist and primary care physician (AMI and CHF coh

67 a, we tested associations between density of cardiologists and 30-day and 1-year mortality for each c

68 Twenty-one cardiologists and 66 of their outpatients 18 years and o

69 of patients for cardiac surgery, surveys of cardiologists and analysis of market share data indicate

70 believe that by utilizing these parameters, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be offered a bet

71 es were reviewed by a team of interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons within 72 hours of an

72 s, and endocrinologists, in conjunction with cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons.

73 as confirmed by 2 experienced interventional cardiologists and categorized as type 1 (multiple lumen)

74 nd worsening HF hospitalizations assessed by cardiologists and did not result in a significant change

75 xposed personnel included 218 interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists (168 males; 46+/-

76 ient participation and collaboration between cardiologists and gastroenterologists.

77 is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mort

78 s and Relevance: Close collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists is required to meet the de

79 opportunity for closer collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists to study the cardiovascula

80 terms of race, ethnicity, age, and sex, many cardiologists and other health care providers are unawar

81 However, cardiologists and other specialists often encounter urge

82 ted with cardiomyopathy as a resource to aid cardiologists and others in the recognition and diagnosi

83 and the tools that will be made available to cardiologists and others treating cardiovascular disease

84 IV-infected patients is a challenge for both cardiologists and physicians involved in HIV care.

85 The authors randomized cardiologists and primary care providers to receive eith

86 l intervention on outpatient TTE ordering by cardiologists and primary care providers.

87 Both surgeons and interventionalists (cardiologists and radiologists) are involved in endovasc

88 intended to bridge the knowledge gap between cardiologists and regenerative nanomedicine experts.

89 the relationship between regional density of cardiologists and risk of death after hospitalization fo

90 results were shared at meetings attended by cardiologists and sonographers.

91 ures demand increasing collaboration between cardiologists and surgeons in order to achieve optimal o

92 C) ratings among a broad range of practicing cardiologists and the AUC Technical Panel.

93 ents with implantations performed by general cardiologists and thoracic surgeons were at higher risk

94 fession regarding the plight of early career cardiologists and to suggest possible solutions.

95 Association class III or IV, confirmed by a cardiologist, and a significant LVEF drop, or death of d

96 es available to the pediatric interventional cardiologist, and to review the outcomes from past endea

97 (2) change in market share for hospitals and cardiologists, and (3) proportion of physicians leaving

98 rships between primary care physicians,adult cardiologists, and ACHD specialists to provide optimal c

99 ialists, including non-invasive and invasive cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons), who carefully judg

100 2.4%, and 67.0% for primary care physicians, cardiologists, and electrophysiologists, respectively; P

101 ltidisciplinary teams of interventionalists, cardiologists, and geneticists in tertiary centers with

102 o practice in academic centers, be pediatric cardiologists, and have a noninvasive subspecialty.

103 sting healthcare quality accreditation, more cardiologists, and private ownership were associated wit

104 be feasible to improve TTE utilization among cardiologists, and this type of intervention warrants st

105 between pharmacist and primary care provider/cardiologist; and (4) 2 types of voice messaging (educat

106 device diagnostic evaluations by nurses and cardiologists; and (2) selected decisional trees.

107 Dual-boarded cardiologists appear to deliver a small proportion of al

108 Cardiologists are distributed unevenly across regions of

109 Interventional cardiologists are increasingly exposed to radiation-indu

110 hildren with Kawasaki disease grow up, adult cardiologists are likely to see increasing numbers of th

111 Interventional cardiologists are occupationally exposed to high doses o

112 Given that most female cardiologists are pregnant at some point during their ca

113 Although cardiologists are the primary source of referral of pati

114 espiratory function has long been applied by cardiologists as a measure of function that depended pri

115 exercise present distinct challenges to the cardiologist asked to evaluate athletes.

116 Early cardiologist assessment and assistance with triage was e

117 Interventional cardiologists at 2 cardiac catheterization laboratories

118 We examined the quality performance of 351 cardiologists at 48 hospitals in New York State, using p

119 ssor of Medicine, University of Sydney and a Cardiologist, at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, all based

120 up of 15 centers (the ANGELS of AF centers), cardiologists attending to follow-up visits were supplie

121 Never before have cardiologists been faced with so many choices of stent,

122 Patients' and cardiologists' beliefs about benefits of PCI.

123 Cardiologists' beliefs about PCI reflect trial results,

124 For the scenarios, 63% of cardiologists believed that the benefits of PCI were lim

125 ms as analyzed by independent interventional cardiologists blinded for clinical data.

126 diagnoses were adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists blinded to copeptin results.

127 ter discharge were independently assessed by cardiologists blinded to the baseline observations.

128 f aneurysms and coronary artery disease by 2 cardiologists blinded to the history.

129 Scans were performed by experienced nuclear cardiologists blinded to the subjects' cohort assignment

130 ve of myocardial infarction by 2 independent cardiologists by 2 1 method required the presence of cor

131 eview by electrophysiologists, heart failure cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and cardiovascular nurs

132 Two cardiologists centrally adjudicated the final diagnosis

133 ging experts, MV surgeons and interventional cardiologists, clinical trial specialists and statistici

134 ibe the working activities and pay of female cardiologists compared with their male colleagues and to

135 Interventional cardiologists consider both clinical and genetic factors

136 GCs feel more confident than cardiologists counseling about VUS results (P<0.001); wh

137 Early career academic cardiologists currently face unprecedented challenges th

138 A blinded survey of cardiologists demonstrated that many of the discriminati

139 It is therefore critical for cardiologists, diabetologists, nephrologists, and primar

140 The cardiologist disagreed with the computer interpretation

141 Here, 2 cardiologists discuss the risks and benefits of screenin

142 We defined density as the number of cardiologists divided by population aged>/=65 years with

143 performed at the discretion of the invasive cardiologist during cardiac catheterization.

144 research that we identify include paediatric cardiologist education, parental distress, socioeconomic

145 a multidisciplinary group of interventional cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and cardiac surgeon

146 ute heart failure and included heart failure cardiologists, emergency physicians, laboratory medicine

147 Results: Of the 66 cardiologists enrolled in the study, 65 were included in

148 ew cardiovascular subspecialist, the genetic cardiologist, equipped with these combined skills, to pe

149 AMI and HF in regions with a low density of cardiologists experienced modestly higher 30-day and 1-y

150 (P<0.001); while both cardiovascular GCs and cardiologists feel more confident than other GCs in prov

151 After adjustment, cardiologist follow-up was associated with significantly

152 ther evaluated by a blinded, board-certified cardiologist for agreement or disagreement with the inte

153 ecommended by the catheterization laboratory cardiologist for patients undergoing catheterization wit

154 Older athletes will approach clinical cardiologists for advice regarding their fitness for par

155 Before AUC publication, 85 cardiologists from 10 U.S. institutions assessed the app

156 Data regarding cardiologists from 161 U.S. practices were included, and

157 gories: electrophysiologists, interventional cardiologists, general cardiologists, thoracic surgeons,

158 f systemic hypertension, it is important for cardiologists, general practitioners and other physician

159 Patients of high ordering cardiologists had greater odds of all-cause mortality at

160 Although cardiologists have long treated patients with coronary a

161 known whether patients in regions with fewer cardiologists have worse outcomes after hospitalization

162 that combines expertise from interventional cardiologists, heart failure specialists, cardiac surgeo

163 geons, interventional and non-interventional cardiologists, imaging specialists, neurologists, geriat

164 A survey of New York cardiologists in 1996 found that these report cards had

165 one-third of patients followed routinely by cardiologists in clinic have suboptimally controlled BP,

166 Catheterization laboratory cardiologists in hospitals with PCI capability were more

167 We surveyed cardiologists in New York State in 2011 to determine the

168 ss of cardiac surgeon report cards, in 2011, cardiologists in New York State made little use of this

169 tionnaire was administered to interventional cardiologists in NYS with specific emphasis on how modif

170 th at least 1 visit to 1 of 35 Ontario-based cardiologists in the EchoWISELY randomized clinical tria

171 Patients of cardiologists in the top ordering tertile of rarely appr

172 Dopamine was preferentially selected by cardiologists, in the Southern United States, at nonteac

173 is 10-year period, the number of claims from cardiologists increased 44% (from 2082-2997 per 1000 ben

174 The majority of interventional cardiologists indicated that the exclusion of patients w

175 docarditis team, including cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, infectious diseases specialists, neurolog

176 e, nurturing the development of early-career cardiologists interested in global health is essential t

177 scular Exchange Database, a new resource for cardiologists interested in pursuing short-term clinical

178 amples of board-certified, clinically active cardiologists, internists, and endocrinologists to recei

179 y was to assess how general and subspecialty cardiologists, internists, gastroenterologists, and orth

180 n is increasingly performed by intensivists, cardiologists, interventional radiologists, and related

181 cal history or family history, referral to a cardiologist is indicated.

182 e clinical practice of multiple sonographers/cardiologists is associated independently with DMR survi

183 ew era in collaboration between surgeons and cardiologists is discussed and the potential role of the

184 ased risk and require long-term follow-up by cardiologists knowledgeable about management issues in t

185 fit automatic ECG data analysis by providing cardiologist level accuracy and robust compatibility wit

186 warrant adequate understanding by practicing cardiologists: long QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polym

187 ular or noncardiovascular by a panel of WISE cardiologists masked to angiographic data.

188 Although some assume that a cardiologist may instinctively cultivate some of these s

189 Cardiologists may also refer women to evidence-based com

190 Critical care cardiologists may be uniquely positioned to treat the nu

191 ce of pregnancy and early parenthood for all cardiologists may secure the best possible candidates to

192 cancer therapy, the team of oncologists and cardiologists must be better equipped with an evidence-b

193 There were 122 responses, the majority from cardiologists (n=85, 70%) and nurse or transplant coordi

194 Cardiologists need to understand emerging payment models

195 Cardiologists need to understand the risks and therapeut

196 It is becoming clear that the cardiologist needs both to consider T2DM in cardiovascul

197 a proposed collaborative care model bridging cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and prim

198 id having the angiogram by an interventional cardiologist (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval,

199 pected to fulfil the dream of interventional cardiologists of a transient scaffold that would disappe

200 Therefore, cardiologists of today have to be familiar not only with

201 Image quality was assessed by two cardiologists on a four-point scale.

202 vascular disease (P<0.01), prescription by a cardiologist or nonprimary care provider (P<0.01), stati

203 tiary centers were more often consulted by a cardiologist (OR, 8.6 [5.0-15]), had an echocardiography

204 nch block, definite STEMI (according to both cardiologists) or an ambiguous reading.

205 Most of the growth in services provided by cardiologists over the past decade is the result of incr

206 d among cardiology trainees and early-career cardiologists over the past decade.

207 Only 22% of PCPs and 42% of cardiologists (p = 0.0477) felt extremely well prepared

208 was ~$200 lower when cared for by ACOs with cardiologist participation (compared with those without)

209 012 to 392 in 2015), the proportion with any cardiologist participation remained stable (from 80% in

210 Care receipt in an ACO with cardiologist participation was associated with an additi

211 neficiaries, those cared for by ACOs without cardiologist participation were associated with a spendi

212 and quality across ACOs were conditional on cardiologist participation.

213 Rates of these outcomes did not vary by cardiologist participation.

214 Early payment reforms were voluntary and cardiologists' participation is variable.

215 ential confounding between physician groups (cardiologist, PCP, or none).

216 sease (ACHD) care, as perceived by pediatric cardiologists (PCs).

217 se mix (11%, 15%, and 18%) and the number of cardiologists per capita (12%, 14%, and 15%).

218 ing payment and delivery reforms that affect cardiologists, present 4 emerging examples, and consider

219 g the development process from radiologists, cardiologists, primary care physicians, and other stakeh

220 This statement is directed toward pediatric cardiologists, primary care providers, and subspecialist

221 of the genotype-positive family members, the cardiologist queries a database for current knowledge on

222 The cardiologists rated 256 (64%) of 400 nuclear stress test

223 Interventional cardiologists receive one of the highest levels of annua

224 The influence of the report cards on cardiologists' referral decisions was limited, with 25%

225 These findings help surgeons and cardiologists refine the indications, timing, prognostic

226 mber of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular

227 sts that the status of early-career academic cardiologists remains challenging; therefore, the author

228 an intervention is successful with attending cardiologists remains unknown.

229 All cardiologists reported beliefs about PCI for patients in

230 referral decisions was limited, with 25% of cardiologists reporting a moderate or substantial influe

231 The mean age of cardiologists reporting moderate or substantial influenc

232 Services provided by cardiologists represent a major portion of Medicare expe

233 ere included in the analysis (1 intervention cardiologist retired from practice during the study).

234 Two core laboratory cardiologists reviewed presenting ECGs to identify left

235 -year), of which 273 (18%) were submitted to cardiologists' reviews during the second period (P<0.001

236 -year), of which 376 (33%) were submitted to cardiologists' reviews, compared with, 1522 alerts in 56

237 The supervising cardiologist (S.C.) made a management plan based on CA (

238 sensitivity of the DNN exceeded the average cardiologist sensitivity for all rhythm classes.

239 clinical genetic test results modify the way cardiologists should approach and manage affected patien

240 Cardiologists should be aware of this special subset of

241 Interventional cardiologists should be committed to optimal stent choic

242 with an outpatient visit to 1 of 35 eligible cardiologists, stratified into 3 ordering tertiles.

243 labels validated by trained personnel under cardiologist supervision.

244 nsus committee of board-certified practicing cardiologists, the DNN achieved an average area under th

245 fixed at the average specificity achieved by cardiologists, the sensitivity of the DNN exceeded the a

246 e on the family planning decisions of female cardiologists, the Women in Cardiology section of the Am

247 An interventional cardiologist then measured FFR in all patent coronary ar

248 gists, interventional cardiologists, general cardiologists, thoracic surgeons, and other specialties.

249 diagram in any RCT to enable the practicing cardiologist to interpret how the results should influen

250 b-Saharan Africa (SSA) lack a single trained cardiologist to provide basic cardiac care.

251 Pharmacists were trained by a cardiologist to pulse palpate, record, and interpret a s

252 ice, this could potentially allow practicing cardiologists to accurately assess the severity of coron

253 it is the method used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery

254 Thus, it is important for practicing cardiologists to be knowledgeable about the diagnosis, p

255 It is an invitation to action for cardiologists to become familiar with this emerging subs

256 on the morphofunctional phenotypes, allowing cardiologists to conveniently group them in broad descri

257 ortant, our study found a notable failure by cardiologists to correctly recognize which of their pati

258 the ethical principles that should obligate cardiologists to discuss and use outcomes data, when ava

259 ty for collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists to improve the care of oncology patients r

260 ors expanding quickly, the time has come for cardiologists to work closely with cancer specialists to

261 It calls on clinicians, researchers, and cardiologists to work with other healthcare providers, c

262 s was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including

263 s was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including

264 s was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including

265 d end points, reported by investigators (all cardiologists) using specific case report form pages, in

266 ith dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage and more cardiologist visits after discharge and who participated

267 ), and cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient cardiologist visits after discharge.

268 en and patients with diabetes, those who had cardiologist visits, and among those taking statins.

269 for chest pain in Ontario, follow-up with a cardiologist was associated with a decreased risk of all

270 The interventional cardiologist was blinded to the DE-CMR results.

271 tery disease, the catheterization laboratory cardiologist was the final source of recommendation for

272 Consensus classification by 2 cardiologists was considered the operational gold standa

273 he latter group, both the patients and their cardiologist were unaware of the findings on FFR.

274 In a pilot cluster-randomized study, cardiologists were assigned to receive versus not receiv

275 Almost all (94%) cardiologists were aware of report cards of cardiac surg

276 teristics of a national sample of practicing cardiologists were described according to sex.

277 Cardiologists were more likely than cardiac GCs to recom

278 of the cardiology division were included; 66 cardiologists were randomized.

279 system was developed to automatically notify cardiologists when patients presented to the emergency d

280 h low-risk defects can be managed by general cardiologist,whereas those with more complex defects sho

281 Patients with CAD seen by cardiologist who ordered a high rate of rarely appropria

282 esults were reviewed by a blinded panel of 3 cardiologists who adjudicated the outcome of Chagas card

283 distributed to genetic counselors (GCs) and cardiologists who have seen at least one patient for inh

284 Of cardiologists who identified no benefit of PCI in 2 scen

285 tive was to investigate practice patterns of cardiologists who order a high frequency of low-value tr

286 Fewer cardiologists who reported moderate or substantial influ

287 Cardiologists who take primary responsibility for cardia

288 Early-career academic cardiologists, who many believe are an important compone

289 oexisting heart diseases, expert advice from cardiologists will improve clinical outcome.

290 Interventional cardiologists will require dedicated training in the spe

291 rs, a cardiac surgeon, and an interventional cardiologist with TAVR experience was conducted on April

292 This presents cardiologists with a cohort of patients for whom the ris

293 ntiplatelet drugs, and to provide practicing cardiologists with an updated instrument to guide their

294 s' characteristics and compared dual-boarded cardiologists with and without active board certificatio

295 ialists, MV cardiac surgeons, interventional cardiologists with expertise in structural heart disease

296 Among 3810 cardiologists with faculty appointments in 2014 (13.3% o

297 We identified all US cardiologists with medical school faculty appointments i

298 Images were compared qualitatively by three cardiologists with regard to diagnostic value, presence

299 Compared to dual-boarded cardiologists without active board certification in crit

300 ation for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiologists Working Groups for Cardiac Imaging and Car