戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n productivity and other indirect costs (eg, caregiver burden).
2 e (for example decreased quality of life and caregiver burden).
3 ining interventions and strategies to reduce caregiver burden.
4  group returned to work quicker and had less caregiver burden.
5 by slowing functional decline and decreasing caregiver burden.
6 hysicians have a responsibility to recognize caregiver burden.
7 er, including patients' knowledge, mood, and caregiver burden.
8  QOL, and patient satisfaction, with reduced caregiver burden.
9 ut significantly increased indirect costs or caregiver burden.
10 nce limitations on morbidity, mortality, and caregiver burden.
11 cision makers and interventions to alleviate caregiver burden.
12 dherence to medication, self-management, and caregiver burden.
13 nal ability and pain were related to partner caregiver burden.
14 t quality of life, institutionalization, and caregiver burden.
15 and significantly impact quality of life and caregiver burden.
16 ontinence, resulting in substantial informal caregiver burden.
17 n and anxiety symptoms, quality of life, and caregiver burden.
18 functional decline, poor prognosis, and high caregiver burden.
19 al and psychological symptoms, survival, and caregiver burden.
20 tion of care have resulted in an epidemic of caregiver burden.
21 l health (12-item Short-Form Health Survey), caregiver burden (12-item Zarit Burden Interview) and st
22          We examined the association between caregiver burden, a common stressor, and risk of epithel
23  d, 0.26 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.51]), and lower caregiver burden (AMD in BIZA-D score, -0.59 [95% CI, -0
24 logical outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and caregiver burden among 150 caregivers of patients with e
25                             Risk factors for caregiver burden among caregivers of older trauma patien
26 2-month caregiver burden and between 3-month caregiver burden and 12-month PICS were not observed (PI
27 ten go unrecognised despite being related to caregiver burden and a decreased participation in societ
28 tant factor associated with a higher risk of caregiver burden and a reduction in QoL in terms of ener
29  shown mild to modest efficacy in mitigating caregiver burden and associated manifestations of caregi
30 sociations between 3-month PICS and 12-month caregiver burden and between 3-month caregiver burden an
31 with greater morbidity and mortality, higher caregiver burden and burnout, high risk of nursing home
32 eased life satisfaction after adjustment for caregiver burden and demographic and medical variables f
33 evelop and evaluate interventions to improve caregiver burden and outcomes for the patient-caregiver
34 d to develop supportive programs that reduce caregiver burden and rates of institutionalization for c
35 aregiver HR-QoL, satisfaction with care, and caregiver burden and reduced hospital readmissions at 6
36               This should include a focus on caregiver burden and the predictable tensions that careg
37 ers independently reported on their sense of caregiver burden and their supportiveness toward the pat
38 lity of life, and neuropsychiatric symptoms; caregiver burden and well-being.
39 uses high morbidity, is associated with high caregiver burden, and can result in considerable health-
40 pairment, higher service utilization, higher caregiver burden, and increased mortality.
41 dies are needed to quantify anxiety, stress, caregiver burden, and posttraumatic stress disorder outc
42 les, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, caregiver burden, and social problem-solving abilities w
43     Effective interventions to reduce family caregiver burden are poorly understood but family caregi
44          Health-care costs and, importantly, caregiver burden, are also reported to be higher in deme
45 y, depression, fear of cancer recurrence and caregiver burden, as well as symptoms of fatigue, pain,
46          Many studies showed improvements in caregiver burden-associated symptoms (eg, mood, coping,
47 mographics, psychosocial characteristics and caregiver burden at 2 months posttransplant, and HRQOL a
48    The associations between patient PICS and caregiver burden at 3 and 12 months were examined using
49                                     PICS and caregiver burden at 3-month follow-up was positively ass
50  was significant covariance between PICS and caregiver burden at each time point.
51 7.45; 95% CI, -11.08 to -3.81; P < .001) and caregiver burden (b = -0.50; 95% CI, -1.09 to 0.08; P =
52                             Quality of life, caregiver burden, behavioral and psychological symptoms
53 symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]), caregiver burden (Berlin Inventory of Caregivers' Burden
54 beta = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.88; P < .001; caregiver burden: beta = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.82; P <
55 n and 12-month PICS were not observed (PICS->caregiver burden: beta = 0.82; 95% CI, -0.02 to 1.66; P
56 quality of life (QOL; Caregiver QOL survey), caregiver burden (Caregiver Reaction Assessment), self-e
57                  When considering decreasing caregiver burden, case management, psychoeducation, and
58 cancer (HNC), there is limited literature on caregiver burden (CGB) and its evolution over treatment.
59 improvement in cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and depression in the meth
60  also improved cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and depression.
61                                              Caregiver burden, characterized by psychological distres
62                                              Caregiver burden, collected using the brief 12-item Queb
63 ses and female caregivers experience greater caregiver burden, distress, increased rates of depressio
64     When the demands of caregiving result in caregiver burden, ED returns can ensue.
65 imer disease, is associated with significant caregiver burden, excess disability, increased medical c
66          Practical assessment strategies for caregiver burden exist to evaluate caregivers, their car
67 titude, and experiences) of palliative care, caregiver burden, family function, patient quality of li
68 ety, improving quality of life, and reducing caregiver burden for informal caregivers of people with
69 beta = 0.82; 95% CI, -0.02 to 1.66; P = .09; caregiver burden-&gt;PICS: beta = 0.00; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.
70                  Few interventions targeting caregiver burden have been empirically evaluated, with t
71 ody dementia, such as autonomic symptoms and caregiver burden, have not been investigated, nor have t
72 er self-efficacy and preparedness may reduce caregiver burden in geriatric trauma.
73              Evidence was weak for improving caregiver burdens in cancer and was absent for heart fai
74 NPI]), caregiver burden (Berlin Inventory of Caregivers' Burden in Dementia [BIZA-D]), health-related
75                             Risk factors for caregiver burden include female sex, low educational att
76 -"Emotional impacts, adopting new roles, and caregiver burden; Influence of gender roles; Adaptation,
77 a-analyses to summarize the effectiveness of caregiver burden interventions were identified by search
78 er scores indicating greater impairment] and Caregiver Burden Inventory [score range, 0-96, with high
79 significant difference in age at visit or in Caregiver Burden Inventory score.
80 ween post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and caregiver burden is crucial for optimal care of patients
81                                              Caregiver burden is frequently overlooked by clinicians.
82 in patient health status are associated with caregiver burden is unknown.
83                                     Although caregiver burden is well described in chronic illness, f
84  (eg, mood, coping, self-efficacy) even when caregiver burden itself was minimally improved.
85                         The findings suggest caregiver burden may be associated with ED revisits with
86 that persons with these conditions with high caregiver burden may experience a greater widowhood effe
87                                              Caregiver burden may result from providing care for pati
88 he Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; caregiver burden, measured with the Caregiver Burden Que
89       There were significant improvements in caregiver burden, mental health, and depression after po
90 dividual circumstances and contexts in which caregiver burden occurs.
91 iving were more likely to experience greater caregiver burden (odds ratio [OR], 7.79; 95% CI, 2.54-23
92  by demonstrating the longitudinal impact of caregiver burden on ED use in older adults.
93  at delaying placement, such as reduction of caregiver burden or difficult patient behaviors, need to
94 did not differ significantly in 11-week QOL, caregiver burden, or PTSD symptoms.
95 icantly in QoL measures and reported reduced caregiver burden (P=.008).
96                                      Greater caregiver burden predicted poorer caregiver HRQOL in sev
97                                Outcomes were caregiver burden, quality of life, and depression.
98 onnaire; caregiver burden, measured with the Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure; emerge
99 tio of means = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15), and caregiver burden (ratio of means = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.
100                                          The caregiver burden scale did not differ between groups eit
101 ported burden at 6 months, measured with the caregivers burden scale (CBS).
102 r caregivers resulted in a small benefit for caregiver burden (standardized mean difference, -0.24 [9
103 quality of life, knowledge and satisfaction, caregiver burden, time tradeoffs, and out-of-pocket cost
104 ers of older trauma patients experience high caregiver burden up to 3 months after the patients' disc
105                                              Caregiver burden was assessed using the Oberst Caregivin
106                                              Caregiver burden was assessed using the Zarit Burden Int
107 ong women who provided care outside of work, caregiver burden was categorized by time spent caregivin
108                                         High caregiver burden was defined by a score of 17 or higher
109                                              Caregiver burden was evaluated with the 19-item Social S
110                                      Partner caregiver burden was related to lower levels of partner
111                                     PICS and caregiver burden were assessed at 3 months and 12 months
112 ivors and their caregivers, patient PICS and caregiver burden were associated at concurrent time poin
113  social risk factors and adverse outcomes of caregiver burden were reviewed.
114 f-efficacy, preparedness for caregiving, and caregiver burden were tested via mixed-effect logistic r
115  0-96, with higher scores indicating greater caregiver burden]) were included.
116 e of people with dementia living at home and caregiver burden (when available).
117            For families, predictors included caregiver burden, worse self-reported health, working ou
118    No significant difference was observed in caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview score, 1.19 [95
119 ife in Alzheimer Disease Scale [QOL-AD]) and caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview) between the in
120 y (Clinical Global Impressions Scale [CGI]), caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Scale), and depression (C

 
Page Top