コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ) were established for supplement-stimulated cholescintigraphy.
2 dder disease were enrolled into quantitative cholescintigraphy.
3 ermined 14 days later using 99mTc-Mebrofenin cholescintigraphy.
4 and liver ultrasonography, and conventional cholescintigraphy.
5 significant differences in specificity among cholescintigraphy (90%; 95% CI: 86%, 93%), US (83%; 95%
7 ction fraction induced by cholecystokinin at cholescintigraphy and after disappearance of the recurre
8 Because of enthusiastic acceptance of CCK cholescintigraphy by clinicians, the types of patients r
10 llow-up time based on the rationale that CCK cholescintigraphy can quickly confirm or exclude the dia
12 ublications confirming the usefulness of CCK cholescintigraphy had a high pretest likelihood of disea
13 n (GBEF) determined by cholecystokinin (CCK) cholescintigraphy has a high positive predictive value f
21 After gallbladder filling on conventional cholescintigraphy, the subjects ingested the supplement
22 d supplement, as an alternative to sincalide cholescintigraphy, to develop a standard methodology, an
23 42 women, 10 men) who underwent quantitative cholescintigraphy twice (total studies, 104), over a mea
25 e followed up for months or years before CCK cholescintigraphy was performed, allowing other diseases