ライフサイエンスコーパス: certified value

1 RM 1573a with good agreement compared to the certified value.

2 agreement at a 95% confidence limit with the certified value.

3 l (INCT-TL-1) are in good agreement with the certified value.

4 lped to minimize bias and uncertainty in the certified value.

5 M) and result was in good agreement with the certified value.

6 ) was found to be in good agreement with the certified value.

7 by MIC were in agreement better than 95% to certified values.

8 e Material 1849a were well in agreement with certified values.

9 s of the reference materials agreed with the certified values.

10 and leaves) were in good agreement with the certified values.

11 d that the results are in agreement with the certified values.

12 values obtained are in conformity with NIST certified values.

13 yzed and results were in good agreement with certified values.

14 re quantitatively in good agreement with the certified values.

15 us standards were in good agreement with the certified values.

16 yzed and the results were in accordance with certified values.

17 results were statistically equivalent to the certified values.

18 6b and DORM-4 was in good agreement with the certified values.

19 ne beads, and the results compared well with certified values.

20 imental results for lead were confirmed with certified values.

21 ults for total As were in agreement with the certified values.

22 the results were to be in agreement with the certified values.

23 ined values were in good accordance with the certified values.

24 iciency evaluation samples differed from the certified values (1.04-14.1 microg/L) by 3-18%.

25 were 99.2 +/- 0.6 and 100.2 +/- 0.8% of the certified value (290 +/- 3 microg As/kg) by the AHG-ICPM

26 andard reference material, which agreed with certified values (91-101%).

27 ials were in satisfactory agreement with the certified values according to the t-test for a 95 % conf

28 We compared NIST-certified values along with literature-derived concentra

29 The certified value and expanded uncertainty expressed at a

30 statistical agreement between determined and certified values and an RSD of up to 11 %.

31 results were statistically equivalent to the certified values and in good agreement with those obtain

32 CC was lower than 18% and the agreement with certified values and spike recoveries were higher than 9

33 It had good agreement (about 99%) with the certified values, and the relative standard deviation wa

34 determined in the uncertainty limits of the certified values as well as the analytes added to the mi

35 asured with <7% relative difference from the certified value at all U concentrations.

36 ce materials were in good agreement with the certified values at the 95% confidence level.

37 soil analysis are in good agreement with the certified values, demonstrating the effectiveness of the

38 ified Reference Material (CRM) 347] with the certified values determined by gas chromatography/mass s

39 Materials (CRMs) 576, 577, and 578] with the certified values determined by gas chromatography/mass s

40 ed Reference Materials 192 and 193] with the certified values determined by gas chromatography/mass s

41 95% confidence interval are <+/-0.06% of the certified values for CO2 and N2O and <0.2% for CH4, whic

42 d reduced tobacco-specific nitrosamines with certified values for composition.

43 tute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with certified values for ephedrine alkaloids, synephrine, ca

44 with National Research Council Canada (NRCC) certified values for Fe, Co, Ni, and Mo and provided mas

45 ix certified reference materials (CRMs) with certified values for methylmercury and butyltin compound

46 with results from other techniques to assign certified values for methylmercury in oyster, mussel, an

47 e results obtained with FLA-APGD-OES and the certified values for the CRM TORT-2 as well as the refer

48 Certified values for the mass fractions of HCB and HCBD

49 he lack of standard reference materials with certified values for vitamin D that laboratories need to

50 ng experimental values in agreement with the certified values in the analysis of NIST SRM 955c (Capri

51 file or contribute to the uncertainty of the certified values like absorption spectra, fluorescence a

52 The certified values obtained for Ca, As, Cd and Pb were 1.4

53 ion efficiency, which has recently reached a certified value of 25.2%, and abundance of raw materials

54 mum power conversion efficiency of 26.05% (a certified value of 25.44%).

55 This is greater than the NIST 2701 certified value of 551 +/- 35 mg kg(-1) but less than 30

56 rial MOOS-3 seawater, in good agreement with certified values of 1.60 +/- 0.15 and 30.5 +/- 0.8 muM (

57 Very good agreement between the found and certified values of Cd in the CRMs (the recoveries were

58 ogues provides results in agreement with the certified values of three different Certified Reference

59 ation values experimentally obtained and the certified values of two serum standard reference materia

60 f FA and 5-MTHF in SRM-1849a were within the certified value range.

61 The agreement with certified values ranged from 92 to 108% for all analytes

62 0 mmol L(-1)NH(4)OH), the agreement with the certified values ranged from 94 to 98% and recoveries hi

63 Agreement with certified values was better than 94%.

64 The deviation from the certified values was found to be less than 15% for most

65 Excellent correspondence to the certified values was obtained.

66 field ICPMS (for those elements for which no certified values were available or that were affected du

67 ated using standard reference materials, and certified values were found to be within the 95% confide

68 standard reference materials agreed with the certified values which are at sub mug g(-1) levels.

69 this method for progesterone agreed with the certified value within the uncertainty of the measuremen

70 is method for total cortisol agreed with the certified values within 1.1%.

71 of this method for estradiol agreed with the certified values within the uncertainty of the measureme