ライフサイエンスコーパス: circumcised

1 pression; and proportion of HIV-negative men circumcised.

2 costs and lost wages associated with getting circumcised.

3 e median age 26 years, 11.8% with HIV, 55.0% circumcised.

4 ns, adolescents were asked whether they were circumcised.

5 ian age, 26 years), 11.8% had HIV, and 55.0% circumcised.

6 derlying reasons for their propensity to get circumcised.

7 eased in Ad5 seronegative (1.0 [0.5-1.9]) or circumcised (1.0 [0.6-1.7]) men.

8 ed subjects, 512 (69%) considered themselves circumcised, 54 (7%) considered themselves uncircumcised

9 icant vaccine-associated risk was seen among circumcised, Ad5-negative men (HR, 0.97; P=1.0) over all

10 recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) in circumcised, Ad5-seronegative men and transgendered pers

11 with HIV and 560 (32%) men without HIV were circumcised; an additional 69 (4%) men with HIV and 132

12 We find no significant differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in their likelihood of

13 e HIV-1 transmission (i.e., infectivity) for circumcised and uncircumcised men, by use of detailed ac

14 The HPV prevalence was similar for circumcised and uncircumcised men.

15 ves as uncircumcised, 27 (4%) reported being circumcised, and 233 (31%) did not know.

16 lready circumcised, of whom 135 (60.8%) were circumcised as part of the trial.

17 mately 20-fold and 10-fold greater for males circumcised at age 1 to 9 years and at 10 years or older

18 vs uncircumcised newborn males and for males circumcised at younger than 1 year, age 1 to 9 years, or

19 Compared with boys circumcised at younger than 1 year, the incidences of pr

20 Men circumcised before sexual debut were at reduced risk of

21 return on investment is highest if males are circumcised between ages 20 and 25, but this return on i

22 Ethnic groups in western Uganda circumcised boys at younger ages and encountered lower r

23 llages, 52.8% (30 889 of 58 536) of men were circumcised compared with 29.5% (25 484 of 86 492) of me

24 n with HIV and 132 (5%) men without HIV were circumcised during study follow-up.

25 on of male individuals in a village who were circumcised during the campaign, using an intention-to-t

26 and 673 HIV-negative men (40% of 1673) were circumcised in intervention communities.

27 62 (28%) of 224 men were circumcised in the male circumcision clinic referral gro

28 ilable only 12% of eligible men sought to be circumcised leading to an increase in circumcision preva

29 s there were no seroconversions among the 50 circumcised male partners (P<0.001).

30 Records were available for 1,400,920 circumcised males, 93.3% as newborns.

31 ly exceeded 1 at P < .05 or occurred only in circumcised males.

32 cantly higher for uncircumcised men than for circumcised men (0.0128 vs. 0.0051; P=.04).

33 ly higher in uncircumcised men (46%) than in circumcised men (29%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.96 [95% confid

34 longer in uncircumcised men (154 days) than circumcised men (91 days) (P=.04).

35 of being HIV seropositive compared with non-circumcised men (adjusted OR = 0.50, 95%CI:0.25-0.97), a

36 e was 0.40/100 PY (20/4992.8 PY) among newly circumcised men and 0.98/100 PY (118/12 095.1 PY) among

37 e was 0.40/100 py (20/4992.8 py) among newly circumcised men and 0.98/100 py (118/12095.1 py) among u

38 men reported safer sexual practices than non-circumcised men and had lower prevalence of HIV and HSV-

39 men in this study had strong preferences for circumcised men because of the low risk perception of HI

40 Finally, we find that circumcised men engage in a more elaborated set of sexua

41 Circumcised men have a lower risk of HIV-1 infection tha

42 Circumcised men reported less risky sexual behaviours, b

43 Circumcised men reported safer sexual practices than non

44 risk of incident HIV infection was lower in circumcised men than in uncircumcised men (0.46, 0.32-0.

45 0065); the relative risk of HIV infection in circumcised men was 0.47 (0.28-0.78), which corresponds

46 Circumcised men were 3 and 6 times more likely to clear

47 Circumcised men were less likely to have prevalent genit

48 month HSV-2 incidence was 33.5% (32.7% among circumcised men, 34.6% among uncircumcised men).

49 f HPV infection, exclusively conducted among circumcised men, and based on urine or semen samples.

50 with circumcised men, social norms favoring circumcised men, and perceived increased sexual desirabi

51 cause of the low risk perception of HIV with circumcised men, social norms favoring circumcised men,

52 d perceived increased sexual desirability of circumcised men.

53 f HIV or STIs during sexual intercourse with circumcised men.

54 all STIs is greatly reduced or eliminated in circumcised men.

55 rome in the past 12 months compared with non-circumcised men.

56 dence of high-risk HPV in female partners of circumcised men.

57 ulcus of the penis of uncircumcised men than circumcised men.

58 f acquiring HIV-1 per sex act, compared with circumcised men.

59 d with a reduced odds of HIV infection among circumcised MSM (beta, -0.415; P = .01).

60 222 tested HIV negative and were not already circumcised, of whom 135 (60.8%) were circumcised as par

61 the intervention (21 events in 1.5% of those circumcised) resolved quickly.

62 Of the 738 fully circumcised subjects, 512 (69%) considered themselves ci

63 re significantly more likely to be white and circumcised than men with adequate swab samples.

64 e not significantly lower among MSM who were circumcised than uncircumcised (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% co

65 ers, including the proportion of adult males circumcised, the frequency of condom use during sex acts

66 rate ratio (IRR) of HIV acquisition in newly circumcised versus uncircumcised men.

67 rate ratio (IRR) of HIV acquisition in newly circumcised vs uncircumcised men.

68 ratio and the incidence rate difference for circumcised vs uncircumcised newborn males and for males

69 A total of 53,567 MSM participants (52% circumcised) were included in the meta-analysis.