戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  c-Fos expression in GnRH neurons only after central administration.
2 ing hormone (LH) release after peripheral or central administration in Kiss1- or Gpr54 (Kiss1r)-null
3 g hormone (GnRH) release after peripheral or central administration in mice.
4 ervation of an acute orexigenic effect after central administration in mice.
5  hypothalamic signaling molecules, but their central administration induces different effects on hepa
6 sive rats, high-resolution echocardiography, central administration (intracerebroventricular infusion
7 ciception with reduced adverse effects after central administration (intrathecal or intracerebroventr
8 vity of relatively short duration whereas on central administration it had only a KOR-antagonist acti
9                         In addition, chronic central administration of 1,25D3 dramatically decreased
10                                              Central administration of 1-10 microg of peptide elicits
11                                              Central administration of 14 did not produce locomotor e
12                                              Central administration of 17beta-estradiol (E2) decrease
13 o extend the dissimilar efficacy profiles of central administration of a CRF agonist, r/h CRF(1-41),
14                     We tested this theory by central administration of a gapmer antisense oligonucleo
15                                   Continuous central administration of a neutralizing antibody to the
16 ic leptin overexpression was induced through central administration of adeno-associated virus-encodin
17 restingly, NPY-/- mice are hypersensitive to central administration of AgRP(83-132), yet exhibit a no
18                                     Finally, central administration of alphaCGRP to adult hybrid mice
19                                    Following central administration of an ASO to rodents, we observe
20 sion in the mediobasal hypothalamus and that central administration of an NPY Y(1) receptor antagonis
21                                              Central administration of analogue 2 in rats increased f
22 resonance imaging (MRI) it was observed that central administration of Ang-(1-7) following transient
23 rain and peripheral cholinergic systems, and central administration of anticholinergic drugs in depen
24 (1) or delta opioid antagonists, and through central administration of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide
25                                              Central administration of bicuculline (a GABA(A) recepto
26 MJN110 (which selectively elevates 2-AG) and central administration of both MJN110 and the CB1 antago
27                                          The central administration of C75, a potent inhibitor of the
28 iogenic effects in male C57BL/6J mice, while central administration of CART reduced c-Fos in 5-HT(DRN
29                                              Central administration of CGRP activates the hypothalamo
30                     Test the hypothesis that central administration of CMT-3 would inhibit microglial
31                                              Central administration of corticotropin-releasing hormon
32                       However, the effect of central administration of CRF in these rat strains has y
33                                              Central administration of CRH results in endocrinologica
34                                 In contrast, central administration of DHT, 3beta-diol, and the ERbet
35                                              Central administration of DPDPE (delta-selective agonist
36 neral opioid antagonist, naltrexone, through central administration of either general, mu, mu(1), kap
37                       Here, we show that the central administration of estradiol rapidly increases th
38                                        After central administration of excess Ang II, the reduction o
39 ormones compared with glucose ingestion, and central administration of fructose provokes feeding in r
40 food deprivation are reduced by systemic and central administration of general opioid antagonists.
41        We previously found that systemic and central administration of GHSR antagonists reduced binge
42                                              Central administration of GLP-1 augmented glucose-stimul
43                                              Central administration of GLP-1 increases plasma cortico
44                                              Central administration of glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1
45                                              Central administration of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1
46 nts indicate that the anorexigenic effect of central administration of glucose was blunted by coinjec
47      Similar results were observed following central administration of GM-CSF in mice.
48                          We demonstrate that central administration of gp120 (4 microg) significantly
49                          Similar to insulin, central administration of IGF-1 can suppress hepatic glu
50                                              Central administration of IL-1 (1 or 2 ng/mouse) depress
51                                              Central administration of IL-1beta (10 ng) also signific
52                                              Central administration of IL-1beta suppresses natural ki
53                 Finally, both peripheral and central administration of IL-1beta, itself, induced sick
54              In addition, in conscious rats, central administration of IMD results in increased plasm
55                                  Systemic or central administration of leptin alone did not alter GP,
56                                              Central administration of leptin to peripherally leptin-
57                                              Central administration of leucine increases hypothalamic
58                                      Chronic central administration of MCH and adenoviral vectors inc
59 agonist, inhibited food intake stimulated by central administration of MCH, reduced consumption of pa
60 e been observed in antinociception following central administration of morphine into either the later
61                                              Central administration of MTII for 4 days (10 nmol/day)
62 ression in the brain was analyzed, following central administration of N6-cyclohexyladenosine.
63                                     In vivo, central administration of nesfatin-1 reduces motivation
64                                              Central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) potently
65                                              Central administration of NPS increases locomotor activi
66                                              Central administration of NPY (10 microg) also enhanced
67 d the metabolic and anorectic effects of the central administration of oleic acid.
68                              In normal rats, central administration of orexin or exposure to certain
69                           In rodent studies, central administration of orexin peptides increases food
70                                              Central administration of orexin-A acutely suppressed ca
71  level dependent (BOLD) fMRI to test whether central administration of oxytocin 45-60 min before fMRI
72 Beginning in 1979 with the first report that central administration of oxytocin stimulates maternal b
73 se and alcohol-seeking, we demonstrated that central administration of peptide antagonists for relaxi
74 hey also have a severely blunted response to central administration of peptide YY (PYY).
75 d (b) to further characterize the effects of central administration of QRFP(26) on energy balance in
76                             Recognizing that central administration of QRFP26 and QRFP43 increases hi
77                                              Central administration of recombinant CTRP13 suppressed
78                                              Central administration of recombinant protein suppressed
79                                     Finally, central administration of ROS alone increased c-fos and
80                               We showed that central administration of senktide (NK3R agonist) induce
81 related cardiovascular responses elicited by central administration of the cannabinoid receptor (CB(1
82 esponse to solicitous males in females after central administration of the D1-like agonist SKF38393 a
83                                              Central administration of the endozepine octadecaneurope
84                                          The central administration of the fatty acid synthase (FAS)
85                                              Central administration of the long-chain fatty acid olei
86 ing schedule attenuated rats' sensitivity to central administration of the melanocortin agonist MTII.
87                                              Central administration of the melanocortin receptor agon
88 th this compound in MC4-R knockout mice, and central administration of this compound had no effect on
89 earlier vasopressor initiation, the need for central administration of vasopressors has been question
90                                              Central administration of WIN 55,212-2 significantly inc
91  knockout (KO) induces alcohol drinking, and central administrations of CRF reduce alcohol intake.
92                                              Central-administration of oxytocin antagonist attenuated
93 iabetic rodent models through peripheral and central administration routes.