ライフサイエンスコーパス: chest radiograph

1 aboratory signs and absence of infiltrate on chest radiograph).

2 e localization of the aortic valve on supine chest radiograph.

3 consistent with pulmonary oedema on frontal chest radiograph.

4 putum smear result, and extent of disease on chest radiograph.

5 oracic echocardiography is equivalent to the chest radiograph.

6 nsthoracic echocardiography and confirmed by chest radiograph.

7 ss expensive than the routine postprocedural chest radiograph.

8 to simulate the pulmonary anatomy seen on a chest radiograph.

9 sician-diagnosed pneumonia, without use of a chest radiograph.

10 al (n = 26) abnormalities on the most recent chest radiograph.

11 ipsilateral IJ as detected by postprocedure chest radiograph.

12 jugular venous pressure, or cardiomegaly on chest radiograph.

13 e in the infant chest is air trapping on the chest radiograph.

14 chest radiographs first evaluate the infant chest radiograph.

15 ediastinal widening or pleural effusion on a chest radiograph.

16 e for the CT scan compared with that for one chest radiograph.

17 e for one CT scan compared with that for one chest radiograph.

18 trasound significantly outperformed portable chest radiograph.

19 a new, noncalcified pulmonary nodule seen on chest radiograph.

20 ard, which consisted of 1007 posteroanterior chest radiographs.

21 s (DCNNs) for detecting tuberculosis (TB) on chest radiographs.

22 There were no arterial placements found on chest radiographs.

23 Study radiologists independently reviewed chest radiographs.

24 RA) results, normal examinations, and normal chest radiographs.

25 ); 20 patients (87%) presented with abnormal chest radiographs.

26 uracy for detection of small lung cancers on chest radiographs.

27 lation that would benefit from daily routine chest radiographs.

28 bnormalities systematically reviewed initial chest radiographs.

29 nction test results; electrocardiograms; and chest radiographs.

30 57% (P = 0.006) but not orders for portable chest radiographs.

31 available were seen retrospectively on prior chest radiographs.

32 19) pneumonia from non-COVID-19 pneumonia on chest radiographs.

33 nificantly less likely to have cavitation on chest radiographs.

34 side studies, with 87% of patients receiving chest radiographs.

35 ty, nodule or mass, and fracture) on frontal chest radiographs.

36 ystem for detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest radiographs.

37 ful for automated prioritization of abnormal chest radiographs.

38 rformance automated binary classification of chest radiographs.

39 ions were used to classify clinical LRTI and chest radiographs.

40 Participants were shown 30 chest radiographs, 14 of which had a pneumothorax, and w

41 ree hundred posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiographs (189 radiographs with negative finding

42 (79%) and interstitial process for portable chest radiograph (29%).

43 n for both pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph (96% and 73%, respectively).

44 -certified radiologists who evaluated supine chest radiographs according to side-separate reading sco

45 ly sized collection of prospectively labeled chest radiographs achieved high diagnostic performance i

46 470 388 fully anonymized institutional adult chest radiographs acquired from 2007 to 2017.

47 acquired using one manufacturer (Siemens) to chest radiographs acquired using another (Philips), prod

48 le-GAN to translate texture information from chest radiographs acquired using one manufacturer (Sieme

49 Routine chest radiograph after this common procedure is an unnec

50 RFs, extracted from chest radiographs after the cycle-GAN's texture translat

51 gin H1N1 influenza, is largely restricted to chest radiograph and computed tomography (CT), which can

52 (33%) of the patients without infiltrate on chest radiograph and excluded CAP in 56 (29.8%) of the 1

53 racterized by ill-defined infiltrates on the chest radiograph and hypoxia.

54 AAS included an upright chest radiograph and upright and supine abdominal radiog

55 essed by independent review of daily digital chest radiographs and arterial blood gases.

56 All chest radiographs and clinical outcomes of patients, inc

57 Chest radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans ob

58 ive pulmonary vascular abnormalities seen on chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in

59 ol and Prevention criteria for EVALI and had chest radiographs and CT images available at initial pre

60 Distinctive vascular lesions on chest radiographs and CT scans in Eisenmenger syndrome a

61 seases are included, and pictorial examples (chest radiographs and CT scans) are provided for the maj

62 stinctive vascular abnormalities observed on chest radiographs and CT scans.

63 fied these radiologist-missed cancers on the chest radiographs and graded them for visibility, locati

64 Chest radiographs and high-resolution computed tomograph

65 orotic fractures, such as spine fractures on chest radiographs and sagittal multidetector CT reconstr

66 o the previous Mayo Lung Project, which used chest radiographs and sputum cytology for screening high

67 oracic vertebral body on frontal and lateral chest radiographs and to a line drawn between the anteri

68 t African sites, 206 (74%) had cavitation on chest radiograph, and 60 (22%) had HIV infection.

69 tion of two negative sputum smears, a normal chest radiograph, and a CD4+ cell count of 350 or more p

70 pneumonia were no fever, no consolidation on chest radiograph, and absolute neutrophil count <5 x 109

71 Applicants underwent a chest radiograph, and any with results suggestive of tub

72 ein angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, chest radiograph, and chest computed tomography) togethe

73 patients had pulmonary ultrasound, portable chest radiograph, and chest CT performed within 24 hours

74 he lung for carbon monoxide, pulse oximetry, chest radiograph, and high-resolution thoracic computeri

75 acute heart failure, dyspnoea, congestion on chest radiograph, and increased brain natriuretic peptid

76 apillary refill, atelectasis or pneumonia on chest radiograph, and pleural effusion.

77 eline period, unadjusted arterial blood gas, chest radiograph, and RBC utilization in the interventio

78 ial incentives targeting arterial blood gas, chest radiograph, and RBC utilization.

79 ith 128 fewer arterial blood gases, 73 fewer chest radiographs, and 16 fewer RBCs per 100 patients (p

80 agnosis, an interpretable perfusion scan and chest radiographs, and a Wells' score.

81 p with daily complete blood count, scheduled chest radiographs, and biopsies.

82 Thoracic CT scans, chest radiographs, and clinical data were reviewed for 2

83 laboratory data, electrocardiograms (EKGs), chest radiographs, and pulmonary function tests have bee

84 Arterial blood gas testing, chest radiographs, and RBC transfusions provide an impor

85 decrease the avoidable arterial blood gases, chest radiographs, and RBC utilization on utilization of

86 e number of orders for arterial blood gases, chest radiographs, and RBCs per patient.

87 fection; multiple infiltrates or cavities on chest radiograph; and comatose state, intubation, receip

88 Chest radiograph approximated accurate catheter tip posi

89 e (aPR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.60-3.52), and normal chest radiograph (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.63-2.16) and was

90 Routine postprocedure chest radiographs are considered standard practice.

91 wo experienced radiologists categorized each chest radiograph as characteristic, nonspecific, or nega

92 experienced radiologists who identified fake chest radiographs as belonging to a target manufacturer

93 inputs, ML classifiers categorized the fake chest radiographs as belonging to the target manufacture

94 standard, the AI system correctly classified chest radiographs as COVID-19 pneumonia with an area und

95 Using cycle-GAN-generated chest radiographs as inputs, ML classifiers categorized

96 data set was used to train CNNs to classify chest radiographs as normal or abnormal before evaluatio

97 gnostic performance in the classification of chest radiographs as normal or abnormal; this function m

98 bgroup of men with normal lung parenchyma on chest radiograph at baseline, there was evidence of expo

99 ortality; and percentage of opacification on chest radiograph at drain removal and at 30, 90, and 180

100 hypothesis that reading perfusion scans with chest radiographs but without ventilation scans, and cat

101 dentifying lung cancers previously missed on chest radiographs by radiologists, with histopathologic

102 ut (ie, milliampere seconds) of about 50%, a chest radiograph can be obtained with image quality appr

103 Neither clinical symptoms nor findings on chest radiographs can reliably distinguish children with

104 Chest radiograph categorization was compared against RT-

105 lysis included 79 185 matched A and B Reader chest radiograph classifications.

106 The initial chest radiographs, clinical variables, and outcomes, inc

107 esented with increased severity on admission chest radiographs compared with White or non-Hispanic pa

108 s involving ionizing radiation that included chest radiograph, computed tomogram scans, radionuclide

109 s (culture positive), probable tuberculosis (chest radiograph consistent), possible tuberculosis (che

110 The mean time between catheter insertion and chest radiograph control (28.3 min) was clearly longer t

111 Similarly, patient care items ("chest radiograph correctly interpreted"; "time to start

112 Pulmonary infiltrates seen on chest radiographs corresponded to intraalveolar edema an

113 For the 500 sampled chest radiographs, CV19-Net achieved an AUC of 0.94 (95%

114 AAP, NA-LRI and overall rates of visits with chest radiograph (CXR) examination in the pediatrics eme

115 essed CAAP, NA-LRIs, and overall visits with chest radiograph (CXR) examination rates in the pediatri

116 Chest radiograph (CXR) findings were classified as showi

117 n both microbiologically confirmed cases and chest radiograph (CXR)-positive cases compared to contro

118 y (CT) of the chest (98.0% and 100%) and for chest radiograph (CXR; 57.6% and 100%).

119 Chest radiographs (CXRs) are a valuable diagnostic tool

120 Chest radiographs (CXRs) are frequently used to assess p

121 Chest radiographs (CXRs) were graded from 0 to 6 (0, no

122 2 matched V/Q defects with regionally normal chest radiograph, (d) 1-3 small segmental perfusion defe

123 icly available National Institutes of Health chest radiograph dataset comprising 112 120 chest radiog

124 ed after a transient ischemic attack, when a chest radiograph demonstrated a right lung mass.

125 Lateral chest radiograph demonstrated lytic destruction of the x

126 Annual screening with chest radiograph did not reduce lung cancer mortality co

127 identally on routine imaging studies such as chest radiograph, echocardiography, chest computed tomog

128 Of the 100 portable chest radiographs evaluated by three reviewers, two revi

129 ormance for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs, even when baseline performance was op

130 ng clinical decision support tool for supine chest radiograph examinations in the clinical routine wi

131 ation criteria with bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph experience a more intense early inflamm

132 l for visualizing neural network learning of chest radiograph features in congestive heart failure (C

133 Teamwork behavior items (e.g., "chest radiograph findings communicated to team" and "tea

134 Radiologists were blinded to the supine chest radiograph findings during CT interpretation.

135 vel models for detecting clinically relevant chest radiograph findings were developed for this study

136 reement of pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph findings with correlating lobe ("lobe-s

137 and general radiologists familiar with adult chest radiographs first evaluate the infant chest radiog

138 tuberculin skin test, syphilis serology, and chest radiograph) followed by more complex investigation

139 linically relevant complications detected on chest radiographs following ultrasound-guided right inte

140 linically relevant complications detected on chest radiographs following ultrasound-guided right inte

141 oup were offered annual posteroanterior view chest radiograph for 4 years.

142 st between pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph for interstitial findings (86% vs 29%,

143 ffective, expeditious alternative to routine chest radiograph for position controls of central venous

144 trained cardiothoracic radiologists examined chest radiographs for opacities and assigned a clinicall

145 al low-dose CT assessments with three annual chest radiographs for the early detection of lung cancer

146 spective study, 22 960 de-identified frontal chest radiographs from 11 153 patients (average age, 60.

147 for detecting TB-associated abnormalities in chest radiographs from outpatients in Nepal and Cameroon

148 ving any WHO danger sign or consolidation on chest radiograph had an NPV of 96.8% for adverse pneumon

149 Background Disease severity on chest radiographs has been associated with higher risk o

150 A chest radiograph helps localise the site and possible co

151 , 1.15 to 5.63; P=0.02), pleural effusion on chest radiograph (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.18 to 5.58; P=0.02

152 An automated deep-learning approach based on chest radiograph images may identify more smokers at hig

153 of the aortic valve location on plain supine chest radiograph images, which can be used to evaluate i

154 etermine the aortic valve location on supine chest radiograph images.

155 Symptoms and chest radiographs improved, and amounts of macrophage in

156 position of catheter was then controlled by chest radiograph in all cases.

157 st that most influence the appearance of the chest radiograph in infants with cough and fever.

158 as associated with alveolar consolidation on chest radiograph in nonconfirmed cases, and with high (>

159 on could be easily monitored on plain supine chest radiograph in the ICU.

160 rials and Methods A total of 103 489 frontal chest radiographs in 46 712 patients acquired from Janua

161 ndomly sampled test data set composed of 500 chest radiographs in 500 patients was evaluated by the C

162 Initial chest radiographs in children with a mild and self-limit

163 9-Net, was trained, validated, and tested on chest radiographs in patients with and without COVID-19

164 ystem (CAD4COVID-XRay) was trained on 24 678 chest radiographs, including 1540 used only for validati

165 diograph consistent), possible tuberculosis (chest radiograph inconsistent), or not tuberculosis (imp

166 All patients had dyspnoea, congestion on chest radiograph, increased brain natriuretic peptide (B

167 evelop and evaluate deep learning models for chest radiograph interpretation by using radiologist-adj

168 Conclusion Chest radiograph interpretation skill increased with exp

169 Purpose To investigate the development of chest radiograph interpretation skill through medical tr

170 key aspects such as antibiotic pretreatment, chest radiograph interpretation, utility of induced sput

171 All chest radiographs interpreted as positive were reviewed

172 Location of an intrathoracic lesion on chest radiograph is facilitated by application of 'silho

173 Chest radiograph is key in establishing parenchymal lung

174 Another objective was to point out that chest radiograph is not sufficient to depict the evoluti

175 ity of screening for lung cancer with modern chest radiographs is unknown.

176 two reviewers for detecting abnormalities on chest radiographs (kappa = 0.99; 95% confidence interval

177 sion Features of congestive heart failure on chest radiographs learned by neural networks can be iden

178 e use of CBCs, chemistry panels, bone scans, chest radiographs, liver ultrasounds, computed tomograph

179 blood counts, chemistry panels, bone scans, chest radiographs, liver ultrasounds, pelvic ultrasounds

180 The absence of a new infiltrate on a plain chest radiograph lowers the likelihood of VAP (summary L

181 1), anemia (LR range, 2.2-3.3), and abnormal chest radiograph (LR range, 2.5-3.8).

182 radiologists had difficulty recognizing the chest radiographs' manufacturer.

183 nit, early CT scan findings complementary to chest radiograph markedly affect both diagnosis and clin

184 Results A total of 2060 patients (5806 chest radiographs; mean age, 62 years +/- 16 [standard d

185 h COVID-19 pneumonia and 3148 patients (5300 chest radiographs; mean age, 64 years +/- 18; 1578 men)

186 as the severity of lung disease on admission chest radiographs, measured by using the modified Radiog

187 ligence (AI) algorithm to detect COVID-19 on chest radiographs might be useful for triage or infectio

188 nnual computed tomography (CT, n = 9,357) or chest radiograph (n = 9,357) screening and monitored for

189 consisted of a set of continuously acquired chest radiographs (n = 454) obtained in patients suspect

190 empirical evidence, the decision to order a chest radiograph needs to rely on expert opinion in seek

191 1.03-1.27] per cycle threshold [CT]), and a chest radiograph not suggestive of active tuberculosis (

192 recent previous tuberculosis, high CT, and a chest radiograph not suggestive of active tuberculosis.

193 Prior chest radiographs (not shown) were normal, and angiograp

194 A chest radiograph obtained at the outside hospital prompt

195 A chest radiograph obtained at the time of physical examin

196 sarcoidosis after evaluation of an abnormal chest radiograph obtained during work-up of a recently d

197 and mid to lower lung zone distribution on a chest radiograph obtained in the setting of pandemic COV

198 from 1995 to 2006 at two institutions, each chest radiograph obtained prior to tumor discovery was e

199 Multiple sequential chest radiographs obtained between 1955 and 2004 in 84 w

200 ds In a retrospective study, 216 431 frontal chest radiographs obtained between 1998 and 2012 were pr

201 firmed S-OIV infection and available initial chest radiographs obtained between April 2009 and Octobe

202 am was applied to 34 posteroanterior digital chest radiographs obtained in 34 patients (21 men, 13 wo

203 -cm lung regions were extracted from digital chest radiographs obtained in healthy subjects.

204 s independently reviewed frontal and lateral chest radiographs obtained in young patients 24 hours af

205 Standard and DES chest radiographs of 50 patients with 55 confirmed prima

206 eaders reinterpreted the perfusion scans and chest radiographs of eligible patients.

207 Supine anterior-posterior chest radiographs of patients with an aortic valve prost

208 Postoperative chest radiographs on postoperative days 1, 3, and 8 (Fig

209 ), for automated real-time triaging of adult chest radiographs on the basis of the urgency of imaging

210 ible active tuberculosis (most with abnormal chest radiographs, only 18% symptomatic).

211 equired obstructive spirometry, emphysema on chest radiograph or computed tomography, or physician di

212 ual clinical practice-eg, 50 (73%) ordered a chest radiograph or sputum test during the vignette comp

213 Any follow-up chest radiographs or computed tomographic images that ha

214 antimicrobial use (P = 0.032), and number of chest radiographs (P = 0.005), when controlling for pote

215 onent tests (P < 0.001) and 16% for portable chest radiographs (P = 0.03).

216 For the non-COVID-19 chest radiographs, patients with pneumonia who underwent

217 evaluation (ie, tuberculin skin test and/or chest radiograph) per prevalent case diagnosed; number o

218 Sixty-six percent (547/833) of those with chest radiographs performed had infiltrates and 31% (340

219 Of 451 patients with chest radiographs performed, 195 (43%) had pneumonia (sp

220 , 76%; 95% CI, 62%-90%), and cardiomegaly on chest radiograph (pooled sensitivity, 89%; 95% CI, 73%-1

221 For the chest radiographs positive for COVID-19, patients with r

222 Vietnamese immigrants with abnormal chest radiographs provided up to three sputum specimens,

223 sitively with extent of lung infiltration on chest radiographs (r = 0.483; p < 0.05).

224 s achieved by additionally rating the supine chest radiograph reading score 1 as positive for pneumon

225 0.78-0.93) when considering only the supine chest radiograph reading score 2 as positive for pneumon

226 has become a standard of care, postinsertion chest radiograph remains the gold standard to confirm ce

227 terpretation of lung opacities in ICU supine chest radiographs remains challenging.

228 "edema" or "bilateral + infiltrates" on the chest radiograph report, a tidal volume of >8 mL/kg pred

229 a (validated by review of medical records or chest radiograph reports).

230 nderstanding of the appearance of the infant chest radiograph requires an understanding of the anatom

231 t for both pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph respectively (right lung: 92.5% vs 65.7

232 Chest radiograph revealed a parenchymal infiltrate in 18

233 ed between pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph (right: 99% vs 87%; p = 0.009 and left:

234 Chest radiograph ruled out pneumothorax in 137 of 137 pa

235 iomegaly, interstitial or pulmonary edema on chest radiograph, S(3) heart sound, tachycardia) plus le

236 Among patients who were admitted, a chest radiograph score of 3 or more was an independent p

237 nd clinical condition (respiratory function, chest radiograph score, or Shwachman clinical score).

238 he relationship between clinical parameters, chest radiograph scores, and patient outcomes.

239 readers reviewed each worker's longitudinal chest radiograph series in reverse chronologic order and

240 rs of hospital admission (n = 145, 43%) were chest radiograph severity score of 2 or more (odds ratio

241 The model trained on the chest radiograph severity score produced the following a

242 19 presenting to the emergency department, a chest radiograph severity score was predictive of risk f

243 es (AUCs): 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.88) for the chest radiograph severity score, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.8

244 Purpose To analyze the prognostic value of a chest radiograph severity scoring system for younger (no

245 The first chest radiograph showed significantly fewer abnormalitie

246 Fifteen chest radiographs showed major abnormalities.

247 Chest radiographs showed mild pulmonary edema with a sma

248 Chest radiographs showed pulmonary infiltrates in all pa

249 er the cycle-GAN's texture translation (fake chest radiographs), showed decreased intermanufacturer R

250 r antibodies, and double-stranded DNA, and a chest radiograph showing pleural fluid.

251 of anticentromere antibodies, hypertension, chest radiograph suggestive of pulmonary fibrosis, and l

252 Lobar infiltrates on chest radiographs suggestive of bacterial pneumonia were

253 t in all, many had residual abnormalities on chest radiographs (ten [67%] of 15) and pulmonary functi

254 ve a higher severity of disease on admission chest radiographs than White or non-Hispanic patients, a

255 ding and overlying a subtle lung nodule on a chest radiograph that are created by the projection of a

256 ARDS diagnosis relies on oxygenation and the chest radiograph that might be directly influenced by th

257 Fifty-three chest radiographs that depicted 31 primary lung cancers

258 or primary interpretation, full-size digital chest radiographs that have been JPEG compressed to 10:1

259 learning AI algorithm to detect COVID-19 on chest radiographs, that was trained and tested on a larg

260 on of the peripheral vein and postprocedural chest radiograph to assess catheter tip position.

261 We obtained posteroanterior chest radiographs to identify the prevalence of pleural

262 An infiltrate on chest radiograph was considered the reference standard f

263 Each patient's ED chest radiograph was divided into six zones and examined

264 Chest radiograph was suggestive of a posterior mediastin

265 ases of tuberculosis (i.e., cases in which a chest radiograph was suggestive of active tuberculosis b

266 nactive tuberculosis (i.e., cases in which a chest radiograph was suggestive of tuberculosis that was

267 the detection of coronavirus disease 2019 on chest radiographs was comparable with that of six indepe

268 Neovascularity on chest radiographs was more common in Eisenmenger syndrom

269 The frequency of normal chest radiographs was significantly higher in group 1 (n

270 Eleven (48%) of 23 cancers for which prior chest radiographs were available were seen retrospective

271 Migrants whose chest radiographs were compatible with active tuberculos

272 Results Normal chest radiographs were detected by our AI system with a

273 andardized procedure notes and postprocedure chest radiographs were extracted and individually review

274 Chest radiographs were independently assessed by two obs

275 Chest radiographs were interpreted according to the Inte

276 Skull and chest radiographs were obtained (Figs 1, 2), and the pat

277 Chest radiographs were obtained after implantation.

278 Chest radiographs were obtained approximately 28 days po

279 Posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs were obtained in the emergency departm

280 A total of 1964 chest radiographs were obtained, of which normal images

281 At this time, chest radiographs were obtained.

282 Independent reviews of chest radiographs were performed by radiologists.

283 lity was calculated, and echocardiograms and chest radiographs were performed on all study patients.

284 Chest radiographs were read according to a WHO standard.

285 The chest radiographs were read as "normal/near normal," "ab

286 The medical records and daily chest radiographs were reviewed by a pediatric radiologi

287 Medical records and chest radiographs were reviewed for the main tertiary ho

288 Chest radiographs were reviewed independently by study r

289 itoring, arterial gas analysis, and portable chest radiographs were reviewed to identify the timing o

290 graphy and lung ultrasound is noninferior to chest radiograph when used to accurately assess central

291 t pulmonary ultrasound protocol and portable chest radiograph with chest CT for localization of patho

292 luid-density posterior mediastinal lesion on chest radiograph with destruction of the vertebral body

293 Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which compared chest radiograph with spiral computed tomographic (CT) s

294 orithm, detected coronavirus disease 2019 on chest radiographs with a performance similar to that of

295 ts are proficient in differentiating between chest radiographs with and without symptoms of pneumonia

296 ired using another (Philips), producing fake chest radiographs with different textures.

297 lusion Automated real-time triaging of adult chest radiographs with use of an artificial intelligence

298 orks developed to detect COVID-19 on frontal chest radiographs, with reverse-transcription polymerase

299 urrent illness such as cough and an abnormal chest radiograph without antecedent tuberculosis or pneu

300 ning Trial, which compared CT screening with chest radiograph, yielded a mortality advantage of 20% t