コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 h tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure in chronic myeloid leukemia.
2 to be critical to maintain CSC in a model of chronic myeloid leukemia.
3 60% to 78% (P < .001) for AML, ALL, MDS, and chronic myeloid leukemia.
4 R) in CNL and in some patients with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.
5 is lost in Bcr-Abl(+) cells, which underlie chronic myeloid leukemia.
6 predicts clinical outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
7 kinases may be therapeutically useful in BC chronic myeloid leukemia.
8 inhibitors has transformed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
9 nilotinib is very effective in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
10 for leukemic stem cell (LSC) maintenance in chronic myeloid leukemia.
11 and the emergence of imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia.
12 control as imatinib mesylate has produced in chronic myeloid leukemia.
13 ;22) chromosomal translocation causative for chronic myeloid leukemia.
14 as the clinically related diagnosis atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.
15 kemia, and in blast crisis transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia.
16 monocytes of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia.
17 blast crisis, similar to the course of human chronic myeloid leukemia.
18 oglitazone) is proposed for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
19 SL biosynthesis affects the MDR phenotype of chronic myeloid leukemias.
20 well as acute myeloid leukemia (AML, 1.19), chronic myeloid leukemia (1.54), and myelodysplastic syn
21 phocytic Leukemia, 1 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 1 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, 2 Severe Aplastic Anemia) unde
24 mia (CNL) and to a lesser extent in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) resulting in constitutiv
25 hronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), and myelodysplastic/mye
26 liferative disease resembling human atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), preceded by ROCK hypera
28 monocytic leukemia (CMML; n = 119), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML; n = 71), MDS/MPN with ri
29 an B cell leukemia cell lines, primary human chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia with no
30 e (BCR-Abl) is a driver oncogene that causes chronic myeloid leukemia and a subset of acute lymphoid
31 tant subclones and experience in blast-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and acute promyelocytic leukemi
32 01 for treatment of many different stages of chronic myeloid leukemia and in 2002 for treatment of ga
33 PK activators in the treatment of refractory chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic l
35 e inhibitor used to treat imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-pos
37 across inv(3)/t(3;3) acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome c
38 ll cycle progression and cooperates with the chronic myeloid leukemia-associated BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein
42 hput screen using Msi2-reporter blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (bcCML) and identify several ad
44 omal tumors (PDGFRA mutations) as well as in chronic myeloid leukemia (BCR-PDGFRA translocation), and
47 tinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib
49 ve therapy for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, but not all patients respond w
50 ibility that mutation-mediated resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia can be fully controlled; howeve
51 plied rMATS-DVR to RNA-seq data of the human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562 in response to s
52 sionMap to characterize fusion genes in K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cell line, we further demonstra
55 h siRNAs reduced proliferation of human K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells because of reduced IGF-II
56 azaspiro compounds reduced the viability of chronic myeloid leukemia cells in the micromolar range.
57 t, Gfi-1 short hairpin RNA-tranduced CD34(+) chronic myeloid leukemia cells were markedly more clonog
62 criteria were categorized by 4 cancer types (chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia,
63 cute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 322), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (n = 646), lymphoma (n =
64 (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and are now widely accept
65 ral chemotherapeutic used primarily to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stro
67 n several hematologic malignancies including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myelodysplastic syndr
68 athways in leukemic cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Ph(+) B-cell acute ly
69 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromoso
70 ding the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and polycythemia vera (PV
71 ays an essential role in the pathogenesis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and some cases of acute l
72 imatinib mesylate (IM) induces autophagy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and that this process is
73 kemic stem cells (LSCs) drive progression of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and tyrosine kinase inhib
74 oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL) transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are e13a2 (b2a2) and e14a
75 more than 95% of all patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are reported to the natio
79 (TKIs) are highly effective in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but do not eliminate leuk
80 esylate (imatinib) are effective in managing chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but incapable of eliminat
81 yeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) by showing that these 2 l
82 es have demonstrated that some patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) can maintain remission af
84 ML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines with commercia
88 ixafor, an antagonist of CXCR4, may dislodge chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells from the niche, sen
89 ibitors (TKIs) in eliminating differentiated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells, recent evidence su
90 nize folate receptor-beta-positive (FRbeta+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells, resulting in more
92 se activity by imatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) currently serves as the p
94 yrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) depends on the requiremen
95 y interact with or depend on JAK2 or Lnk, in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) development, suggesting t
96 he oncogene product BCR-ABL, has transformed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from a life-threatening d
97 e validated the platform with an established chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) fusion gene (BCR-ABL1) as
98 s) has led to the widespread perception that chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become another chroni
100 cess of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has given patients hope f
101 Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has limited efficacy agai
102 chromosome (causing the Bcr-Abl mutation) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has provided a paradigm f
103 tions have been established for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in adults treated with ty
104 oven efficacy in adults with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) and
105 fficacy and safety outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) tre
106 ximately 5% of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP).
107 rogression-free survival among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase, aft
108 udy enrolled 210 patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in two equal, sequential
129 kemia stem cells (LSCs) in a BCR-ABL-induced chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) mouse model, and we hypot
130 improvement in the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) occurred after the introd
132 y in a phase 1/2 study in chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or advanced Ph(+) leukemi
133 phase 2 trial of ponatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosom
136 y within the LSC population in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients at diagnosis and
137 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has migrated ext
138 vaccines were evaluated in 51 chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients on imatinib, or
139 to achievement of deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients on tyrosine kina
140 most common mechanism of drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with ABL
145 CD44v3 overexpression enhanced chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) progenitor replating capa
146 se, and serially transplantable blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) progenitors revealed incr
152 introduction of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) represents the most succe
153 fication of a population of highly quiescent chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) SCs that is enriched foll
154 The progress made in the understanding of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) since the recognition of
155 tly demonstrate that CD26 is a new, specific chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) stem cell biomarker that
159 l transcriptome profiling in treatment-naive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) stem/progenitor cells and
160 Recent clinical findings in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) suggest that the risk of
161 alyze more than 2,000 SCs from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) throughout the disease co
162 Cs) play a pivotal role in the resistance of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) to tyrosine kinase inhibi
164 safety is an emerging issue in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kin
165 kinase inhibitors has significantly affected chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment, transforming t
166 e report that loss of K3 in a mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) triggers the release of L
167 hase 3 trial with ponatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was interrupted due to an
168 can safely be discontinued in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have had undetectable
169 MR(4.5)) defines a subgroup of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who may stay in unmaintai
170 ors (TKIs) among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with and without cost-sha
172 sults have been obtained in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with first-line imatinib
175 matopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a prototypical stem cell
176 nuclear and cytoplasmic functions of p27 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a well-characterized mal
178 kemia (CNL) and atypical (BCR-ABL1-negative) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), both of which are diagno
179 ased survival dramatically for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but continuous administr
181 s enabled durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), issues of drug resistanc
182 (TKIs) in 1998 transformed the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to significantly
184 nase inhibitors (TKI) changed the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), turning a life-threateni
185 of the oncogenic tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), using highly enriched CM
187 ause treatment outcomes are poor in advanced chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), we hypothesized that exp
188 l human hematopoietic malignancies including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), where BCL6 expression wa
189 demonstrate proof of concept in the case of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), wherein our model recapi
190 ions are a common mechanism of resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), yet the mechanism of res
191 -Abl1(-/-) cells generated highly aggressive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-blast phase-like disease
192 nses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-chronic phase (CP) are as
194 1-positive clonal hematopoiesis resembling a chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-like disease manifesting
195 tes disease progression in a murine model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-like myeloproliferative n
236 cute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 1883); chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 1079); and myelodyspl
237 both accelerated phase (AP) and blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-BC) and against Philadelph
238 io, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.82; P = .01) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; hazard ratio, 3.44; 95% C
239 total of 39 patients (solid tumors, n = 28; chronic myeloid leukemia [CML], n = 9; acute lymphoblast
240 oncoprotein associated with the majority of chronic myeloid leukemias (CMLs), induces accumulation o
241 phases emerge as patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) are treated with tyros
242 Without effective therapy, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) evolves into an acute
243 own to predict for response in chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients treated with
244 sed BCR-ABL1 inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia do not eliminate leukemic stem
245 e Evaluation of Ponatinib versus Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (EPIC) study was a randomised,
246 stant patients enrolled in the PONATINIB for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Evaluation and Ph(+)Acute Lymph
247 creased risk of bleeding among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, even in the absence of thrombo
248 detection of the BCR-ABL1 fusion delineates chronic myeloid leukemia from classic BCR-ABL1(-) MPNs,
249 n associated with various cancers, including chronic myeloid leukemia, head and neck squamous cell ca
251 otinib or dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia; however, such therapy also fai
252 ignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis, myelodysplasti
253 nt efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) and i
254 BCR-ABL1 transcript levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) at 3,
255 r responses on the outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in th
258 hing to nilotinib enabled more patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) to su
259 ved for use in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and
260 ients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase from the phase
261 rvival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with i
262 on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with n
263 or outcome and response in 123 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with s
264 a in first complete remission (N = 1742) and chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase (N = 257
265 investigation using CAPRI to study atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, in which we uncovered non triv
266 in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia, irrespective of BCR-ABL KD mut
268 disorders, unlike bcr/abl tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia, is not a causative but rather
269 inhibitors results in potent suppression of chronic myeloid leukemia leukemic precursors and Ph(+) a
270 ng chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, MDS/MPN-Unclassifiable, ring s
271 Increased serum OPN concentrations occur in chronic myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and acute my
272 leagues show that, during the development of chronic myeloid leukemia, mutated cells transform normal
273 Frequently linked to polycythemia vera and chronic myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis displays high pa
274 hematopoietic progenitors from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or myeloproliferative neoplasms
275 of early CCyR remains a major determinant of chronic myeloid leukemia outcome regardless of whether M
277 f 6 acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 of 6 chronic myeloid leukemia patient samples exposed to SB,
278 nib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (DASISION) trial, eval
279 ne the frequency of compound mutations among chronic myeloid leukemia patients on ABL1 TKI therapy, i
280 c responses (CCyRs) in approximately half of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated while still in
284 ression and transit times between normal and chronic myeloid leukemia progenitors that may inform can
285 development, and targeting SIRT1 sensitized chronic myeloid leukemia progenitors to tyrosine kinase
290 progenitors into self-renewing blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells (BC LSCs) was partia
291 found to be highly upregulated on candidate chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells, allowing for leukem
293 onclusion, 8% of patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated at our institution are
294 it to 465 patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with standard-dose imat
297 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia were randomized to IM 400 mg/da
298 to inhibit the dysregulated proliferation of chronic myeloid leukemia, which is associated with the B
299 We analyzed a cohort of 26 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who had failed imatinib and a s
300 strikingly effective in the initial stage of chronic myeloid leukemia with more than 90% of the patie