戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 a) (CIA) remains a major unsolved problem in clinical oncology.
2       Concerns for patient safety persist in clinical oncology.
3  Cancer Research and the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
4 both Clinical Cancer Research and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
5 multidrug resistance is a central problem in clinical oncology.
6 of 1,000 members of the American Society for Clinical Oncology.
7  IgE-based anticancer immunotherapy in human clinical oncology.
8 e information has become routine practice in clinical oncology.
9 ntibodies is an indispensable cornerstone of clinical oncology.
10 spectives of CTCs and ctDNA as biomarkers in clinical oncology.
11 vely few agents have found widespread use in clinical oncology.
12 r biology, and the widespread use of MTDs in clinical oncology.
13 ent cyto-immunotherapeutic with potential in clinical oncology.
14 ians, academics, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
15 relationship, tumor biology, immunology, and clinical oncology.
16 el P. Link, MD President American Society of Clinical Oncology.
17 rapy and offer a perspective on the state of clinical oncology.
18 09 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
19 ed this article for submission to Journal of Clinical Oncology.
20 onal cancer research, given its relevance in clinical oncology.
21 tial paradigm for differentiation therapy in clinical oncology.
22   Schilsky, MD President American Society of Clinical Oncology.
23 mple of differentiation-induction therapy in clinical oncology.
24 provement program of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
25 is needed to ensure high-quality research in clinical oncology.
26 ents one of the major unresolved problems of clinical oncology.
27 erapy-induced alopecia is a major problem in clinical oncology.
28 in new therapeutics that have revolutionized clinical oncology.
29 t few decades and now play a central role in clinical oncology.
30 olytic viruses could enter the mainstream of clinical oncology.
31  the 2004 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
32 lular pharmacology of anthracyclines and for clinical oncology.
33 bership directory of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
34 esis, and its current and projected roles in clinical oncology.
35 99 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
36 mpact that expression profiling will have on clinical oncology.
37  finally, the management of allergy in daily clinical oncology.
38 he design of immunotherapeutics relevant for clinical oncology.
39 ive multicenter comparative trials in modern clinical oncology.
40 an Cancer Society or the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
41 Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
42  for Cancer Research and American Society of Clinical Oncology.
43 f Controlled Trials, and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts were searched for cohort stu
44 cent guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology advocate the inclusion of HIV-infected
45                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncolo
46 ritten permission by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncolo
47          Purpose A joint American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncolo
48 d and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and t
49            To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology (ASCO/A
50                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario convened an ex
51                            The use of PET in clinical oncology and for tissue pharmacokinetic and pha
52 n Cancer Society and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and has been published jointly by invi
53 he January 20, 2007, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology and in its first vignette column.
54  is an initiative of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and its Institute for Quality that add
55     The lessons from NAT are translatable to clinical oncology and may help to promote safety.
56                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontari
57 cular biology, health services research, and clinical oncology and the advocacy community, with a com
58 ations and efficacy, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology
59 by invitation and consent in both Journal of Clinical Oncology and the Archives of Pathology & Labora
60 ollaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologis
61                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologis
62                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologis
63 eting proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical On
64 for them periodically in both the Journal of Clinical Oncology and the Journal of Oncology Practice.
65 stracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symp
66  practice guidelines, point-of-care needs in clinical oncology, and federal policy issues and implica
67 ege of Chest Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Net
68 ion for Cancer Research, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the American Association for Canc
69 ociety for Neuroscience, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the Radiological Society of North
70     The abstracts of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting between 1995 and 2014 a
71 stracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings (2004 to 2010), the Wo
72 stracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2004 to 2007 were
73  of Cancer Research and American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.
74 conducted as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2001 Presidential Initiative to
75 se The panel updated the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) adjuvant therapy guideline for
76 o cancer prevention, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) advocates a fundamental reform
77                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) advocates for policies that ens
78 s the development of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and explores the role of its me
79  is an initiative of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and its Institute for Quality,
80                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Society of Surgical Oncolog
81 recommendations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Organisation f
82                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Me
83                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Me
84 stracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Med
85 Representatives from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National Comprehensive
86             In 2008, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Oncology Nursing Societ
87 e Annual Meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the San Antonio Breast Canc
88     For that reason, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Surgical Onc
89          Using data from American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meetings, we determined
90 g abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meetings.
91 vention Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) believes that a proactive stanc
92     PURPOSE In 2006, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors (BOD) approv
93    In December 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors approved the
94             In 2004, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Prevention Committee sur
95                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Committee desig
96 result identified by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Committee to th
97                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel of medical onc
98                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and
99                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a subcommittee to deve
100 athology (ASCP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to con
101 Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to dev
102                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) developed its own test -- the M
103                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Endorsement Panel reviewed the
104  further reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Endorsement Panel.
105                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established a Working Group to
106                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel conducted a system
107                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) focused update updates a single
108 e recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) for cancer-susceptibility genet
109                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Grants Program began in 1984 wi
110       To update the 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline on initial hormonal m
111 y recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline on the role of bone-m
112                 The 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline recommended primary p
113                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines program employs a sy
114                          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedu
115                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedu
116                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedu
117                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedu
118                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedu
119                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedu
120 ts founding in 1964, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has been committed to improving
121                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has embarked on an intensive ca
122                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has long affirmed that the reco
123                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has policies and procedures for
124              METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Committee (HSC)
125  experts, members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Committee, and
126 n outside reviewers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Commit
127                 The 2001 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) International Symposium, Breast
128                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is a global community of health
129                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is committed to improving cance
130  For the third year, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is publishing Clinical Cancer A
131 nd consecutive year, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is publishing Clinical Cancer A
132  for the first time, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is publishing Clinical Cancer A
133                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is taking the lead in this area
134  of its relevance to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) membership, ASCO endorsed the g
135 nce of this guideline to American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) membership, ASCO reviewed the g
136 ed to be relevant to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) membership.
137                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) panel considered the Cancer Car
138                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) prescribed technology assessmen
139                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (P
140                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (P
141               PURPOSE An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (P
142                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (P
143 lists to update the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (P
144             In 1998, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published a special article reg
145                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published its first clinical pr
146  Research (AACR) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recognize the potential ENDS ha
147                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recognizes the role of a profes
148 risk parameters from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommendation did not add powe
149 0% of the members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) reside and practice outside US
150                          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) staff reviewed the CAP/IASLC/AM
151 program developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) to aid oncology practices in qu
152 irs (SPGA) Committee and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Tobacco Cessation and Control S
153 ent Program (LDP) of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a group of participants was ch
154 he 2006 guideline of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a systematic review of the lit
155                          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the leading medical profession
156                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the medical society representi
157                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-prescribed technology assessmen
158    Purpose To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-Society of Surgical Oncology (S
159 the participants and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
160 ng patient HER2 results, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologist
161  biologic agents published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology between January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2
162  American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guidel
163 ly predicted to become a standard of care in clinical oncology, but more effective data sharing to ac
164                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Research Committee, which compr
165 romises useful applications in every part of clinical oncology care.
166 er Cancer Foundation and American Society of Clinical Oncology (Career Development Award); The Trust
167 Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Research Programs Co
168 rable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline published
169 r new standards (eg, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists [ASCO
170   The study supports the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists and C
171 2013 updates to the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recom
172  the 2013 updates to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recom
173 proach for addressing disparities within the clinical oncology community.
174          Only 40.0% of students reported any clinical oncology component to their institution's train
175                    Little is known about how clinical oncology concepts are taught to PhD students or
176                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology conducted a survey of US oncologists e
177 2012 and March 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology conducted a survey of US oncologists e
178 d abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences held between January 2000
179 , abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences held between January, 2000
180 the Study of Lung Cancer/American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus workshop in New York.
181 dence-Based Care and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Joint Expert Panel in Augus
182                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Panel of experts in medical
183                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a panel of medical oncology,
184 cologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted
185                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical on
186                          American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical on
187                          American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical on
188                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to conduct a
189                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Update Committee and condu
190                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Update Committee of expert
191                                           In clinical oncology, detecting and treating disease as ear
192 ms, assessing their institution's methods of clinical oncology education and their perspective on opt
193 d their perspective on optimal approaches to clinical oncology education.
194 ement of policy from the American Society of Clinical Oncology encourages the Secretary of the United
195               Twenty patients referred for a clinical oncology examination were scanned using a trimo
196 culty rated the value of nearly all types of clinical oncology exposure significantly lower than did
197 ssage reminders (published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology) failed to improve adherence.
198 the advancement of precision medicine in the clinical oncology field.
199 e annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (from 1999 to 2010), at the first Inte
200  a focused update of the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline concerning use of postmastec
201 RPOSE To update the 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on pharmacologic interventio
202                 Although American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines discourage the use of tumor
203  agreement with the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines on the use of biomarkers in
204 hemotoxicity, but recent American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend full dose.
205                         American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend palliative chemot
206  were developed based on American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines.
207 r over three decades, a mainstay and goal of clinical oncology has been the development of therapies
208 latelet transfusion, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has developed practice guidelines desi
209             Translation of this framework to clinical oncology has positioned immunotherapy as a pill
210 lity of TERT-based adoptive immunotherapy in clinical oncology, highlighting, for the first time, the
211 ly published by this group in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1998.
212                                           In clinical oncology, interferon-alpha remains an active an
213 s in fundamental cancer biology research and clinical oncology investigation.
214 clinical application of IgE-derived drugs in clinical oncology is clear if the antitumor activity of
215                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology is committed to reducing the impact of
216           One of the main targets in current clinical oncology is the development of a cheap device c
217  one of the fundamental unsolved problems of clinical oncology - is driven in part by defined abnorma
218                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology issued a practice guideline on use of
219 nd related phase III trials published in six clinical oncology journals in the last 3.5 years were an
220             This fundamental practice within clinical oncology limits optimization of a treatment reg
221  became available to all American Society of Clinical Oncology member physicians in 2006 as a volunta
222 actively practicing 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology members in the 50 United States.
223  used as basis for these American Society of Clinical Oncology/NCODA standards.
224  Update Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology NSCLC Expert Panel based recommendatio
225  that are either already approved for use in clinical oncology or currently under preclinical or clin
226 s and presenters who published in Journal of Clinical Oncology or who presented an abstract at the AS
227 revised opinion based on American Society of Clinical Oncology panel consensus in the context of an e
228                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology Panel reviewed pertinent information f
229                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology Panel, in collaboration with the Cance
230 Cs) are increasingly common entries into the clinical oncology pipeline.
231                                              Clinical oncology practice is interprofessional and inte
232 as not been fully incorporated into standard clinical oncology practice.
233 e the techniques' effective integration into clinical oncology practice.
234 dies, including the 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology presentation, described in this paper
235  Evaluation Program (CTEP) and the Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) grants.
236 r Institute's (NCI) Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP) seeks to enhance mino
237 o cancer centers and at sites in a Community Clinical Oncology Program.
238                       An American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion (PCO) off
239             In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology published a guideline recommending tha
240 ociety of Hematology and American Society of Clinical Oncology published between 2005 and 2007.
241                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (
242 ces participating in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative i
243 nsive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend consideration of the use of
244 an Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations for use of erythropoie
245 ve revisions to the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations were warranted, but cl
246           As this annual American Society of Clinical Oncology report of the major cancer research ad
247  Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology" represent the invaluable contribution
248 e assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical oncology research has increased substantially o
249                                  Lectures on clinical oncology research topics were the most valuable
250                  This is an exciting time in clinical oncology research, because we have a plethora o
251 nancial relationships for authors who report clinical oncology research.
252 give recommendations for exercise testing in clinical oncology research.
253 s are being developed and adapted for use in clinical oncology research.
254 ents in our research practices in paediatric clinical oncology research.
255  manuscript presents the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) ethical framework for incor
256 This report presents the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) evaluation of the adaptatio
257                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) new conflict of interest po
258 is article addresses the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) vision for improved communi
259                      The American Society of Clinical Oncology's first guideline in the 2013 Choosing
260 de (SLN) biopsy based on American Society of Clinical Oncology/Society of Surgical Oncology recommend
261  a tool to assess trainees' knowledge of the clinical oncology subspecialty, establish consistency in
262 mission tomography has broad implications in clinical oncology, such as diagnosis, staging, and monit
263  2004 proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the 2003 and 2004 proceedings of the
264 ted therapeutics become increasingly used in clinical oncology, the ability to quantify protein expre
265 nt was obtained from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Society of Hematology, a
266 anizations including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Organization for Researc
267 ed randomized trials published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, the New England Journal of Medicine,
268                    Before its application in clinical oncology, this powerful technique had already a
269 ry, and engineering with cancer research and clinical oncology through education, outreach, and colla
270 ministered tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in clinical oncology to inhibit EGF signaling.
271 applied recently in an article in Journal of Clinical Oncology to measure the impact of using a genom
272 of high-voltage electrical pulses (HVEPs) in clinical oncology to treat solid tumors with irreversibl
273 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology , to patients seen in their own clinic
274 R pathway, cell death and the immune system, clinical oncology) to discuss the latest developments in
275 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
276 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
277 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
278 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
279 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
280 dies, including those published inJournal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
281 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
282 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
283 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
284 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
285 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
286 ies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinica
287                         The study of PROs in clinical oncology trials has become well established.
288 ing children in appropriately designed adult clinical oncology trials is feasible and can be done in
289  is being pursued as a therapeutic target in clinical oncology trials, its effects on metastasis, the
290 tcomes (PROs) have become a key component of clinical oncology trials, many challenges exist regardin
291 l Hsp90 inhibitor, 17-AAG, has advanced into clinical oncology trials.
292 0 inhibitors have shown promising effects in clinical oncology trials.
293 nical Benefit Scale, the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework, and the National Comp
294   Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology VTE Guideline Panel include (1) all ho
295 alyses performed for the American Society of Clinical Oncology VTE Guidelines Committee and the Cochr
296 y a Working Group of the American Society of Clinical Oncology were reviewed with attention to prespe
297  the guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which suggest that all patients of ch
298 rporating AI and machine learning tools into clinical oncology, with an emphasis on biomarker develop
299 y populations; increase the diversity of the clinical oncology workforce as a requisite to improving
300  Research Service Award, American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award, MSK's Ludwig

 
Page Top