ライフサイエンスコーパス: classical conditioning

1 the subject is performing (e.g., operant vs. classical conditioning).

2 nt areas of the insect brain after olfactory classical conditioning.

3 edictive representations are learned through classical conditioning.

4 ditioned stimulus (US) pathway of odor-shock classical conditioning.

5 ition rate in rabbit (Orcytolagus cuniculus) classical conditioning.

6 were also defective in learning the eyeblink classical conditioning.

7 r-level cognitive processes in some forms of classical conditioning.

8 light termination, and thus plays a role in classical conditioning.

9 l structures involved in, and necessary for, classical conditioning.

10 he foregut, however, were found to attenuate classical conditioning.

11 bes two neurophysiological correlates of the classical conditioning.

12 well described by a neural network model of classical conditioning.

13 g of conditioned responses (CRs) in eyeblink classical conditioning.

14 h the ryanodine receptor, may be involved in classical conditioning.

15 cript in naive brain that is suppressed upon classical conditioning.

16 smaller in cells from animals that received classical conditioning.

17 xcitability were still present 1 month after classical conditioning.

18 s the CS-preceding-US pairing requirement of classical conditioning.

19 d the unconditioned stimulus is essential in classical conditioning.

20 ability in B photoreceptors after multitrial classical conditioning.

21 B to medial type A synaptic connection after classical conditioning.

22 ontribute to long-term plasticity underlying classical conditioning.

23 incrementally learned associations, such as classical conditioning.

24 Hermissenda express differential effects of classical conditioning.

25 n training also produced RF plasticity, like classical conditioning.

26 g, and short-term associative learning under classical conditioning.

27 terns in CA1 and PFC support learning during classical conditioning.

28 nase A during paired stimulation to initiate classical conditioning.

29 ventral tegmental area while mice engaged in classical conditioning.

30 tage model of AMPAR synaptic delivery during classical conditioning.

31 g AMPARs using an in vitro model of eyeblink classical conditioning.

32 ed and demonstrate that this is regulated by classical conditioning.

33 ed cortical plasticity and reduced eye blink classical conditioning.

34 ed paradigm, where infants undergo olfactory classical conditioning.

35 c nerve terminals using an in vitro model of classical conditioning.

36 in presynaptic structural plasticity during classical conditioning.

37 mimicked the CS in the single-cell analog of classical conditioning.

38 of associative learning in instrumental and classical conditioning.

39 bsence of the conditioned stimulus following classical conditioning.

40 y comparison subjects underwent differential classical conditioning.

41 ing of ICSS thresholds, effects resistant to classical conditioning.

42 related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial di

43 tributing to habituation, sensitization, and classical conditioning, also undergoes operant condition

44 asticity of human auditory cortex induced by classical conditioning and contingency reversal.

45 o underwent 2 associative forms of learning: classical conditioning and differential conditioning.

46 Beta-adrenergic involvement in classical conditioning and extinction was investigated.

47 beta-adrenergic involvement in classical conditioning and extinction was investigated.

48 oteinase is regulated in the early stages of classical conditioning and functions in the conversion o

49 compare cerebellum-dependent delay eyeblink classical conditioning and hippocampus-dependent context

50 f perceptual and motor operations, including classical conditioning and implicit learning.

51 ative memory for an auditory stimulus during classical conditioning and its accompanying specific rec

52 ine receptor in both a cellular correlate of classical conditioning and light adaptation.

53 te the behavioral and neural consequences of classical conditioning and may have important consequenc

54 ody (MB) is critically involved in olfactory classical conditioning, and cAMP signaling molecules are

55 itive abilities, including immediate memory, classical conditioning, and spatial learning.

56 nsis to form associative memories by using a classical conditioning approach.

57 ere cAMP signaling is required for olfactory classical conditioning, are dispensable for the regulati

58 Current theories of classical conditioning assume that learning depends on t

59 Imaging the same subjects before and after classical conditioning at single-synapse resolution prov

60 tudying the molecular and cellular basis for classical conditioning, based on its ability to associat

61 s reward related signals in the same type of classical conditioning behavior typically studied to eva

62 Operant and classical conditioning both produce an increased respons

63 tly reduced an associative form of learning (classical conditioning) but had no effect on two nonasso

64 lasticity of human auditory responses due to classical conditioning, but go further in revealing dist

65 ey functional magnetic resonance imaging and classical conditioning by pairing a visual shape (condit

66 Since the formal description of classical conditioning by Pavlov, lesion studies in anim

67 ing eyeblinks and shows that robust eyeblink classical conditioning can be readily established in the

68 rcement learning-based theoretical models of classical conditioning (crudely, prediction learning) ar

69 Specifically, strong classical conditioning drives a positive shift in percep

70 day or more) impairs acquisition of eyeblink classical conditioning (EBC), a cerebellar-dependent Pav

71 Acquisition and retention of eyeblink classical conditioning (EBCC) was examined in 30 healthy

72 campal damage are impaired at delay eyeblink classical conditioning (EBCC).

73 um are critically involved in trace eyeblink classical conditioning (EBCC).

74 longstanding puzzle: how incentive salience, classical conditioning, emotional arousal, and mental be

75 is a straightforward adaptation of Pavlov's classical conditioning experiment, that we used to measu

76 Olfactory classical conditioning experiments have previously demon

77 e that observed in interval timing tasks and classical conditioning experiments.

78 Many models of classical conditioning fail to describe important phenom

79 Classical conditioning features prominently in many etio

80 eeking behavior and that the LT trained in a classical conditioning format transferred to an operant

81 We used a Pavlovian classical conditioning functional MRI task to explore th

82 Computational models of classical conditioning have made significant contributio

83 rovide an alternative cellular mechanism for classical conditioning-Hebbian long-term potentiation (L

84 The authors examined 400 ms delay eyeblink classical conditioning in 20 participants with Fragile X

85 Using classical conditioning in adult mice of either sex, we s

86 tion, we used a neural correlate of eyeblink classical conditioning in an isolated brainstem from the

87 Thus, classical conditioning in Aplysia appears to be mediated

88 rst, I discuss our original paper describing classical conditioning in Aplysia californica, and place

89 A cellular analog of classical conditioning in Aplysia was used to determine

90 enhancement of sensorimotor synapses during classical conditioning in Aplysia-like LTP of sensorimot

91 or-dependent LTP appears to be necessary for classical conditioning in Aplysia.

92 forms of learning such as sensitization and classical conditioning in Aplysia.

93 postsynaptic, possibly Hebbian, mechanism in classical conditioning in Aplysia.

94 reviously to be critical for nondifferential classical conditioning in Aplysia.

95 Light duration and intensity influence classical conditioning in Hermissenda through their effe

96 cells and interneurons that are involved in classical conditioning in Hermissenda.

97 ircuitry supporting delay and trace eyeblink classical conditioning in humans and laboratory animals

98 possible to study the functional anatomy of classical conditioning in humans.

99 neurobiology and individual determinants of classical conditioning in humans.

100 to an acute stressful experience facilitates classical conditioning in male rats but impairs conditio

101 Thus, classical conditioning in mammals activates MAPK, which

102 ewed interest in the possibility of studying classical conditioning in monkeys.

103 esult from less conscious processes, such as classical conditioning in the case of immune, hormonal,

104 ine receptor (D1R) agonist failed to support classical conditioning in the cellular analog, whereas D

105 (Sepia officinalis) were used to demonstrate classical conditioning in this species and to determine

106 Trace conditioning is a form of classical conditioning in which a time gap separates the

107 aversion (CTA) learning is a robust form of classical conditioning in which animals rapidly associat

108 rd- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive s

109 Trace conditioning, a form of classical conditioning in which the presentation of the

110 -based memory traces that underlie olfactory classical conditioning in young and aged Drosophila.

111 The mimicking of classical conditioning, including acquisition, extinctio

112 mulates empirical data from many variants of classical conditioning, including delay and trace paradi

113 Auditory classical conditioning increased neuroplasticity gene in

114 Olfactory classical conditioning increases the odor responsiveness

115 Eyeblink classical conditioning is a relatively simple form of as

116 results suggest that memory formation due to classical conditioning is associated with reciprocal cha

117 mory formation after single-trial appetitive classical conditioning is dependent on an intact NO-cGMP

118 ensorimotor synapses in a cellular analog of classical conditioning is disrupted by infusing the Ca(2

119 Classical conditioning is thought to play a key role in

120 of awareness during the acquisition stage of classical conditioning is unknown.

121 Interest in classical conditioning is usually focused on anticipator

122 Classical conditioning is widely used to study motivatio

123 During olfactory classical conditioning, large subsets of dopaminergic ne

124 Classical conditioning models elegantly describe how ani

125 ecific reflex modification (CRM) occurs when classical conditioning modifies responding to an uncondi

126 xamined how cAMP manipulations and olfactory classical conditioning modulate olfactory responses in t

127 se data represent the first demonstration of classical conditioning of a steroid hormone response to

128 It is concluded that in vitro classical conditioning of an abducens nerve eye-blink re

129 Classical conditioning of Aplysia's siphon-withdrawal re

130 The cerebellum is necessary for classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses

131 ic form of associative learning and memory - classical conditioning of discrete responses learned wit

132 Using classical conditioning of eye blink and other discrete r

133 Classical conditioning of eyeblink responses has been on

134 w learning occurs in cerebellar circuits for classical conditioning of eyeblinks are meeting this cha

135 These results suggest that appetitive classical conditioning of feeding resulted in the pairin

136 likely that reinforcement during appetitive classical conditioning of feeding was mediated by affere

137 ed on mere similarity, not identity, (2) the classical conditioning of pea plants to trope toward win

138 ere we test these competing hypotheses using classical conditioning of perceptually similar odours in

139 Exposure to familiar stimuli facilitates classical conditioning of physiological responses, inclu

140 experiments involving the cellular analog of classical conditioning of siphon withdrawal.

141 Classical conditioning of the eye-blink response, perhap

142 cessory inferior olive in infant rats during classical conditioning of the eye-blink response.

143 r interpositus nucleus in infant rats during classical conditioning of the eye-blink response.

144 Classical conditioning of the eyeblink or nictitating me

145 etention of a simple form of motor learning, classical conditioning of the eyeblink reflex, depends o

146 test nor the learning of motor timing during classical conditioning of the eyeblink reflex.

147 d its associated circuitry are essential for classical conditioning of the eyeblink response and othe

148 Classical conditioning of the eyeblink response is a for

149 possible modulatory role of motor cortex in classical conditioning of the eyeblink response was exam

150 In delay classical conditioning of the eyeblink response, the cer

151 anges in cerebellar AMPA receptors following classical conditioning of the eyeblink-nictitating membr

152 the crucial involvement of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of the eyeblink/nictitating membr

153 Behavioral and physiological data about classical conditioning of the eyelid response and motor

154 cific facilitation), which may contribute to classical conditioning of the gill and siphon withdrawal

155 Studies of sensitization and classical conditioning of the gill-withdrawal reflex in

156 Differential classical conditioning of the gill-withdrawal response (

157 act preparation to test whether differential classical conditioning of the GWR also depends on activa

158 Classical conditioning of the mollusc, Hermissenda crass

159 Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane-eye b

160 Here we apply classical conditioning of the proboscis extension respon

161 ntribution of various cellular mechanisms to classical conditioning of the reflex with a siphon tap c

162 and motor neurons contributes importantly to classical conditioning of the reflex.

163 ransduction pathways have been implicated in classical conditioning of this preparation, although the

164 To understand the effect of classical conditioning on the output of type B photorece

165 learn about rewards and threats using either classical conditioning or behavioral choice paradigms.

166 ined after rabbits were given either paired (classical conditioning) or explicitly unpaired (control)

167 Learning which stimuli (classical conditioning) or which actions (operant condit

168 A classical conditioning paradigm (P3-P4) showed that the

169 tioning was measured using delayed eye blink classical conditioning paradigm and results were compare

170 Here, we developed a classical conditioning paradigm in which 6- to 8-d-old l

171 tion tests, subjects were trained in a delay classical conditioning paradigm using a tone conditioned

172 A forelimb-withdrawal classical conditioning paradigm was used in awake cats (

173 of sucrose and quinine paired with cues in a classical conditioning paradigm while the electrophysiol

174 ic stimulation of motor cortex and eye blink classical conditioning paradigm, to test whether dystoni

175 Rabbits were trained in a delay classical conditioning paradigm, using a tone as the con

176 Using EEG and an aversive classical conditioning paradigm, we observed sharpening

177 imaging (fMRI) in an olfactory version of a classical conditioning paradigm, whereby neutral faces w

178 olfactory sensory cues paired with food in a classical conditioning paradigm.

179 oded by neurons in either structure during a classical conditioning paradigm.

180 ociate a juice reward with a visual cue in a classical conditioning paradigm.

181 In classical conditioning paradigms, conditioned stimuli tr

182 Classical conditioning paradigms, such as trace conditio

183 ple, by intracortical microstimulation or by classical conditioning paradigms.

184 uence requirement observed in most mammalian classical conditioning paradigms.

185 portant roles in the description of numerous classical conditioning paradigms.

186 le using electrochemical technology during a classical conditioning procedure.

187 In contrast, classical conditioning procedures in which the CS and US

188 ry preferences through honeybee colonies via classical conditioning procedures.

189 previously neutral environmental stimuli via classical conditioning processes.

190 as verbal information or distinct stimuli in classical conditioning, provide signals that activate pl

191 Drosophila antennal lobe, we show here that classical conditioning rapidly alters the neural code re

192 In a prenatal model of classical conditioning, rat fetuses received presentatio

193 he role of the cerebellar cortex in eyeblink classical conditioning remains unclear.

194 irming that orientation discrimination under classical conditioning requires primary visual cortex (V

195 Classical conditioning resulted in synaptic facilitation

196 rabbits during and after a single trace fear classical conditioning session.

197 tly predicts that hippocampal involvement in classical conditioning should be critical not only when

198 signals can be exploited by visual cortex as classical conditioning stimuli, enabling the perceptual

199 ene's function to specific pathways used for classical conditioning, such as conditioned stimulus (CS

200 ord striatal activity from mice performing a classical conditioning task in which reward mean, reward

201 We find in a classical conditioning task that individual mouse GPh ne

202 erneurons (critic) while monkeys performed a classical conditioning task.

203 nal cell types in M1 while mice engaged in a classical conditioning task.

204 Previous work using classical conditioning tasks has suggested that reward p

205 hippocampal function simulate performance in classical conditioning tasks using the error backpropaga

206 During classical conditioning tasks, conditioned stimuli appear

207 al tegmental area (VTA) while mice performed classical conditioning tasks.

208 uts to dopamine neurons while mice performed classical conditioning tasks.

209 ards even when choice is not required, as in classical conditioning tasks.

210 Operant and classical conditioning tests were used to measure social

211 Classical conditioning that involves mnemonic processing

212 d and non-affected side and normal eye blink classical conditioning that was not different from healt

213 Six hours after classical conditioning the levels of both autophosphoryl

214 Classical conditioning the rabbit nictitating membrane i

215 Classical conditioning, the simplest form of associative

216 thermore, in contrast to adult somatosensory classical conditioning, these data suggest that the cort

217 In classical conditioning to an auditory conditioned stimul

218 etic resonance imaging (fMRI) with olfactory classical conditioning to differentiate the neural respo

219 nt article applies a neural network model of classical conditioning to investigate the possible cause

220 Results implicate specific brain regions in classical conditioning to meth and demonstrate the impor

221 s govern human memory updating, ranging from classical conditioning to naturalistic episodes.

222 aging of dendritic spines with auditory-cued classical conditioning to test if the formation of a fea

223 = 51, 19 male) learned, through differential classical conditioning, to associate specific screen loc

224 this study, neurophysiological correlates of classical conditioning training were identified and char

225 ing VIP neuronal activity left probabilistic classical conditioning unaffected but severely impaired

226 ole of tTLL in an in vitro model of eyeblink classical conditioning using an isolated brainstem prepa

227 ornis is an invertebrate model used to study classical conditioning using light as the conditioned st

228 n of the reinforcement pathway that supports classical conditioning was analyzed in additional behavi

229 Trace eyeblink classical conditioning was assessed in patients with bil

230 Here, a single-cell analog of classical conditioning was developed.

231 Memory for classical conditioning was retained for at least 24 hr.

232 Trace eyeblink classical conditioning was used to assess the impact of

233 angry faces, one of which, through previous classical conditioning, was associated with a burst of w

234 how sounds guide anticipatory licking during classical conditioning, we employed high-density electro

235 Using olfactory classical conditioning, we observe that both scFv antibo

236 During classical conditioning, we observed opposite dynamics in

237 that produce reinstatement in other forms of classical conditioning, we observed spontaneous recovery

238 in a pattern-based imaging paradigm of human classical conditioning, we were able to identify dissoci

239 Moreover, correlates of classical conditioning were specific to stimulation of A

240 forms of associative learning are Pavlovian (classical) conditioning, where a stimulus is followed by

241 ng Maintenance Days 5 and 10, rats underwent classical conditioning, whereby passive cocaine infusion

242 facilitation (PA-LTF), a cellular analog of classical conditioning, which was expressed at Aplysia s

243 diately after, and 1 hr after one session of classical conditioning with a tone CS and a corneal airp

244 irst time that Drosophila larvae can perform classical conditioning with no overlap between sensory s

245 he timing of neurotransmitter release during classical conditioning with the use of two-photon micros