コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ding an aminoglycoside, and early indwelling catheter removal).
2 the 46 abscesses recurred (12-95 days after catheter removal).
3 colonization and skin colonization rates at catheter removal.
4 nts with indwelling catheters at the time of catheter removal.
5 reventing insulin errors and accidental tube/catheter removal.
6 g radiolabeled tracer, was given 1 hr before catheter removal.
7 ers (CVC) are slow and in many cases require catheter removal.
8 were cultured and venography was repeated at catheter removal.
9 were collected until treatment cessation or catheter removal.
10 essfully treated with antifungal therapy and catheter removal.
11 lso evaluated insertion site colonization at catheter removal.
12 rapid and generally uncomplicated with early catheter removals.
15 pulmonary artery catheter insertion mandates catheter removal and repair of the carotid artery punctu
16 ond PD catheter implanted, 6.6% underwent PD catheter removal, and 5.9% had a PD catheter revision wi
17 of tissue removed, bladder infusion prior to catheter removal, and ethanol-glycine in assessment of t
19 risk ratio [RR], .52; 95% CI, .33-.85), and catheter removal based on defined schedules potentially
20 ife-threatening infections require immediate catheter removal, but most can be treated with antimicro
21 Prompt adequate antifungal treatment and catheter removal could be critical to decrease early mor
23 acy end points included the time to drainage catheter removal, drainage catheter output volume, and c
25 arly antifungal treatment and central venous catheter removal form the cornerstones to decrease morta
28 s (CRBI) can be successfully treated without catheter removal (in situ therapy), but there is insuffi
30 o identify a biofilm device infection before catheter removal may obviate removal of a substantial nu
36 t early appropriate antifungal treatment and catheter removal (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.91),
37 regression analysis, only early intravenous catheter removal (on day 2) [odds ratio: 0.390; 95% conf
40 h an aggressive postoperative irrigation and catheter removal policy can result in transurethral rese
41 pus implemented a protocol requiring urinary catheter removal prior to urine sampling from a new cath
42 consumption, time to mobilization and Foley catheter removal, quality of patient blinding to randomi
43 te hair removal, R = -0.012 [P = .95]; Foley catheter removal, R = -0.089 [P = .63]; deep vein thromb
44 g a follow-up procedure, which we defined as catheter removal, replacement, or revision within 90 day
45 on, in comparison with two methods requiring catheter removal (tip roll and tip flush), and a third t
51 inical failure, whereas early central venous catheter removal was protective (AOR, 0.43; P = .040).
53 ithout bloodstream infection resolving after catheter removal with a positive quantitative tip cultur
54 28 cases); and (3) severe clinical symptoms (catheter removal with delayed replacement after deferves
55 randomisation and 48 h after central venous catheter removal with impregnated (antibiotic or heparin
56 ocytosis, or hypotension which resolved with catheter removal, without another source of infection.