ライフサイエンスコーパス: caregiving

1 endations that address a national agenda for caregiving.

2 but not with more global aspects of observed caregiving.

3 e a prerequisite of sensitive and responsive caregiving.

4 pragmatics of care and the emotional toll of caregiving.

5 pendently inversely correlated with paternal caregiving.

6 alth care utilization, and need for informal caregiving.

7 These caregivers expressed no positives in caregiving.

8 re other-focused, and not highly burdened by caregiving.

9 t temperament, but was partially mediated by caregiving.

10 b stress, marital unhappiness, and burden of caregiving.

11 nces for intergenerational relationships and caregiving.

12 graphical implications for intergenerational caregiving.

13 or reduce employment owing to the demands of caregiving.

14 tions in joint endeavors to coordinate their caregiving.

15 care needs, and engaged in higher-intensity caregiving.

16 performance, social cognition, and maternal caregiving.

17 ding vetted information on heart failure and caregiving.

18 ith information on household expenditure and caregiving.

19 its applicability to the domain of parental caregiving.

20 to create appropriate care plans to support caregiving.

21 Four-year mortality, based on level of caregiving: (1) spouse not disabled; (2) spouse disabled

22 at baseline, answered questions on informal caregiving; 1,700 incident breast cancer cases accrued o

23 ribed medications (beta = 0.521, p = 0.007), caregiving 8 to 16 h (beta = 0.396, p = 0.027) or more t

24 at an elevated risk of experiencing multiple caregiving abuses, including physical maltreatment, high

25 urred more often in females, those without a caregiving adult in the household, and individuals with

26 oth "indiscriminate friendliness" toward non-caregiving adults and altered amygdala development.

27 rences in neurobiological outcomes following caregiving adversity, indicating that these pathways are

28 MCS caregiving affects QoL for both patients and caregivers.

29 Family caregiving after critical illness has been associated wi

30 nd supporting family caregivers during their caregiving and after the death of the patient.

31 feel anxious and excluded from their child's caregiving and decision-making.

32 Cross-sectional analyses of caregiving and endogenous sex steroid hormones were also

33 to examine the relationship between years of caregiving and FMD.

34 tudy, we found that positive and supervisory caregiving and food security at home are associated with

35 promoting action on positive and supervisory caregiving and food security at home are likely to suppo

36 They described mixed emotions about caregiving and had difficulty accepting that their partn

37 Previous studies of caregiving and inflammation have generally used small co

38 d synthesize the literature on the impact of caregiving and intervention strategies for supporting ca

39 The association between caregiving and mortality among women invited to particip

40 h depressive symptoms lead to high levels of caregiving and should examine whether successful treatme

41 e effects on the hippocampus are mediated by caregiving and stressful life events suggest that attemp

42 Here we discuss how caregiving and the accompanying experiential and hormona

43 rd and motivation system--predicted paternal caregiving and was negatively related to testes volume.

44 rishment, disability, isolation, relocation, caregiving, and bereavement-contributes to physiological

45 prolonged distress, the physical demands of caregiving, and biological vulnerabilities of older care

46 en caregiver self-efficacy, preparedness for caregiving, and caregiver burden were tested via mixed-e

47 , nutrition, security and safety, responsive caregiving, and early learning.

48 including close relationships, professional caregiving, and group-based emotions.

49 with previous literature on race and family caregiving, and indicate that cultural values regarding

50 mptoms, decreased caregiver preparedness for caregiving, and lower patient quality of life were assoc

51 rance, comorbidities, health literacy, adult caregiving, and perceived discrimination).

52 d by health, nutrition, learning, responsive caregiving, and security and safety.

53 ources, Educating about practical aspects of caregiving, and Supporting caregivers through bereavemen

54 children have least access to individualised caregiving, and when deprivation coincides with early de

55 or the education of mothers about responsive caregiving, appear to be effective in reducing maternal

56 Caregivers who report strain associated with caregiving are more likely to die than noncaregiving con

57 his is consistent with conceptualizations of caregiving as a dynamic, learning process in humans.

58 Caregiving as chronic stress exposure is the conceptual

59 care for >=15 hours per week, 42% described caregiving as moderately to extremely stressful.

60 quality, social support, and level of unmet caregiving assistance needs were better for participants

61 Caregiving associated with depressive symptoms in elderl

62 essed the prediction from maternal sensitive caregiving at 6 mo and levels of attachment disorganizat

63 are emitted by many mammal species to elicit caregiving attention.

64 Maternal sensitivity and the quality of caregiving behavior are likely determined by the respons

65 ome vagal cardiac tone) associated with male caregiving behavior may allow males to both nurture and

66 ement and mentalization, as well as specific caregiving behavior toward the child.

67 Research has examined which caregiving behaviors support the frequency of behavioral

68 teract with the systems involved in maternal caregiving behaviors, mother-infant interactions are hig

69 etter understanding of variation in parental caregiving behaviour and its potential for modulation by

70 trition) had significantly better responsive caregiving behaviours at 4 years of child age than those

71 ucation were both associated with protective caregiving behaviours, including vitamin A capsule recei

72 ose kin to gain indirect fitness or to learn caregiving behaviours.

73 rticipants also reported significantly lower caregiving burden (11.2 v 12.3, P = .023), depression (3

74 atio [PR] = 1.79, 95%CI: 1.07, 3.01), higher caregiving burden (PR = 1.06, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.08) and bet

75 his report describes a case that exemplifies caregiving burden and discusses the importance of identi

76 regiver burden was assessed using the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale, which measures time on task (OC

77 ble participants with elevated depression or caregiving burden were included and randomized to 1 of 1

78 transplantation (HSCT) struggle with immense caregiving burden, leading to substantial quality of lif

79 These caregivers reported significant caregiving burden.

80 ole for Oxytocin (OT) in mediating sensitive caregiving but no study has examined the relationship be

81 Caregiving by nonparents (alloparenting) and fathers is

82 gs demonstrate the centrality of synchronous caregiving, by which infants practice the detection and

83 Caregiving can also be extremely stressful, and many car

84 Caregiving can impose substantial physical, mental, and

85 eded by a protracted and stressful period of caregiving, caregivers reported considerable relief at t

86 reported sociodemographic, psychosocial, and caregiving characteristics; cancer characteristics were

87 Caregiver characteristics, caregiving circumstances, negative consequences, support

88 ces represent violations of species-expected caregiving conditions, thereby imposing challenges to th

89 light the importance of the stability of the caregiving context and the critical need to ensure that

90 How caregiving contributes to human hippocampal developmenta

91 and included a specific valuation of women's caregiving contributions.

92 of caregiving hours, and the average annual caregiving cost per case (assuming an average hourly wag

93 Informal caregiving costs are substantial and should be considere

94 he same time, it should be acknowledged that caregiving could affect the carer negatively and cause e

95 mental health status, intrafamily conflict, caregiving demands, and financial hardship.

96 no racial difference in negative aspects of caregiving, depression, or anxiety.

97 care recipient, higher number of hours spent caregiving, depression, social isolation, financial stre

98 Stress from caregiving did not appear to increase breast cancer risk

99 ental and physical health upon transition to caregiving did not differ by gender.

100 g other than for exercise, volunteering, and caregiving did not differ significantly across the activ

101 e parent's disorder and help with associated caregiving difficulties.

102 severe deprivation early in life, we tracked caregiving disruptions across childhood; assessed pubert

103 ormal mediation model indicated that greater caregiving disruptions during childhood predicted greate

104 By documenting the impact of caregiving disruptions on pubertal development and ultim

105 ection holds greater significance for female caregiving due to its heightened activity during natural

106 nts (N=80) of standardized case scenarios of caregiving dyads.

107 g whether randomized placement into a family caregiving environment alters development of the autonom

108 evidence for a causal link between the early caregiving environment and stress response system reacti

109 ates the influence of social context and the caregiving environment and suggests that the relation be

110 e symptomatic than girls regardless of their caregiving environment and, unlike girls, had no reducti

111 A stable caregiving environment early in life is essential for ch

112 The caregiving environment had a medium effect size of 0.3 f

113 e an important time in development where the caregiving environment has a substantial impact on the H

114 The authors assessed the quality of the caregiving environment through maternal reports and inte

115 The quality of the caregiving environment was the strongest independent pre

116 stitutional rearing is considered an adverse caregiving environment, but few studies have systematica

117 bly because maternal depression disrupts the caregiving environment.

118 y compared the developmental outcomes in and caregiving environments provided to children by depresse

119 with significantly higher levels of informal caregiving, even after the effects of major coexisting c

120 Furthermore, caregiving exacerbated these disparities across SGM subg

121 iation in the P1 of the VEP at 6 months, yet caregiving experience do explain variation in the P1 amp

122 established that personality influences the caregiving experience, carer well-being and outcomes suc

123 to attenuate the stress associated with the caregiving experience.

124 Caregiving experiences also explain variation in childre

125 ndings describe how mother's brain varies by caregiving experiences and gives salience to moments of

126 The interview questions centered on family caregiving experiences and on how these caregivers made

127 We find no associations between caregiving experiences and variation in the P1 of the VE

128 pecify mechanisms of brain malleability with caregiving experiences in human fathers.

129 We also examine whether children's caregiving experiences prior to the neuro-cognitive asse

130 roviding experimental evidence that positive caregiving experiences protect against the stress-sensit

131 ng older persons varies as a function of the caregiving experiences that precede the death.

132 entia can be encouraged toward more positive caregiving experiences through empathy-building interven

133 le with dementia describe a wide spectrum of caregiving experiences, from very negative to very posit

134 ity and to be shaped by previous and current caregiving experiences, maternal and infant stimuli and

135 h the maternal brain, and its sensitivity to caregiving experiences.

136 udy of individuals subjected to nonnormative caregiving experiences.

137 bility shaped by biological dispositions and caregiving experiences; yet the mechanisms sustaining ma

138 mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers), and primary-caregiving

139 To determine whether a chronic stressor (caregiving for a spouse with a progressive dementia) is

140 L-6 production in 119 men and women who were caregiving for a spouse with dementia and 106 noncaregiv

141 ch demonstrating the psychological burden of caregiving for advanced cancer patients, limited informa

142 Caregiving for disabled individuals among Neanderthals h

143 nce, time, and cost associated with informal caregiving for elderly cancer patients.

144 e weekly hours and imputed costs of informal caregiving for elderly people with no depressive symptom

145 eural and molecular consequences of paternal caregiving for offspring are becoming increasingly appar

146 ional time and cost associated with informal caregiving for older Americans with depressive symptoms.

147 19.3%), peer mentoring (18.9%), and children caregiving for parents (8.3%).

148 were to examine risk factors associated with caregiving for patients with advanced cancer, evaluate t

149 ed post partum, could enhance the quality of caregiving for the child through better clinical care fo

150 gy and behavior emphasize the brain basis of caregiving for the cross-generation transmission of huma

151 Burden of caregiving for this type of patient is particularly seve

152 Whereas the adjusted probability of informal caregiving for those respondents reporting NC and CNT wa

153 k of access to care, specifically beneficial caregiving from friends, relatives, and adult children.

154 had more negative appraisals of illness and caregiving, greater uncertainty, and more hopelessness c

155 P =.005), while the strained and nonstrained caregiving groups did not show significant weight change

156 ost people adjusted to the task demands, MCS caregiving had a significant impact, both positive and n

157 ssness, and negative appraisal of illness or caregiving had detrimental effects.

158 Across the animal kingdom, paternal caregiving has been found to be a highly malleable pheno

159 ging to study in humans, however, and family caregiving has been identified as one type of stressful

160 Although family caregiving has been intensively studied in the past deca

161 Family caregiving has been proposed as chronic stress that may

162 subcortical structures that support maternal caregiving have evolved into a global network of parenta

163 The pathophysiological consequences of caregiving have not been fully elucidated.

164 m of the hidden curriculum--it can symbolize caregiving hierarchies and spheres of practice, the soci

165 caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers), and primary-caregiving homosexual fathers (PC-Fathers) rearing infan

166 High numbers of caregiving hours and self-reported stress did not predic

167 eived more than twice the number of informal caregiving hours per week (P < 0.001), at an annual cost

168 tion, perceived income, care partner burden, caregiving hours per week and the presence of a secondar

169 informal care, the average weekly number of caregiving hours, and the average annual caregiving cost

170 ctivities of daily living), and (2) informal caregiving (hours of caregiving provided by a primary in

171 psychological and physical health effects of caregiving, identified caregivers at risk for adverse ou

172 Caregiving impacts QoL of MCS patients and their caregiv

173 cial, health, and well-being implications of caregiving in HF; (3) evaluate HF caregiving interventio

174 were not evident for more generic aspects of caregiving in this urban sample of 76 postpartum mothers

175 mbers of fathers that are involved in direct caregiving in Western societies.

176 rends Study and the linked National Study of Caregiving included data on 2811 family and unpaid careg

177 d, and childhood) and also between places of caregiving (including households and communities, outpat

178 This 1999-2004 US study examined caregiving intensity and 2-year change in performance-ba

179 Caregiving intensity status and physical performance sco

180 es were stratified by age group, gender, and caregiving intensity.

181 cations of caregiving in HF; (3) evaluate HF caregiving interventions to support caregiver and patien

182 Just as adequate caregiving is a potent effector of brain development, so

183 ngs and challenge the widespread belief that caregiving is a substantial risk factor for increased in

184 e results suggest that the chronic stress of caregiving is associated with impaired endothelial funct

185 The impact of caregiving is highly variable, driven largely by the int

186 serious and life-threatening illness, family caregiving is typically at the core of what sustains pat

187 If caregivers' well-being is compromised by caregiving, it may bode poorly for transplant recipients

188 patient, caregiver-patient relationship, and caregiving itself, with adverse outcomes.

189 t were developed and used to assess mealtime caregiving knowledge, attitudes, skills, and behaviors f

190 Using valid instruments to assess caregiving knowledge, attitudes, skills, and behaviors i

191 the concepts of interest, including mealtime caregiving knowledge, attitudes, skills, and/or behavior

192 imary endpoint for mothers was wellbeing and caregiving knowledge, practices, and skills when the chi

193 institutionalization-results from increased caregiving load and increased illness severity over time

194 correlates of a specific component of human caregiving: maternal mental state talk, reflecting a mot

195 dicate that cultural values regarding family caregiving may be important in arthritis care.

196 king speed in older women, and the stress of caregiving may have exacerbated its impact.

197 ults add to a body of evidence that informal caregiving may impart health benefits.

198 motherhood, and the resultant experience of caregiving, may change the way women respond to affectiv

199 The caregiving model developed from the data illustrated tha

200 paired the ability to discriminate between a caregiving mother and a novel mother, and this ability r

201 their firstborn infant: heterosexual primary-caregiving mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-

202 nvolving child behavior problems and extreme caregiving need.

203 s (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49), substantial caregiving needs (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17), and pain

204 ctional disability are major determinants of caregiving needs and societal health care costs.

205 , which markedly affects quality of life and caregiving needs, has been associated with hospitalizati

206 recipients, and the care recipient's overall caregiving needs.

207 likely future survival, general health, and caregiving needs.

208 f parenting, here I chart a global 'parental caregiving' network that integrates conserved structures

209 hat parenting implemented a global "parental caregiving" neural network, mainly consistent across par

210 alongside the 2011 to 2017 National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) and 2013 Panel Study of Income Dynamic

211 ternal perception of infant temperament, and caregiving observations.

212 ement synthesizes the evidence pertaining to caregiving of adult individuals with HF in order to (1)

213 ating periods but then declines to allow for caregiving of resulting offspring.

214 ed with decline in walking speed and whether caregiving, often considered an indicator of chronic str

215 iquity of motherhood, the enduring impact of caregiving on cognition and the brain across the lifespa

216 s limited understanding of the impact of MCS caregiving on patients and caregivers.

217 Effects of caregiving on the caregiver and patient range from physi

218 The burden of caregiving on the family members remains poorly understo

219 ect (the absence of sensitive and responsive caregiving) or disrupted interaction with offspring indu

220 Caregiving outcomes included burden, appraisal, and comp

221 lness of a spouse can affect the health of a caregiving partner.

222 These findings demonstrate how caregiving patterns fostering interpersonal resonance, r

223 eceived an average of 10.0 hours of informal caregiving per week, as compared with 6.9 and 6.8 hours

224 Caregiving plan inadequacy (n=30) was the most common ps

225 Across 22 interviews, SWs mirrored that caregiving plans were the most common psychosocial contr

226 Caregiving plays a critical role in children's cognitive

227 ation is affected by infant irritability and caregiving practices.

228 en (PR = 1.06, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.08) and better caregiving preparedness (PR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.75).

229 All participants reported no involvement in caregiving prior to the first biomarker assessment, and

230 unity, Cancer Care); and collaboration among caregiving, professional, and cancer-related organizatio

231 ving), and (2) informal caregiving (hours of caregiving provided by a primary informal caregiver and

232 evelopment in part by the extended period of caregiving provided by parents, and parents aid in scaff

233 it remains unclear whether the distress that caregiving provokes also takes a physiologic toll on the

234 l infant, a circumscribed aspect of maternal caregiving purported to be a prerequisite of sensitive a

235 ty of life, overall quality of patient care, caregiving quality, social support, and level of unmet c

236 onments following interventions that improve caregiving quality.

237 echanism by which baby schema promotes human caregiving, regardless of kinship.

238 iCST appeared to enhance the quality of the caregiving relationship and caregivers' QoL.

239 Secondary outcomes included quality of the caregiving relationship from the perspectives of the per

240 Subgroup analyses by race, sex, caregiving relationship, and caregiving strain failed to

241 Caregiving relationships change over time.

242 Fostering caregiving relationships is a likely mechanism of the in

243 g about MCS implantation, people entered MCS caregiving relationships naive to its full demands.

244 parisons of positive and negative aspects of caregiving reported by caregivers of black and white str

245 Additional caregiving resources and interventions to reduce caregiv

246 st device (LVAD) commits loved ones to major caregiving responsibilities and, often, medical decision

247 interviews revealed substantial strain from caregiving responsibilities as well as frequent symptom

248 then took on extensive and prolonged family caregiving responsibilities at some point prior to the s

249 g the difficulty of combining STEM work with caregiving responsibilities generally, new parents are m

250 treatments and devices for patients with HF, caregiving responsibilities have expanded in recent deca

251 ch" generation, with its members having dual caregiving responsibilities to both parents and children

252 variables with participants who reported no caregiving responsibilities.

253 with HF in order to (1) characterize the HF caregiving role and how it changes with illness trajecto

254 personality factors shape adjustment to the caregiving role and how these impact on the progression

255 ance or information to support them in their caregiving role.

256 st commonly reported problems related to the caregiving role.

257 e married, the spouse frequently assumes the caregiving role.

258 Caregiving's relationship with LVAD outcomes is mixed, a

259 aregiving Self-Efficacy and Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, respectively.

260 n may be the "stretched" generation, because caregiving seems to extend over a long period.

261 ving were assessed via the Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy and Preparedness for Caregiving

262 ave unmet educational needs and many lack HF caregiving self-efficacy.

263 vents suggest that attempts to enhance early caregiving should be a focused public health target for

264 Ten instruments assessed mealtime caregiving skills or behaviors; 5 assessed attitudes, in

265 rify challenges and opportunities across the caregiving spectrum, including patients who are hospital

266 Among respondents with the same caregiving status at baseline and 1-year interviews, hig

267 Thus, the current study examined how caregiving status was associated with the relation betwe

268 between global sleep quality and grandparent caregiving status was significant in predicting depressi

269 ustment for smoking, alcohol use, widowhood, caregiving status, cognitive function, physical disabili

270 (PSQI), and a question regarding grandparent caregiving status.

271 s by race, sex, caregiving relationship, and caregiving strain failed to identify any subgroups with

272 echanism explaining the relationship between caregiving stress and cardiovascular morbidity.

273 nvestigated the relationship between chronic caregiving stress and endothelial dysfunction assessed b

274 We examined the relationship between chronic caregiving stress and endothelial function.

275 Evidence suggests that caregiving stress is associated with pathophysiologic pr

276 od adversity, intimate partner violence, and caregiving stress, are especially common among women.

277 We evaluated how caregiving, stress, and caregiver strain were associated

278 s if they reported the carers perspective of caregiving - studies that focused mostly on the person w

279 outcomes such as coping ability, burden and caregiving style.

280 verty on hippocampal volume were mediated by caregiving support/hostility on the left and right, as w

281 During caregiving, suppressed adult neurogenesis does not appea

282 ed an informal caregiver to participate in a caregiving survey.

283 rends Study and its linked National Study of Caregiving, surveys of Medicare beneficiaries and their

284 of maternal brain structure and function of caregiving systems recently studied in humans as well as

285 unknown whether caregivers who perform more caregiving tasks have a greater decline in health from h

286 survivors reported more positive aspects of caregiving than caregivers of white stroke survivors (6.

287 We describe 5 burdens of family caregiving (time and logistics, physical tasks, financia

288 Adjusted hazard ratios related caregiving to 10-year mortality in all women initially s

289 the need to focus on specific components of caregiving to advance understanding of the maternal brai

290 Approximately 6 million people provide caregiving to people diagnosed with cancer.

291 ant's temperament, and a home observation of caregiving was conducted.

292 the caregiver sample, the number of years of caregiving was significantly related to FMD (r = -0.465,

293 ng (MPOA(Gal)) neurons are indispensable for caregiving, we hypothesized that inhibitory MPOA(Gal) pr

294 Caregiver self-efficacy and preparedness for caregiving were assessed via the Revised Scale for Careg

295 Study) linked to the NSOC (National Study of Caregiving), were used to identify elderly stroke surviv

296 They expressed satisfaction with caregiving, were other-focused, and not highly burdened

297 effector of brain development, so is adverse caregiving, which is the largest environmental risk fact

298 es conserved structures supporting mammalian caregiving with later-evolving networks and implicates p

299 elf-reported levels of stress from, informal caregiving with prospective breast cancer incidence.

300 Additionally, the quality of caregiving women received in childhood was associated wi