ライフサイエンスコーパス: chest radiography

1 ose tests; electrocardiography; and portable chest radiography).

2 not provide a microbiological diagnosis (eg, chest radiography).

3 umonia from other causes of abnormalities at chest radiography.

4 sis for evaluating clinical image quality in chest radiography.

5 mputed tomography of the chest compared with chest radiography.

6 diagnosed using clinical questionnaires and chest radiography.

7 center during 2007 underwent PA and lateral chest radiography.

8 f the lesions overlooked by human readers at chest radiography.

9 the diagnostic capabilities and influence of chest radiography.

10 , particularly the use of pulse oximetry and chest radiography.

11 onary nodules, one of which was calcified at chest radiography.

12 nd rate of false-positive results of routine chest radiography.

13 e (50%) of their 24 cancers were detected at chest radiography.

14 polymerase chain reaction to detect HIV, and chest radiography.

15 at baseline, compared with 68 (7% [5-9]) by chest radiography.

16 screen-film posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiography.

17 raphy system as they are used clinically for chest radiography.

18 stic thoracentesis do not need postprocedure chest radiography.

19 raphy compared with conventional screen-film chest radiography.

20 al examination, basic laboratory testing, or chest radiography.

21 ients with positive or equivocal findings at chest radiography.

22 mortality by 20%, when compared with annual chest radiography.

23 odeficiency virus and 1703 had cavitation on chest radiography.

24 without any baseline chest images underwent chest radiography.

25 or clinical implementation of phase-contrast chest radiography.

26 ificity of low-dose computed tomography with chest radiography.

27 ings, analogous modalities are pelvic US and chest radiography.

28 L-2R and ACE levels determined and underwent chest radiography.

29 he catheter tip determined by postprocedural chest radiography.

30 and exclusion of pneumothorax compared with chest radiography.

31 identify four out of every five earlier than chest radiography.

32 pheid Inc.), tuberculin skin test (TST), and chest radiography.

33 ence of a single or multilobar infiltrate on chest radiography.

34 (1:1) to follow-up with either PET/CT or US/chest radiography.

35 d tomography (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest radiography.

36 course of antibiotics or oral steroids, and chest radiography.

37 lacement of yearly follow-up posteroanterior chest radiography.

38 compared with that diagnosed with routine US/chest radiography.

39 c, and with a right lower lobe infiltrate on chest radiography.

40 sonographic air bronchograms undetectable by chest radiography.

41 Thirteen studies were eligible (CT = 12; chest radiography = 1; US = 0).

42 tential for automating the interpretation of chest radiography(2).

43 y group (26,715 to low-dose CT and 26,724 to chest radiography); 26,309 participants (98.5%) and 26,0

44 (41%), fecal occult blood testing (39%), and chest radiography (36%), were desired.

45 Chest radiography (38%) and abdominal computed tomograph

46 the 69,820 patients, 66,276 (95%) underwent chest radiography, 63,715 (91%) received supplemental ox

47 nd 39 of 40 relapses were identified with US/chest radiography (97.5%; P = .0001 for the equivalence

48 d with the 26,554 participants who underwent chest radiography, according to the quintile of 5-year r

49 964) with findings of pulmonary infection at chest radiography (all of whom were symptomatic) require

50 ents with findings of pulmonary infection at chest radiography (all of whom were symptomatic) require

51 Background Dark-field chest radiography allows for assessment of lung alveolar

52 Chest radiography alone may be sufficient for initial sc

53 alth and work questionnaire, spirometry, and chest radiography among 464 male California rice farmers

54 were included and randomized, 68 (49.6%) to chest radiography and 69 (50.4%) to low-dose computed to

55 formed by an expert sonographer, and finally chest radiography and a final evaluation performed by a

56 galy or signs of congestive heart failure on chest radiography and absence of known valve disease wer

57 presentation who underwent a combination of chest radiography and additional cardiovascular or pulmo

58 However, chest radiography and arterial blood gas sampling seem u

59 rapy, with disease severity determined using chest radiography and bacterial load.

60 Combining chest radiography and clinical variables increased the A

61 CLMs using ultrasound and MRI has increased, chest radiography and computed tomography still play imp

62 half of the examinations submitted were from chest radiography and CT (1618 of 3542 [46%]), followed

63 The accuracies of chest radiography and CT for the detection of pleural di

64 o identify patients with COVID-19 infection, chest radiography and CT play a vital role in the detect

65 Chest radiography and CT were performed at presentation

66 Chest radiography and CT were performed at presentation

67 All patients underwent chest radiography and CT within 4 days of presentation (

68 Chest radiography and CT, respectively, revealed interst

69 bnormality was predominately diffuse at both chest radiography and CT.

70 Anteroposterior chest radiography and enhanced chest CT were also perfor

71 Anteroposterior chest radiography and enhanced chest CT were also perfor

72 ith the development of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest radiography and hypoxia requiring supplemental oxy

73 Initial radiologic examination included chest radiography and plain abdominal erect radiography.

74 outline a 'basic' screening panel (including chest radiography and preliminary laboratory tests) and

75 ears for TB using diagnostic tests including chest radiography and repeated induced sputum sample tes

76 Combined chest radiography and serum ACE levels at the standard c

77 Chest radiography and serum angiotensin-converting enzym

78 Chest radiography and sputum culture drug susceptibility

79 ach study year and at months 12 and 24 using chest radiography and sputum culture.

80 After little success with chest radiography and sputum cytology, in 2011 the Unite

81 ervice Corps (IHSC) medical staffing utilize chest radiography and symptom screening as the primary s

82 er; had pneumonia that had been diagnosed by chest radiography and that was documented as being cause

83 LUS was performed within 24 hours of chest radiography and the presence of unilateral and bil

84 All patients underwent chest radiography and thin-section CT, and images were i

85 ials and Methods Patients who underwent both chest radiography and thoracic CT within 72 hours betwee

86 Patients have initial imaging with chest radiography and ultrasound, which can also be used

87 ns (eg, blood cell counts, metabolic panels, chest radiography, and electrocardiography) performed wi

88 chocardiography, metabolic exercise testing, chest radiography, and hemodynamics before intervention

89 phy delivers a larger dose of radiation than chest radiography, and only 1499 (52.3%) knew that radia

90 ymptoms and systemic manifestations, undergo chest radiography, and receive interventions.

91 ccult-cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, a

92 he efficacy of low-dose computed tomography, chest radiography, and sputum cytologic evaluation for l

93 .8-3.8]) by CT and seven (0.7% [0.3-1.3]) by chest radiography, and stage I malignant disease in 23 (

94 participants underwent clinical evaluation, chest radiography, and testing with sputum Xpert MTB/RIF

95 lture colony count, bilateral cavitations on chest radiography, and the number of drugs the initial i

96 On the basis of clinical assessment, chest radiography, and transthoracic echocardiography, a

97 the procedure to catheter utilization after chest radiography approval was 2.4 hours.

98 US and chest radiography are diagnostic tools that enable effec

99 icting 6-y lung cancer incidence in the PLCO chest radiography arm, with sensitivities >79.8% and spe

100 to diagnose pneumonia were determined using chest radiography as a reference standard.

101 cy with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiv

102 ceiving M. vaccae had greater improvement on chest radiography at 6 months (91% vs. 77% for placebo r

103 ine or screening posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography at a university-affiliated primary car

104 ded consecutive adult patients who underwent chest radiography at one of four Danish hospitals in Jan

105 devices, and cardiac monitors who underwent chest radiography between January 2012 and January 2022.

106 s 40 years of age or older who had undergone chest radiography between January and December 2022 with

107 old patients who underwent DE PA and lateral chest radiography between March 1, 2021, and June 30, 20

108 raphs, patients with pneumonia who underwent chest radiography between October 1, 2019, and December

109 underwent several imaging studies-including chest radiography; bone scanning; contrast material-enha

110 nstances of NSCLC evident retrospectively at chest radiography but undetected by a radiologist at a t

111 trictive bronchiolitis had normal results on chest radiography, but about one quarter were found to h

112 ference standard for diagnosing pneumonia is chest radiography, but it is likely that many physicians

113 on (ideally with rapid molecular tests), but chest radiography can be helpful.

114 Systematic but unselective daily routine chest radiography can likely be eliminated without incre

115 Perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography can provide diagnostic accuracy simila

116 ers at a smaller size and earlier stage than chest radiography can.

117 ly detection of pneumothorax, most often via chest radiography, can help determine need for emergent

118 Chest radiography (chest x-ray [CXR] and chest computed

119 Its features have been described on plain chest radiography, chest computed tomography (CT), chest

120 Chest radiography combined with sIL-2R at a cutoff of 60

121 icantly improved with selenium-based digital chest radiography compared with conventional screen-film

122 sented with higher mRALE scores at admission chest radiography compared with White or non-Hispanic pa

123 quires various imaging techniques, including chest radiography, computed tomographic scanning, and bo

124 These imaging modalities include chest radiography, computed tomography, lung magnetic re

125 ren between 1 month and 15 years of age with chest radiography-confirmed pneumonia.

126 V-P scintigraphy, chest radiography, conventional and thin-section CT, and

127 management by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus D

128 Our results show that phase-contrast chest radiography could play a future role in observing

129 l computed tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung canc

130 For larger datasets-pneumonia (chest radiography), COVID-19 (CT), SARS-CoV-2 (CT), and

131 aluate for metastatic disease using low-cost chest radiography (CXR) and abdominal ultrasound (US) fo

132 for three specific scenarios: performance of chest radiography (CXR) as the first radiation-associate

133 t or former heavy smokers to receive LDCT or chest radiography (CXR) for three annual screens.

134 Chest radiography (CXR) is the most widely-used thoracic

135 ave only recently been employed to interpret chest radiography (CXR) to screen and triage people for

136 Portable chest radiography (CXR), point of care ultrasound, and c

137 unction tests, Doppler echocardiography, and chest radiography (CXR).

138 RDS and compare its performance with that of chest radiography (CXR).

139 computed tomography (LDCT; n = 26,722) with chest radiography (CXR; n = 26,732) for lung cancer dete

140 An annotated nonpublic German chest radiography dataset (18 500 reports, 16 844 patien

141 Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) provides real-time information r

142 ose To reduce data set size requirements for chest radiography deep learning models by using an advan

143 Conclusion Dynamic chest radiography demonstrated improvement in diaphragm

144 piratory tract, had evidence of pneumonia by chest radiography, diagnosis of pneumonia within 24 h of

145 vealed that the elimination of daily routine chest radiography did not affect either hospital or ICU

146 quired alveolar pneumonia (CAAP) and overall chest radiography examination rates in young children.

147 Chest radiography exhibited a relatively low sensitivity

148 fever within 48 hours, respiratory symptoms, chest radiography findings consistent with pneumonia as

149 er with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001;

150 to analyze the clinical utility of screening chest radiography for asymptomatic or minimally symptoma

151 Background Supine chest radiography for bedridden patients in intensive ca

152 accuracy of bedside ultrasound compared with chest radiography for confirmation of central venous cat

153 sensitivity of the method was compared with chest radiography for detecting radiation-induced change

154 Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in traum

155 sion Tomosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determin

156 ikelihood ratios [LRs] for practitioners for chest radiography for pneumonia: positive LR, 4.8; evide

157 , dual-energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and man

158 the cost effectiveness of routine miniature chest radiography for screening for tuberculosis on admi

159 ening, with the use of either low-dose CT or chest radiography, for 3 years.

160 Chest radiography frequently serves as baseline imaging

161 y hospital who had been imaged using bedside chest radiography from January 2009 to December 2020 wer

162 biotic medications (from 74.4% to 60.1%) and chest radiography (from 59.2% to 51.7%) decreased, where

163 ups: those with pericardial calcification on chest radiography (group I) and those without (group II)

164 Model validation in the chest radiography groups of the PLCO and the National Lu

165 CT examination and 4% with a false-positive chest radiography had a resulting invasive procedure.

166 Routine chest radiography has low diagnostic yield in asymptomat

167 Background Chest radiography has not been validated for its prognos

168 Chest radiography (images not shown) revealed bronchiect

169 owed that tuberculosis screening by (mobile) chest radiography improved screening coverage and tuberc

170 on of dark-field radiography to conventional chest radiography improves pneumothorax detection, subst

171 ults: culture/molecular + immunodiagnostic + chest radiography in 12 (27.9%) cases, immunodiagnostic

172 aphy in 12 (27.9%) cases, immunodiagnostic + chest radiography in 19 (44.2%) cases, culture/molecular

173 phy in 19 (44.2%) cases, culture/molecular + chest radiography in 2 (4.7%) cases, culture + immunodia

174 were compared at posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography in 52 adult male patients.

175 Universal chest radiography in a large pre-employment TB screening

176 eness of low-dose CT screening compared with chest radiography in a nationally representative target

177 Here, we explore phase-contrast chest radiography in a realistic in silico framework.

178 mined the effect of abandoning daily routine chest radiography in adults in intensive care units (ICU

179 inical assessment, tuberculin skin test, and chest radiography in all eligible children irrespective

180 gher for tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fo

181 ning has the potential to augment the use of chest radiography in clinical radiology, but challenges

182 aphic variables and to compare sonograhy and chest radiography in detecting early stages of NEC in su

183 t RT-PCR results to determine the utility of chest radiography in diagnosing COVID-19.

184 tive and quantitative features of dark-field chest radiography in participants with pulmonary emphyse

185 n impact on radiomic diagnostic accuracy for chest radiography in patients with congestive heart fail

186 Chest radiography in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF)

187 The incidence of new opacity on chest radiography in the 48 hours after tracheal intubat

188 w-dose helical computed tomography (CT) with chest radiography in the screening of older current and

189 ma patients older than 14 years who received chest radiography in this prospective, observational, di

190 lure and had dyspnea, vascular congestion on chest radiography, increased plasma concentrations of na

191 recognizing the manufacturer on the basis of chest radiography inputs.

192 Conclusion AI-assisted chest radiography interpretation resulted in absolute in

193 However, the detection of pneumonia from chest radiography is a difficult task even for experienc

194 Chest Radiography is a non-invasive imaging modality for

195 This result shows that systematic use of chest radiography is a useful tool for active TB screeni

196 Chest radiography is considered the gold standard for pn

197 Screening for tuberculosis with miniature chest radiography is cost effective even under a wide ra

198 Chest radiography is generally the first imaging modalit

199 leischner Society recommendations, screening chest radiography is not indicated in patients with coro

200 normalities or asymmetrical lung sounds, and chest radiography is usually not indicated.

201 ver, the application of GPT-4V to real-world chest radiography is yet to be thoroughly examined.

202 Keywords: Dual Energy Chest Radiography, Lateral Chest Radiography, Lateral Ch

203 ords: Dual Energy Chest Radiography, Lateral Chest Radiography, Lateral Chest X-ray Coronary Calcium,

204 tients with cough lasting 3 weeks or longer, chest radiography may be warranted in the absence of oth

205 Background Chest radiography may play an important role in triage f

206 not noted nor controlled for during portable chest radiography, may substantially alter the interpret

207 Computed tomography (CT) and chest radiography models were used.

208 ned for TB with an algorithm using symptoms, chest radiography, molecular diagnostics, and tuberculin

209 ghest numbers of follow-up examinations were chest radiography (n=431), chest CT (n=410), abdominal C

210 Materials and Methods SupCon helped generate chest radiography networks from 821 544 chest radiograph

211 d contrastive [SupCon] learning) to generate chest radiography networks.

212 ratio of < or = 150 torr (< or = 20 kPa) and chest radiography on admission to the cardiovascular ICU

213 Of the 249 patients who underwent chest radiography on admission, 100 (40%) had findings c

214 e of the hemithorax occupied by effusion, on chest radiography on day 7 as compared with day 1.

215 culture + immunodiagnostic in 1 (2.3%) case, chest radiography only in 8 (18.6%) cases, and immunodia

216 two study sites compared times for two-view chest radiography only, and those at the other two study

217 re diagnosis, of 6897 patients who had had a chest radiography, only 2296 (33%) also had spirometry.

218 e primary outcome was pneumonia diagnosed by chest radiography or by the presence of 3 respiratory in

219 Participants were randomized to chest radiography or low-dose computed tomography screen

220 Two randomized trials of screening with chest radiography or low-dose CT are currently under way

221 cer screening with low-dose CT compared with chest radiography or no screening.

222 to other screening strategies initiated with chest radiography or symptoms, the trial of all particip

223 ow significant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone.

224 tection when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis.

225 malnutrition) and parenchymal abnormality on chest radiography or who had cervical lymphadenopathy.

226 Chest radiography or Xpert RIF/MTB, delivered through ma

227 al staging approach including bone scanning, chest radiography, or dedicated CT and abdominopelvic so

228 lta infection, they were more likely to have chest radiography performed (difference, 9.7% [95% CI, 4

229 ildren with Omicron infection most often had chest radiography performed and received treatments; com

230 hs were selected using 2 strategies from all chest radiography performed at the hospitals, including

231 Of the 17 children who had chest radiography performed, 12 (70.6%) had abnormal fin

232 conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and to

233 omography (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imag

234 nts were examined with a clinical dark-field chest radiography prototype that simultaneously acquired

235 ronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cell components, chest radiography, pulmonary function test results, and

236 Symptomatic employees had chest radiography, pulmonary function tests, high-resolu

237 h asthma, PECC was associated with decreased chest radiography rates among pediatric-resourced hospit

238 se computed tomography (CT) as compared with chest radiography reduced lung-cancer mortality.

239 al computed tomography (CT) rather than with chest radiography reduced mortality from lung cancer.

240 Background Chest radiography remains the most common radiologic exa

241 ned with structured semiquantitative bedside chest radiography reports allowed nonradiologist physici

242 Materials and Methods Chest radiography reports from the MIMIC-CXR and Nationa

243 ng the presence or absence of 13 findings on chest radiography reports showed moderate to substantial

244 3.4% for low-dose CT and 73.5% and 91.3% for chest radiography, respectively.

245 Chest radiography reveals diffuse bilateral infiltrates,

246 res (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; I2 = 0%) and chest radiography (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96; I2 = 32%),

247 2-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate

248 ase level, distribution of lung disease, and chest radiography score at hospital presentation.

249 ally assessed by using an eight-point scale (chest radiography score).

250 Low-dose CT or chest radiography screening with a screening assessment

251 rs were observed with CT screening than with chest radiography screening.

252 examination, routine laboratory testing, and chest radiography seems to be appropriate for detecting

253 Miniature chest radiography should be strongly considered as an im

254 suspected influenza and lung infiltrates on chest radiography should receive early and aggressive tr

255 matic mediastinal masses depicted at routine chest radiography should undergo contrast-enhanced CT.

256 Initial chest radiography showed an enlarged heart with bilatera

257 Because chest radiography showed consolidation in addition to ty

258 Chest radiography showed no pneumonia, and venous ultras

259 US/chest radiography showed significantly higher specificit

260 Dark-field chest radiography signal intensity appeared to correlate

261 HHCs underwent symptom screenings, chest radiographies, sputum TB bacteriologies, TB infect

262 Illness severity as measured by chest radiography, sputum smears, and symptoms had littl

263 were screened for TB by symptom assessment, chest radiography, sputum testing by Xpert MTB/RIF fourt

264 isease using clinical criteria that included chest radiography staging, need for treatment, lung func

265 ure on screening by means of low-dose CT and chest radiography, suggesting that a reduction in mortal

266 r active pulmonary tuberculosis incorporated chest radiography, symptom resolution, and sputum microb

267 images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired

268 ior radiographs were obtained with a digital chest radiography system.

269 Compared with chest radiography, there was also a trend favoring reduc

270 e World Health Organization (WHO) recommends chest radiography to facilitate tuberculosis (TB) screen

271 pose To evaluate the potential of dark-field chest radiography to improve the detection and assessmen

272 IF test, urinary lipoarabinomannan test, and chest radiography) to determine whether treatment for tu

273 erior mediastinal masses depicted at routine chest radiography underwent ultrasonography (US), unenha

274 examines the spectrum of imaging findings at chest radiography, US, CT, and MRI in 35 children admitt

275 Chest radiography use was significantly lower in the int

276 pants with or without pneumothorax underwent chest radiography using a prototype system that acquires

277 as associated with alveolar consolidation at chest radiography, very severe pneumonia, oxygen saturat

278 Rates of nonrecommended tests (ie, chest radiography, viral testing, and complete blood cel

279 Comparison of chest radiography vs low-dose computed tomography screen

280 ere male, and the prevalence of pneumonia by chest radiography was 18.0%.

281 absolute rate reduction with low-dose CT vs chest radiography was 71 deaths per 100 000 person-years

282 y subgroup in which performing daily routine chest radiography was beneficial.

283 ening for active tuberculosis with miniature chest radiography was estimated to be $9,600 per case id

284 Chest radiography was estimated to have a sensitivity of

285 Chest radiography was performed (Fig 1), followed by dia

286 Chest radiography was performed, followed by diagnostic

287 bclinical TB missed by symptom screening and chest radiography was rare in our mostly HIV-negative co

288 The rates for chest radiography were 9% (CI, 8% to 11%) and 15% (CI, 1

289 tentially resectable NSCLC lesions missed at chest radiography were characterized by predominantly pe

290 nary echinococcosis (n = 110) on preliminary chest radiography were examined with chest computed tomo

291 Complications of ECMO seen at chest radiography were recorded.

292 ronary artery aneurysms and calcification on chest radiography were unusual features in this group of

293 erformed lung ultrasonography, and evaluated chest radiography when available.

294 ing with DCNNs can accurately classify TB at chest radiography with an AUC of 0.99.

295 Random assignment to low-dose CT or chest radiography with baseline and 1 repeated annual sc

296 Admission chest radiography with interstitial infiltrates was more

297 phs in patients who underwent cardiac CT and chest radiography within the same year, between 2013 and

298 Chest radiography would also identify substantially more

299 56%-72%) specificity alone but combined with chest radiography yielded 92% sensitivity and 58% specif

300 work-up, including complete blood count and chest radiography, yielded negative results.