戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nterrater reliability from the outset (ie, a ceiling effect).
2 changed with fear conditioning, suggesting a ceiling effect.
3 t elevated aggression, which could reflect a ceiling effect.
4                         Lidocaine also had a ceiling effect.
5 ence of skill-based adherence training and a ceiling effect.
6 nate among degrees of happiness because of a ceiling effect.
7 on with validated AD outcomes, and floor and ceiling effects.
8  items (scored out of 19) with minimal floor/ceiling effects.
9 time-varying factors, and is biased by floor/ceiling effects.
10 ation, split-half reliability, and floor and ceiling effects.
11 assess differences in patient ratings due to ceiling effects.
12                                     To avoid ceiling effects, 2 subgroups of patients with VA worse t
13                    WCWs were associated with ceiling effects: 31.6% (study A) and 37.5% (study B) of
14 obility Index at awakening (23%) and minimal ceiling effects across all time points (5-12%).
15 ted 488 nm AF increased early in life with a ceiling effect after 6 months.
16  in exposure to rifampin without an apparent ceiling effect and a greater estimated fall in bacterial
17         This contrasts with the concept of a ceiling effect and should be carefully considered when e
18                                     However, ceiling effects and burden of data collection can limit
19  abnormally distributed items and items with ceiling effects and empty response categories.
20 erimetric sensitivities successfully avoided ceiling effects and were highly correlated with absolute
21 d in this in vivo experiment may be due to a ceiling effect, and further experimentation is warranted
22 sociation between PWV and mortality showed a ceiling effect, and PWV was truncated at 12 m/sec.
23                   No statements had floor or ceiling effects, and all statements had acceptable test-
24 eliability, frequency analysis for floor and ceiling effects, and Spearman rho for test-retest reliab
25 gnitive control task do not appear driven by ceiling effects; and (iii) our observed post-harvest imp
26 els of antibody landscapes, including: titre ceiling effects, antigenic seniority and exposure-type s
27 an immediate drop in abuse rates, a definite ceiling effect appeared over time, beyond which no furth
28 rinsic efficacy for G protein signaling when ceiling effects are properly accounted for.
29 registered hypothesis tests, likely due to a ceiling effect as most learners reported high agreement
30 ng success, but current evidence points to a ceiling effect as newer neurohormonal targets are exploi
31 animals (SHM+SAL), which was likely due to a ceiling effect as performance reached high levels early
32 ns across items, and less than 10% floor and ceiling effects, (b) Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.
33 ime, high levels of patients' morbidity, and ceiling effects because of the high quality of standard
34  CBCM and antidepressants) likely produced a ceiling effect beyond which omega-3 PUFAs, even if effec
35                     We addressed confounding ceiling effects by introducing a subset approach and ens
36 nfluence student responses, perhaps due to a ceiling effect created by the large number of students w
37 t of less than 0.2 SD provides evidence that ceiling effects do not occur in these trials.
38                                      A glass ceiling effect exists for women in male-dominated profes
39 he high-ADR subgroup was worse, suggesting a ceiling effect for current colonoscopic techniques and h
40                        This might point to a ceiling effect for enteral protein intake with respect t
41 ne and placebo groups as well as a potential ceiling effect for item recall, both of which likely con
42 oss all time points (1-7%) and a significant ceiling effect for Physical Function in ICU Test-scored
43 seline scores were high (0.93), suggesting a ceiling effect for QALYs.
44 r mental disorders are limited, suggesting a ceiling effect for treatment research as presently condu
45 termination of age moderation, and potential ceiling effects for the memory measure.
46 espite therapeutic advances in this arena, a ceiling effect has been reached with both single-agent m
47 les showed good variability, small floor and ceiling effects, high internal consistency (Cronbach's a
48 n (0.46; P = 0.0003), which also exhibited a ceiling effect in almost half of the respondents.
49                               Because of the ceiling effect in oxyhaemoglobin saturation, [Formula: s
50 siological age-related increase in qAF and a ceiling effect in patients.
51 enal clearance act additively to produce the ceiling effect in plasma concentrations.
52 fective in the short term for QALYs due to a ceiling effect in quality of life.
53 ailure to account for intrinsic efficacy and ceiling effects in different pathways, distortions intro
54 y different population samples and potential ceiling effects in existing tasks.
55 gnificantly increase TST, potentially due to ceiling effects in good sleepers.
56  expectancy in Down syndrome, but with clear ceiling effects in the highest percentiles of age at dea
57                                   The bamboo ceiling effect is mostly demonstrated among foreign-born
58 cal responses in athletes, suggesting that a ceiling effect may exist.
59                                              Ceiling effects may occur at late stages, for both scale
60          Quantile regressions suggested that ceiling effects might have modestly biased effect estima
61                  However, morphine displayed ceiling effect not seen when it was administered systemi
62 bility with the floor effect of 3.1% and the ceiling effect of 0.4%.
63 d spatial fidelity of signaling in vivo, the ceiling effect of the allosteric cooperativity which may
64 igher than expected, it is unclear whether a ceiling effect of the high level of psychological interv
65 ur within the CoG and does not result from a ceiling effect on projection neuron firing frequency.
66 uprenorphine-induced antinociception display ceiling effects or are bell shaped, which have been attr
67    None of the measures had notable floor or ceiling effects or missing data.
68  Twenty-six items were excluded due to floor/ceiling effects, poor response rates, or high item-item
69 with treatment intensity at 1 year, but with ceiling effects related to treatment intensity and basel
70 r warfarin complications, widening the floor ceiling effects that limit the use of TTR and INR variab
71 s may have impact on the treatment response (ceiling effect), there is an ongoing need for research i
72                     As a consequence of this ceiling effect, there is no pharmacokinetic justificatio
73 asures and the rehabilitation potential (ie, ceiling) effects they may impose on LVR are important co
74 tial model for BCVA change balancing for the ceiling effect was constructed.
75        Either antigenic seniority or a titre ceiling effect were included in the two best fitting mod
76 etween domain scores was assessed, and floor/ceiling effects were calculated.
77                                  These floor/ceiling effects were magnified when assessed in those wi
78 fficacy of potentiators may be obscured by a ceiling effect when drug screening is performed under st