戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  flaps were replaced slightly coronal to the cemento-enamel junction.
2  number of teeth with alveolar bone crest to cemento-enamel junction (ABC-CEJ) distances >2 mm.
3 ngival margin [GM], 1 and 2 mm apical to GM, cemento-enamel junction, above the bone crest); 2) bone
4                                              Cemento-enamel junction alveolar crest measurements were
5 bjective was to test the association between cemento-enamel junction, alveolar-crest distance (CEJ-AC
6 bitewing radiographs were taken to determine cemento-enamel junction-alveolar crest distances (alveol
7 nd IL-10 analysis, and distances between the cemento-enamel junction and alveolar bone crest were eva
8         Interradicular distance (IRD) at the cemento-enamel junction and alveolar bone levels at base
9              ABL was calculated by measuring cemento-enamel junction and alveolar crest distance.
10 ne dental problem, is often initiated at the cemento-enamel junction and hence is called cat 'neck' l
11 al attachment level > or =4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction and probing depth > or =4 mm.
12 m natural teeth and dental implants by using cemento-enamel junction and the actual distance between
13 rmined the bucco-lingual measurements of the cemento-enamel junction and the mesial and distal roots
14 y of tooth anatomical landmarks, such as the cemento-enamel junction and the presence of root steps.
15 Margin cracks appeared to originate from the cemento-enamel junction, and traversed the tooth wall ad
16 This study measures the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar bone crest an
17                    The distances between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar process (AP)
18 were used to assess the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar bone leve
19 the distribution of the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar bone leve
20 etween the junctional epithelium (JE) to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the CEJ to the alveola
21 surface with its coronal edge as near to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) as possible.
22 gingival margin was at or within 1 mm of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) for 58% of the sites treat
23 Although mean GM location was coronal to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) in both groups, gingival m
24 ugh the buccal mucosa: 1) 6 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of the maxillary fourth pr
25 tal soft tissue (SST); surgical distances of cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to bone crest (CEJ-BC), CE
26 estimated by measuring the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest
27 was estimated by measuring the distance from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest
28 ificant difference for the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest (P =
29 ss of the harvested ramus graft and from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the EOR, the CEJ to the
30 Depth of recession and width of GR below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) was also determined.
31 ingival thickness (GT), detectability of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and presence of root step
32 ingival thickness (GT), detectability of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and presence of root step
33 evaluated, and measured from cusp tip to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), CEJ to root apex, and cus
34      The intrabony defect fill measured from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ)-base of the defect (BD), a
35  and the distance between the bone crest and cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).
36 n on the facial surface as measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).
37 PD [mm]) and the free gingival margin to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ-GM [mm]) were obtained in a
38 d the 26%-28% 3D RSA bone loss apical to the cemento-enamel junction corresponded to a CRR of 1:1, re
39                                              Cemento-enamel junction distances (ACH) were measured on
40 terior teeth: gingival index, probing depth, cemento-enamel junction-gingival margin distance (attach
41 alipers: 1) furcation entrance/roof (FE); 2) cemento-enamel junction level (CEJ); 3) mesial root widt
42 ce from the lingual nerve to the mid-lingual cemento-enamel junctions of mandibular molars and premol
43                                          The cemento-enamel junctions of the adjacent teeth were used
44 ured including the lengths from the proximal cemento-enamel junction (pCEJ) to apical contact point (
45 ratio of bone volume over tissue volume, and cemento-enamel junction to alveolar bone crest (CEJ-ABC)
46  radiographic bone fill as measured from the cemento-enamel junction to base of bony defect and 2) ch
47 ined as >/=30% of sites with a distance from cemento-enamel junction to bone of >/=5 mm, were 11.2% i
48 robing site measurements) were made from the cemento-enamel junction to the alveolar crest.
49 re measured, including: 1) distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bone crest; 2) tooth torq
50  mean bone loss of 1.01 +/- 0.06 mm from the cemento-enamel junction, whereas all doses of SIM/SIM-mP