ライフサイエンスコーパス: challenge test

1 positive and 6 negative results of oral food challenge test).

2 d current asthma (questionnaire and exercise challenge test).

3 ithecus aethiops sabaeus) using the Intruder Challenge Test.

4 5% CO2 were reevaluated 1 year following the challenge test.

5 bone biomarkers, and a corticotropin (ACTH)-challenge test.

6 fter positive results on a double-blind food challenge test.

7 , and he consequently underwent an oral food challenge test.

8 At age 14, he underwent a repeat oral food challenge test.

9 to be a useful tool for use in an oral food challenge test.

10 sustained and did not change with the sting challenge test.

11 The tolerance was then evaluated by a sting challenge test.

12 controls who maintained normal methacholine challenge tests.

13 the diagnosis of CMD do not need to undergo challenge tests.

14 r progression and motor response in levodopa challenge tests.

15 rgy with systemic symptoms through oral food challenge tests.

16 he importance of verification by appropriate challenge tests.

17 d 1, the Bet v 1-homolog in apple, for oral challenge tests.

18 onfirmed in cases of unclear history by oral challenge tests.

19 paired environment during drug-free and drug-challenge tests.

20 ere allergic reactions, BAT ought to precede challenge testing.

21 ewer resources and be more reproducible than challenge testing.

22 d near complete kill of airborne microbes in challenge tests (5-9 log reduction) and [Formula: see te

23 ffectiveness; $390 per case), 1-hour glucose challenge test (63% effectiveness; $571), random glucose

24 drinkers, undergoing an initial oral alcohol challenge testing (.8 g/kg alcohol vs. placebo) and an i

25 The exercise challenge test after ingestion of an apple was performed

26 The result of an exercise challenge test after ingestion of egg was negative, and

27 The threshold was determined by an oral food challenge test, after positive results on a double-blind

28 sis of spirometry testing and a methacholine challenge test against the current standard of care over

29 clinical history and response to a profilin challenge test and 6 nonallergic subjects were recruited

30 ponsiveness was measured with a methacholine challenge test and bronchial inflammation with fraction

31 We investigated the significance of challenge test and other tests not only to diagnose HWP-

32 ntravenous saline infusion test or captopril challenge test and subtype differentiation was performed

33 strain was added to fish diet to perform the challenge test and to study the growth and immunological

34 h depression (N=162) by using a fenfluramine challenge test and/or measurement of CSF levels of 5-hyd

35 We hypothesize that some negative NSAID challenge tests and an overdiagnosis of NSAIDH occur in

36 gh-resolution chest tomography, methacholine challenge testing, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bron

37 monitoring, spirometry, and serial bronchial challenge tests, and those participants using daily asth

38 Functional MR-based memory challenge tests are in development as well.

39 o risk nonselective NSAID exposure when oral challenge tests are unavailable.

40 accompanied by conventional microbiological challenge tests, as well as morphological characterizati

41 Challenge test assays and a most probable number approac

42 ty (according to arrival time) who underwent challenge testing at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-collaps

43 e airflow obstruction underwent methacholine challenge tests at baseline.

44 Methacholine bronchial challenge test (BCT) was undertaken in the Isle of Wight

45 , monthly spirometry, and methacholine (MCh) challenge testing before and after the study.

46 by transcriptome time-course analyses during challenge tests before and after energy restriction.

47 ts who underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge tests both at baseline (1991-1993), when they

48 extremely large kinetic isotope effect, as a challenging test case for our simulation approach.

49 The budding yeast cell cycle is a challenging test case for this approach, because the con

50 Semantic cognition presents a challenging test case, as the brain must achieve two see

51 an anti-TNF-alpha antibody, D2E7, which is a challenging test case, because D2E7 was highly optimized

52 When applied to a challenging test case, detecting social liquid transfer

53 As a challenging test case, we successfully apply our approac

54 e application of the model, we apply it to a challenging test case: the catabolite activator protein

55 Finally, using two challenging test cases, we demonstrate that RosettaDEER

56 ndard test data, and 0.84, 0.74, and 0.82 on challenging test cases-surpassing existing deep learning

57 ptoms of asthma and an abnormal methacholine challenge test (cases) were compared with 92 age- and sm

58 The challenge test confirmed moderate pathogenicity in rainb

59 nts (40.9, 19 - 58 years) in whom later food challenge tests confirmed food allergy.

60 denied symptoms and had normal methacholine challenge tests (controls).

61 Conference (TAC) Adverse Drug Reaction 2017 challenge test data set, consisting of 200 manually cura

62 , often requiring potentially hazardous drug challenge testing (DCT).

63 men the benefits versus risks of skin tests, challenge tests, desensitization, and initiation of immu

64 In challenge tests designed to assess attention in the cont

65 of the cough reflex using citric acid cough challenge tests did not show any significant changes.

66 HCI continues to provide a challenging test domain for applying and developing psyc

67 ns of children hospitalized for an oral food challenge test during January and February 2016 at the D

68 onitis: nine patients had positive bronchial challenge testing (eight of whom were also IgG positive

69 ts who had a positive result in an oral food challenge test for udon (wheat noodles), informed consen

70 findings clearly show the utility of the FEN challenge test for uncovering in vivo functional deficit

71 at the mechanism, the observations provide a challenging test for mathematical models of chemotaxis.

72 nes from multigene families-perhaps the most challenging test for whole-genome alignments.

73 n pregnancies at the time of routine glucose-challenge testing, for measurement of leptin.

74 all women underwent a 50-gram 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) followed by a 75-gram 2-hour oral g

75 test (OGTT), although a non-fasting, glucose challenge test (GCT) is used in some parts of the world

76 The allergen challenge test has been the mainstay of diagnosis of all

77 ues) are still to be refined but most of the challenge tests have safely crossed the border from rese

78 For all the challenges tested here, parametric matrix models produce

79 From January 2010 to June 2012, we performed challenge test in 41 cases with positive prick test of G

80 e Japanese Pediatric Guideline for Oral Food Challenge Test in Food Allergy 2009.

81 depletion after an intravenous (IV) fructose challenge test in low- versus high-fructose consumers wa

82 At the oral challenge test in the hospital, 3 g of erythritol induce

83 ng state) with two-step screening (a glucose challenge test in which the blood glucose level was obta

84 irect (methacholine) and indirect (mannitol) challenge testing in community managed asthma.

85 h and also the predictive value of capsaicin challenge testing in the assessment of novel antitussive

86 ws straight forward, dose-defined sublingual challenge tests in a high number of birch pollen-allergi

87 standard hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis challenge tests in adult female survivors of childhood a

88 Sixty-three foods were challenge-tested in 46 children.

89 amined the results of an inpatient oral food challenge test involving the use of juice containing who

90 Challenge test is not included in indispensable examinat

91 However, challenge test is still a useful tool for assessing actu

92 feature of asthma pathophysiology, bronchial challenge testing is not routinely used in primary care

93 usually not sensitized to Cor a 8, 9, or 14, challenge testing is still needed to accurately discrimi

94 Of the proapoptotic challenges tested, K17-null skin keratinocytes in primar

95 Water from a boreal river was selected as a challenging test material due to its high concentrations

96 k-up with several laboratory examination and challenge test may help appropriate diagnosis of HWP-IWA

97 w and abnormal response to the acetazolamide challenge test may require a revascularization procedure

98 Metabolic challenge tests may be a valuable tool to magnify the ef

99 The methacholine challenge test (MCT) is commonly used to assess airway h

100 postprandial responses to a mixed-meal shake challenge test of cardiometabolic risk factors, lipoprot

101 Subsequent mNGS challenge testing of 20 positive CSF samples prospective

102 A more challenging test of threading a larger set of test prote

103 These include (a) performance on three challenging tests of face identity processing recommende

104 In both oral food challenge tests (OFCs) with jelly containing whole citro

105 A 50-g oral glucose challenge test (OGCT) is a widely accepted screening met

106 (SBFBT) and at 37 degrees C (SBF37) (thermal challenge test) once in volunteers and at the time of in

107 blinded, placebo-controlled oral provocation challenge tests (OPCTs) or by self-reported history in p

108 asthma was confirmed by either methacholine challenge testing or test of reversibility to beta-agoni

109 llowed up clinically with repeated bronchial challenge tests over 1 year.

110 ecline in C-peptide response during Sustacal challenge tests over a 6-year period, there was a diminu

111 Furthermore, on the challenge test, OVX+E animals tested without estrogen tr

112 Of the 66 challenge tests performed with negative skin-tested iodi

113 Thirty nine of 41 cases were challenge test positive.

114 17 of 78 patients with a negative penicillin challenge tested positive during challenges with other b

115 essed through blood tests, hypertonic saline challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

116 r of patients presented severe positive food challenge test reactions at low doses of the allergen pr

117 MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission d

118 blood flow and normal acetazolamide-enhanced challenge test results will do well after permanent caro

119 alysis further adjusted for maternal glucose challenge test results.

120 In vivo glucose challenge test revealed significantly increased glucose-

121 Saline challenge testing revealed enhanced renal fluid retentio

122 ation was demonstrated by specific bronchial challenge test (SBCT) with peach leaf extract.

123 A Sting Challenge Test (SCT) is the only reliable method to veri

124 siveness as indicated by methacholine (MTCH)-challenge test, serum total immunoglobulin E (TIgE), ser

125 The challenge test set was divided into three subcategories,

126 In an oral food challenge test, she felt abdominal pain and nausea only

127 to LMW and HMW agents by specific inhalation challenge test (SIC).

128 le collection devices in the market severely challenges test success rate.

129 it cannot replace the gold-standard aspirin challenge test, the implementation of the ANN might prov

130 ed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer of specific IgE antibody and/or ba

131 this hypothesis, we employed pharmacological challenge testing to compare serotonin function in patie

132 tests, and a subset (n = 13) underwent oral challenge tests to both formulations of GOS.

133 nstraints especially during surges, staffing challenges, test triage and communication strategies, cl

134 The bacterial challenge test using pathogenic Vibrio anguillarum revea

135 Her food oral challenge test was positive, as well as a skin-prick tes

136 pete with cocaine in a drug free and cocaine challenge test was sensitive to cocaine dose.

137 Methacholine challenge testing was performed before treatment randomi

138 A lung function test and a methacholine challenge test were performed at EGEA1 and EGEA2.

139 t airway hyperresponsiveness on methacholine challenge testing were compared with 66 age-matched cont

140 Nasal and cutaneous allergen challenge tests were performed annually.

141 cocorticoids (as determined by dexamethasone challenge tests) were reliably found.

142 ial ischemia in rats undergoing a dobutamine challenge test, which can be used to mimic exercise-like

143 Participants performed a Levodopa challenge test while wearing an inertial measurement uni

144 er transcriptome time-course analyses during challenge tests will deliver more information on the eff

145 cocaine for 10 d, and all groups underwent a challenge test with 10 mg/kg cocaine.

146 st, or a positive challenge test with it, IV challenge test with an alternative, negative skin-tested

147 test with the causal contrast, or a positive challenge test with it, IV challenge test with an altern

148 lower cumulative mortality during the shrimp challenge test with V. parahaemolyticus was observed in

149 sessed through microbial growth analysis and challenge testing with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, rev

150 rmination, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial challenge testing with suspected antigens, and re-review

151 or after 24 weeks of gestation, oral glucose challenge tests with 140- and 135-mg/dL cutoffs had sens

152 Diuretic challenge tests with furosemide or hydrochlorothiazide c

153 inflammatory drug hypersensitivity (NSAIDH), challenge tests with the culprit drug yield negative res