ライフサイエンスコーパス: cervical spine

1 men, and a head phantom containing the upper cervical spine.

2 sis on acute management and clearance of the cervical spine.

3 synthesis in imaging of the breast and upper cervical spine.

4 pressure and body motion at the level of the cervical spine.

5 ped progressive dwarfism and lordosis of the cervical spine.

6 ic, and predictive value in disorders of the cervical spine.

7 chitecturally complex muscles traversing the cervical spine.

8 ance imaging (MRI) with cyclic motion of the cervical spine.

9 considered as "non-relevant" in their upper cervical spine.

10 ted in a goat model of annular injury in the cervical spine.

11 for markedly reduced range of motion of the cervical spine.

12 of painful disorders in humans affecting the cervical spine.

13 fracture after a penetration gunshot to the cervical spine.

14 hiplash and degenerative disturbances of the cervical spine.

15 lopathy (CM) based on clinical images of the cervical spine.

16 le properties in disorders of and beyond the cervical spine.

17 grades 3-4), 11 had abnormal findings in the cervical spine, 16 in the thoracic spine, and 23 patient

18 NC+ patients had isolated head (37) or high cervical spine (3) injury, and 11 of that group (27.5%)

19 cal to arriving at the correct diagnosis for cervical spine abnormalities.

20 69 patients who underwent radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

21 bly the patients who need radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

22 nt surgery for rheumatoid involvement of the cervical spine, after development of objective signs of

23 recalled-echo sequences for MR evaluation of cervical spine anatomy and abnormalities.

24 t spastic gait caused by misalignment of the cervical spine and die because of starvation.

25 Patient phantoms based on clinical cervical spine and knee examinations were manufactured a

26 rst 20 years of the disease, after which the cervical spine and lumbar spine were equally involved.

27 d as a well-circumscribed fatty area between cervical spine and posterior muscles.

28 Cervical spine and spinal cord injuries are rare in pedi

29 limited evidence of specific changes to the cervical spine and the surrounding tissues in patients w

30 decrease estimates of activity of the upper cervical spine, and the lower cervical/upper thoracic ve

31 for further evaluation with CT of the brain, cervical spine, and thorax.

32 EMG, videofluoroscopic swallow and CT of the cervical spine, and were selected for surgery on the bas

33 care: (1) initial diagnostic imaging (head, cervical spine, ankle, and pelvis), (2) repeated diagnos

34 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical spine anomalies in paediatric patients are diff

35 The main types of cervical spine anomalies seen in paediatric patients are

36 spiratory insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, and cervical spine anomalies.

37 s of 0.83-0.89 suggested that the lumbar and cervical spine BASRI scores were disease specific.

38 findings missed at autopsy (fracture of the cervical spine, bullet fragments in the posterior area o

39 SCIWORA lesions are found mainly in the cervical spine but can also be seen, although much less

40 The cervical spine can be affected by many types of inflamma

41 certainty, residual errors (2-3 mm along the cervical spine) cannot be mitigated by single translatio

42 s, cervical disc disorders, fractures of the cervical spine, cervicalgia) and cervical surgeries.

43 d scouting and scanning body segments (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) individually

44 The lack of cervical spine clearance and inability to extend the nec

45 safely performed in trauma patients without cervical spine clearance and neck extension, including p

46 Cervical spine clearance in obtunded adults after blunt

47 Cervical spine clearance protocols are controversial for

48 common and resulted in significant delays to cervical spine clearance.

49 the radiographic or clinical status of their cervical spine: cleared and noncleared.

50 The 48 subjects who had undergone cervical spine computed tomography studies comprised the

51 ervical spine extensors has been observed in cervical spine conditions using time-consuming and rater

52 A missed cervical spine (CS) injury can have devastating conseque

53 ents underwent MDCT of the head, MDCT of the cervical spine (CS), and MDCT angiography of the HN at a

54 a, readers 2 and 3 reviewed in consensus the cervical spine CT (reference for fracture and luxation)

55 Materials and Methods Patients who underwent cervical spine CT during initial trauma evaluation betwe

56 This dataset is composed of cervical spine CT images with annotations related to fra

57 Background Cervical spine CT is regularly performed to exclude cerv

58 trauma aged 18 years and older who underwent cervical spine CT scans from March 2014 to March 2015 at

59 opy-guided CILESIs at which a postprocedural cervical spine CT was performed (June 2016 to December 2

60 hanced brain CT in pediatric patients, adult cervical spine CT, and adult cervical and intracranial C

61 observed for pediatric unenhanced brain CT, cervical spine CT, and adult cervical and intracranial C

62 least 20 minutes after initial brain and/or cervical spine CT, and no evidence of bodily injury at p

63 In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex w

64 ormone deficiency and also abnormal neck and cervical spine development.

65 seen with scalp dysesthesia, 14 patients had cervical spine disease confirmed by imaging.

66 calp aponeurosis secondary to the underlying cervical spine disease may lead to the symptoms of scalp

67 Cervical spine disease related to disc herniation was mo

68 individuals had a 39% increased risk of any cervical spine disorder (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39; 95

69 stimate the risk of vascular and nonvascular cervical spine disorders among exposed individuals, comp

70 Acknowledging the wider reports of MFI in cervical spine disorders and the time required to manual

71 However, the nature and prevalence of cervical spine disorders in TS/CTD are unknown.

72 with severe TS/CTD are at increased risk of cervical spine disorders.

73 ration (MFI) has been widely reported across cervical spine disorders.

74 -29 received fluoroscopic screening of their cervical spines during 4 repetitions of neutral to full

75 packages was generally very good, except for cervical spine examinations where one software package d

76 Muscle fat infiltration (MFI) of the deep cervical spine extensors has been observed in cervical s

77 bits were implemented during a pedicle screw cervical spine fixation and hip arthroplasty performed o

78 hiplash and degenerative disturbances of the cervical spine, four reviews were published concerning u

79 of the Radiological Society of North America Cervical Spine Fracture AI Challenge.

80 ormance of the top models from the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection challenge on a clinica

81 Seven top-performing models in the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection challenge were retrosp

82 hallenge demonstrated a high performance for cervical spine fracture detection on a clinical test dat

83 were reviewed for 20 potential predictors of cervical spine fracture in this retrospective case-contr

84 Predictors of cervical spine fracture included severe head injury (adj

85 Absolute cervical spine fracture probabilities were calculated by

86 ife-threatening condition was diagnosed (eg, cervical spine fracture, skull fracture, intracranial bl

87 can be used to determine the probability of cervical spine fracture.

88 rauma patients at high and moderate risk for cervical spine fracture.

89 considered: high, moderate, and low risk for cervical spine fracture.

90 gression was used to determine predictors of cervical spine fracture.

91 groups with a wide range of probabilities of cervical spine fracture.

92 Keywords: Cervical Spine, Fracture Detection, Machine Learning, Ar

93 A sample of 3112 CT scans with and without cervical spine fractures (CSFx) were assembled from mult

94 lunt trauma patients 65 years and older with cervical spine fractures and on randomly selected contro

95 Radiographs of 97 patients with acute cervical spine fractures were matched with those of 92 p

96 traumatized or soiled airways, patients with cervical spine fractures, and patients who have undergon

97 reened population included all patients with cervical spine fractures, LeFort II or III facial fractu

98 Of the 13 patients with cervical spine fractures, six patients had been stabiliz

99 sisted of 28 patients, 13 of which had known cervical spine fractures; 27 noncleared patients were ma

100 to undergo splenectomy for Felty's syndrome, cervical spine fusion for myelopathy, or total knee arth

101 For anterior cervical spine fusion, rhBMP-2 was associated with incre

102 t headache pathogenesis and how a history of cervical spine hypermobility may be a needed predisposin

103 nts with scalp dysesthesia also had abnormal cervical spine images.

104 Secondary outcomes were cervical spine imaging completion after acute neck pain

105 Patients who died prior to obtaining cervical spine imaging were excluded.

106 Overall, 7113 children (80%) underwent cervical spine imaging, compared with 7882 (63%) in PEDS

107 In upper cervical spine imaging, digital circular tomosynthesis e

108 iatric trauma patients with increased use of cervical spine imaging.

109 prehospital setting to evaluate the need for cervical spine immobilization in children, regardless of

110 Half (316 [50.0%]) were admitted with cervical spine immobilization, and 38 (12%) of these wer

111 r retrospective study, patients who received cervical spine implants between 2014 and 2018 were ident

112 patients (n = 15 lesions), in the lumbar or cervical spine in 9 patients (n = 22 lesions), and in pe

113 e first to quantify intervertebral MC in the cervical spine in asymptomatic people.

114 rmal multi-detector row CT scan of the total cervical spine in obtunded and/or "unreliable" patients

115 Due to the unique anatomy of the cervical spine in paediatric patients, radiographic inte

116 There is a consensus on how to clear the cervical spine in patients who are alert, but in patient

117 ased use of multidetector CT of the head and cervical spine in patients who experienced blunt trauma,

118 natomic variations in the radiography of the cervical spine in small infants and children can help av

119 n, involving the lumbar spine in one and the cervical spine in the other, are described.

120 alled-echo sequence for MR evaluation of the cervical spine in the transverse plane.

121 onclusion Subsequent MRI following CT of the cervical spine in trauma patients with lateral atlantode

122 and the inability to "clinically" clear the cervical spine in young children.

123 tion and CT scan findings were evaluated for cervical spine injuries (CSI) and the incidence of misse

124 Cervical spine injuries occur in 2-5% of blunt trauma pa

125 approximately three times the rate of acute cervical spine injuries reported in the literature.

126 Cervical spine injuries were present in 71% of patients,

127 een advocated, particularly in patients with cervical spine injuries, the appropriate therapy of lesi

128 of the cervical spine to evaluate potential cervical spine injuries.

129 Because clinicians fear missing occult cervical-spine injuries, they obtain cervical radiograph

130 ty in practice and imaging usage to diagnose cervical spine injury (CSI) following blunt trauma in pe

131 ed research regarding the diagnosis of blunt cervical spine injury (CSI) in children.

132 (OR, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.42-27.27; P = .02), and cervical spine injury (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.41-13.50; P =

133 obtunded patients with blunt trauma in whom cervical spine injury could not be excluded with physica

134 l spine CT is regularly performed to exclude cervical spine injury during the initial evaluation of t

135 f intubation of the patient with a potential cervical spine injury fails, or appropriate experienced

136 Probability of cervical spine injury was determined by reviewing emerge

137 no complications in the seven patients with cervical spine injury who were stabilized with a cervica

138 ng to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury.

139 dels were adjusted for other known causes of cervical spine injury.

140 ion appears to be safe in the patient with a cervical spine injury.

141 and 100% (366 of 366 patients) for unstable cervical spine injury.

142 tified all but 8 of the 818 patients who had cervical-spine injury (sensitivity, 99.0 percent [95 per

143 MRI showed incidence rates of 0% to 1.5% for cervical spine instability (16 studies; 1799 patients),

144 valent autoimmune disease; it often leads to cervical spine instability and subsequent myelopathy.

145 Upper cervical spine instability has the most potential for mo

146 trauma, neck hematoma, laryngeal disruption, cervical spine instability, and head injury all combine

147 emselves with anesthetic concerns, including cervical spine instability, in patients with Down syndro

148 is needed because of the associated risk of cervical spine instability.

149 and the most common autoimmune diseases with cervical spine involvement are rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

150 CPPD crystal deposition in the cervical spine is seen with a higher prevalence than pre

151 Cervical spine lesions were manually delineated on T2- a

152 This work shows the added value of cervical spine lesions, and provides an avenue for evalu

153 limited to only one of the three columns of cervical spine ligament support.

154 in 354 of the 366 patients and negative for cervical spine ligamentous injury in 362.

155 ve sleep apnea syndrome, reduced mobility of cervical spine, limited mouth opening); pathology (sever

156 Radiographs of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, and hips were scor

157 y, two blinded raters independently examined cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) images of 140 hea

158 ateral funiculi and central cord area of the cervical spine may influence clinical status in multiple

159 Gunshot wounds to the cervical spine most frequently concur with serious injur

160 oscope, the Airtraq and Airwayscope diminish cervical spine motion during elective orotracheal intuba

161 juries on the basis of findings at follow-up cervical spine MR imaging.

162 Complete cervical spine MR studies were obtained to evaluate soft

163 This focused review of postoperative cervical spine MRI discusses common cervical surgery dec

164 Cervical spine MRI is essential for evaluating potential

165 Another unique challenge for cervical spine MRI is susceptibility to motion artifacts

166 The patients had previously undergone total cervical spine multi-detector row CT with normal finding

167 ork (CNN) model was trained to segment seven cervical spine muscle groups (left and right muscles seg

168 sitions-neutral, extended, and flexed, their cervical spine musculoskeletal responses were measured.

169 In 513 consecutive patients, CT scans of the cervical spine obtained for acute trauma were retrospect

170 goal was to use epidural recordings from the cervical spine of human subjects to develop a computatio

171 ormed to exclude soft-tissue injuries in the cervical spine of obtunded patients with blunt trauma in

172 ent and expected uniform spine uptake in the cervical spines of normal patients.

173 oints and, similarly, grading the lumbar and cervical spine on a scale of 0-4 (for normal, suspicious

174 Patients who underwent CT of the cervical spine or neck had worse outcomes than those who

175 ent CT of the abdomen or pelvis or CT of the cervical spine or neck with unsuspected findings highly

176 the abdomen or pelvis and 18 CT scans of the cervical spine or neck.

177 5 patients (29%) had undergone biopsy of the cervical spine or paraspinal soft tissue.

178 xtension, including patients with stabilized cervical spine or spinal cord injury.

179 on all measurable parameters: initial head, cervical spine, or whole-body computed tomography for lo

180 Cervical spine pain co-occurred with pain in the thoraci

181 d us to consider SPECT for the management of cervical spine pain.

182 kidney disease, congestive heart failure, or cervical-spine pain and radiculopathy.

183 The clinical symptoms of cervical spine pathologies are often nonspecific or abse

184 at computed tomography (CT) of an injury of cervical spine posterior ligamentous complex (PLC).

185 etailed examination including a computerized cervical spine posture analysis and demographic data was

186 cores of disc degeneration in the lumbar and cervical spine, psychological distress as assessed by th

187 lete physical and neurologic examination and cervical spine radiographs.

188 esource costs of the technical components of cervical spine radiography varied with patient probabili

189 The average technical resource cost for cervical spine radiography was $49.60.

190 Cervical spine radiography was performed (Fig 1), follow

191 Cervical spine radiography was performed, followed by MR

192 nsecutive patients with trauma who underwent cervical spine radiography.

193 This study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardin

194 ng scale (NRS), neck disability index (NDI), cervical spine range of motion (ROM), neck muscle streng

195 Cervical spine reconstructions without attenuation corre

196 mGy x cm (head scans), 5.4 microSv/mGy x cm (cervical spine scans), and 18 microSv/mGy x cm (body sca

197 fectiveness of radiography and CT as primary cervical spine screening modalities in trauma patients.

198 CT is the preferred cervical spine screening modality in trauma patients at

199 Current trauma guidelines dictate that the cervical spine should not be cleared in intoxicated pati

200 for 11 imaging tests (of the lumbosacral or cervical spine, shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle/hind foot

201 Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P

202 indicate that it is preferred for assessing cervical spine stability in obtunded blunt trauma patien

203 mic fluoroscopic or MR imaging assessment of cervical spine stability in patients who sustained blunt

204 al spinal cord in patients with degenerative cervical spine stenosis and symptomatic cervical myelopa

205 ecreases in the rates of hospitalization for cervical spine surgery or total knee arthroplasty (prima

206 Anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery.

207 trauma patients underwent MR imaging of the cervical spine to evaluate potential cervical spine inju

208 graphs (sacroiliac joints, lumbar spine, and cervical spine) took 30 seconds.

209 Cervical spine trauma encompasses a wide of injuries, ra

210 Then, in 85 patients with suspicion of cervical spine trauma following high-velocity trauma, re

211 w-velocity trauma and have acute head and/or cervical spine trauma in the absence of evidence of bodi

212 m to identify individuals with a low risk of cervical spine trauma who can safely forgo imaging tests

213 ng criteria: CT-documented acute head and/or cervical spine trauma, CT CAP performed at least 20 minu

214 some clinicians will not clear the patient's cervical spine until full recovery of consciousness.

215 t improvement in the uniformity of estimated cervical spine uptake in normal patients, compared with

216 ive accuracy can be obtained in SPECT of the cervical spine using this simple attenuation estimate.

217 Cervical spine vertebroplasty from anterolateral access

218 Bone age of hand, wrist and cervical spine was assessed.

219 Multi-detector row CT of the cervical spine was performed with a four- or 16-detector

220 eers, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the cervical spine was performed with a magnetization transf

221 MR imaging of the cervical spine was performed with transverse gradient-ec

222 complement the diagnostics, a CT scan of the cervical spine was performed; the scan confirmed the dia

223 echnique for the evaluation of postoperative cervical spine with ADR and complements T2WI in the eval

224 lic artifact reduction in the post-operative cervical spine with ADR.

225 has not been evaluated for the postoperative cervical spine with ADR.

226 pruritus, magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine with and without contrast was performed,

227 derwent 1.5-T MR imaging examinations of the cervical spine within 48 hours after a motor vehicle acc

228 ances, such as cervical vertebra 2 ('C2') in cervical spine X-rays and sacral vertebra 1 ('S1') in lu